MFW Top 26
Bulldog
large percentage of mfw posts, it generated a lot of speculation. Just for
kicks, I wrote a utility that automatically polled a usenet server every
hour and sucked down the headers of all mfw posts. It's been running about
35 days now. I've got 13 mb of headers thus far. (That's *just* headers,
mind you, not the message bodies.) Roughly about 8000 messages.
While I haven't written any of the pattern matching routines that might
turn up some really eye-opening stuff, a look at the raw data gave a few
interesting details.
MFW had 1129 different users post in that time frame.
540 of those users made only 1 post.
196 made only 2 posts
253 made between 3 and 10 posts (inclusive)
44 people accounted for 50% of traffic.
(traffic meaning total posts)
The data is reasonably accurate, but not exaclty precise. The more I
massage it, the more accurate it will become, but it is pretty meaningful as
it is.
I also have records of the length of posts, the time of day, day of
week, newsreader used, user ISP addresses, reverse traceroutes, and lots of
other stuff that will be really cool to play with. As I come up with more,
I'll post it. I'll post the top 26 posters ranked per volume of posts in
the follow-up to this message.
- Bulldog
Bulldog
to include her. Posting history since 4/5/2000 listed in order of User ID,
number of posts.
1. Watson Davis 220
2. "Eric Midkiff" 192
3. "Mistress Krista" 189
4. Patrick Arnold 187
5. Robert Schuh 168
6. X-Comments2 159
7. "KEVIN CLEMENTS" 143
8. (Vitore Selca) 128
9. Patrick & Gemma Styles 128
10. "Pete" 123
11. Dean C. Harris 120
12. "Daniel F Garcia" 119
13. Bob Mann 118
14. (Matt Madsen) 99
15. Par Deus 96
16. (Tom Morley) 89
17. "Bulldog" 86
18. Julien Gauthier 80
19. Michael Kelly Larsen 79
20. Tony K Bounds 79
21. Steve Gallagher 76
22. (George UK) 76
23. "Stephen Mulholland" 70
24. (Will Brink) 69
25. (MikeL) 68
26. Selene 66
Dean C. Harris
wrote:
>1. Watson Davis 220
>2. "Eric Midkiff" 192
>3. "Mistress Krista" 189
>4. Patrick Arnold 187
>5. Robert Schuh 168
>6. X-Comments2 159
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Who the fuck is that? I guess I killfiled him decades ago.
>7. "KEVIN CLEMENTS" 143
>8. (Vitore Selca) 128
>9. Patrick & Gemma Styles 128
>10. "Pete" 123
>11. Dean C. Harris 120
Damn. Missed the Top 10 by a pathetic 4 posts!
There's always..um...when do you plan to post these type of stats again?
Once a month maybe?
Press&Pull On...Always:
Dean (the pansy presser) Harris
Dean C. Harris
wrote:
>MFW had 1129 different users post in that time frame.
>540 of those users made only 1 post.
>196 made only 2 posts
>253 made between 3 and 10 posts (inclusive)
>44 people accounted for 50% of traffic.
>(traffic meaning total posts)
Very interesting insight. Thanks for taking the time to write the
proggie.
When will it be available as freeware on Tucows?
>The data is reasonably accurate, but not exaclty precise. The more I
>massage it, the more accurate it will become, but it is pretty meaningful as
>it is.
Ya know...spammers/marketers may find this useful. IOW, you may have
something here.
Any way you could make it a plug in to say FreeAgent/Agent? If you work
on it 'smore maybe contact Forte' Inc to see if they are interested.
This is pretty useful when someone finds a new usenet group and wants to
know who the frequent posters are...it would give an idea of who may be
good people to pay more attention too.
For example I started reading rec.guns, and a few rec.aviation groups
recently. If I could get the info above plus the top 25 or so posters
it would save me time as to who are the regulars.
Does your software sniff out duplicate posts?
I can see it being useful to add people to kill filters based on certain
criteria.
> I also have records of the length of posts,
Ooo...who are the top 10 least bandwidth/reader friendly non editors
when posting?
Pete...Eric...Whitney when he was here...Watson...are some guesses.
>the time of day, day of
>week, newsreader used, user ISP addresses, reverse traceroutes, and lots of
>other stuff that will be really cool to play with. As I come up with more,
>I'll post it. I'll post the top 26 posters ranked per volume of posts in
>the follow-up to this message.
That's pretty cool stuff. I would like to volunteer as a pre Alpha
tester. :)
George UK
wrote:
>I started to list the top 25, but when I saw Selene was #26, I felt obliged
>to include her. Posting history since 4/5/2000 listed in order of User ID,
>number of posts.
>
>1. Watson Davis 220
No surprise there
>2. "Eric Midkiff" 192
Heavy hitter
>3. "Mistress Krista" 189
All hail
>4. Patrick Arnold 187
Heavy heavy hitter
>5. Robert Schuh 168
MFWs Kurgan
>6. X-Comments2 159
Agoo?
>7. "KEVIN CLEMENTS" 143
Big boy hardcore!
>8. (Vitore Selca) 128
I'll show you my buttsome day..
>9. Patrick & Gemma Styles 128
Shiny happy people.
>10. "Pete" 123
Banana hands
>11. Dean C. Harris 120
Could be a contender (for No 1)
>12. "Daniel F Garcia" 119
Tells Goliath to fuck off!
>13. Bob Mann 118
Di Canio Deeee Caaaaanioooo!
>14. (Matt Madsen) 99
MFWs helper
>15. Par Deus 96
How much g of protein
>16. (Tom Morley) 89
Am gonna get ya!
>17. "Bulldog" 86
Whens the next meet?
>18. Julien Gauthier 80
Related to Jean Paul?
>19. Michael Kelly Larsen 79
You are going to be meat...
>20. Tony K Bounds 79
So are you....
>21. Steve Gallagher 76
And fucking you....
>22. (George UK) 76
Slacker!
>23. "Stephen Mulholland" 70
Watch out for the rabbits!
>24. (Will Brink) 69
Dr Jeckyl (Roberts is Mr Hyde)
>25. (MikeL) 68
Now auditioning to be a Chippendale
>26. Selene 66
>
I'm not slagging you, you're nice!
George UK
Eric Midkiff
Bulldog <bul...@thebowens.net> wrote in message
news:YHqS4.631$H63...@newsfeed.slurp.net...
> I started to list the top 25, but when I saw Selene was #26, I felt
obliged
> to include her. Posting history since 4/5/2000 listed in order of User
ID,
> number of posts.
>
> 1. Watson Davis 220
> 3. "Mistress Krista" 189
> 4. Patrick Arnold 187
> 5. Robert Schuh 168
> 6. X-Comments2 159
> 8. (Vitore Selca) 128
> 11. Dean C. Harris 120
> 14. (Matt Madsen) 99
> 15. Par Deus 96
> 16. (Tom Morley) 89
> 17. "Bulldog" 86
> 18. Julien Gauthier 80
> 22. (George UK) 76
> 23. "Stephen Mulholland" 70
> 24. (Will Brink) 69
> 25. (MikeL) 68
> 26. Selene 66
>
--
Eric Midkiff
Squats rule.
