Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

OT: Steel and Girls' Underwear

2 views
Skip to first unread message

ATP

unread,
Nov 11, 2002, 9:51:21 PM11/11/02
to
I was picking up my kids this afternoon from day care and happened to notice
a pair of thong underwear on one of the caregivers (thank God for low-cut
jeans) that resembled a miniature version of the safety harness I use with
my aerial lift. This thing had steel D-rings and synthetic webbing. It was
apparently not designed primarily for sanitary purposes........

Has this type of thing gone mainstream? The girl did not look like a slore,
she looked fairly wholesome in every other regard.


James

unread,
Nov 11, 2002, 10:21:22 PM11/11/02
to

"ATP" <walter...@unforgiven.com> wrote in message
news:J0_z9.16554$wF2....@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...

> The girl did not look like a slore,
> she looked fairly wholesome in every other regard.
>


Those are the best... :)


ignorcrew

unread,
Nov 12, 2002, 9:23:31 AM11/12/02
to
"ATP" <walter...@unforgiven.com> wrote in message news:<J0_z9.16554$wF2....@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>...

On the shopping bag from Arbocombie(sp?) store that my son shops at,
there is a picture of a girl wearing something, though not quite, like
that. Nothing lacy, but a high G-string underwear worn under low cut
jeans, and therefore meant to show. I don't think it's what you are
taking about, but I still think it's new.

Mostly boys have been wearing underwear that is suppose to show from
low-hanging lose jeans for years. But this is the first time I have
seen a picture of a girl that obviously showing off that she is
wearing G-strings.

I have not actually seen this on a life person.

Randy Shrader

unread,
Nov 12, 2002, 10:15:54 AM11/12/02
to

"ignorcrew" <sevns...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1e42dfcf.02111...@posting.google.com...

>
>
> Mostly boys have been wearing underwear that is suppose to show from
> low-hanging lose jeans for years. But this is the first time I have
> seen a picture of a girl that obviously showing off that she is
> wearing G-strings.
>
> I have not actually seen this on a life person.

My girlfriend did this by accident a few years ago when she was bending over
getting something out of the trunk of her car. Really made the day for a
carload of teenage guys, if the amount of horn honking was any indication.

Randy


geek_girl

unread,
Nov 12, 2002, 10:35:34 AM11/12/02
to
ignorcrew wrote:
> "ATP" <walter...@unforgiven.com> wrote in message news:<J0_z9.16554$wF2....@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>...
>
>>I was picking up my kids this afternoon from day care and happened to notice
>>a pair of thong underwear on one of the caregivers (thank God for low-cut
>>jeans) that resembled a miniature version of the safety harness I use with
>>my aerial lift. This thing had steel D-rings and synthetic webbing. It was
>>apparently not designed primarily for sanitary purposes........
>>
>>Has this type of thing gone mainstream? The girl did not look like a slore,
>>she looked fairly wholesome in every other regard.
>
>
> On the shopping bag from Arbocombie(sp?) store that my son shops at,
> there is a picture of a girl wearing something, though not quite, like
> that. Nothing lacy, but a high G-string underwear worn under low cut
> jeans, and therefore meant to show. I don't think it's what you are
> taking about, but I still think it's new.

If by "it's new" you mean "it became commonplace about 6 or 7 years ago"
then yes, it's new.

>
> Mostly boys have been wearing underwear that is suppose to show from
> low-hanging lose jeans for years. But this is the first time I have
> seen a picture of a girl that obviously showing off that she is
> wearing G-strings.
>
> I have not actually seen this on a life person.

Perhaps you need to get out more.

Nina

unread,
Nov 12, 2002, 11:24:53 AM11/12/02
to
In article <3DD11FC4...@excite.com>, geek_girl
<sj_au...@excite.com> wrote:

This is actually the most dangerous part of weight-loss: bending over
and having your thong show.

Cheers,
Nina
Not that, uh, I'd know from real life experience-er-anything.

--
Let's hear it for the weirdos! --Lydia Ash
http://www.theslack.com

J. Thiessen

unread,
Nov 12, 2002, 11:56:09 AM11/12/02
to


Been on college campuses lately? I had women show up to my physics
lab dressed like this for the last couple of years.

J.

John HUDSON

unread,
Nov 12, 2002, 12:54:42 PM11/12/02
to
**
"J. Thiessen" <inan...@cyberspace.orgASD> wrote in message
news:slrnat2g3...@dragonfly.sonic.net...

