Now you would think they would be EXCITED to discover a NEW Flow
Cytometry Software they never have seen before....Why Block, Filter,
Delete? Especialy since there is No License Fees and Only $150.00 for
students.
Is this How Science Fourms with Members From the Purdue University
Cytometry Mail list act when Any New Products Are Mentioned?
Collusion is an agreement, usually secretive, which occurs between
two
or more persons to deceive, mislead, or defraud others of their legal
rights, or to obtain an objective forbidden by law typically
involving
fraud or gaining an unfair advantage. It can involve "wage fixing,
kickbacks, or misrepresenting the independence of the relationship
between the colluding parties."[1] All acts affected by collusion are
considered void.[2]
The Science Advisory Board
Home | Forums | My Profile | Active Topics | Members | Search | News
|
Resources | Studies | About Us | Site Map
Screen Name:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
All Forums
Software
Flow cytometer analysis on PC
Printer Friendly
Author Topic
mlinde
Member
United States
11 Posts Posted - February 03 2006 : 6:21:13 PM
________________________________________
I'm looking into flow cytometer analysis programs for the PC and I
was
wondering whether anyone had any insight into which programs were the
most useful and worthwhile. From what I have seen, Flow-Jo and
FCSexpress are the more commonly used PC programs. Does anyone have
any experience with either of these programs? The other option would
be to purchase another Macintosh and use CellQuest. Advice, comments,
suggestions?
rakeshverma
Member
United States
93 Posts Posted - February 04 2006 : 10:46:54 PM
________________________________________
I have used CellQuest. Its a good option.
Antonio68
Member
Germany
20 Posts Posted - May 01 2006 : 11:48:43 AM
________________________________________
You can use Summit from Dako is free and gives you the possibility to
do offline compensation. However, the best flow cytometry software is
FlowJo. There is a PC (Java based) and a Mac version. The Mac version
for the moment is quite better.
lovesthelab
Senior Member
United States
804 Posts Posted - July 06 2006 : 4:59:46 PM
________________________________________
I'm not a PC person, but am an ardent flow person. My flow friends
with PCs swear by WinMidi, which is free. If you Google for free flow
cytometry software, you'll come to 2 sites, one at UMass, one at
Scripps. Lots of free analysis software for the PC, maybe because BD
relied on Macs for so long.
mlinde
Member
United States
11 Posts Posted - August 02 2006 : 5:44:55 PM
________________________________________
As an update, I tried trial versions of FCSexpress and FlowJo and
wasn't really happy with either of them compared to Cell Quest. I
found FCSexpress almost impossible to work with. FlowJo was alright,
but I don't think I had the time to really get the software down.
Anyone know if BD ever plans to put out CellQuest on PC?
lovesthelab
Senior Member
United States
804 Posts Posted - August 09 2006 : 1:22:04 PM
________________________________________
quote:
________________________________________
As an update, I tried trial versions of FCSexpress and FlowJo and
wasn't really happy with either of them compared to Cell Quest. I
found FCSexpress almost impossible to work with. FlowJo was alright,
but I don't think I had the time to really get the software down.
Anyone know if BD ever plans to put out CellQuest on PC?
________________________________________
Don't quote me, but I do believe that CellQuest is available for PC
because the newer BD flow cytometers are digital and use PCs for
acquisition. Mlinde, have you ever tried WinList or WinMidi? Both of
those were written for PCs. Also WEASEL comes in PC and Mac versions.
Did you read the flow perspectives? There is a software discussion
there. (Disclosure-- I wrote it).
Mlinde or anyone else, you can contact me through the SAB e-mail
system if you want to discuss flow software or anything flow some
more
off the forum. I'll be glad to help if I can.
Edited by - lovesthelab on August 09 2006 1:24:07 PM
rgrant
Moderator
Australia
2350 Posts Posted - October 10 2007 : 02:34:47 AM
________________________________________
Well, it took me about 30 seconds to discover that Mitchell Haynes is
VP Sales at Kanecki - see http://www.kanecki.com/about.html
Admin, this is blatant advertising (MH started this thread
yesterday).
--
"I don't have a lot of use for Coldplay most of the time" -- rwintle
http://network.nature.com/blogs/user/rpg
rwintle
Advanced Member
Canada
4684 Posts Posted - October 10 2007 : 10:49:46 AM
________________________________________
AND SOMEBODY TELL HIM TO STOP SHOUTING.
khenwood67
Administrator
United States
247 Posts Posted - October 10 2007 : 11:03:53 AM
________________________________________
I've deleted the topic that he started, and also deleted his post in
this forum. He won't be posting on the forums again.
Kathryn Henwood
Membership Coordinator
The Science Advisory Board
k.henw...@scienceboard.net
30 seconds to discover that Mitchell Haynes of course they were
searching hard since they are all on the Purdue Cytometry Mail list
marketing the software Developed with the members were on the list
Purdue Controls over 200servers connected to every university and
hospital ect!
Collusion is largely illegal in the United States, Canada and most of
the EU due to antitrust law, but implicit collusion in the form of
price leadership and tacit understandings still takes place. Several
examples of collusion in the United States
While Controling over 200 servers, Controling the Data Standards
Committee ISAC Congress, All the User Groups, Fourms, Listing just
about Every Core Lab in the WORLD on the Mail List
Collusion is an agreement, usually secretive, which occurs between
two
or more persons to deceive, mislead, or defraud others of their legal
rights, or to obtain an objective forbidden by law typically
involving
fraud or gaining an unfair advantage. It can involve "wage fixing,
kickbacks, or misrepresenting the independence of the relationship
between the colluding parties."[1] All acts affected by collusion are
considered void.[2]
So what if I Posted all the Evidence Downloaded Directly from the
Purdue University Cytometry Mial List and ISAC Congress Leaders while
the Discussed the Plan?
Read the Postings....... I down loaded 17 Years worth...
Remember GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOGLE
ARCHIVES NEVER GO AWAY
http://www.new.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=23879772873&ref=mf
In the study of economics and market competition, collusion takes
place within an industry when rival companies cooperate for their
mutual benefit. Collusion most often takes place within the market
form of oligopoly, where the decision of a few firms to collude can
significantly impact the market as a whole. Cartels are a special
case
of explicit collusion. Collusion which is not overt, on the other
hand, is known as tacit collusion.
According to neoclassical price-determination theory and game theory,
the independence of suppliers forces prices to their minimum,
increasing efficiency and decreasing the price determining ability of
each individual firm. However, if firms collude to increase prices
loss of sales is minimized as consumers lack alternative choices at
lower prices. This benefits the colluding firms at the cost of
efficiency to society.
One variation of this traditional theory is the theory of kinked
demand. Firms face a kinked demand curve if, when one firm decreases
its price, other firms will follow suit in order to maintain sales,
and when one firm increases its price, its rivals are unlikely to
follow, as they would lose the sales' gains that they would otherwise
get by holding prices at the previous level. Kinked demand
potentially
fosters supra-competitive prices because any one firm would receive a
reduced benefit from cutting price, as opposed to the benefits
accruing under neoclassical theory and certain game theoretic models
such as Bertrand competition.
Practices that facilitate tacit collusion include:
Uniform prices
A penalty for price discounts
Advance notice of price changes **************************
Information exchange ******************
From: Adam Treister (a...@treestar.com)
Date: Mon Apr 22 2002 - 00:15:07 EST
* Reply: Mario Roederer: "Job Opening -- Immediate -- Vaccine
______________________________________...
Only two more weeks until ISAC, that biennial bacchanalia of flower
power
and fun! So I hope you'll excuse a bunch of blatantly commercial
announcements to the list, but endulge me this one time and read on.
At the show we'll be releasing FlowJo Version 4. We've got new
platforms
for overlaying and clustering, we've made it work better across the
Internet, added all sorts of new
For those who haven't found it yet, we've unveiled a spanking new
FlowJo
website. Flowjo.com is chuck full of new content, functionality and
spunk.
Automated price quotes, online ordering, a FAQ that will guide you to
new
depths of understanding, and none of that awful yellow on black text.
The
search engine even works. No ads & cookie-free. Check it out.
*************
Specifically, you should check our pricing. Prices are going up on
*******
May 10. ************
It has been a number of years since we've changed our prices and with
the
development of the OSX and PC versions, it¹s time for a leap. I
guess
there's no such thing as a free launch. Anyway, this may be a great
time to
buy that FlowJo ten pack you've been thinking about. Licenses
purchased
before May 10 are entitled to a year of free upgrades, including the
4.0
release.
Unleash the flower power!
Adam
--
Adam Treister
Tree Star,
Purdue Cytometry Mailing List: Re: Thanks for the suggestions -
[Disclaimer: Yes, I live off FlowJo sales, and that's a blatantly
commercial statement, but it gets technical from here on.] We've
played with spatial 3D ...
www.cyto.purdue.edu/hmarchiv/2006/0939.htm
From: Adrian Smith <A.Sm...@centenary.usyd.edu.AU>
(Disclaimer: - I provided a some input into the way the platform
works and I have been beta testing FlowJo for a while now)
purdue cytometry mail list 2007 verity software sales 07 by...