-- Pete
Stephen Mulholland
Eric Midkiff wrote in message ...
Yes, this is bothering me too. Am I not GOOD enough for parentheses, is that
it? And what about those with no added extras? Do they all sit around and
ridicule the quoties and the parennies?
Anyway, us quoties make a formidable team. Don't make us angry. You
wouldn't like us when we're angry.
Stephen Paranoid Mulholland
mulho...@rocketmail.com
Zaf
> Back when mfw was buzzing about the famous imposters accounting for a
> large percentage of mfw posts, it generated a lot of speculation. Just
for
> kicks, I wrote a utility that automatically polled a usenet server every
> hour and sucked down the headers of all mfw posts. It's been running
about
> 35 days now. I've got 13 mb of headers thus far. (That's *just* headers,
> mind you, not the message bodies.) Roughly about 8000 messages.
> While I haven't written any of the pattern matching routines that
might
> turn up some really eye-opening stuff, a look at the raw data gave a few
> interesting details.
>
> 540 of those users made only 1 post.
> 196 made only 2 posts
> 253 made between 3 and 10 posts (inclusive)
> 44 people accounted for 50% of traffic.
> (traffic meaning total posts)
>
>
> massage it, the more accurate it will become, but it is pretty meaningful
as
> it is.
>
> week, newsreader used, user ISP addresses, reverse traceroutes, and lots
of
> other stuff that will be really cool to play with. As I come up with
more,
> I'll post it. I'll post the top 26 posters ranked per volume of posts in
> the follow-up to this message.
An interesting thing I noticed was the traffic went down by 25 % when Lyle
stooped posting frequently.
--
Zaf
No self-respecting male who has ever gotten to first base in his life
would ever write someone like Greg Zulak for sexual advice. Now,
if Frank Sepe was writing such a column, he could probably dispense
some great advice, because Frank has to beat the babes off with a stick.
Sadly, the only beating Greg Zulak engages in is the flogging of his
privates.
Jason Meuller
Bulldog
Zaf <za...@lineone.net> wrote
>
> An interesting thing I noticed was the traffic went down by 25 % when Lyle
> stooped posting frequently.
Yes, Lyle has been noticably absent the past few weeks, which skews the
data. Also, Bill ROberts' data may be a bit off as well. One, he's using
the anon server. (However I can easily account for that, I just haven't
done it yet.) Two, He's been a lot quieter the past week or so as well. He
may very well (and probably is) in the top 26 when I take those two things
into account.
- Tommy
Bulldog
Eric Midkiff <ericm...@att.net> wrote
> > Why are some people in quotation marks, and others in parentheses?
> > 2. "Eric Midkiff" 192
> > 22. (George UK) 76
I just used info from the "From" value field to sort the number of posts
by. If you'll look at those headers from you and George, for example, it is
clear.
From: "Eric Midkiff" <ericm...@att.net>
From: geo...@weight-train.co.uk (George UK)
I shows'em likes I sees'em.
- Bulldog
KEVIN CLEMENTS
news:391a58c4...@news.freeserve.net...
obliged
> >to include her. Posting history since 4/5/2000 listed in order of User
ID,
> >number of posts.
>
>
> Big boy hardcore!
>
Thanks George, being called hardcore from you is awesome :)
Kevin Clements
KEVIN CLEMENTS
news:pCuS4.59136$fV.36...@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...> news:YHqS4.631$H63...@newsfeed.slurp.net...
> > I started to list the top 25, but when I saw Selene was #26, I felt
> obliged
> > to include her. Posting history since 4/5/2000 listed in order of User
> ID,
> > number of posts.
> >
> Eric Midkiff
I was trying to ignore it, but why am I the ONLY one in caps?
Kevin Clements
KEVIN CLEMENTS
Missing also is Whitney, he would surely have made the Top Ten if he'd not
been on holiday.
Kevin Clements
Julien Gauthier
Roberts aka Annonymous is not in that list. Unless he posted less than Selene,
which I`d find surprizing.
Interresting list tho. Very interresting.
JG
Julien Gauthier
KEVIN CLEMENTS wrote:
Once every then comes back Sgt ROBO for a blitz post Krieg. In that few week
span, he takes over the top 5 hands down.
I'd really like to hear that his shoulder is getting better and better.
JG
Bulldog
Dean C. Harris <deanh...@csi.com> wrote
> >1. Watson Davis 220
> >2. "Eric Midkiff" 192
> >3. "Mistress Krista" 189
> >4. Patrick Arnold 187
> >5. Robert Schuh 168
> >6. X-Comments2 159
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Who is that? I guess I killfiled him decades ago.
Heh, it was very late when I slapped this up last night. That musta
slipped by me. That may be Roberts, or it may be a rouge news server that
mis-ordered a value field. When I get home, I can figure it out. Actually,
I think it may be Bill. His headers do, in fact, contain that string, and
most other peoples don't. Hey, this was the first pass, it was past
midnight and I was on Percocet. Gimme some slack.
> >10. "Pete" 123
> >11. Dean C. Harris 120
>
> Damn. Missed the Top 10 by a pathetic 4 posts!
Actually, I *think* you may be one of the ones who will gain a few more
posts when I run the data through another filter or two. The first pass I
was VERY strict on making POSITIVE matches. This kept phonies from messing
up the data. (Like those guys who post as Schuh. I'm very sure only posts
made by Robert himself were attributed to him.) The downside of this is
that a few posts that may actually be valid, I didn't count because of some
small inconsistancy, even though they were legitimate. When I looked at the
posts I rejected, and can see why, I'll add a filter to let them pass, which
will up the scores a bit. (I know for a fact that Will Brinks numbers will
go up some. Everytime he reloaded or re-setup his newsreader the past week
or so, we kicked out his posts cuz we saw something looked odd. While not
accurate, that's exactly what it should have done.)
>
> There's always..um...when do you plan to post these type of stats again?
> Once a month maybe?
I dunno. Since it's 80% automatic right now, what I might end up doing
is having it run completely automatically and link the results to a web
site. That way, you could go search for whatever you want, whenever you
want, using whatever specs you want.
- Bulldog
Bob Mann
<kr...@email.msn.com> wrote:
>
>I was trying to ignore it, but why am I the ONLY one in caps?
>
>Kevin Clements
>
Because that's how your name shows up in the headers.
--
Bob Mann
Http://members.home.net/bobmann
It may be that your sole purpose in life
is to serve as a warning to others.
Bulldog
Bob Mann <bob...@home.com> wrote :
> On Thu, 11 May 2000 08:20:40 -0400, "KEVIN CLEMENTS"
> >
> >
> >Kevin Clements
> >
> Because that's how your name shows up in the headers.