I fail to see how they can possibly be comfortable with their 'drawers'
wedged hard up in their cracks all day! It certainly doesn't look very
glamorous and reminds me somewhat of a Sumo wrestler. Bring back the VPL I
say, as would many of my generation, it is far more full of promise, and
leaves much more to the imagination! ;o))

John

**

>
> J.


ignorcrew

unread,
Nov 12, 2002, 1:52:57 PM11/12/02
to
geek_girl <sj_au...@excite.com> wrote in message news:<3DD11FC4...@excite.com>...
Or, rather, keep staying in.

Jose Yimpho

unread,
Nov 12, 2002, 3:07:54 PM11/12/02
to

I hate it when that happens.

J. Thiessen

unread,
Nov 12, 2002, 3:10:04 PM11/12/02
to

When has fashion ever been about comfort?

> glamorous and reminds me somewhat of a Sumo wrestler. Bring back the VPL I

Alas, each generation has their own tastes. I'm not sure any of them are
rational.

> say, as would many of my generation, it is far more full of promise, and
> leaves much more to the imagination! ;o))

VPL full of promise? _Commando_ is *full* of promise. Not that I'm looking.

J.

Lucas Buck

unread,
Nov 12, 2002, 3:16:54 PM11/12/02
to
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 08:24:53 -0800, Nina <ninaS...@mindspring.com> wrote:

>> > Mostly boys have been wearing underwear that is suppose to show from
>> > low-hanging lose jeans for years. But this is the first time I have
>> > seen a picture of a girl that obviously showing off that she is
>> > wearing G-strings.
>> >
>> > I have not actually seen this on a life person.
>>
>> Perhaps you need to get out more.
>
>This is actually the most dangerous part of weight-loss: bending over
>and having your thong show.

jpegs, please.


Steve

unread,
Nov 12, 2002, 6:25:55 PM11/12/02
to
"John HUDSON" <j...@linear.com> wrote

> I fail to see how they can possibly be comfortable with their 'drawers'
> wedged hard up in their cracks all day!

Neither are high heels

ATP

unread,
Nov 12, 2002, 6:32:14 PM11/12/02
to
John Hanson wrote:

> On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 02:51:21 GMT, "ATP" <walter...@unforgiven.com>
> said:
>
>>> I was picking up my kids this afternoon from day care and happened
>>> to notice a pair of thong underwear on one of the caregivers (thank
>>> God for low-cut jeans) that resembled a miniature version of the
>>> safety harness I use with my aerial lift. This thing had steel
>>> D-rings and synthetic webbing. It was apparently not designed
>>> primarily for sanitary purposes........
>
> Did you happen to get her number?

I don't think that would go over too well............

>
>>>
>>> Has this type of thing gone mainstream? The girl did not look like
>>> a slore, she looked fairly wholesome in every other regard.
>>>
>

> I hope so.


ATP

unread,
Nov 12, 2002, 6:33:19 PM11/12/02
to
Yes, but would your underwear set off the airport metal detector?


Nina

unread,
Nov 12, 2002, 6:44:31 PM11/12/02
to
In article <3dgA9.4797$Vy4....@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>, "ATP"
<walter...@unforgiven.com> wrote:

No, but the underwire in my bra has.

Cheers,
Nina
The half-naked terrorist?

determined

unread,
Nov 12, 2002, 6:48:22 PM11/12/02
to
Does it strike anyone as odd that the dress code for a day care would allow
someones butt floss to show? Personally, I don't think I'd want my kid
exposed to that...

"ATP" <walter...@unforgiven.com> wrote in message
news:J0_z9.16554$wF2....@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...

ATP

unread,
Nov 12, 2002, 6:47:23 PM11/12/02
to

I was in school last spring, but most of the hot girls in the grad classes
were Taiwanese and dressed fairly conservatively. They were gorgeous. I
might have to visit the local community college to see some wannabe slores.


Lee Michaels

unread,
Nov 12, 2002, 6:54:34 PM11/12/02
to

"Nina" <ninaS...@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:ninaSPAMOFF-D628...@News.CIS.DFN.DE...
Good thing they don't have androgen detectors. They would never let you fly.

John HUDSON

unread,
Nov 12, 2002, 6:54:55 PM11/12/02
to
**
"Steve" <steves...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:6f8cb8c9.02111...@posting.google.com...

I'm not quite sure how "high heels" get their 'drawers' wedged up their
cracks! I'm not even sure that "high heels" wear 'drawers', and neither do
they have "cracks"! In fact I think you are just being silly!


aj

unread,
Nov 12, 2002, 7:09:32 PM11/12/02
to

'taint nuthin' wrong with nekkid people. Nor clothed people with butt floss.

