Agence France Press (AFP) Journalism "Definition" Of Murderers, Today (27 June 2004)
Leonardo Been
27 June 2004
WHO killed two Iraqi children and six Iraqi National Guardsmen, today?
According to Agence France Press (AFP) on 27 June 2004, the
murderer was named... violence.
Also killed today, by a murderer bearing the same name, were a US
soldier, and another American.
According to Agence France Press (AFP) again,
a different murderer but with the same name, struck in another
location in Iraq, causing the mentioned deaths.
Even the motive - the reason WHY these commonly named murderers were
committing their hideous murders - was
ALSO revealed by the Agence France Press (AFP) journalist
in the same article (at least, his or her "intelligence" and also
his or her "ethics" were revealed) ...and that in the very headline:
"Violence kills at least 10, as officials say Saddam Hussein will
be charged with war crimes"
(Sun Jun 27, 6:56 PM ET - ISTANBUL (AFP))
"Now you know" WHY the omni-present murderer (who travels by
the name of 'violence') will kill you or others,
and thus "you know" also WHEN violence will strike at you
or at others:
The moment when you charge Criminal Minds with their
Crimes!
The message of this journalist, of Agence France Press, is
all too obvious:
Please be a Destructive Coward, do all that Criminal
Minds want you to do to anybody - also to your
readers -
so as "not to infuriate or arouse the wrath of
Criminal Minds"
as if these would stop murdering when you don't
charge them with their Crimes...
Other signs of journalistic "ethics" as recorded
yesterday, 26 June, in their "definition" of murderers,
were provided by Associated Press journalists:
murderers = 'Iraqi nationalists who believe the new
interim government is simply a cover for
continued U.S. domination of the country.'
murderers = 'Iraq Violence'
murderers = 'insurgents bloody drive'
murderers = 'A car bomb exploded'
I wrote on 21 June 2004 (*) about this type of journalism:
As journalists are still far too insane (**) and far too un-educated,
to report to you - in cases that it is important for you to know -
about who does what,
with what intentions who does what he does, and what someone is
NOT saying but carefully omitting or preventing to be looked at,
about himself and about others,
in particular, journalists are not so reporting about individuals
that are sophisticated Psychopaths (Criminal Minds),
whom journalists are mentally far TOO LAZY to detect
- while at their very best calling such sophisticated
Psychopaths 'detractors' or 'critics' and so on -
(journalists are not reporting even the most
vital, life-saving, conflict-solving, and by
consequence the most interesting and the most
necessary data about an individual or about a
situation, so)
I will still have to do that reporting, in some cases, and for some
time, as nobody else at all has yet acquired the ability and
education, and overcome the mental resistance, *(1)
to do that, what is most vital to do
- as any journalist learns in any school of journalism,
it IS the very foundation of journalism itself, yet (on
any school of journalism, also) he is completely
un-educated in that ability and practice -
to do that, what journalists are too lazy, too much lacking in
discipline and in care for the society (that they PRETEND to
care for so much), by themselves
to acquire and use.
It is journalists NOT reporting to you, the highly
sophisticated, yet pathologically incurable Psychopaths,
which may (and it indeed does) include
some Celebrities, some Nobel Prize Winners and some
Oscar Winners.
A main tool you (and also journalists) have to use, for detecting
Criminal Minds is, to
look at what they (Criminal Minds) are NOT saying about another,
what truth about another they (Criminal Minds) are deliberately
wanting you NOT to see or feel about another,
what truth they try to PREVENT you from feeling or knowing about
another,
and also, when they try to destroy YOU, and when they try to get
others to destroy YOU
- which you might find more important, and more worthy of
your interest -
look at what they are NOT saying but omitting to say about YOU,
what truth about YOU they are deliberately wanting others (and
also you yourself) NOT to see or feel.
They ARE Criminal Minds, sophisticated Psychopaths:
They use "truth" - small facts not in contact or not in
connection with the main facts, and small incidents torn
away from their true emotions,
in order to SEPARATE YOU and others from feeling and knowing and
sensing and acting upon what IS the whole story, the true
emotions and the actual intentions.
How you can detect those who, in their very sophisticated ways,
separate you from feeling who is who and who does what, is described
in
- and you better read it, because you too are attacked by
Criminal Minds, by sophisticated and "popular"
Psychopaths precisely in the same way, at your work
or in your family or in your community, by their standard
methods of deception and destruction of life, which you
will educate yourself about, by -
'Detecting Criminal Minds By Their Intentional Omission Of Truth'
(19 August 2002 - Version 1.2)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3b6f518d.02090...@posting.google.com&output=gplain
(*) 'Underneath The Mask Michael Moore A Sophisticated Psychopath
Detected' (21 June 2004)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=989886.040622...@posting.google.com&output=gplain
(**)'Definition Of Insane - Relation To Humor' (5 Feb 2003)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3b6f518d.0302160841.7730fa14%40posting.google.com&output=gplain
__________
References:
- 'The First International Law (Version 2.0) - {HRI 20021124-V2.0}'
(24 November 2002 - Version 2.0 on 23 Sept 2003)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3b6f518d.0309...@posting.google.com&output=gplain
- 'Standard Responses Of Criminal Minds' (9 May 2003)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3b6f518d.03050...@posting.google.com&output=gplain
- 'Associated Press Journalism "Definition" Of Murderers, Today
(27 November 2003)'
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=989886.0406221950.72827a96%40posting.google.com&output=gplain