<sigh> Yes, that is correct Bob. More precisely, Kevin is the ONLY
one in caps because he is the ONLY one who typed his name in his newsreader
in caps. The quotes/parentheses thing is a function of either which
newsreader you use or which news server you use, not something the user
intentionally does themselves, as is the case in Kevin's situation.
Either that, or I decided to capitalize his name because I wanted to
single him out for ridicule, and thought the subtle annoyance of having his
named SHOUTED would make everybody laugh at him and he would henceforth be
shunned by mfw.
- Bulldog
afriKan
>
> I dunno. Since it's 80% automatic right now, what I might end up doing
> is having it run completely automatically and link the results to a web
> site. That way, you could go search for whatever you want, whenever you
> want, using whatever specs you want.
>
> - Bulldog
Oh, so now you wait until I have to concentrate on nasty real life
issues before you start running your scan, meaning that I dont even
make the list. Way to go Bulldog.
Bruce
--
Dont step on the fairies.
Art
Bulldog <bul...@thebowens.net> wrote in message news:f4yS4.927$H63....@newsfeed.slurp.net...
> > Once a month maybe?
>
> is having it run completely automatically and link the results to a web
> site. That way, you could go search for whatever you want, whenever you
> want, using whatever specs you want.
>
When this has been done in other news groups that I read, the number of
information-less/value-less posts shot up as people competed to be in the
top 10 or, if they were in the top 10, the top poster.
Please keep this possibility mind (as well as the "quality" of the posts) when
you decide whether or not to make the information available.
Thanks,
Art
Stephen Mulholland
Art wrote in message ...
>
>Bulldog <bul...@thebowens.net> wrote in message
news:f4yS4.927$H63....@newsfeed.slurp.net...
>>
>> Dean C. Harris <deanh...@csi.com> wrote
>>
>> >
>> > There's always..um...when do you plan to post these type of stats
again?
>> > Once a month maybe?
>>
>> I dunno. Since it's 80% automatic right now, what I might end up
doing
>> is having it run completely automatically and link the results to a web
>> site. That way, you could go search for whatever you want, whenever you
>> want, using whatever specs you want.
>>
>
>When this has been done in other news groups that I read, the number of
>information-less/value-less posts shot up as people competed to be in the
>top 10 or, if they were in the top 10, the top poster.
We don't normally do information or value, so this doesn't apply here.
Stephen Mulholland
mulho...@rocketmail.com
Dean C. Harris
wrote:
<snip of very funny stuff>
>>11. Dean C. Harris 120
>
>Could be a contender (for No 1)
Thanks for your support. Though, I would need to post an additional
100+ to get there. Not likely. Though, I will take out some of those
folks 'above' me one day!
Dean C. Harris
<mulho...@belfastcity.gov.uk> wrote:
>>> 1. Watson Davis 220
>>> 2. "Eric Midkiff" 192
>>> 3. "Mistress Krista" 189
>>> 4. Patrick Arnold 187
>>> 5. Robert Schuh 168
>>> 6. X-Comments2 159
>>> 7. "KEVIN CLEMENTS" 143
>>> 8. (Vitore Selca) 128
>>> 9. Patrick & Gemma Styles 128
>>> 10. "Pete" 123
>>> 11. Dean C. Harris 120
>>> 12. "Daniel F Garcia" 119
>>> 13. Bob Mann 118
>>> 14. (Matt Madsen) 99
>>> 15. Par Deus 96
>>> 16. (Tom Morley) 89
>>> 17. "Bulldog" 86
>>> 18. Julien Gauthier 80
>>> 19. Michael Kelly Larsen 79
>>> 20. Tony K Bounds 79
>>> 21. Steve Gallagher 76
>>> 22. (George UK) 76
>>> 23. "Stephen Mulholland" 70
>>> 24. (Will Brink) 69
>>> 25. (MikeL) 68
>>> 26. Selene 66
>>>
>>Why are some people in quotation marks, and others in parentheses?
>
>Yes, this is bothering me too. Am I not GOOD enough for parentheses, is that
>it? And what about those with no added extras? Do they all sit around and
>ridicule the quoties and the parennies?
>
>Anyway, us quoties make a formidable team. Don't make us angry. You
>wouldn't like us when we're angry.
People needing extras to call attention to themselves. That's all.
And they paid Bulldog off...sexually. Now, you quoties and parenthetic
pukes know what you did and the shame it should carry....
George UK
>Thanks George, being called hardcore from you is awesome :)
>
>Kevin Clements
>
>
George UK
Dean C. Harris
wrote:
> I just used info from the "From" value field to sort the number of posts
>by. If you'll look at those headers from you and George, for example, it is
>clear.
>
>From: "Eric Midkiff" <ericm...@att.net>
>From: geo...@weight-train.co.uk (George UK)
>
>I shows'em likes I sees'em.
IOW, Eric and his lot are not really going by their real names...like I
suspected all along.
Kevin, you better be careful now that you have seen his face!
Dean C. Harris
<kr...@email.msn.com> wrote:
>I was trying to ignore it, but why am I the ONLY one in caps?
hahahhaha. LOL.
Everyone around here is so SELF CONSCIOUS and PA..PA...PARANOID.
Dean C. Harris
<kr...@email.msn.com> wrote:
>Missing also is Whitney, he would surely have made the Top Ten if he'd not
>been on holiday.
In two categories (there will be other categories next time, right?)
both the Top 25 posters and the Top 10 Bandwidth Unfriendly.
Dean C. Harris
<TheDabbl...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>When this has been done in other news groups that I read, the number of
>information-less/value-less posts shot up as people competed to be in the
>top 10 or, if they were in the top 10, the top poster.
>
>Please keep this possibility mind (as well as the "quality" of the posts) when
>you decide whether or not to make the information available.
>
>Thanks,
Nooooooooooooooooooooooo...........
Dean C. Harris
wrote:
> <sigh> Yes, that is correct Bob. More precisely, Kevin is the ONLY
>one in caps because he is the ONLY one who typed his name in his newsreader
>in caps. The quotes/parentheses thing is a function of either which
>newsreader you use or which news server you use, not something the user
>intentionally does themselves, as is the case in Kevin's situation.
>
> Either that, or I decided to capitalize his name because I wanted to
>single him out for ridicule, and thought the subtle annoyance of having his
>named SHOUTED would make everybody laugh at him and he would henceforth be
>shunned by mfw.
>
>- Bulldog
You realize you will come to regret the day you told us about your
little drug induced proggie.
When the Jihad's start flying we will eventually blame the
Creator....it's just a matter of time...
Anonymous
>>1. Watson Davis 220
>>2. "Eric Midkiff" 192
>>3. "Mistress Krista" 189
>>4. Patrick Arnold 187
>>5. Robert Schuh 168
>>6. X-Comments2 159
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>7. "KEVIN CLEMENTS" 143
>>8. (Vitore Selca) 128
>>9. Patrick & Gemma Styles 128
>>10. "Pete" 123
>>11. Dean C. Harris 120
>Damn. Missed the Top 10 by a pathetic 4 posts!