--
-aj

J. Thiessen

unread,
Nov 12, 2002, 8:16:29 PM11/12/02
to

Oh yeah. I was in physics grad school and my *peers* weren't dressing this
way. The undergrad underwear continuum basically ran:


Atomic Wedgie-------------------------------------Woolen Long Johns
| | |
Liberal Arts Engineers Physics

But the U. Arizona wasn't exactly known as a bastion of serious undergrad
study. My non-physics students' major topic of conversation was about how
stoned/drunk/laid they got last night, with last night being any given day
of the week.

J.

Lisa

unread,
Nov 12, 2002, 11:10:52 PM11/12/02
to

"Nina" <ninaS...@mindspring.com> wrote ...

> geek_girl <sj_au...@excite.com> wrote:
> >
> > If by "it's new" you mean "it became commonplace about 6 or 7 years ago"
> > then yes, it's new.
> >
> > > someone from my killfile wrote

> > > Mostly boys have been wearing underwear that is suppose to show from
> > > low-hanging lose jeans for years. But this is the first time I have
> > > seen a picture of a girl that obviously showing off that she is
> > > wearing G-strings.
> > >
> > > I have not actually seen this on a life person.
> >
> > Perhaps you need to get out more.
> >
>
> This is actually the most dangerous part of weight-loss: bending over
> and having your thong show.
>
> Cheers,
> Nina
> Not that, uh, I'd know from real life experience-er-anything.


Another bad time to have your thong 'show' is going to see a specialist,
thinking you'll be having a nice consultation in his oak-paneled office, but
being advised by his cheery nurse to strip down to your undies and put on
this eeensy cotton drape. Sitting there in a black silk thong and lace bra
when his young resident comes in to do the preliminary exam is
Blush-Inducing.

Or so I'm told.
---
Lisa
Can't one only imagine the conversation they had in the hall "Wait'll you
see what THIS one is wearing!"


Lucas Buck

unread,
Nov 13, 2002, 12:32:19 AM11/13/02
to
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 04:10:52 GMT, "Lisa" <fd4t...@earthlink.zappspam.net>
wrote:

>Another bad time to have your thong 'show' is going to see a specialist,
>thinking you'll be having a nice consultation in his oak-paneled office, but
>being advised by his cheery nurse to strip down to your undies and put on
>this eeensy cotton drape. Sitting there in a black silk thong and lace bra
>when his young resident comes in to do the preliminary exam is
>Blush-Inducing.

jpegs please.
please, oh god please, jpegs.
please.

Hell, I'll settle for an MRI.

John HUDSON

unread,
Nov 13, 2002, 3:52:23 AM11/13/02
to
**
"Lisa" <fd4t...@earthlink.zappspam.net> wrote in message
news:ghkA9.2022$Bh1.1...@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net...

This almost wandering into voyeurism and fantasy, both of which I thoroughly
approve!! ;o))

Perhaps you would be kind enough to expand on this 'story, and then speed up
your typing as you get near the end!! <VBG>

John

**

ignorcrew

unread,
Nov 13, 2002, 12:12:04 PM11/13/02
to
J. Thiessen <inan...@cyberspace.orgASD> wrote in message news:<slrnat2g3...@dragonfly.sonic.net>...

Obviously not.

I had women show up to my physics
> lab dressed like this for the last couple of years.
>
> J.

Darn, I am beginning to show my age!

Lisa

unread,
Nov 13, 2002, 4:57:07 PM11/13/02
to

"Lucas Buck" <le...@dodgerssuck.NOSPAM.com> wrote ...

That's next week.
The MRI, no JPEGs :P

To bring this back around to a more frequent MFW topic, what really bites is
the gender thang here. I usually don't find that being female impacts my
life in a negative or even an inconvenient way. I _like_ being a woman. But
it did cross my mind that probably no MAN ever reconsiders his underwear
choice before going to the doctor.
Except to check that they're clean.
---
Lisa
har-umph!

Kevin J

unread,
Nov 13, 2002, 5:00:17 PM11/13/02
to

"Lisa" <fd4t...@earthlink.zappspam.net> wrote in message
news:TUzA9.3056$Ta6.3...@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net...


Uh, lets see my choices . . .

On the one hand, boxer-briefs. On the other hand, boxer-briefs.

Wow, tough decision!

