>Although he makes himself look even more ridiculous by claiming that >the ONLY Mark Probert ... yet alone Mark S Probert in the State of NY >is NOT he ...
This is usenet. How do you even know if Mark Probert is his real name? Clue: My last name is not Jungle.
You can continue to make personal attacks but very few people will be impressed.
> >Although he makes himself look even more ridiculous by claiming that > >the ONLY Mark Probert ... yet alone Mark S Probert in the State of NY > >is NOT he ...
> This is usenet. How do you even know if Mark Probert is his real > name? Clue: My last name is not Jungle.
> You can continue to make personal attacks but very few people will be > impressed.
On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 08:03:06 -1000, george of the jungle
<k...@somewhere.not.here> wrote: >This is usenet. How do you even know if Mark Probert is his real >name?
He called my home and identified himself as such before he started ranting and threatening me ...
You can doubt that this is the same Mark S Probert if it makes you feel good ...
Doesn't matter.
Although he makes himself look even more ridiculous by claiming that the ONLY Mark Probert ... yet alone Mark S Probert in the State of NY is NOT he ...
And further claims that there is not a "scintilla" of evidence that this is referring to this same Mark S Probert ... he only augments his lies.
He appears to have changed not one scintilla ... just joined with others of his ilk ... since losing his NY Law License:
In the Matter of Mark Probert (Admitted as Mark S. Probert), a Suspended Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Petitioner.
92-02731
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT
183 A.D.2d 282; 590 N.Y.S.2d 747
November 9, 1992, Decided
PRIOR HISTORY: [***1]
Disciplinary proceedings instituted by the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District. Respondent was admitted to the Bar on February 15, 1978, at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, under the name Mark S. Probert.
DISPOSITION: Ordered that the petitioner's motion to impose discipline upon the respondent based upon his failure to appear or answer is granted; and it is further,
HEADNOTES: Attorney and Client - Disciplinary Proceedings
Respondent attorney, who is charged with 22 counts of failing to cooperate with investigations of alleged misconduct by the Grievance Committee, and who has failed to answer or appear, is disbarred.
COUNSEL:
Frank A. Finnerty, Jr., Westbury (Muriel L. Gennosa of counsel), for petitioner.
JUDGES: Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Bracken, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the petitioner's motion to impose discipline upon the respondent based upon his failure to appear or answer is granted; and it is further,
Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, the respondent, Mark Probert, is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,
Ordered that the respondent shall continue to comply with this Court's rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended and resigned attorneys (22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,
Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary [***2] Law § 90, the respondent, Mark Probert, is commanded to continue to desist and refrain (1) from practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another, (2) from appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission or other public authority, (3) from giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) from holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law.
OPINIONBY: Per Curiam.
OPINION: [*282]
[**747] By decision and order of this Court dated September 29, 1989, the respondent was suspended from the practice of law until the further order of this Court based upon his failure to cooperate with the Grievance Committee. By further order of this Court dated June 4, 1992, the Grievance Committee was authorized to institute and prosecute a disciplinary proceeding [*283] against the respondent and the Honorable Moses M. Weinstein was appointed as Special Referee.
[**748] A notice of petition and petition was personally served upon the respondent on July 2, 1992. No answer was forthcoming. The petitioner now moves to hold the [***3] respondent in default. The motion was personally served upon the respondent on August 14, 1992. The respondent has failed to submit any papers in response to the default motion.
The charges involve 22 counts of the respondent's failure to cooperate with the Grievance Committee in its investigations into complaints of professional misconduct.
The charges, if established, would require the imposition of a disciplinary sanction against the respondent. Since the respondent has chosen not to appear or answer in these proceedings, the charges must be deemed established. The petitioner's motion to hold the respondent in default and impose discipline is, therefore, granted. Accordingly, the respondent is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective immediately.
> On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 08:03:06 -1000, george of the jungle > <k...@somewhere.not.here> wrote:
> >This is usenet. How do you even know if Mark Probert is his real > >name?
> He called my home and identified himself as such before he started > ranting and threatening me ...
How do you know that I correctly identified myself when I called you to discuss your threrats to contact a Mark Probert from Virgina? Maybe that was the Mark Probert from Virginia who called you.
> You can doubt that this is the same Mark S Probert if it makes you > feel good ...
> Doesn't matter.
Yes, you have never let the truth stop you from bashing anyone who you see as a person who disagrees with you, or who adresses your abusive behavior. Thus you justify contacting spouses, like Andy's and mine, and making up hundreds of webpages where you distort the facts and defame people.
Yes, your victims are getting tired of your abuse.
> So what if there is a lawyer with the same name as Mark?
> he has nothing to do with this Mark.
> Please stop your stupid personal attacks. They add nothing to the > conversation.
> Have a great day.
This person has shown up before many times on asad....I used to think she had a crush on him...then her behavior started to look more like that of a stalker...and here she is again, same story, different day...
>> Please stop your stupid personal attacks. They add nothing to the >> conversation.
>> Have a great day.
>This person has shown up before many times on asad....I used to think she >had a crush on him...then her behavior started to look more like that of a >stalker...and here she is again, same story, different day...
> et me point out that Jan is not a spammer. She is just terminally gullible, > and equates sales-hype with proof.