(27962)
Document count: purdue (139318) cytometry (25468) mail (53709) list
(63448) 2007 (37553) verity (222) software (15216) sales (14402) 07
(21574) by (129519) thread (26375) purdue cytometry mail list 2007
verity software sales 07 by... (27962)
about 187244 results found, top 500 sorted by relevance
score using date hide summaries group by location
spacer 1-10 next
Collusion is largely illegal in the United States, Canada and most of
the EU due to antitrust law, but implicit collusion in the form of
price leadership and tacit understandings still takes place. Several
examples of collusion in the United States include:
Andrew Malyi and market division among manufacturers of heavy
electrical equipment in the 1960s.
An attempt by Major League Baseball owners to restrict players'
salaries in the mid-1980s.
Price fixing within food manufacturers providing cafeteria food to
schools and the military in 1993.
Market division and output determination of livestock feed additive
by
companies in the US, Japan and South Korea in 1996.
There are many ways that implicit collusion tends to develop:
The practice of stock analyst conference calls and meetings of
industry participants almost necessarily results in tremendous
amounts
of strategic and price transparency. This allows each firm to see how
and why every other firm is pricing their products.
If the practice of the industry causes more complicated pricing,
which
is hard for the consumer to understand (such as risk-based pricing,
hidden taxes and fees in the wireless industry, negotiable pricing),
this can cause competition based on price to be meaningless (because
it would be too complicated to explain to the customer in a short
advertisement). This causes industries to have essentially the same
prices and compete on advertising and image, something theoretically
as damaging to consumers as normal price fixing.
EXAMPLE YOU WILL NOT SEE...
FLOW CYTOMETRY SOFTWARE COMPANIES AND LICENSE FEES!
PURDUE CYTOMETRY MAIL LIST THE ONLY MAIL LIST ATTACHED TO ISAC
CONGRESS AND EVERY UNIVERSITY, HOSPITAL AND LISTSERVER IN THE WORLD!
THE ISAC CONGRESS DATA STANDARDS COMMITTEE ALL DEVELOPERS WITH FLOW
CYTOMETRY SOFTWARE CORPORATIONS
KANECKI ASSOCIATES INC. THE ONLY CORPORATION NOT ALLOWED ON THE
PURDUE
CYTOMETERY MAIL LIST CALLED SCAMMERS BY ISAC CONGRESS PRESIDENT J
PAUL
ROBINSON WITH DIRECTIONS TO BE WARE TO THE ISAC CONGRESS EDITOR AND
MORE!
I had someone do a check on them. it is apparent that they have
written
some software and they think its ants-pants.
...I already told them that they were acting as scammers and they got
upset with
me...well, if they don't desist, they will find out how much
influence
we actually have...
Purdue discussion list which is primarily about cytometry - and a lot
of flow cytometry - to join,
people actually have to go through me, and we review every person who
comes on.
3. I am contacting Google and other sites to let them know that these
people are self-propagating links.
Larry D. Farrell, Ph.D.
> Professor of Microbiology
> Idaho State University
Paul Robinson was *not* informed of my message to you. What
makes
you think he was?
To:Larry Farrell <farrlarr_at_isu.edu>; mitchell haynes
<buybroker_at_yahoo.com>;
skelley_at_flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu; Bartek Rajwa
rajwa_at_flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu
Larry
Sorry you are experiencing a problem
>From the header - This is apparently coming from a Mitchel Haynes
mitchell haynes <buybroker_at_yahoo.com> - is this correct?
I initially thought messages coming from this person were a scam and
challenged them when they started posting to our list as well. I had
someone do a check on them. it is apparent that they have written
some
software and they think its ants-pants. They have tried to post
things
on the Purdue list, they have used every possible website and email
discussion group to get cross listed to boost their ratings on
Google.
Basically I view their behavior as very tenuous and from the message
you
sent me, it appears that it is not appropriate to do what they are
doing...
I have taken the following action:
Steve Kelley has been instructed to remove their email and any
postings on the Purdue list. They are now banned
2. I am going to Copying Bartek Rajwa the editor of the ISAC site to
beware of them
3. I am contacting Google and other sites to let them know that these
people are self-propagating links.
4. If I see any message that in any way impunes Purdue or our
reputation, I will go after them with every possible legal recourse
at
my disposal. We will not allow our reputation to suffer because of
commercial abuse.
5. You should ban this address, and basically indicate to your
members
that this is a scam.
While they claim to be legitimate, they are acting exactly as any
scam artist
...I already told them that they were acting as scammers and they got
upset with
me...
well, if they don't desist,
they will find out how much influence we actually have...
Cytometry Mailing List and Messages from Companies
This message: [ Message body ] [ More options ]
Related messages: [ Next message ] [ Previous message ] [ In reply
to ] [ Next in thread ]
From: Roland Gvhde <r.goe...@partec.com>
Date: Wed Mar 19 2008 - 03:53:39 EDT
Dear All,
the question on whether messages from companies are of commercial/
non-
commercial or promotional/non-promotional nature has been discussed
quite oftenly in the past years at this forum. The borderline is
very
thin, anyhow.
Therefore, a mail notifying for example that a scientist who is well
known since years in the flow scene has changed his position from an
academic institution to a company or between companies seems to be
justified while the same information eventually may be regarded by
others as commercial mail. The information on new products is
clearly
commercial but can be valuable to many people. Or what about a
company
announcing in this mailing list a sponsor award for winning a travel
to the next ISAC Congress in Budapest - for sure that majority would
categorize such a mail as commercial. Anyhow, there should also be
some room to tell the forum that such a prize can be won and that
someone can have a benefit. Another case: in the mail signature of a
non-commercial mail, a link to a company newsletter is given, e.g.
<<
Partec Newsletter: http://newsletter.partec.com/ov?mailing=17I60R3-DAOZSO
>> - of course this mail then has clearly commercial components,
and
alone the fact that for discussing this I am using here on purpose
an
established weblink makes this mail with non-commercial background
at
the same moment somehow commercial. It could also be discussed
whether
for example small start-ups may get a chance to transmit news on
highly interesting innovations to the scene while multi-billion USD
companies will anyhow reach everyone in their marketing, also
without
(mis)using this list - especially knowing that inventions mainly
come
from smaller companies which in many cases are than bought by the
larger ones. So, who wants to judge all these cases.
In order to avoid that this issue is being regularly discussed again
in detail, it could be worth to consider installing an easy tool for
this mailing list which may satisfy most of the forum members: One
possibilty would be that commercial entities filing a mail to the
list
(a mail which potentitally could create discussions about a
commercial/
non-commercial background) could actively include a fixed starting
term in the mail header which would identify the mail as originating
from a company. So, my mail could show a header like for example:
[Company:] Cytometry Mailing List and Messages from Companies
By this way, each individual of this forum could decide on his own
whether or whether not to set up an easy filter in his mail
programme
using the added term/word which would separate the mails sent to
this
list into different mail folders.
Without doubts, there could be better ideas, but this question
should
be left to all forum members and the forum managers.
When looking through the many, many mails in the past months, it
anyhow seems that since a while a significantly increasing
discipline
from all companies can be acknowledged to respect this mailing list
as
a valuable tool for members to exchange needful information,
scientific and technical matters, questions on application issues
and
answers to problems.
Kind regards
Roland
---
Roland Gvhde
International Project Manager
Partec Essential Healthcare
Partec GmbH
Otto-Hahn-Str. 32
D-48161 M|nster Germany
Fon +49 2534 8008-0
Fax +49 2534 8008-90
Mail i...@partec.com
Web www.partec.com
Am 16.03.2008 um 19:38 schrieb Jeffrey Harvey:
> Hi Joanne,
> It is quite true that this site is supposed to be used for providing
> information, asking and answering questions and discussing issues.
> The availability of a new technology to members of the cytometry
> community, for whom it was not previously available, is worthy of
> being disseminated via this bulletin board. There was a similar
> message recently, regarding the opening of the first Partec US
> office, which did not raise any objections, as should be the case
> here. The matter was actually discussed, along with the content,
> before this was posted, so it's not as if there was no sensitivity
> to this issue. The message was intended to be informative, not
> commercial and I apologize to all who may view it otherwise.
> However, there was no solicitation to buy anything, nor any detailed
> product information, only the quite newsworthy information that
> another new technology is available in markets where it was not
> previously.
> Best Regards,
> Jeff
Received on Wed Mar 19 18:18:00 2008
This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: margaret lubkin: "Every time you send a reply"
Previous message: Telford, William (NIH/NCI) [E]: "RE: Optical Gel"
In reply to: Jeffrey Harvey: "Re: Bay bioscience opens US office and
introduces its JSAN cell sorting and analysis system there"
Next in thread: Gerstein, Rachel: "RE: Bay bioscience opens US office
and introduces its JSAN cell sorting and analysis system there"
Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By
Subject ]
[ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 31 2007 -
03:12:00 EST
Collusion is an agreement, usually secretive, which occurs between
two
or more persons to deceive, mislead, or defraud others of their legal
rights, or to obtain an objective forbidden by law typically
involving
fraud or gaining an unfair advantage. It can involve "wage fixing,
kickbacks, or misrepresenting the independence of the relationship
between the colluding parties."[1] All acts affected by collusion are
considered void.[2]
I had someone do a check on them. it is apparent that they have
written
some software and they think its ants-pants.
...I already told them that they were acting as scammers and they got
upset with
me...well, if they don't desist, they will find out how much
influence
we actually have...
Purdue discussion list which is primarily about cytometry - and a lot
of flow cytometry - to join,
people actually have to go through me, and we review every person who
comes on.