Kevin J


Lee Michaels

unread,
Nov 13, 2002, 5:28:52 PM11/13/02
to

"Lisa" <fd4t...@earthlink.zappspam.net> wrote in message
news:TUzA9.3056$Ta6.3...@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
>

Clean?? Now you tell me.

pAula

unread,
Nov 13, 2002, 8:09:42 PM11/13/02
to

"Lisa" <fd4t...@earthlink.zappspam.net> wrote:
>
> "Lucas Buck" <le...@dodgerssuck.NOSPAM.com> wrote ...
> > "Lisa" <fd4t...@earthlink.zappspam.net>> wrote:
> >
> > >Another bad time to have your thong 'show' is going to
see a specialist,
> > >thinking you'll be having a nice consultation in his
oak-paneled office,
> but
> > >being advised by his cheery nurse to strip down to your
undies and put on
> > >this eeensy cotton drape. Sitting there in a black silk
thong and lace
> bra
> > >when his young resident comes in to do the preliminary
exam is
> > >Blush-Inducing.

Reminds me of when my absolute favorite fuchsia gym
tights/pants blew the crotch seam from stem to stern when I
leaned over to pick up a plate. I didn't hear or sense
anything, just all of a sudden my cheeks felt sorta breezy.

> > jpegs please.
> > please, oh god please, jpegs.
> > please.
> >
> > Hell, I'll settle for an MRI.
>
> That's next week.
> The MRI, no JPEGs :P
>
> To bring this back around to a more frequent MFW topic,
what really bites is
> the gender thang here. I usually don't find that being
female impacts my
> life in a negative or even an inconvenient way. I _like_
being a woman. But
> it did cross my mind that probably no MAN ever reconsiders
his underwear
> choice before going to the doctor.
> Except to check that they're clean.
> ---
> Lisa
> har-umph!

'Clean' is a relative term, Lisa.


--
pAula

Lost causes and funny religions are on
another newgroup.
~Lee Michaels~

MJL

unread,
Nov 13, 2002, 11:01:33 PM11/13/02
to
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 08:24:53 -0800, Nina <ninaS...@mindspring.com>
wrote:


>


>This is actually the most dangerous part of weight-loss: bending over
>and having your thong show.
>
>Cheers,
>Nina
>Not that, uh, I'd know from real life experience-er-anything.

Lose a couple of hundred pounds and you think you're sexy or
something?

--

We are stardust.

MJL

unread,
Nov 13, 2002, 11:04:39 PM11/13/02
to
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 04:10:52 GMT, "Lisa"
<fd4t...@earthlink.zappspam.net> wrote:


>Another bad time to have your thong 'show' is going to see a specialist,
>thinking you'll be having a nice consultation in his oak-paneled office, but
>being advised by his cheery nurse to strip down to your undies and put on
>this eeensy cotton drape. Sitting there in a black silk thong and lace bra
>when his young resident comes in to do the preliminary exam is
>Blush-Inducing.
>
>Or so I'm told.

I think even worse is having to explain that you didn't remember to
put on underwear "that day".

Not that I'd have experience in that particularly excruciatingly
embarrassing event.

--

We are stardust.

Bob Mann

unread,
Nov 13, 2002, 11:49:54 PM11/13/02
to
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 17:09:42 -0800, "pAula" <pes...@peoplepc.com>
wrote:

>'Clean' is a relative term, Lisa.

Some guys like to use that old 4 sides thing.
Front, back, inside out and repeat.
--
Bob Mann

"Oh Lord. Bless this thy hand grenade, that with it, Thou mayest
blow thine enemies to tiny bits, in thy mercy. Amen."

Kevin J

unread,
Nov 13, 2002, 11:56:11 PM11/13/02
to

"Bob Mann" <bob...@mts.netwhoo> wrote in message
news:4qa6tug5673qvfj0g...@4ax.com...

> On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 17:09:42 -0800, "pAula" <pes...@peoplepc.com>
> wrote:
>
> >'Clean' is a relative term, Lisa.
>
> Some guys like to use that old 4 sides thing.
> Front, back, inside out and repeat.

I knew a guy who does that and justifies it as being environmentally
friendly. Also doesn't flush his toilet unless he does number 2, and is a
vegan to boot, but who would eat meat once in a while (2 months or so) if it
came from proper sources. Oh, and he thought that capitalist corporations
are the devil incarnate, and the end of humanity is spelled WTO. We didn't
see eye to eye on most things.

Kevin J


Bob Mann

unread,
Nov 14, 2002, 12:05:19 AM11/14/02
to
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002 04:56:11 GMT, "Kevin J" <kjnosp...@mta.ca>
wrote:

Sounds like a real loogan.

