Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.

Dismiss

Charter Schools Increasing Racial Segregation in Classrooms, according to study

1 view

Skip to first unread message

EconomicDemocracy Coop

unread,

Feb 14, 2010, 1:54:00 PM2/14/10

Study: Charter Schools Increasing Racial Segregation in Classrooms

Encouraged by the Obama administration, efforts to expand the number
of charter schools are being organized around the country. But
concerns are being raised about the system. We speak to UCLA’s Civil
Rights Project co-director Gary Orfield about a new study that
suggests charter school growth is increasing classroom segregation.
[includes rush transcript]

Guest:

Gary Orfield, co-director of the Civil Rights Project at UCLA. He is
author of many books, including School Resegregation: Must the South
Turn Back? and Dismantling Desegregation: The Quiet Reversal of Brown
v. Board of Education.

JUAN GONZALEZ: Efforts to expand the number of charter schools are
being organized around the country. In Virginia, Republican Governor
Robert McDonnell outlined a plan on Wednesday to increase the state’s
cap on the publicly funded, privately run schools. In Mississippi, the
state Senate passed a bill Tuesday to clear the way for charter
schools. Here in New York City, the city’s Panel for Educational
Policy recently approved closing nineteen public schools at a time
when Mayor Mike Bloomberg was pushing state legislators to lift the
cap on charter schools.

Part of the push for the new charter schools has come from the Obama
administration. Under a new program called “Race to the Top,” states
are competing for $4.3 billion in federal grants for reforming
schools. States submitted applications for the money in January. The
money will be doled out by Education Secretary Arne Duncan, a strong
supporter of charter schools.

AMY GOODMAN: While the charter school movement is growing, some
concerns are being raised about the system.
A new study by UCLA’s Civil Rights Project suggests charter school
growth is increasing classroom segregation. Seven out of ten black
charter school students attend schools with extremely low numbers of
white students. Black students account for 32 percent of charter
school enrollment nationwide, twice the percentage enrolled in public
schools. The UCLA report is entitled “Charter Schools’ Political
Success is a Civil Rights Failure.”

Gary Orfield joins us now on the telephone. He’s co-director of the
Civil Rights Project at UCLA, author of many books including School
Resegregation: Must the South Turn Back? and Dismantling
Desegregation: The Quiet Reversal of Brown v. Board of Education.

Gary Orfield, welcome to Democracy Now! Explain the results of your
study.

GARY ORFIELD: Very good to be with you.

This study, which was conducted by Erica Frankenberg and Genevieve
Siegel-Hawley and Jia Wang, uses a number of different federal data
sets with data from all over the country to see how segregated charter
schools are and to compare them with public schools and to look at
them in a variety of ways.

Basically, what we find is that although public schools have become
much more segregated since the Supreme Court changed the law in the
1990s, charter schools are vastly more segregated than that; and that
it’s segregation not just by race, but also by poverty; and that there
are not only segregated black schools and some segregated Latino
schools, but there’s also segregated white schools that overrepresent
whites in some states, including California, and some of which have no—
appear to have no free lunch facility. So, basically, the system of
choice that’s used here doesn’t have the civil rights protections that
good magnet schools have, for example. And the Bush administration, as
it pushed the growth of these policies, really stopped trying to
enforce civil rights in this movement.

So what we’re saying is, these issues really need to be looked at. If
we’re going to require or put very heavy pressure on states to
increase the number of charters—and most states have relatively few;
thirty-five states have just small numbers of students in charters—
we’ve got to make sure that there are civil rights provisions attached
to them.

JUAN GONZALEZ: Well, Gary Orfield, wouldn’t critics of your study say
that because the effort at improving schools through charters have
been concentrated in the lowest-performing districts, largely minority
districts, that that would tend to lead to higher percentages, let’s
say, of African Americans or Latinos in these schools?

GARY ORFIELD: Well, charter schools are actually in many kinds of
districts and many kinds of communities, some of which are virtually
all non-minority. And for black students, particularly in the East and
the Middle West, there is a heavy concentration in central cities, but
the charters are even more segregated than the public schools there.
And charters aren’t limited by district boundaries the way public
schools are. They could draw students from across city-suburban
boundary lines, for example.

JUAN GONZALEZ: And what about the issue of Hispanic students, in
particular? One of the things that we’ve been seeing here in New York
City is that while achievement levels are very low in both the—in many
African American communities and Latino communities, that the bulk of
the student population for most of the charters is African American,
and not Latino, because many of the charters apparently are not
addressing the issue of limited-English-speaking students in their
population.

GARY ORFIELD: Well, we see some very serious questions about the
access of Latino students. Latino students, of course, are the largest
minority group in the United States. They’re about 21 percent of the
students in the American public schools. They tend to be
underrepresented in charter schools, even though they certainly have a
need and desire to escape from failing public schools in a good many
neighborhoods and communities. And here in California, for example,
there’s a significant underrepresentation of Latinos, who are by far
the largest ethnic group in the state, and an overrepresentation, a
substantial overrepresentation, of whites in charter schools.

One of the problems is English language learners appear to be
underrepresented in these schools. We see that pretty clearly in some
of our work and in another independent report that was recently issued
by a research center at the University of Colorado. We find that we
can’t even get good data about how many English language learners are
in these schools, because federal government obviously hasn’t been
requiring the submission of it. When we looked for the data on
California, where, you know, about 30-some percent of the kids who
start school here are English language learners, we found that only
seven were reported in the whole charter system in California, which
is a vast system that has four percent of all the students in the
state in it.

So there’s worrisome issues about whether or not the appropriate
provisions are being made for these students. Charter schools are
public schools receiving public funds, and they are accountable for
exactly the same kind of civil rights responsibilities as other public
schools. That includes educating English language learners and special
education kids. But they appear to be underrepresenting both of these
populations.

AMY GOODMAN: What most surprised you, Gary Orfield, about your study?

GARY ORFIELD: Well, I was really surprised by the underrepresentation
of Latino students, and I was surprised by the emergence of what
appear to be white flight schools. You know, there was a Supreme Court
decision back in the 1960s that said if you create a new school
district and it increases segregation, it violates the Constitution.
Charter schools, depending on the state, are often considered
independent, their own school system basically, so we’re creating new
schools, new school organizations, that are even more segregated than
the existing ones and not doing really anything to try to make sure
that doesn’t happen and that students who make these kinds of choices
have diversity and all the values that it gives you in terms of
academic preparation and preparation for life.

AMY GOODMAN: Well, Gary Orfield, we want to thank you for joining us,
co-director of the Civil Rights Project at UCLA, which just issued
their report, “Charter Schools’ Political Success is a Civil Rights
Failure.”