3. I am contacting Google and other sites to let them know that these
people are self-propagating links.
Larry D. Farrell, Ph.D.
> Professor of Microbiology
> Idaho State University
Paul Robinson was *not* informed of my message to you. What
makes
you think he was?
To:Larry Farrell <farrlarr_at_isu.edu>; mitchell haynes
<buybroker_at_yahoo.com>;
skelley_at_flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu; Bartek Rajwa
rajwa_at_flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu
Larry
Sorry you are experiencing a problem
>From the header - This is apparently coming from a Mitchel Haynes
mitchell haynes <buybroker_at_yahoo.com> - is this correct?
I initially thought messages coming from this person were a scam and
challenged them when they started posting to our list as well. I had
someone do a check on them. it is apparent that they have written
some
software and they think its ants-pants. They have tried to post
things
on the Purdue list, they have used every possible website and email
discussion group to get cross listed to boost their ratings on
Google.
Basically I view their behavior as very tenuous and from the message
you
sent me, it appears that it is not appropriate to do what they are
doing...
I have taken the following action:
Steve Kelley has been instructed to remove their email and any
postings on the Purdue list. They are now banned
2. I am going to Copying Bartek Rajwa the editor of the ISAC site to
beware of them
3. I am contacting Google and other sites to let them know that these
people are self-propagating links.
4. If I see any message that in any way impunes Purdue or our
reputation, I will go after them with every possible legal recourse
at
my disposal. We will not allow our reputation to suffer because of
commercial abuse.
5. You should ban this address, and basically indicate to your
members
that this is a scam.
While they claim to be legitimate, they are acting exactly as any
scam artist
...I already told them that they were acting as scammers and they got
upset with
me...
well, if they don't desist,
they will find out how much influence we actually have...
I will check the message
> Subject: flow cytometry software will you trust Purdue..Lets play
MONOPOLY
> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 09:38:56 -0800 (PST)
> Organization: http://groups.google.com
and see if this is actually libelous - it appears to be - and if it
is,
I will close this person down really, really fast!!! (Steve please
check
out this message and make a copy)
Larry, we have about 3000 people on the Purdue discussion list which
is
primarily about cytometry - and a lot of flow cytometry - to join,
people actually have to go through me, and we review every person who
comes on.
I am sorry you are experiencing this problem, and we are happy to
help
in any way we can.
regards
paul Robinson
Professor, Purdue
From: J. Paul Robinson <j...@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu>
Date: Mon Mar 31 2008 - 01:18:05 EDT
From J. Paul Robinson - Moderator
Robert is right - there is too much politics and not enough
science...
What is happening here, is that there are too many cooks.
Let me make it very clear that we work hard to keep this list clean.
It
does not always work. When we identify a failure, we usually respond
to
the person concerned and don't waste all your time.
We frequently note in our posts, that advertising is not allowed.
This
list was developed from 2 or 3 individuals who actually had email in
1990, to 3000 over the past 19 years. It did not happen by chance,
nor
was it overnight. It was developed with a lot of cost ($$$), a lot of
time, and what was a pretty darned good idea when it started. We
don't
tolerate people who try to damage the list.
Now that it's highly successful, there are a number of individuals
that
are trying to either circumvent the list, use it for their own
purposes,
or simply sideline it. There are even some proposing that they should
be
able to manipulate the list and its contents in any forum for any
purpose. I am really shocked at this rather callous approach to a
scientific discussion board. I am not making public those individuals
or
their companies, but if I am pushed, I will identify them publicly.
If
I
do so, and they create havoc, it could shut the list down - or end up
in
a nasty legal battle. I don't suppose that would be popular?
So, it seems to me, that we need to get back to basics and focus on
the
reason this list has been so successful (and why you all want to use
it
for advertising - or even why those who what to hijack it...) - it
does
a good if not great job overall.
thanks for your support - all 3000 of you ...well most of you!
Clearly we will provide a mechanism for companies to provide a means
for
communication....it's on our list...
Maybe I am getting too old for all this abuse....!
regards
Paul Robinson
Purdue University
purdue cytometry mail list 2007 verity software sales 07 by...
(27962)
Document count: purdue (139318) cytometry (25468) mail (53709) list
(63448) 2007 (37553) verity (222) software (15216) sales (14402) 07
(21574) by (129519) thread (26375) purdue cytometry mail list 2007
verity software sales 07 by... (27962)
about 187244 results found, top 500 sorted by relevance
score using date hide summaries group by location
spacer 1-10 next
Purdue Cytometry Mailing List: Re: Thanks for the suggestions -
[Disclaimer: Yes, I live off FlowJo sales, and that's a blatantly
commercial statement, but it gets technical from here on.] We've
played with spatial 3D ...
www.cyto.purdue.edu/hmarchiv/2006/0939.htm
Jennifer Wilshire, PhD jenni...@flowjo.com MetroFlow Meeting,
Reply: Sue DeMaggio: "Re: FW: FlowJo Seminar for Los Angeles Basin"
I'm not sure if there is a Los Angeles Basin users
group, but thought I could advertise here to interested parties.
Thanks,
Lora Barsky - Lead Operator
Research Immunology/BMT FACS Core
Childrens Hospital Los Angeles
http://www.healthsystem.virginia.edu/internet/cytometry/forms/FlowJo.cfm
FlowJo Site License
Registration Form
Complete the form below to access the University of Virginia's Site
License for FlowJo data analysis software.
Contact Joanne Lannigan joannelanni
https://ssl.search.live.com/health/results.aspx?qu=FlowJO+PURDUE&cat=...
TO ROBERT MURPHY WITH LINKS FOR DOWNLOAD AND ALL INFORMATION
PERTAINING TO FCS CYTORPO QUICK FACS 11
SOME HOW IT WAS FOWARDED TO: J PAUL ROBINSON...MAYBE IT WAS
INTERCEPTED!
Fw: NEW FLOWCYTOMETRY SOFTWARE FOR ALL BD and Beckman/Coulter
Flow Cytometers CAN PROCESS 24,000- 48,000 SAMPLES PER HOUR
Standard
Header|Full Message
View
mitchell haynes <buybro..._at_yahoo.com>
ViewFriday,
September 28, 2007 1:36:36 AM
To:j..._at_flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu
Cc:da..._at_kanecki2.com
Cytopro
quick facs savings analysis.doc (82KB); Setup-Quick
Facs 11 Demo.exe (7854KB); FCS
CYTOPRO BENIFITS.doc (25KB)
Find:
Dear Robert Murphy
NEW
FLOWCYTOMETRY SOFTWARE FOR ALL BD and Beckman/Coulter Flow Cytometers
CAN
PROCESS 24,000-42,000 SAMPLES PER HOUR.
FLOW CYTOMETRY FCS CYTO PRO QUICK FACS
http://www.kanecki.com/flow.html
Increased quality and productivity. With 10,000,000 event files, you
can process 24,000 samples/hour, and maintain quality up to Sigma 5
or
better. Compare this to having your research technologist performing
only 100 samples/hour analysis.
Increased laboratory utilization by 3X because you can perform the
analysis off-lab and free laboratory time for reading samples. This
was achieved when I developed the program, and we had a program
project grant from 1992 to 1998 of $8M.
Works with FCS 3.0 in all data modes as floating point, integer*4,
and
ASCII.
Works with BD and Beckman/Coulter Flow Cytometers and Cell Sorters
Backwards compatible with FCS 2.0 files and Flow Cytometers and Cell
Sorters.
Can read FCS 3.0 files up to 10M events with 20 parameters.
Easy to Use, three step process. Load initial file, set gate, specify
file list to process. That's it.
Collaboration tools to allow you to cut and paste image results to
results.
Statistical analysis results imprinted on histogram plots directly as
mean, mode, and median with the ability to present results in log
mode
or linear mode, depending on the detector used.
Plain vanilla coding for easy update and maintenance to allow for the
greatest user and software quality.
One time purchase fee, no yearly renewal fees as with others.
Proven tract record in FACS, Fluorescent Activated Cell Sorter
Laboratory. The laboratory was rated the best laboratory in the
Midwest USA in 1990.
This application is designed for large-scale fluorescent activated
cell sorter
analysis. The program can read up to FCS 3.0 files and has been
tested
to run on Becton Dickinson and CoulterOrtho based flow cytometers and
cell sorters. The main advantage of this program is that you can have
the computer perform the analysis for you after you have selected the
region to analyze. The result is that up to 24,000 samples per hour
can be analyzed on a 1.4 GHz speed computer.
This program is designed for researcher and technologist use. It uses
rectangular gating, and is intuitive to use. To use this program, the
FCS must have the extension, *.bin as "54203023.bin" as an example.
The *.bin extension is what the computer uses to locate the files on
the computer.
THANK YOU FOR YOU TIME
MITCHELL HAYNES
VP
SALES
KANECKI
ASSOCIATES
832-347-1669
Ø To: skel..._at_flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu
Cc: skel..._at_flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu
> Hi Joanne,
> It is quite true that this site is supposed to be used for providing
> information, asking and answering questions and discussing issues.
> The availability of a new technology to members of the cytometry
> community, for whom it was not previously available, is worthy of
> being disseminated via this bulletin board. There was a similar
> message recently, regarding the opening of the first Partec US
> office, which did not raise any objections, as should be the case
> here. The matter was actually discussed, along with the content,
> before this was posted, so it's not as if there was no sensitivity
> to this issue. The message was intended to be informative, not
> commercial and I apologize to all who may view it otherwise.