Nina

unread,
Nov 14, 2002, 1:29:37 AM11/14/02
to
In article <av76tuoc7n2ttcqt8...@4ax.com>, MJL
<jert...@aol.com> wrote:

If I had lost a couple hundred pounds from my highest, I would weigh
zero.

I'm worried about you. Try a better troll next time.

Cheers,
Nina

MJL

unread,
Nov 14, 2002, 10:03:48 PM11/14/02
to
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 22:29:37 -0800, Nina <ninaS...@mindspring.com>
wrote:

>In article <av76tuoc7n2ttcqt8...@4ax.com>, MJL
><jert...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 08:24:53 -0800, Nina <ninaS...@mindspring.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> >
>> >This is actually the most dangerous part of weight-loss: bending over
>> >and having your thong show.
>> >
>> >Cheers,
>> >Nina
>> >Not that, uh, I'd know from real life experience-er-anything.
>>
>> Lose a couple of hundred pounds and you think you're sexy or
>> something?
>
>If I had lost a couple hundred pounds from my highest, I would weigh
>zero.
>
>I'm worried about you. Try a better troll next time.
>
>Cheers,
>Nina

It was like, sacasm, sweetpea.

--

We are stardust.

Watson Davis

unread,
Nov 18, 2002, 4:49:28 PM11/18/02
to

Sacasm? Is that like sarcasm but not as sarcastic?

Watson (the pencil neck) Davis

Watson Davis

unread,
Nov 18, 2002, 4:52:19 PM11/18/02
to

Underwear?

Watson Davis

unread,
Nov 18, 2002, 4:54:12 PM11/18/02
to
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 17:09:42 -0800, "pAula" <pes...@peoplepc.com>
wrote:

>


>"Lisa" <fd4t...@earthlink.zappspam.net> wrote:
>>
>> "Lucas Buck" <le...@dodgerssuck.NOSPAM.com> wrote ...
>> > "Lisa" <fd4t...@earthlink.zappspam.net>> wrote:
>> >
>> > >Another bad time to have your thong 'show' is going to
>see a specialist,
>> > >thinking you'll be having a nice consultation in his
>oak-paneled office,
>> but
>> > >being advised by his cheery nurse to strip down to your
>undies and put on
>> > >this eeensy cotton drape. Sitting there in a black silk
>thong and lace
>> bra
>> > >when his young resident comes in to do the preliminary
>exam is
>> > >Blush-Inducing.
>
>Reminds me of when my absolute favorite fuchsia gym
>tights/pants blew the crotch seam from stem to stern when I
>leaned over to pick up a plate. I didn't hear or sense
>anything, just all of a sudden my cheeks felt sorta breezy.

I've done that a couple of times. One time there was a big ripping
noise and an immediate depressurization of butt cheekage but the
second time, I didn't really notice anything except a sudden breeze.

Both times were while squatting.

Lisa

unread,
Nov 18, 2002, 11:52:21 PM11/18/02
to

"Watson Davis" <wat...@watsonmusic.com> wrote :

> an immediate depressurization of butt cheekage

Oh, Watson. You DO have a way with words.
---
Lisa


Watson Davis

unread,
Nov 19, 2002, 1:45:56 AM11/19/02
to

Now if I could just figure out a way with those pesky sentences and
paragraphs...

Scorpio Phile

unread,
Nov 19, 2002, 1:50:29 AM11/19/02
to
"Lisa" <fd4t...@earthlink.zappspam.net> wrote in message news:<TUzA9.3056$Ta6.3...@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net>...
>
> To bring this back around to a more frequent MFW topic, what really bites is
> the gender thang here. I usually don't find that being female impacts my
> life in a negative or even an inconvenient way. I _like_ being a woman. But
> it did cross my mind that probably no MAN ever reconsiders his underwear
> choice before going to the doctor.
> Except to check that they're clean.
> ---
> Lisa
> har-umph!

What's even worse is to get to the doctor's office and remember that
you're not wearing ANY!!!!

Mick and Deb

unread,
Nov 20, 2002, 3:48:59 AM11/20/02
to

"Watson Davis" <wat...@watsonmusic.com> wrote in message
news:47A6B304FAF60959.1D532FBA...@lp.airnews.net...

Did you put up a containment field, for the sake of others?

Mick

Watson Davis

unread,
Nov 20, 2002, 10:55:24 AM11/20/02
to

I have to admit.

I didn't think of the children.

I didn't put up a containment field until well after the event and
hundreds of those little fuckers are emotionally damaged because of
it.

o.

the guilt.

OK. Can we have lunch now?

0 new messages