And i'm in there. How sad Dean...
Beat you by 3 posts.
>There's always..um...when do you plan to post these type of stats >again?
Once a month maybe?
I'll make sure i have at least 3 more posts then you each month.
--
The asshole formerly known as Pete
--------== Posted Anonymously via Newsfeeds.Com ==-------
Featuring the worlds only Anonymous Usenet Server
-----------== http://www.newsfeeds.com ==----------
Anonymous
>In two categories (there will be other categories next time, right?)
>both the Top 25 posters and the Top 10 Bandwidth Unfriendly.
Long posts and "bandwidth unfriendly" are 2 entirely fifferent things. If
the posts are long but informative, as mine are, or to point out other
people are wrong, as i did with you a few weeks ago but you gave up, people
who are wrong are notorious for doing that, as they see, and recognize, my
infinite wisdom, and have no choice but to accept it.
And i'm still waiting for those Dutch slang words...
KEVIN CLEMENTS
news:82nlhsgif2mglp0br...@4ax.com...
> Dean (the pansy presser) Harris
Shame? Oh no babydoll, I call that F-U-N !!!!
Kevin Clements
KEVIN CLEMENTS
>
> IOW, Eric and his lot are not really going by their real names...like I
> suspected all along.
>
> Kevin, you better be careful now that you have seen his face!
>
>
> Dean (the pansy presser) Harris
Now that IS something I should be ashamed of.....<G>
Kevin Clements
Anonymous
Julien Gauthier wrote:
>
> I think that somehow there are some missing elements. At least one. Bill
> Roberts aka Annonymous is not in that list. Unless he posted less than Selene,
> which I`d find surprizing.
I might have, since she posts a fair bit and I also had a week or week-and-a-
half period of no mfw (had a deadline to meet.)
Another possibility is that due to the anonymous server, the posts weren't
counted by the program as being all by the same individual.
--
the artist formerly known as Bill
KEVIN CLEMENTS
> On Thu, 11 May 2000 08:20:40 -0400, "KEVIN CLEMENTS"
> <kr...@email.msn.com> wrote:
>
> >I was trying to ignore it, but why am I the ONLY one in caps?
>
> hahahhaha. LOL.
>
> Everyone around here is so SELF CONSCIOUS and PA..PA...PARANOID.
>
>
> Dean (the pansy presser) Harris
Me self-conscious? Paranoid? No not me, I know y'all love me,....I mean
dontcha? Really you do...I just know you do......you have too....<sniff,
sniff> (puppy dog eye-look)
Kevin Clements
KEVIN CLEMENTS
>
> >Thanks George, being called hardcore from you is awesome :)
> >
> >Kevin Clements
> >
> >
> You are getting there Kev.
>
> George UK
Cool beans ;) Hey by the way, do you follow a Scottish Premier team? I have
started watching a highlight show on Fox Sports Net that is a weekly
highlights show of teams in the English/Scottish Premier Leagues. I know
Manchester United just won the English Premiership, who won the Scottish
one?
Also if soccer season is ending in Britain, what sports takes over in the
summer? Cricket?
Kevin Clements
Anonymous
>Thanks for your support. Though, I would need to post an additional
>100+ to get there. Not likely. Though, I will take out some of those
>folks 'above' me one day!
Not me.
I'll make sure i always post a few more then you. And i get X-tra points
because my posts contain valuable information. Yours don't.
--
The asshole formerly known as Pete
--------== Posted Anonymously via Newsfeeds.Com ==-------
Ian Manning
posts the most around here.
Ian
Anonymous
>Everyone around here is so SELF CONSCIOUS and >PA..PA...PARANOID.
I'm not paranoid.
There is a conspiricy going on, for the reason that certain peole in this
group, they know who they are, KNOW that my training philosopies are right
but want to show the rest of the world i'm wrong, because most people just
can't handle the truth.
I'm gonna right a book about it;
"The newsgroup Conspiracy"
Oliver is allready talking to Christopher Walken about the movie...
I want Jack Nickelson to play Eric and Jennifer Lopez should play Krista.
Danny DeVito should play you...
MikeL
UK) wrote:
>
>>Thanks George, being called hardcore from you is awesome :)
>>
>>Kevin Clements
>>
>>
>You are getting there Kev.
>
He just has to give up this silly powerlifing kick he is on. =-P
--
ML
"no amount of money can magically change a creaky, balky,
untrained body into a well-trained, strong and smoothly-moving
physique that adds layers of sensual enjoyment to every moment
of existence" --Trygve
MikeL
<TheDabbl...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
>Bulldog <bul...@thebowens.net> wrote in message news:f4yS4.927$H63....@newsfeed.slurp.net...
>>
>> Dean C. Harris <deanh...@csi.com> wrote
>>
>> >
>> > There's always..um...when do you plan to post these type of stats again?
>> > Once a month maybe?
>>
>> I dunno. Since it's 80% automatic right now, what I might end up doing
>> is having it run completely automatically and link the results to a web
>> site. That way, you could go search for whatever you want, whenever you
>> want, using whatever specs you want.
>>
>
>When this has been done in other news groups that I read, the number of
>information-less/value-less posts shot up as people competed to be in the
>top 10 or, if they were in the top 10, the top poster.
>
>Please keep this possibility mind (as well as the "quality" of the posts) when
>you decide whether or not to make the information available.
I intend to do better than 25th place damnit. If i must post even
more dvivel than usual then by golly I'll do it!!
Bulldog
Dean C. Harris <deanh...@csi.com> wrote
> >>> 17. "Bulldog" 86
> >>>
> >>Why are some people in quotation marks, and others in parentheses?
> People needing extras to call attention to themselves. That's all.
> And they paid Bulldog off...sexually
Oh my, I see my name is in parenthesis as well. How embarrassing.
- Bulldog
Bob Mann
<kr...@email.msn.com> wrote:
>George UK <geo...@weight-train.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:391ad660...@news.freeserve.net...
>>
>> >Thanks George, being called hardcore from you is awesome :)
>> >
>> >Kevin Clements
>> >
>> >
>> You are getting there Kev.
>>
>> George UK
>
>Cool beans ;) Hey by the way, do you follow a Scottish Premier team? I have
>started watching a highlight show on Fox Sports Net that is a weekly
>highlights show of teams in the English/Scottish Premier Leagues. I know
>Manchester United just won the English Premiership, who won the Scottish
>one?
>
>Also if soccer season is ending in Britain, what sports takes over in the
>summer? Cricket?
>
>Kevin Clements
>
Darts and arguing about summer trades. (IOW, cricket sucks)
Rangers always wins the Scottish Premier.
--
Bob Mann
Http://members.home.net/bobmann
It may be that your sole purpose in life
is to serve as a warning to others.
Selene
kinda honored that the top "26" was created just for me...I did
wonder about the selection of 26 people until I'd read further.
However, do NOT let my boss see this, as I am seriously behind
on my Canyon A flows at Kentucky diversion report.) I mean, how
could I stay out of a *soccer* discussion?