> However, there was no solicitation to buy anything, nor any detailed
> product information, only the quite newsworthy information that
> another new technology is available in markets where it was not
> previously.
> Best Regards,
> Jeff
Received on Wed Mar 19 18:18:00 2008
This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: margaret lubkin: "Every time you send a reply"
Previous message: Telford, William (NIH/NCI) [E]: "RE: Optical Gel"
In reply to: Jeffrey Harvey: "Re: Bay bioscience opens US office and
introduces its JSAN cell sorting and analysis system there"
Next in thread: Gerstein, Rachel: "RE: Bay bioscience opens US office
and introduces its JSAN cell sorting and analysis system there"
Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By
Subject ]
[ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 31 2007 -
03:12:00 EST
Collusion is an agreement, usually secretive, which occurs between
two
or more persons to deceive, mislead, or defraud others of their legal
rights, or to obtain an objective forbidden by law typically
involving
fraud or gaining an unfair advantage. It can involve "wage fixing,
kickbacks, or misrepresenting the independence of the relationship
between the colluding parties."[1] All acts affected by collusion are
considered void.[2]
I had someone do a check on them. it is apparent that they have
written
some software and they think its ants-pants.
...I already told them that they were acting as scammers and they got
upset with
me...well, if they don't desist, they will find out how much
influence
we actually have...
Purdue discussion list which is primarily about cytometry - and a lot
of flow cytometry - to join,
people actually have to go through me, and we review every person who
comes on.
3. I am contacting Google and other sites to let them know that these
people are self-propagating links.
Larry D. Farrell, Ph.D.
> Professor of Microbiology
> Idaho State University
Paul Robinson was *not* informed of my message to you. What
makes
you think he was?
To:Larry Farrell <farrlarr_at_isu.edu>; mitchell haynes
<buybroker_at_yahoo.com>;
skelley_at_flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu; Bartek Rajwa
rajwa_at_flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu
Larry
Sorry you are experiencing a problem
>From the header - This is apparently coming from a Mitchel Haynes
mitchell haynes <buybroker_at_yahoo.com> - is this correct?
I initially thought messages coming from this person were a scam and
challenged them when they started posting to our list as well. I had
someone do a check on them. it is apparent that they have written
some
software and they think its ants-pants. They have tried to post
things
on the Purdue list, they have used every possible website and email
discussion group to get cross listed to boost their ratings on
Google.
Basically I view their behavior as very tenuous and from the message
you
sent me, it appears that it is not appropriate to do what they are
doing...
I have taken the following action:
Steve Kelley has been instructed to remove their email and any
postings on the Purdue list. They are now banned
2. I am going to Copying Bartek Rajwa the editor of the ISAC site to
beware of them
3. I am contacting Google and other sites to let them know that these
people are self-propagating links.
4. If I see any message that in any way impunes Purdue or our
reputation, I will go after them with every possible legal recourse
at
my disposal. We will not allow our reputation to suffer because of
commercial abuse.
5. You should ban this address, and basically indicate to your
members
that this is a scam.
While they claim to be legitimate, they are acting exactly as any
scam artist
...I already told them that they were acting as scammers and they got
upset with
me...
well, if they don't desist,
they will find out how much influence we actually have...
I will check the message
> Subject: flow cytometry software will you trust Purdue..Lets play
MONOPOLY
> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 09:38:56 -0800 (PST)
> Organization: http://groups.google.com
and see if this is actually libelous - it appears to be - and if it
is,
I will close this person down really, really fast!!! (Steve please
check
out this message and make a copy)
Larry, we have about 3000 people on the Purdue discussion list which
is
primarily about cytometry - and a lot of flow cytometry - to join,
people actually have to go through me, and we review every person who
comes on.
I am sorry you are experiencing this problem, and we are happy to
help
in any way we can.
regards
paul Robinson
Professor, Purdue
From: J. Paul Robinson <j...@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu>
Date: Mon Mar 31 2008 - 01:18:05 EDT
From J. Paul Robinson - Moderator
Robert is right - there is too much politics and not enough
science...
What is happening here, is that there are too many cooks.
Let me make it very clear that we work hard to keep this list clean.
It
does not always work. When we identify a failure, we usually respond
to
the person concerned and don't waste all your time.
We frequently note in our posts, that advertising is not allowed.
This
list was developed from 2 or 3 individuals who actually had email in
1990, to 3000 over the past 19 years. It did not happen by chance,
nor
was it overnight. It was developed with a lot of cost ($$$), a lot of
time, and what was a pretty darned good idea when it started. We
don't
tolerate people who try to damage the list.
Now that it's highly successful, there are a number of individuals
that
are trying to either circumvent the list, use it for their own
purposes,
or simply sideline it. There are even some proposing that they should
be
able to manipulate the list and its contents in any forum for any
purpose. I am really shocked at this rather callous approach to a
scientific discussion board. I am not making public those individuals
or
their companies, but if I am pushed, I will identify them publicly.
If
I
do so, and they create havoc, it could shut the list down - or end up
in
a nasty legal battle. I don't suppose that would be popular?
So, it seems to me, that we need to get back to basics and focus on
the
reason this list has been so successful (and why you all want to use
it
for advertising - or even why those who what to hijack it...) - it
does
a good if not great job overall.
thanks for your support - all 3000 of you ...well most of you!
Clearly we will provide a mechanism for companies to provide a means
for
communication....it's on our list...
Maybe I am getting too old for all this abuse....!
regards
Paul Robinson
Purdue University
purdue cytometry mail list 2007 verity software sales 07 by...
(27962)
Document count: purdue (139318) cytometry (25468) mail (53709) list
(63448) 2007 (37553) verity (222) software (15216) sales (14402) 07
(21574) by (129519) thread (26375) purdue cytometry mail list 2007
verity software sales 07 by... (27962)
about 187244 results found, top 500 sorted by relevance
score using date hide summaries group by location
spacer 1-10 next
Purdue Cytometry Mailing List: Re: Thanks for the suggestions -
[Disclaimer: Yes, I live off FlowJo sales, and that's a blatantly
commercial statement, but it gets technical from here on.] We've
played with spatial 3D ...
www.cyto.purdue.edu/hmarchiv/2006/0939.htm
Jennifer Wilshire, PhD jenni...@flowjo.com MetroFlow Meeting,
Reply: Sue DeMaggio: "Re: FW: FlowJo Seminar for Los Angeles Basin"
I'm not sure if there is a Los Angeles Basin users
group, but thought I could advertise here to interested parties.
Thanks,
Lora Barsky - Lead Operator
Research Immunology/BMT FACS Core
Childrens Hospital Los Angeles
http://www.healthsystem.virginia.edu/internet/cytometry/forms/FlowJo.cfm
FlowJo Site License
Registration Form
Complete the form below to access the University of Virginia's Site
License for FlowJo data analysis software.
Contact Joanne Lannigan joannelanni
https://ssl.search.live.com/health/results.aspx?qu=FlowJO+PURDUE&cat=...
TO ROBERT MURPHY WITH LINKS FOR DOWNLOAD AND ALL INFORMATION
PERTAINING TO FCS CYTORPO QUICK FACS 11
SOME HOW IT WAS FOWARDED TO: J PAUL ROBINSON...MAYBE IT WAS
INTERCEPTED!
Fw: NEW FLOWCYTOMETRY SOFTWARE FOR ALL BD and Beckman/Coulter
Flow Cytometers CAN PROCESS 24,000- 48,000 SAMPLES PER HOUR
Standard
Header|Full Message
View
mitchell haynes <buybro..._at_yahoo.com>
ViewFriday,
September 28, 2007 1:36:36 AM
To:j..._at_flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu
Cc:da..._at_kanecki2.com
Cytopro
quick facs savings analysis.doc (82KB); Setup-Quick
Facs 11 Demo.exe (7854KB); FCS
CYTOPRO BENIFITS.doc (25KB)
Find:
Dear Robert Murphy
NEW
FLOWCYTOMETRY SOFTWARE FOR ALL BD and Beckman/Coulter Flow Cytometers
CAN
PROCESS 24,000-42,000 SAMPLES PER HOUR.
FLOW CYTOMETRY FCS CYTO PRO QUICK FACS
http://www.kanecki.com/flow.html
Increased quality and productivity. With 10,000,000 event files, you
can process 24,000 samples/hour, and maintain quality up to Sigma 5
or
better. Compare this to having your research technologist performing
only 100 samples/hour analysis.
Increased laboratory utilization by 3X because you can perform the
analysis off-lab and free laboratory time for reading samples. This
was achieved when I developed the program, and we had a program
project grant from 1992 to 1998 of $8M.
Works with FCS 3.0 in all data modes as floating point, integer*4,
and
ASCII.
Works with BD and Beckman/Coulter Flow Cytometers and Cell Sorters
Backwards compatible with FCS 2.0 files and Flow Cytometers and Cell
Sorters.
Can read FCS 3.0 files up to 10M events with 20 parameters.
Easy to Use, three step process. Load initial file, set gate, specify
file list to process. That's it.
Collaboration tools to allow you to cut and paste image results to
results.