Au Contraire, mon ami: repeatedly publishing the same drivell over and a-over and a-over again... this dance is gonna be a drag [I MEAN...] those postes are gonna be drags. It is almost like mindless preaching about the second coming of the LEGO gods...
One def'n of SPAM is repeated posts of questionable information.
Thus, I would view what she posts here and on the SMD and else where as SPAM JMHO SP -- Not a real Addy, yet
> > et me point out that Jan is not a spammer. She is just terminally gullible, > > and equates sales-hype with proof.
>Au Contraire, mon ami > repeatedly publishing the same drivell over and > a-over and a-over again... this dance is gonna be a drag [I MEAN...] > those postes are gonna be drags. It is almost like mindless preaching > about the second coming of the LEGO gods...
Chaque a son gout
>One def'n of SPAM is repeated posts of questionable information.
Au Contraire, mon ami ... ... one person's "Spam" is another person's gastronomique delicacy!
> > et me point out that Jan is not a spammer. She is just terminally gullible, > > and equates sales-hype with proof.
> Au Contraire, mon ami: repeatedly publishing the same drivell over and > a-over and a-over again... this dance is gonna be a drag [I MEAN...] > those postes are gonna be drags. It is almost like mindless preaching > about the second coming of the LEGO gods...
Damn. When I give Jan the benefit of the doubt, everyone criticizes me, and she never acknowledges my efforts.
Just remember, Jan shills for bad science and bad medicine.
> One def'n of SPAM is repeated posts of questionable information.
Well, she has not repeatedly posted this website. She may in the future, but not yet.
> Thus, I would view what she posts here and on the SMD and else where as > SPAM > JMHO
Just do not tell her you are Jewish, or an Atheist, or Catholic, or Gay, or.....
That is absolutely fantastic. If you had been around here for a while, you would know that I just love parodies, and this is one of the best. CCR and John Fogerty has always been amongst my favorites.
> >> Please stop your stupid personal attacks. They add nothing to the > >> conversation.
> >> Have a great day.
> >This person has shown up before many times on asad....I used to think she > >had a crush on him...then her behavior started to look more like that of a > >stalker...and here she is again, same story, different day...
> > Not being one to waste anything, I used it as fertilized in my garden.
> > The plants died.
> .... probably beacuse they forgot to photosynthesize.... 'major problem > with AD(H)D plants.....
Thank G-d I had finished my morning cup of Lady Earl Grey (she kept the good stuff for herself).
However, Earl Grey was a champion of democracy in Great Britain, and a very admirable chap. he was an astute politician and did a "pack the house of Lords" shtick that would make FDR humble.
He was also responsible for ending slavery in Great Britain.
"Not being one to waste anything, I used it as fertilized in my garden. The plants died." ~ Mark
".... probably beacuse They forgot to photosynthesize.... 'major problem With AD(H)D plants..." ~ StovepPipe
"Thank G-d I had finished My morning cup of Lady Earl Grey (she kept the good Stuff for herself).
However, Earl Grey Was a champion of democracy in Great Britain, And a very Admirable chap. He was an astute politician And did a 'pack the house of Lords' shtick That would make FDR humble.
He was also responsible For ending slavery in Great Britain.
But his wife has a better tea." ~ Mark
"O, really? What's that? What's Next?
Early, or late? Or just ~ On Time. Because they're very wrong. Rhyme, Too, Ilk bait. But, O ~ Today's date? I forgot. So please, just ~ Pass the Blewberry Jamm!" ~ Twittering
Mark Probert wrote: > "george of the jungle" <k...@somewhere.not.here> wrote in message > news:j2ke211bh3iadptaueukcho8sfp56hlf29@4ax.com... > > On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 09:07:26 -0600, Ilena Rose <il...@san.rr.com> > > wrote:
> > >Although he makes himself look even more ridiculous by claiming that > > >the ONLY Mark Probert ... yet alone Mark S Probert in the State of NY > > >is NOT he ...
> > This is usenet. How do you even know if Mark Probert is his real > > name? Clue: My last name is not Jungle.
> > You can continue to make personal attacks but very few people will be > > impressed.
> Mark Probert wrote: > > "george of the jungle" <k...@somewhere.not.here> wrote in message > > news:j2ke211bh3iadptaueukcho8sfp56hlf29@4ax.com... > > > On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 09:07:26 -0600, Ilena Rose <il...@san.rr.com> > > > wrote:
> > > >Although he makes himself look even more ridiculous by claiming > that > > > >the ONLY Mark Probert ... yet alone Mark S Probert in the State of > NY > > > >is NOT he ...
> > > This is usenet. How do you even know if Mark Probert is his real > > > name? Clue: My last name is not Jungle.
> > > You can continue to make personal attacks but very few people will > be > > > impressed.
> Just take a look at who posted to it, *gang* members.
Have I posted to it? Nope. My wife, who is her victim, a fact you refuse to acknowledge, did. Three posts of the email Ilena sent her. She will not be posting again.
> And someome sent me and several others this: > Mark Proberts Stalking Victims Support
How many messages there? And, how do I know that you, or Ilena, did not start that? Hmmm?????
> As you can see we had the *decency* NOT to post there.
You would not know decency if it were administered to you by a reverse cleanse.
> Unlike the *gang*.
You meant to say her victims, but your fingers would not move when your brain sent the signal.
> Point match.
I don't play tennis, but, for me, this has been a slam dunk.
|