"KEVIN CLEMENTS" <kr...@email.msn.com> wrote:
> I have started watching a highlight show on Fox Sports Net
> that is a weekly highlights show of teams in the
> English/Scottish Premier Leagues.
Lionel "Deebieboy" Bienvenue!!!!!! Do you have the hots for
him? Actually he does amazingly well for someone who knew
NOTHING about soccer just a few years ago. And it is a pretty
good show for those of us too *cheap* to get Fox Sports World's
all soccer all the time network (though that actually is a
lie)...and besides, if I had soccer available 24 hours a day,
when would I have time to post?
> I know Manchester United just won the English Premiership, who
> won the Scottish one?
Kev, Kev, Kev, the Rangers locked this up WEEKS ago. They could
have lost all their games for the last third of the season or
something like that and they _still_ would have come in first.
They just RUTS all over the Scottish League ($1 to that slacker
Haggerty, who would also have been in the top 26 if it weren't
for finals or some lame excuse like that.)
Next you're going to have to start watching your local MLS team
(Major League Soccer for you plebes that are not up with the
times). 'Course the Miami team is kinda lame, but Tampa Bay is
in first place in their division. (What! They're both in
Florida, what more do you want? MLS is now talking about
renegging on putting a team in Seattle, the slime!)
Anything else you'd like to know? :-)
Selene
(who really should refrain from post-workout posting)
-----
In terms of predictive value, of course, it's still somewhere between
"diddly" and "squat"--though much closer to "diddly." -- Trygve Lode
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
Bulldog
Anonymous <nob...@newsfeeds.com> wrote
>
> Julien Gauthier wrote:
> >
> > I think that somehow there are some missing elements. At least one. Bill
> > Roberts aka Annonymous is not in that list. Unless he posted less than
Selene,
> > which I`d find surprizing.
>
> I might have, since she posts a fair bit and I also had a week or
week-and-a-
> half period of no mfw (had a deadline to meet.)
>
> Another possibility is that due to the anonymous server, the posts weren't
> counted by the program as being all by the same individual.
I just took a look at the data file and indeed, you are the mysterious
X-Comments2, who finished in sixth place. The problem came about because
Newsfeeds.Com follows a very unusual (although quit valid) practice of
placing the From: field at the end of the header. Since this was just a
first pass filter, I didn't bother scanning the entire headers, so it gave
up and just reported the last field it read, even though it knew it was from
the same individual. I manually checked a few of them, and indeed, it is
you.
I was a bit afraid that I wouldn't be able to tell you and Pete apart,
since he's now apparently using the same anonymous service. However, after
looking at it, that will be no sweat.
>>1. Watson Davis 220
>>2. "Eric Midkiff" 192
>>3. "Mistress Krista" 189
>>4. Patrick Arnold 187
>>5. Robert Schuh 168
>>6. the artist formerly known as Bill 159
- Bulldog
Max
-max
George UK <geo...@weight-train.co.uk> wrote in message
news:391ad660...@news.freeserve.net...
>
> >Thanks George, being called hardcore from you is awesome :)
> >
> >Kevin Clements
> >
> >
> You are getting there Kev.
>
> George UK
>
Bulldog
Watson Davis <wat...@watsonmusic.com> wrote
> >
> >1. Watson Davis 220
>
> Well.
>
> There you have it.
>
> Proof that I roooooool... at having no life. This represents time I
> could have been playing guitar.
It could be worse. You could be the pitiful soul who spends time
sitting behind a computer writing software to determine who is spending too
much time sitting behind a computer, and then publishes the results in
newsgroups and on his webpage, which entailed spending yet more time sitting
behind a computer...
- Bulldog
Watson Davis
<TheDabbl...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
>Bulldog <bul...@thebowens.net> wrote in message news:f4yS4.927$H63....@newsfeed.slurp.net...
>>
>> Dean C. Harris <deanh...@csi.com> wrote
>>
>> >
>> > There's always..um...when do you plan to post these type of stats again?
>> > Once a month maybe?
>>
>> I dunno. Since it's 80% automatic right now, what I might end up doing
>> is having it run completely automatically and link the results to a web
>> site. That way, you could go search for whatever you want, whenever you
>> want, using whatever specs you want.
>>
>
>When this has been done in other news groups that I read, the number of
>information-less/value-less posts shot up as people competed to be in the
>top 10 or, if they were in the top 10, the top poster.
>
>Please keep this possibility mind (as well as the "quality" of the posts) when
>you decide whether or not to make the information available.
My place is secure as I already have plenty of practice making
pointless, valueless posts.
Neener, neener, neener.
Watson (the pencil neck) Davis
Watson Davis
wrote:
>I started to list the top 25, but when I saw Selene was #26, I felt obliged
>to include her. Posting history since 4/5/2000 listed in order of User ID,
>number of posts.
>
>1. Watson Davis 220
Well.
There you have it.
Proof that I roooooool... at having no life. This represents time I
could have been playing guitar.
Watson (the pencil neck) Davis
David Cohen
"Watson Davis" <wat...@watsonmusic.com> wrote:
> >1. Watson Davis 220
>
> Well.
>
> There you have it.
>
> Proof that I roooooool... at having no life. This represents time I
> could have been playing guitar.
>
Yeah, yeah, yeah, celebrate over a victory that Lynn Asher, if she was still
here, could have won with both eyes tied behind her back :)
--
www.geocities.com/sammiesdad
ICQ#65392028
Dean C. Harris
wrote:
>And i'm in there. How sad Dean...
>Beat you by 3 posts.
Well, there are many drug related questions only a user like yourself
can answer. So, you get a lot of 'business' that way.
What is up with the Anonymous stuff? Posting to your naughty usenet
groups again and hiding your name?
>I'll make sure i have at least 3 more posts then you each month.
No. You won't.
David Cohen
Max, you are hardcore!!!!!!
Dean C. Harris
wrote:
>Long posts and "bandwidth unfriendly" are 2 entirely fifferent things.
No...it is not.
>If
>the posts are long but informative, as mine are,
:-D
You should do stand up comedy- you are so damn funny.
>or to point out other
>people are wrong, as i did with you a few weeks ago but you gave up,
You last post to me was over _1000_ lines long. ONE THOUSAND. You sick
fuck. You have enough hot air to melt the polar ice cap.
>people
>who are wrong are notorious for doing that, as they see, and recognize, my
>infinite wisdom, and have no choice but to accept it.
Again with the comedy. They just keep on coming, don't they. BTW, I
posted my measurements yesterday..or day before in response to Kevin
posting his. To bad you missed it. You had so much to make fun of.
>And i'm still waiting for those Dutch slang words...
The Dutch are not creative enough for slang.
Dean C. Harris
wrote:
>Not me.
>I'll make sure i always post a few more then you.
Well, being someone's bitch in prison gives you that spare time...
>And i get X-tra points
>because my posts contain valuable information. Yours don't.