Statistical analysis results imprinted on histogram plots directly as
mean, mode, and median with the ability to present results in log
mode
or linear mode, depending on the detector used.
Plain vanilla coding for easy update and maintenance to allow for the
greatest user and software quality.
One time purchase fee, no yearly renewal fees as with others.
Proven tract record in FACS, Fluorescent Activated Cell Sorter
Laboratory. The laboratory was rated the best laboratory in the
Midwest USA in 1990.
This application is designed for large-scale fluorescent activated
cell sorter
analysis. The program can read up to FCS 3.0 files and has been
tested
to run on Becton Dickinson and CoulterOrtho based flow cytometers and
cell sorters. The main advantage of this program is that you can have
the computer perform the analysis for you after you have selected the
region to analyze. The result is that up to 24,000 samples per hour
can be analyzed on a 1.4 GHz speed computer.
This program is designed for researcher and technologist use. It uses
rectangular gating, and is intuitive to use. To use this program, the
FCS must have the extension, *.bin as "54203023.bin" as an example.
The *.bin extension is what the computer uses to locate the files on
the computer.
THANK YOU FOR YOU TIME
MITCHELL HAYNES
VP
SALES
KANECKI
ASSOCIATES
832-347-1669
Ø To: skel..._at_flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu
Cc: skel..._at_flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu
> Hi Joanne,
> It is quite true that this site is supposed to be used for providing
> information, asking and answering questions and discussing issues.
> The availability of a new technology to members of the cytometry
> community, for whom it was not previously available, is worthy of
> being disseminated via this bulletin board. There was a similar
> message recently, regarding the opening of the first Partec US
> office, which did not raise any objections, as should be the case
> here. The matter was actually discussed, along with the content,
> before this was posted, so it's not as if there was no sensitivity
> to this issue. The message was intended to be informative, not
> commercial and I apologize to all who may view it otherwise.
> However, there was no solicitation to buy anything, nor any detailed
> product information, only the quite newsworthy information that
> another new technology is available in markets where it was not
> previously.
> Best Regards,
> Jeff
Received on Wed Mar 19 18:18:00 2008
This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: margaret lubkin: "Every time you send a reply"
Previous message: Telford, William (NIH/NCI) [E]: "RE: Optical Gel"
In reply to: Jeffrey Harvey: "Re: Bay bioscience opens US office and
introduces its JSAN cell sorting and analysis system there"
Next in thread: Gerstein, Rachel: "RE: Bay bioscience opens US office
and introduces its JSAN cell sorting and analysis system there"
Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By
Subject ]
[ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 31 2007 -
03:12:00 EST
Collusion is an agreement, usually secretive, which occurs between
two
or more persons to deceive, mislead, or defraud others of their legal
rights, or to obtain an objective forbidden by law typically
involving
fraud or gaining an unfair advantage. It can involve "wage fixing,
kickbacks, or misrepresenting the independence of the relationship
between the colluding parties."[1] All acts affected by collusion are
considered void.[2]
I had someone do a check on them. it is apparent that they have
written
some software and they think its ants-pants.
...I already told them that they were acting as scammers and they got
upset with
me...well, if they don't desist, they will find out how much
influence
we actually have...
Purdue discussion list which is primarily about cytometry - and a lot
of flow cytometry - to join,
people actually have to go through me, and we review every person who
comes on.
3. I am contacting Google and other sites to let them know that these
people are self-propagating links.
Larry D. Farrell, Ph.D.
> Professor of Microbiology
> Idaho State University
Paul Robinson was *not* informed of my message to you. What
makes
you think he was?
To:Larry Farrell <farrlarr_at_isu.edu>; mitchell haynes
<buybroker_at_yahoo.com>;
skelley_at_flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu; Bartek Rajwa
rajwa_at_flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu
Larry
Sorry you are experiencing a problem
>From the header - This is apparently coming from a Mitchel Haynes
mitchell haynes <buybroker_at_yahoo.com> - is this correct?
I initially thought messages coming from this person were a scam and
challenged them when they started posting to our list as well. I had
someone do a check on them. it is apparent that they have written
some
software and they think its ants-pants. They have tried to post
things
on the Purdue list, they have used every possible website and email
discussion group to get cross listed to boost their ratings on
Google.
Basically I view their behavior as very tenuous and from the message
you
sent me, it appears that it is not appropriate to do what they are
doing...
I have taken the following action:
Steve Kelley has been instructed to remove their email and any
postings on the Purdue list. They are now banned
2. I am going to Copying Bartek Rajwa the editor of the ISAC site to
beware of them
3. I am contacting Google and other sites to let them know that these
people are self-propagating links.
4. If I see any message that in any way impunes Purdue or our
reputation, I will go after them with every possible legal recourse
at
my disposal. We will not allow our reputation to suffer because of
commercial abuse.
5. You should ban this address, and basically indicate to your
members
that this is a scam.
While they claim to be legitimate, they are acting exactly as any
scam artist
...I already told them that they were acting as scammers and they got
upset with
me...
well, if they don't desist,
they will find out how much influence we actually have...
I will check the message
> Subject: flow cytometry software will you trust Purdue..Lets play
MONOPOLY
> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 09:38:56 -0800 (PST)
> Organization: http://groups.google.com
and see if this is actually libelous - it appears to be - and if it
is,
I will close this person down really, really fast!!! (Steve please
check
out this message and make a copy)
Larry, we have about 3000 people on the Purdue discussion list which
is
primarily about cytometry - and a lot of flow cytometry - to join,
people actually have to go through me, and we review every person who
comes on.
I am sorry you are experiencing this problem, and we are happy to
help
in any way we can.
regards
paul Robinson
Professor, Purdue
From: J. Paul Robinson <j...@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu>
Date: Mon Mar 31 2008 - 01:18:05 EDT
From J. Paul Robinson - Moderator
Robert is right - there is too much politics and not enough
science...
What is happening here, is that there are too many cooks.
Let me make it very clear that we work hard to keep this list clean.
It
does not always work. When we identify a failure, we usually respond
to
the person concerned and don't waste all your time.
We frequently note in our posts, that advertising is not allowed.
This
list was developed from 2 or 3 individuals who actually had email in
1990, to 3000 over the past 19 years. It did not happen by chance,
nor
was it overnight. It was developed with a lot of cost ($$$), a lot of
time, and what was a pretty darned good idea when it started. We
don't
tolerate people who try to damage the list.
Now that it's highly successful, there are a number of individuals
that
are trying to either circumvent the list, use it for their own
purposes,
or simply sideline it. There are even some proposing that they should
be
able to manipulate the list and its contents in any forum for any
purpose. I am really shocked at this rather callous approach to a
scientific discussion board. I am not making public those individuals
or
their companies, but if I am pushed, I will identify them publicly.
If
I
do so, and they create havoc, it could shut the list down - or end up
in
a nasty legal battle. I don't suppose that would be popular?
So, it seems to me, that we need to get back to basics and focus on
the
reason this list has been so successful (and why you all want to use
it
for advertising - or even why those who what to hijack it...) - it
does
a good if not great job overall.
thanks for your support - all 3000 of you ...well most of you!
Clearly we will provide a mechanism for companies to provide a means
for
communication....it's on our list...
Maybe I am getting too old for all this abuse....!
regards
Paul Robinson
Purdue University
purdue cytometry mail list 2007 verity software sales 07 by...
(27962)
Document count: purdue (139318) cytometry (25468) mail (53709) list
(63448) 2007 (37553) verity (222) software (15216) sales (14402) 07
(21574) by (129519) thread (26375) purdue cytometry mail list 2007
verity software sales 07 by... (27962)
about 187244 results found, top 500 sorted by relevance
score using date hide summaries group by location
spacer 1-10 next
Purdue Cytometry Mailing List: Re: Thanks for the suggestions -
[Disclaimer: Yes, I live off FlowJo sales, and that's a blatantly
commercial statement, but it gets technical from here on.] We've
played with spatial 3D ...
www.cyto.purdue.edu/hmarchiv/2006/0939.htm
Jennifer Wilshire, PhD jenni...@flowjo.com MetroFlow Meeting,
Reply: Sue DeMaggio: "Re: FW: FlowJo Seminar for Los Angeles Basin"
I'm not sure if there is a Los Angeles Basin users
group, but thought I could advertise here to interested parties.
Thanks,
Lora Barsky - Lead Operator
Research Immunology/BMT FACS Core
Childrens Hospital Los Angeles
http://www.healthsystem.virginia.edu/internet/cytometry/forms/FlowJo.cfm
FlowJo Site License
Registration Form
Complete the form below to access the University of Virginia's Site
License for FlowJo data analysis software.
Contact Joanne Lannigan joannelanni
https://ssl.search.live.com/health/results.aspx?qu=FlowJO+PURDUE&cat=...
TO ROBERT MURPHY WITH LINKS FOR DOWNLOAD AND ALL INFORMATION
PERTAINING TO FCS CYTORPO QUICK FACS 11
SOME HOW IT WAS FOWARDED TO: J PAUL ROBINSON...MAYBE IT WAS
INTERCEPTED!
Fw: NEW FLOWCYTOMETRY SOFTWARE FOR ALL BD and Beckman/Coulter
Flow Cytometers CAN PROCESS 24,000- 48,000 SAMPLES PER HOUR
Standard
Header|Full Message
View
mitchell haynes <buybro..._at_yahoo.com>
ViewFriday,
September 28, 2007 1:36:36 AM
To:j..._at_flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu
Cc:da..._at_kanecki2.com
Cytopro
quick facs savings analysis.doc (82KB); Setup-Quick
Facs 11 Demo.exe (7854KB); FCS
CYTOPRO BENIFITS.doc (25KB)
Find:
Dear Robert Murphy
NEW
FLOWCYTOMETRY SOFTWARE FOR ALL BD and Beckman/Coulter Flow Cytometers
CAN
PROCESS 24,000-42,000 SAMPLES PER HOUR.
FLOW CYTOMETRY FCS CYTO PRO QUICK FACS
http://www.kanecki.com/flow.html
Increased quality and productivity. With 10,000,000 event files, you
can process 24,000 samples/hour, and maintain quality up to Sigma 5
or
better. Compare this to having your research technologist performing
only 100 samples/hour analysis.
Increased laboratory utilization by 3X because you can perform the
analysis off-lab and free laboratory time for reading samples. This
was achieved when I developed the program, and we had a program
project grant from 1992 to 1998 of $8M.
Works with FCS 3.0 in all data modes as floating point, integer*4,
and
ASCII.
Works with BD and Beckman/Coulter Flow Cytometers and Cell Sorters
Backwards compatible with FCS 2.0 files and Flow Cytometers and Cell
Sorters.
Can read FCS 3.0 files up to 10M events with 20 parameters.
Easy to Use, three step process. Load initial file, set gate, specify
file list to process. That's it.
Collaboration tools to allow you to cut and paste image results to
results.
Statistical analysis results imprinted on histogram plots directly as
mean, mode, and median with the ability to present results in log
mode
or linear mode, depending on the detector used.
Plain vanilla coding for easy update and maintenance to allow for the
greatest user and software quality.
One time purchase fee, no yearly renewal fees as with others.
Proven tract record in FACS, Fluorescent Activated Cell Sorter
Laboratory. The laboratory was rated the best laboratory in the
Midwest USA in 1990.
This application is designed for large-scale fluorescent activated
cell sorter
analysis. The program can read up to FCS 3.0 files and has been
tested
to run on Becton Dickinson and CoulterOrtho based flow cytometers and
cell sorters. The main advantage of this program is that you can have
the computer perform the analysis for you after you have selected the
region to analyze. The result is that up to 24,000 samples per hour
can be analyzed on a 1.4 GHz speed computer.
This program is designed for researcher and technologist use. It uses
rectangular gating, and is intuitive to use. To use this program, the
FCS must have the extension, *.bin as "54203023.bin" as an example.
The *.bin extension is what the computer uses to locate the files on
the computer.
THANK YOU FOR YOU TIME
MITCHELL HAYNES
VP
SALES
KANECKI
ASSOCIATES
832-347-1669
Ø To: skel..._at_flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu
Cc: skel..._at_flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu
> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 11:39:02 AM
> Subject: NOT A JUNCK MAIL STEVE WAS JUST FOWARDING INFORMATION TO PROPER
> CHANNELS
> Dear Paul,
> I recieved your responce to the email I sent. Please understand it is not
> junkmail but a update on new technology that will inhance all
> flowcytometers..It is currently being evaluated by BD who request for this
> software to be developed directly by our corporation.
> It was simply sent as an announcement for you concideration.
> The software is demonstrates precision and a higer processing rate than
> every existing software today.
> If you have any questions please call I provided my phone number with the
> email. I understand institutions of your caliber is always looking for new
> technology. Futhermoore this is the only software in the world that works
> for every platform on one peice of software.
> Thank your for you time and have a great day.
> Please do not blame Steve for send the information to the proper channels
> I would think you would be upset if he did not foward important infomation
> that pertains to furthering cytometry breakthroughs.
> If you would like us to send information to another address that won't
> interfer please foward it to me and I will make sure that there are no
> more misunderstandings.
> Mitchell Haynes
From: "j..._at_flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu"
<j..._at_flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu>
To: mitchell haynes <buybro..._at_yahoo.com>
Cc: j..._at_flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 2:26:51 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: NOT A JUNCK MAIL STEVE WAS JUST FOWARDING
INFORMATION TO PROPER CHANNELS
Sorry, I think it is junk mail
regards
paul robinson
http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=23879772873&ref=mf
Collusion is an agreement, usually secretive, which occurs between
two
or more persons to deceive, mislead, or defraud others of their legal
rights, or to obtain an objective forbidden by law typically
involving
fraud or gaining an unfair advantage. It can involve "wage fixing,
kickbacks, or misrepresenting the independence of the relationship
between the colluding parties."[1] All acts affected by collusion are
considered void.[2]
Purdue Cytometry Mailing List: RE: DNA analysis software
... Purdue Cytometry Mailing List: RE: DNA analysis software ... J.
Herbert Technical Support Manager Verity Software House ...
http://flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu/hmarchiv/Current/0747.htm - 7.7KB
78%
||||||||||||||||||||
26 May 07
Find Similar
Highlight
Purdue Cytometry Mailing List: Re: DNA analysis software
... vsh.com] > Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 10:30 AM > To:
Cytometry Mailing List > Subject: RE: DNA ... J. Herbert > Technical
Support Manager > Verity Software House ...
http://www.cyto.purdue.edu/hmarchiv/Current/0755.htm - 8.6KB
78%
||||||||||||||||||||
26 May 07
Find Similar
Highlight
Purdue Cytometry Mailing List: Announcing User Forum at Verity
Software House, Inc.
... Purdue Cytometry Mailing List: Announcing User Forum at
Verity ...
Verity Software House is pleased to announce the creation of a Verity
User's Forum on our ...
http://www.cyto.purdue.edu/hmarchiv/2002/0542.htm - 4.6KB
78%
||||||||||||||||||||
12 Mar 02
Find Similar
Highlight
Purdue Cytometry Mailing List: RE: FL2H in PI cell cycle analysis
... From: Verity Software House <ver...@vsh.com> Date: Fri Sep 07
2007
- 17:30:59 EDT ... From: Verity Software House <ver...@vsh.com> Date:
Fri Sep 07 2007 - 17:30:59 EDT ...
http://flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu/hmarchiv/Current/1351.htm - 7.2KB
77%
||||||||||||||||||||
12 Sep 07
Find Similar
Highlight
Purdue Cytometry Mailing List: By Date
... Purdue Cytometry Mailing List By Thread ... Jim (NIH/NIAMS) (Wed
Dec 19 2007 - 13:41:51 EST) ... 13th Leipziger Workshop, 2nd Call and
Seasonal Greetings Dr. Attila Tarnok (Wed Dec 19 2007 - 07:41:10
EST) ...
http://flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu/hmarchiv/Current/thread.htm - 328.1KB
76%
||||||||||||||||||||
21 Dec 07
Find Similar
Highlight
Purdue Cytometry Mailing List: DNA analysis software
... Purdue Cytometry Mailing List: DNA analysis software ... we offer
a conversion at no charge. I invite you to contact Verity Software
House directly with any specific questions or issues. Best regards,
Don Donald ...
http://www.cyto.purdue.edu/hmarchiv/Current/0753.htm - 5.6KB
76%
||||||||||||||||||||
26 May 07
Find Similar
Highlight
Purdue Cytometry Mailing List: By Date
... Purdue Cytometry Mailing List: By Date ... Wed Dec 19 2007 -
07:41:10 EST ...
http://www.cyto.purdue.edu/hmarchiv/Current/ - 362.4KB
75%
||||||||||||||||||||
21 Dec 07
Find Similar
Highlight
Purdue Cytometry Mailing List: Cytometry software for linux
... Purdue Cytometry Mailing List: Cytometry software for linux ...
Previous message: Verity Software House: "RE: FL2H in PI cell cycle
analysis" ...
http://flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu/hmarchiv/Current/1352.htm - 5.5KB
75%
||||||||||||||||||||
13 Sep 07
Find Similar
about 187243 results found, top 500 sorted by relevance
score using date hide summaries group by location
prev 21-30 next
Purdue Cytometry Mailing List: Re: FL2H in PI cell cycle analysis
... Purdue Cytometry Mailing List: Re: FL2H in PI cell cycle
analysis ... Next in thread: Verity Software House: "RE: FL2H in PI
cell cycle analysis" ...
http://flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu/hmarchiv/Current/1336.htm - 6.6KB
74%
||||||||||||||||||||
11 Sep 07
Find Similar
Highlight
Purdue Cytometry Mailing List: New England Cytometry Users Group
annual meeting preliminary ...
... Purdue Cytometry Mailing List: New England Cytometry Users Group
annual meeting preliminary announcement ... up of speakers this year:
C. Bruce Bagwell, MD, Ph.D. - Verity Software House http://www.vsh.com/
Anne E. Carpenter, Ph.D. - MIT ...
http://flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu/hmarchiv/Current/1153.htm - 7.2KB
74%
||||||||||||||||||||
08 Aug 07
Find Similar
Highlight
Purdue Cytometry Mailing List: An innovative new two DVD set on
Cytometry- Free to all
... John Wiley & Sons, publisher of Cytometry Part A. These major
players in the field of cytometry are known to all of ... Scientific,
Coherent, Q-Imaging and Verity Software. All of these companies
provide ...
http://flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu/hmarchiv/Current/0805.htm - 8.7KB
74%
||||||||||||||||||||
07 Jun 07
Find Similar
Highlight
Purdue Cytometry Mailing List: RE: Thanks to all for a successful
2007
NW Regional ...