You are a King in your own little world, huh?
It's almost good to have you back...
Out on parole?
Dean C. Harris
wrote:
<snip about anonymous Pete wanting to write a book>
Well, you do ramble on...
>I want Jack Nickelson to play Eric and Jennifer Lopez should play Krista.
>Danny DeVito should play you...
You really are jealous of my calves, huh?
Dean C. Harris
<kr...@email.msn.com> wrote:
>Now that IS something I should be ashamed of.....<G>
Hey. You never answered my post to you where I actually got a tape
measure and did some measuring. I just put a 'Mine' in front of you
original subject.
If you aren't going to play why bother showing up?
:(
Dean C. Harris
wrote:
>I might have, since she posts a fair bit and I also had a week or week-and-a-
>half period of no mfw (had a deadline to meet.)
>
>Another possibility is that due to the anonymous server, the posts weren't
>counted by the program as being all by the same individual.
Hey...
Both of you shouldn't use the same 'Anonymous'...what the hell is the
point of that anyways when this whole group knows who both of you are???
Since you had it first Bill you should keep it. So, Pete needs to
change his name in his newsreader.
Dean C. Harris
<kr...@email.msn.com> wrote:
>Me self-conscious? Paranoid? No not me, I know y'all love me,....I mean
>dontcha? Really you do...I just know you do......you have too....<sniff,
>sniff> (puppy dog eye-look)
You didn't answer my post. So..no.
Dean C. Harris
<kr...@email.msn.com> wrote:
>> >Thanks George, being called hardcore from you is awesome :)
>> >
>> >Kevin Clements
>> >
>> >
>> You are getting there Kev.
>>
>> George UK
>
>Cool beans ;) Hey by the way, do you follow a Scottish Premier team? I have
>started watching a highlight show on Fox Sports Net that is a weekly
>highlights show of teams in the English/Scottish Premier Leagues. I know
>Manchester United just won the English Premiership, who won the Scottish
>one?
>
>Also if soccer season is ending in Britain, what sports takes over in the
>summer? Cricket?
Kevin...this flirtation is *almost* as bad when we had that stealthy
'asian girl' spammer who I quickly 'helped'.
We all see right through it. ;)
Anonymous
Max wrote:
> man, i wanna be called hardcore.
>
> -max
I believe the name "Max Hardcore" is already taken.
--
the artist formerly known as Bill
--------== Posted Anonymously via Newsfeeds.Com ==-------
Dean C. Harris
<selene_f...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
>Oh, you guys were just determined to MAKE me post. (I do feel
>kinda honored that the top "26" was created just for me...I did
>wonder about the selection of 26 people until I'd read further.
>However, do NOT let my boss see this, as I am seriously behind
>on my Canyon A flows at Kentucky diversion report.) I mean, how
>could I stay out of a *soccer* discussion?
But- you have a new job. What is the center of the Top 26 MFW universe?
You *know* you gotta figure it out or it'll drive you nuts.
(Already picturing Selene thinking 'Well, I do have that
data...shouldn't take me too long.')
Selene style post enhanced...brought to you by...
Dean C. Harris
wrote:
> Oh my, I see my name is in parenthesis as well. How embarrassing.
I hear you are quite flexible and often look content.
:-P
Dean C. Harris
wrote:
>>1. Watson Davis 220
>
>Well.
>
>There you have it.
>
>Proof that I roooooool... at having no life. This represents time I
>could have been playing guitar.
Or....a billion more lines of code per month...
Anonymous
"Dean C. Harris" wrote:
> Anonymous <nob...@newsfeeds.com> wrote:
>
> >I might have, since she posts a fair bit and I also had a week or week-and-a-
> >half period of no mfw (had a deadline to meet.)
> >
> >Another possibility is that due to the anonymous server, the posts weren't
> >counted by the program as being all by the same individual.
>
> Hey...
>
> Both of you shouldn't use the same 'Anonymous'...what the hell is the
> point of that anyways when this whole group knows who both of you are???
>
> Since you had it first Bill you should keep it. So, Pete needs to
> change his name in his newsreader.
A somewhat-bothersome feature of this particular server is
that you have no choice in the matter: your posts WILL be
as "Anonymous."
You do have a choice in the return e-mail given in the headers,
but not the name itself.
As for myself, the points of it are to make it non-trivial for
some third-party do a search using only my name and known e-mails,
and also to leave no trail of the particular computer used
to post, since I am under some restrictions in that regard.
Dean C. Harris
wrote:
> It could be worse. You could be the pitiful soul who spends time
>sitting behind a computer writing software to determine who is spending too
>much time sitting behind a computer, and then publishes the results in
>newsgroups and on his webpage, which entailed spending yet more time sitting
>behind a computer...
Just when you wrote that you spent yet more time on the computer
explaining how you spend too much time on the computer.
Eric Midkiff
Dean C. Harris <deanh...@csi.com> wrote in message
news:i7nlhskqc0agpav6r...@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 11 May 2000 07:33:14 -0400, "Bulldog" <bul...@thebowens.net>
> wrote:
>
> IOW, Eric and his lot are not really going by their real names...like I
> suspected all along.
>
> Kevin, you better be careful now that you have seen his face!
>
He is one of several who needs to worry.
--
Eric Midkiff
Squats rule.
-- Pete
afriKan
>
(IOW, cricket sucks)
Careful there Bobby boy...
You northerners only like games that can be played in sub zero
temps on ice...
> Rangers always wins the Scottish Premier.
Yup, makes it the most boring league in the world.
Bruce
--
Dont step on the fairies.
Mistress Krista
>
> Kevin...this flirtation is *almost* as bad when we had that stealthy
> 'asian girl' spammer who I quickly 'helped'.
>
> We all see right through it. ;)
>
Ha, neither are as bad as our Prince of Lurv Chris C. Where is that guy,
anyway?
Krista
--
-------------------------
http://www.stumptuous.com/weights.html
mistres...@home.com
Anonymous
>>And i'm in there. How sad Dean...
>>Beat you by 3 posts.
>Well, there are many drug related questions only a user like yourself
>can answer.
You mean AS?
C'mon, i allready explained to you that from my point of view, those
substances are not drugs. And at least i provide some info about it,
especially for beginners.
>So, you get a lot of 'business' that way.
Not yet.
But i might become the "Ed Sturm" of the real stuff. Who knows.
That's what you meant by business, right?
>What is up with the Anonymous stuff?
Nothing.
>Posting to your naughty usenet groups again and hiding your name?
I don't want to attach my name to alt.necrophelia.asianfemale.
I'm pretty sure you would stay anonymous in the
alt.farsighted.ineedtowearcontacts. group
>>I'll make sure i have at least 3 more posts then you each month.
>No. You won't.
Yes i will.
--
The Iron God formerly known as Pete
Anonymous
><snip about anonymous Pete wanting to write a book>
>Well, you do ramble on...
Always.
>>I want Jack Nickelson to play Eric and Jennifer Lopez should play
>>Krista. Danny DeVito should play you...