... Purdue Cytometry Mailing List: RE: Thanks to all for a successful
2007 NW Regional ... Miltenyi, Phoenix Flow Systems, Spherotech, Tree
Star, Union Biometrica, and Verity Software House, Ryan Brinkman,
Perry Halaand, and others of the FICCS ...
http://flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu/hmarchiv/Current/0471.htm - 6.7KB
74%
||||||||||||||||||||
28 Mar 07
ISAC CONGRESS ELECTIONS ADD ONE MORE TO "OUR TEAM" Purdue Cytometry
Mail List
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Purdue Cytometry Mailing List: Re: Thanks for the suggestions -
[Disclaimer: Yes, I live off FlowJo sales, and that's a blatantly
commercial statement, but it gets technical from here on.]
We've
played with spatial 3D ...
www.cyto.purdue.edu/hmarchiv/2006/0939.htm- 9k - Cached - Similar
pages - Note this
January is Flowjo month at URMC
Bushnell, Timothy <[log in to unmask]>
Wed, 2 Jan 2008 09:46:58 -0500
244 lines
Reminder: 1 pm - Flowjo Seminar
Bushnell, Timothy <[log in to unmask]>
Fri, 4 Jan 2008 10:12:35 -0500
193 lines
Reminder: Friday 1 pm - Flowjo Seminar on Compensation and
Transformation
Bushnell, Timothy <[log in to unmask]>
Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:20:29 -0500
214 lines
Reminder: Friday 1 pm - Flowjo Seminar on DNA Analysis and Cell
Proliferation
Bushnell, Timothy <[log in to unmask]>
Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:59:37 -0500
220 lines
Reminder: Today 1 pm - Flowjo Seminar on Compensation and
Transformation
Bushnell, Timothy <[log in to unmask]>
Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:31:11 -0500
221 lines
Reminder: TODAY 1 pm - Flowjo Seminar on DNA Analysis and Cell
Proliferation
Bushnell, Timothy <[log in to unmask]>
Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:57:14 -0500
249 lines
Resend: Reminder: Friday 1 pm - Flowjo Seminar on DNA Analysis and
Cell Proliferation
Bushnell, Timothy <[log in to unmask]>
Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:31:15 -0500
378 lines
Back to: Main UR_CYTOMETRY Page
Subject:Feedback requested on Flowjo web seminarsFrom:"Bushnell,
Timothy" <[log in to unmask]>Reply-To:Cytometry <[log in to unmask]>,
Bushnell, TimothyDate:Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:24:34 -0500Content-
Type:multipart/alternativeParts/Attachments:
Colleagues: For those of you who attended any of the Flowjo web
seminars the last three weeks, I would ask if you could send me your
feedback.
How did the web seminar format work for you? How was the instructor,
John Quinn? Were the selected topics appropriate? Would you like more
of these organized? If so, what topics would you like covered? What
could be done to improve the web seminars? Please send your comments
to me directly. Thanks in advance
Tim Timothy Bushnell, Ph.D.Research Assistant Professor, Pediatrics
and OncologyCo-Director, URMC Flow Cytometry FacilityOffice:
585-273-5535Lab: 585-273-1361Cell: 585-690-5157Fax:
585-276-0233http://
www.urmc.rochester.edu/Aab/geneped/flow/http://www.urmc.rochester.edu...
____UR_Cytometry______Subscribers Corner_____ http://listserv.urmc.rochester.edu
Bushnell, Timothy - Mambo Mar 6, 2008 ... arrow ISAC Election 2008
arrow Bushnell, Timothy ... Timothy (Tim) Bushnell - candidate for
Biological Councilor. Tim Bushnell ...
www.isac-net.org/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=718
ISAC XXII International Congress
FlowJo software. Data showed optimal sensitivity was achieved using
PBMCs ...... CYTOMETRY: PURDUE UNIVERSITY. CYTOMETRY LABORATORIES. J.
Paul Robinson ...
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/cyto.a.20046.abs -
Welcome to Flow Cytometry Core Facility
FlowJo Kinetics Tutorial. ? FlowJo Software Reference Manuals: ...
Purdue flow cytometry. Technical Center for those using secondary and
tertiary ...
www.aecom.yu.edu/facs/ProtocolsLinks.html - 12k - Cached - Similar
pages - Note this
Flow Links - 9 visits - Mar 3
FlowJo Flojo help manual guide lesson help. ... J. Paul Robinson
Gives
WikiPedia an "A" OK, the main Flow Cytometry entry got an A, but Dr.
Robinson felt ...
www.flowjo.com/home/links.html - 22k - Cached - Similar pages - Note
this
Fluorescence Compensation
Jennifer Wilshire, PhD jenni...@flowjo.com MetroFlow Meeting,
Princeton, NJ .... Purdue Cytometry Mailing list - http://www.cyto.purdue.edu.
Practical Flow ...
www.metroflow.org/archive/2004Jan06/abstracts/Jennifer_Wilshire.htm -
39k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this
http://www.healthsystem.virginia.edu/internet/cytometry/forms/FlowJo.cfm
FlowJo Site License
Registration Form
Complete the form below to access the University of Virginia's Site
License for FlowJo data analy
sis software. All fields with * must be
completed or your registration will not be processed. Once your
information has been received and verified you will receive a serial
number which you must enter in FlowJo on the computer whose hardware
address you provided. Cost per user license will be determined at the
end of the year depending on the average number of registered users
for the year.
(See instructions for pricing structure) This amount
will be billed to the PTAO provided below, so please make sure the
PTAO you provide does not expire before that time. Completion of this
registration form is a valid request for services and assumes the
approval of the Principal Investigator of the PTAO account provided.
Contact Joanne Lannigan joannelanni...@virginia.edu with questions.
Flow Links - 9 visits - Mar 3
FlowJo Flojo help manual guide lesson help. ... in Flow Cytometry -
Los Alamos. Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories * 2005 Mail
List,
Thread Sort ...
www.flowjo.com/home/links.html - 22k - Cached - Similar pages - Note
this
Purdue Cytometry Mailing List: RE: Nonreadable FCS 3 files from
From : J. Paul Robinson j...@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu
... We are
currently working on adding the support of these files in the Windows
> version of FlowJo, ...
www.cyto.purdue.edu/hmarchiv/2004/1020.htm
Note this
Purdue Cytometry Mailing List: Re: Nonreadable FCS 3 files from
From : J. Paul Robinson <j...@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu> ... For data
analysis we want to > use a centraly designed templates made in Flow
Jo software. ...
www.cyto.purdue.edu/hmarchiv/2004/0997.htm
Purdue Cytometry Mailing List: Re: Thanks for the suggestions -
[Disclaimer: Yes, I live off FlowJo sales, and that's a blatantly
commercial statement, but it gets technical from here on.] We've
played with spatial 3D ...
www.cyto.purdue.edu/hmarchiv/2006/0939.htm
To:Cytometry Bushnell, Timothy
Date:Mon, 3 Mar 2008 13:03:53 -0500Content-
Colleagues: Is your lab in need of a new flowjo dongle? I am again
coordinating a bulk purchase of flowjo dongles. The academic price is
$1495 a dongle.
In the past, the price breaks start at 3 dongles and
go up from there. If your lab is interested in purchasing a dongle,
please email me directly the name of the PI, an account number to
charge, and the number of dongles you wish to purchase by March
17th. Tim Timothy Bushnell, Ph.D.Research Assistant Professor,
Pediatrics and OncologyCo-Director, URMC Flow Cytometry
FacilityOffice: 585-273-5535Lab: 585-273-1361Cell: 585-690-5157Fax:
585-276-0233http://www.urmc.rochester.edu/Aab/geneped/flow/http://
www.urmc.rochester.edu/wnyfug/
PDF] Tree Star
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
Data Analysis/Presentation
– Tim Bushnell & Ryan Duggan ..... Purdue
University Cytometry Laboratories, West Lafayette, IN ...
www.gliifca.org/pdf/GLIIFCA-2004.pdf - Similar pages - Note this
MyCyte
Thanks > > Tim > > > > Timothy Bushnell, Ph.D. > > Research Assistant
Professor, ... Justin, We're working hard to finalize FlowJo
Collectors' Edition, ...
mycyte.org/index.php?
option=com_newsfeeds&task=view&feedid=11&Itemid=70 - 133k - Cached -
Similar pages - Note this
ISAC E-News -- June, 2007 - Mambo
Jun 8, 2007 ... You also may contact the President, Dr. Tim
Bushnell, ... Adam Treister introduced possibilities of integrating
these with FlowJo. ...
www.isac-net.org/content/view/593/119/ -
Free software - FCS Express only $99 (not quite free, but close :-),
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free software - FCS Express
From: David Novo (d...@denovosoftware.com)
Date: Fri Dec 19 2003 - 16:59:28 EST
• Next message: A.J. Rossini: "Re: Rif. : Free software?"
• Previous message: MailingList/general/Biocy...@biocytex.fr: "Rif. :
EBV by flow"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ attachment ]
________________________________________
Although FCS Express can read files from all manufacturers, and the
lite
version is only $99 (not quite free, but close :-), it will only run
on the
PC. We have no intention of making a MAC compatible version in the
near (or
distant) future.