>You really are jealous of my calves, huh?
Not really.
Christopher (playing me) has a few very intimate scenes with Jennifer
(playing Krista) in the gym, while her farsighted husband (you, played by
Danny) is to blind to figure out what's going on, as he's trying to improve
his bench, a few feet away from the bench Christopher and Jennifer are
using, while her husband (you) thinks he only gives her a spot.
Hey, it's my book...
Anonymous
>Both of you shouldn't use the same 'Anonymous'...what the hell is the
>point of that anyways when this whole group knows who both of you >are???
I think Bill explained it.
And again, "anonymous" is not a screename, availeble for everyone.
>Since you had it first Bill you should keep it. So, Pete needs to
>change his name in his newsreader.
No.
Anonymous
>>Long posts and "bandwidth unfriendly" are 2 entirely different things.
>No...it is not.
Of course it is.
>>If the posts are long but informative, as mine are,
>:-D
>You should do stand up comedy- you are so damn funny.
I was serious.
>>or to point out other
>>people are wrong, as i did with you a few weeks ago but you gave up,
>You last post to me was over _1000_ lines long. ONE THOUSAND. >You sick
fuck.
1000 is nothing.
It allready happended 2 times that my server refused a reply too Eric.
It gave a weird error. Maybe too many lines.
And it happened Jibaholic (Justin) as well, which was very unfortunate, as
he made a few very good points and observations.
>You have enough hot air to melt the polar ice cap.
And they will.
You really believe that global warming is a direct effect from increasing
amounts of carbon-dioxide in the atmosphere?
(BTW, i live below sea
el...:-(
>>people who are wrong are notorious for doing that, as they see, and >>recognize, my infinite wisdom, and have no choice but to accept it.
>Again with the comedy.
What comedy?????
>They just keep on coming, don't they.
Yes.
It never stops.
>BTW, I posted my measurements yesterday..or day before in >response to Kevin posting his. To bad you missed it.
I can find them, don't worry.
>You had so much to make fun of.
Not really.
I nevr make fun about other people's measurements. If you'd paid attention, you would know that. I actually gave you a compliment and some encouragement to train your calves, to make them even bigger.
Have you tried my method?
>>And i'm still waiting for those Dutch slang words...
>The Dutch are not creative enough for slang.
We don't need to be creative.
My Ancestors were very innovative, enough to conquer the world (from a trading point of view) while your Ancestors were... what the fuck were they doing?
Remember, New York was New Amsterdam, and Brooklyn (Breukelen)
and Har
lem (Haarlem) are actually Dutch names of City's.
We sold it because we got tired of trading with the Indians, who named the
Island of Manhattan.
But i'm still waiting for those sland words, we do have them, and you said
you knew them.
Dean C. Harris
wrote:
>> Kevin, you better be careful now that you have seen his face!
>>
>He is one of several who needs to worry.
Luckily, you have all that land in Florida where burying body or body
parts is easy.
George UK
>Cool beans ;) Hey by the way, do you follow a Scottish Premier team? I have
>started watching a highlight show on Fox Sports Net that is a weekly
>highlights show of teams in the English/Scottish Premier Leagues. I know
>Manchester United just won the English Premiership, who won the Scottish
>one?
I support Aberdeen, who finished bottom of the league this year, which
is the first time in our 98 year history that this has happened. It's
a far far away from the time when we were Europes best team. We beat
Bayern Munich in the quarter of the Euro Cup Winners Cup, We beat Real
Madrid in the final, we then went on to beat Hamburg (the European
Champions) over two legs in the Super Cup.
Alex Ferguson (manager of Man UTD) was the manager then.
We are in the Scottish Cup final though, so if you get the chance to
see this it might be good for a laugh.
>Also if soccer season is ending in Britain, what sports takes over in the
>summer? Cricket?
>
>Kevin Clements
>
>
George UK
Anonymous
>>Not me.
>>I'll make sure i always post a few more then you.
>Well, being someone's bitch in prison gives you that spare time...
If i was a prison bitch i would've been busy 24/7 and not post at all.
Did i allready mention how gorgeous i am?
>>And i get X-tra points
>>because my posts contain valuable information. Yours don't.
>You are a King in your own little world, huh?
Not A king, THE king!
Jesus Dean...
>It's almost good to have you back...
Thanks.
>Out on parole?
Not really.
I escaped, after i raped and killed my guard. And BTW, i was innocent... you
know that, don't you?
MikeL
wrote:
>Dean C. Harris wrote:
>
>>Both of you shouldn't use the same 'Anonymous'...what the hell is the
>>point of that anyways when this whole group knows who both of you >are???
>
>
>I think Bill explained it.
>And again, "anonymous" is not a screename, availeble for everyone.
>
>>Since you had it first Bill you should keep it. So, Pete needs to
>>change his name in his newsreader.
>
>
>No.
I'd prefer not to see a whole bunch of anonymous posters. It is
unnecessarily confusing. I am sure we can think of a more interesting
name for you Peytr.
--
ML
"no amount of money can magically change a creaky, balky,
untrained body into a well-trained, strong and smoothly-moving
physique that adds layers of sensual enjoyment to every moment
of existence" --Trygve
Anonymous
>Just when you wrote that you spent yet more time on the computer
>explaining how you spend too much time on the computer.
So what you're trying to say is that explaining that spending time on a
computer to explain your spending time on a computer is also a waste of
time?
What if someone explains that the explanation for the time spent to explain
spending time on a computer explaining you're spending time on the computer?
Is that also a waste of time?
Or is spending time on a computer a waste of time anyway, and any
explanation for that should be considered more wast of time.
Is that what you meant?
Or did you mean something else? If you DID mean something else,
then explain what you meant. Please.
Pete
>I'd prefer not to see a whole bunch of anonymous posters. It is
>unnecessarily confusing. I am sure we can think of a more interesting
>name for you Peytr.
I allready changed it back :-)
Bill inspired me to post the line "the asshole formerly known as..."
--
Pete
Dean C. Harris
wrote:
>So what you're trying to say is that explaining that spending time on a
>computer to explain your spending time on a computer is also a waste of
>time?
Yes...
>What if someone explains that the explanation for the time spent to explain
>spending time on a computer explaining you're spending time on the computer?
>Is that also a waste of time?
Indeed. As is you asking about it and me replying right now.
>Or is spending time on a computer a waste of time anyway, and any
>explanation for that should be considered more wast of time.
Um...yes?
>Is that what you meant?
If you think so...yes.
>Or did you mean something else? If you DID mean something else,
>then explain what you meant. Please.
Nope...it's all very clear...
Max
wooooooohoooooooooooooooooooooooo
-max
--
max's page
http://surf.to/liquidmax/
David Cohen <sammi...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:pFKS4.50573$x4.17...@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
>
> "Max" <liquidn...@email.msn.com> wrote:
> > man, i wanna be called hardcore.
> >
> > -max
>
> Max, you are hardcore!!!!!!