FCS Press (http://www.fcspress.com/) is a very affordable third party
data
analysis package for the Macintosh.
There are several other packages available for the Macintosh (FlowJo,
WinList) but both are significantly more expensive than the ones
listed above.
-Dave
At 09:51 AM 12/18/2003, Jayaraman, Sundararajan wrote:
>Unfortunately this is not Mac compatible!
>Sundararajan Jayaraman, Ph.D.
>Research Assistant Professor
>Diabetes Research Institute
>University of Miami School of Medicine
>1450 NW 10th Avenue (R-134)
>Miami, FL 33136
>Tel. (305) 243-3700
>Fax (305) 243-4404
>E-mail: sjaya...@med.miami.edu
------------------------------
David Novo
President
De Novo Software
De Novo Software
phone: (310) 558-4955
fax: (310) 943-1489
________________________________________
• Next message: A.J. Rossini: "Re: Rif. : Free software?"
• Previous message: MailingList/general/Biocy...@biocytex.fr: "Rif. :
EBV by flow"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ attachment ] ________________________________________is archive was
generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:44:06 EST
Réf. : Free software?
From: MailingList/general/Biocy...@biocytex.fr
Date: Fri Dec 12 2003 - 13:48:58 EST
• Next message: Sexton Robert: "RE: RE : BD FACSCanto"
• Previous message: Perucha Martínez Esperanza: "Histogram analysis"
• Next in thread: Jayaraman, Sundararajan: "RE: Réf. : Free
software?"
• Maybe reply: Jayaraman, Sundararajan: "RE: Réf. : Free software?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ attachment ]
________________________________________
You should have a look to a free demo software on De Novo Software.
Philippe Poncelet, PhD
BioCytex
140, Chemin de l'Armée d'Afrique
13010 Marseille France
Tel: +33 (0) 4 96 12 20 40
Fax: +33 (0) 4 91 47 24 71
Biocytex - Home
Dorte Christiansen <dorte.christian...@nss.nhn.no> le 11/12/2003
14:36:31
Pour : Cytometry Mailing List <cytome...@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu>
cc :
Objet : Free software?
Hi!
As I understand there is some free software for flowdata analysis
somewhere
on the Web. With my limited "web-skills" I haven`t been able to find
a
site
yet. Could someone please direct me to any of these sites?
What is the general opinion of using these free softwares?
Are they safe to use considering the security for my PC?
Regards
Dorte Christiansen
Researchlab
Nordland Hospital
Bodoe
Norway
________________________________________
• Next message: Sexton Robert: "RE: RE : BD FACSCanto"
• Previous message: Perucha Martínez Esperanza: "Histogram analysis"
• Next in thread: Jayaraman, Sundararajan: "RE: Réf. : Free
software?"
• Maybe reply: Jayaraman, Sundararajan: "RE: Réf. : Free software?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ attachment ]
• This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 -
17:44:06 EST
RE: Réf. : Free software?
From: Jayaraman, Sundararajan (SJaya...@med.miami.edu)
Date: Thu Dec 18 2003 - 12:51:59 EST
• Next message: Nathan Regimbal: "Re: DNA analysis"
• Previous message: astacchini: "EBV by flow"
• Maybe in reply to: MailingList/general/Biocy...@biocytex.fr:
"Réf. :
Free software?"
• Next in thread: A.J. Rossini: "Re: Réf. : Free software?"
• Reply: A.J. Rossini: "Re: Réf. : Free software?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ attachment ]
________________________________________
Unfortunately this is not Mac compatible!
Sundararajan Jayaraman, Ph.D.
Research Assistant Professor
Diabetes Research Institute
University of Miami School of Medicine
1450 NW 10th Avenue (R-134)
Miami, FL 33136
Tel. (305) 243-3700
Fax (305) 243-4404
E-mail: sjaya...@med.miami.edu
The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged
and confidential
information, including patient information protected by federal and
state privacy laws.
It is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above. If you
are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination,
distribution or
duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are
not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all
copies of the
original message.
From: MailingList/general/Biocy...@biocytex.fr
> Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:48 PM
> To: Cytometry Mailing List
> Subject: Réf. : Free software?
> You should have a look to a free demo software on De Novo Software.
> Philippe Poncelet, PhD
> BioCytex
> 140, Chemin de l'Armée d'Afrique
> 13010 Marseille France
> Tel: +33 (0) 4 96 12 20 40
> Fax: +33 (0) 4 91 47 24 71
> Biocytex - Home
> Dorte Christiansen <dorte.christian...@nss.nhn.no> le 11/12/2003 14:36:31
> Pour : Cytometry Mailing List <cytome...@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu>
> cc :
> Objet : Free software?
> Hi!
> As I understand there is some free software for flowdata analysis somewhere
> on the Web. With my limited "web-skills" I haven`t been able to find a site
> yet. Could someone please direct me to any of these sites?
> What is the general opinion of using these free softwares?
> Are they safe to use considering the security for my PC?
> Regards
> Dorte Christiansen
> Researchlab
> Nordland Hospital
> Bodoe
> Norway
________________________________________
• Next message: Nathan Regimbal: "Re: DNA analysis"
• Previous message: astacchini: "EBV by flow"
• Maybe in reply to: MailingList/general/Biocy...@biocytex.fr:
"Réf. :
Free software?"
• Next in thread: A.J. Rossini: "Re: Réf. : Free software?"
• Reply: A.J. Rossini: "Re: Réf. : Free software?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ attachment ]
________________________________________
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 -
17:44:06 EST
Re: Réf. : Free software?
From: A.J. Rossini (ross...@blindglobe.net)
Date: Fri Dec 19 2003 - 22:39:46 EST
• Next message: Perfetto, Steve (NIH/VRC): "RE: DiVa and FlowJo
issue"
• Previous message: David Novo: "Free software - FCS Express"
• In reply to: Jayaraman, Sundararajan: "RE: Réf. : Free software?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ attachment ]
________________________________________
For people looking for free software, and don't mind a bit of work
(suffering? bwah-ha-ha...), we've got another not-completely broken
alpha release of rflowcyt, a package which is built on top of R
(The R Project for Statistical Computing), and released in the same
vein as the
Bioconductor suite for genomic analysis (Welcome to BioConductor
— bioconductor.org)
which I am involved with.
It has the following severe weak points -- the user interface for
gating is awful, to put it mildly. It's built on a command-line
interface.
It has the following strong points -- if you don't mind a bit of
work,
R can handle most statistical analyses that people want to do. There
is some documentation for using it, but it's not quite complete, but
we are working on it. However, it is completely cross-platform (R
runs on Linux/Unix, Microsoft Windows, and Mac OSX.
On the other hand, the following R code will write out an excel file
of the list-mode data for plotting:
library(rflowcyt)
my.file <- read.FCS("/path/to/my/FCS/file.fcs")
write.table(my.file$data,file="file.csv",sep=",",c ol.names=NA)
If interested, it can be obtained from
http://www.analytics.washington.edu/~rossini/rflowcyt/
You will have to install R as well as figure out the R package
system. I havn't built binary packages for Windows yet, so it's a bit
of a pain to install (but I should be doing that by the first week of
January).
best,
-tony
Various problems regarding advertising and list abuse
This message: [ Message body ] [ More options ]
Related messages: [ Next message ] [ Previous message ] [ In reply
to ]
From: J. Paul Robinson <j...@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu>
Date: Mon Mar 31 2008 - 01:18:05 EDT
From J. Paul Robinson - Moderator
Robert is right - there is too much politics and not enough
science...
What is happening here, is that there are too many cooks.
Let me make it very clear that we work hard to keep this list clean.
It
does not always work. When we identify a failure, we usually respond
to
the person concerned and don't waste all your time.
We frequently note in our posts, that advertising is not allowed.
This
list was developed from 2 or 3 individuals who actually had email in
1990, to 3000 over the past 19 years. It did not happen by chance,
nor
was it overnight. It was developed with a lot of cost ($$$), a lot of
time, and what was a pretty darned good idea when it started. We
don't
tolerate people who try to damage the list.
Now that it's highly successful, there are a number of individuals
that
are trying to either circumvent the list, use it for their own
purposes,
or simply sideline it. There are even some proposing that they should
be
able to manipulate the list and its contents in any forum for any
purpose. I am really shocked at this rather callous approach to a
scientific discussion board. I am not making public those individuals
or
their companies, but if I am pushed, I will identify them publicly.
If
I
do so, and they create havoc, it could shut the list down - or end up
in
a nasty legal battle. I don't suppose that would be popular?
So, it seems to me, that we need to get back to basics and focus on
the
reason this list has been so successful (and why you all want to use
it
for advertising - or even why those who what to hijack it...) - it
does
a good if not great job overall.
thanks for your support - all 3000 of you ...well most of you!
Clearly we will provide a mechanism for companies to provide a means
for
communication....it's on our list...
Maybe I am getting too old for all this abuse....!
regards
Paul Robinson
Purdue University
THEY ALL DEVELOPED FLOW CYTOMETRY SOFTWARE THROUGH THE PURDUE
CYTOMETRY MAIL LIST AND ISAC CONGRESS!
NOW PRESIDENT AND DATA STANDARDS COMMITTEE.
WANT TO KNOW WHICH COMPANIES JUST LOOK
http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=23879772873&ref=mf