>
> >
> > George UK <geo...@weight-train.co.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > > >Thanks George, being called hardcore from you is awesome :)
> > > >
> > > >Kevin Clements
> > > >
> > > >
> > > You are getting there Kev.
> > >
> > > George UK
> > >
> > > www.trainhard.co.uk
> > >
> > > www.weight-train.co.uk
> >
> >
>
>
steve stanbach
Anonymous wrote:
> And they will.
> You really believe that global warming is a direct effect from increasing
> amounts of carbon-dioxide in the atmosphere?
>
> (BTW, i live below sea
> el...:-(
No, tree hugger bullshit
>
>
> >>people who are wrong are notorious for doing that, as they see, and >>recognize, my infinite wisdom, and have no choice but to accept it.
>
> >Again with the comedy.
>
> What comedy?????
>
> >They just keep on coming, don't they.
>
> Yes.
> It never stops.
>
> >BTW, I posted my measurements yesterday..or day before in >response to Kevin posting his. To bad you missed it.
>
> I can find them, don't worry.
>
> >You had so much to make fun of.
>
> Not really.
> I nevr make fun about other people's measurements. If you'd paid attention, you would know that. I actually gave you a compliment and some encouragement to train your calves, to make them even bigger.
>
> Have you tried my method?
>
> >>And i'm still waiting for those Dutch slang words...
>
> >The Dutch are not creative enough for slang.
>
> We don't need to be creative.
> My Ancestors were very innovative, enough to conquer the world (from a trading point of view) while your Ancestors were... what the fuck were they doing?
>
> Remember, New York was New Amsterdam, and Brooklyn (Breukelen)
> and Har
> lem (Haarlem) are actually Dutch names of City's.
>
> We sold it because we got tired of trading with the Indians, who named the
> Island of Manhattan.
>
> But i'm still waiting for those sland words, we do have them, and you said
> you knew them.
>
> --
> The Iron God formerly known as Pete
Do you really want to take credit for New York? New York is a shit hole.
Van Der
That's better :-) Pete is a trademark in MFW you know?
BTW. I'm emailin you couple of links (free stuff) you may find
interesting.. somethin about a tropical country you know ;-)
Van Der
--
Whatch out!! I'm COMMING !!!!
Bob Mann
<b...@cutthisspamblock.fdp.co.za> wrote:
>Bob Mann wrote:
>>
>(IOW, cricket sucks)
>
>Careful there Bobby boy...
>
>You northerners only like games that can be played in sub zero
>temps on ice...
Never lioked cricket.
I went once to watch Essex play and was never so bored at a "sporting
event" in my life.
>
>> Rangers always wins the Scottish Premier.
>
>Yup, makes it the most boring league in the world.
Of course, if we can ship our cast offs to Celtic and end up with
their more talented players down the road, I don't care. :-)
(Berko to Celtic, DiCanio to West Ham via Sheff. Wed.)
>
>Bruce
--
Bob Mann
Http://members.home.net/bobmann
It may be that your sole purpose in life
is to serve as a warning to others.
Dean C. Harris
wrote:
>BTW. I'm emailin you couple of links (free stuff) you may find
>interesting.. somethin about a tropical country you know ;-)
Ahem.
Some of us wouldn't mind whatever it is you sent Pete.
I will be afraid to check my e-mail now. :)
steve stanbach
Pete wrote:
> steve stanbach wrote:
>
> >> We sold it because we got tired of trading with the Indians, who
> >> named the Island of Manhattan.
>
> >> But i'm still waiting for those sland words, we do have them, and you
> >>said you knew them.
>
> >Do you really want to take credit for New York?
>
> I don't think we can.
> We just (Peter Stuyvesant) created a new City many centuries ago.
> The Dutch dissapeared from America, mainly because there other colonies. But
> i think that if Peter knew the US of A would become the most powerful Nation
> in the world, he would've stayed.
>
> >New York is a shit hole.
>
> Maybe you see it that way because you're American.
> I would love to come over and stay there for a while. I consider Amstyerdam
> one of the ugliest City's. Pleasant, but ugly.
>
> Why it atrracts so many tourists is beyond me...
>
> --
> Pete
Take a guess pete. I would say by now half your city is full of unproductive
pot smoking choads. I also think chicago is a shit hole, however; the people
here are extremely nice unlike NYC. IMO the prettiest big city in america has
to be san francisco and I would recomend SF over NYC. Atlanta is pretty slick
too, but I didn't see allot of it. My personal favorite little city is augusta
georgia!
Pete
Hobbes
>
> Why it atrracts so many tourists is beyond me...
>
> --
> Pete
The good drugs maybe?
Dean C. Harris
>Why it atrracts so many tourists is beyond me...
Smut and drugs.
Tom Morley
> Why it atrracts so many tourists is beyond me...
>
> --
> Pete
There's a hole in the world, like a great black pit
And its filled with people, who are filled with shit,
And it goes by the name of London.
Actually, London is a nice place, but I just love this song from
Sweeny Todd.
--
Tom Morley | I think I can, I think I can,
| I think I can, ....
tmo...@bmtc.mindspring.com | The Little Engine That Could
http://www.math.gatech.edu/~morley | by Watty Piper
ICQ: 24798603 I
Pete
>>So what you're trying to say is that explaining that spending time on a
>>computer to explain your spending time on a computer is also a >>waste of
time?
>Yes...
I disagree.
Clarifications are NEVER a waste of time.
>>What if someone explains that the explanation for the time spent to
>>explain spending time on a computer explaining you're spending >>time on
the computer? Is that also a waste of time?
>Indeed. As is you asking about it and me replying right now.
So your reply was a waste time and this reply to your reply is a waste of
time? Or is it a valid qestion and therefore not a waste of time?
>>Or is spending time on a computer a waste of time anyway, and any
>>explanation for that should be considered more wast of time.
>Um...yes?
So i'm just wasting time?
>>Is that what you meant?
>If you think so...yes.
I'm not sure.
I think you are deliberately trying to confuse me.
>>Or did you mean something else? If you DID mean something else,
>>then explain what you meant. Please.
>Nope...it's all very clear...
Not to me.
You are hiding something...
--
Pete
rhansen
<wat...@watsonmusic.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 11 May 2000 14:23:25 GMT, "Art"
><TheDabbl...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>Bulldog <bul...@thebowens.net> wrote in message news:f4yS4.927$H63....@newsfeed.slurp.net...
>>>
>>> Dean C. Harris <deanh...@csi.com> wrote
>>>
>>> >
>>> > There's always..um...when do you plan to post these type of stats again?
>>> > Once a month maybe?
>>>
>>> I dunno. Since it's 80% automatic right now, what I might end up doing
>>> is having it run completely automatically and link the results to a web
>>> site. That way, you could go search for whatever you want, whenever you
>>> want, using whatever specs you want.
>>>
>>
>>When this has been done in other news groups that I read, the number of
>>information-less/value-less posts shot up as people competed to be in the
>>top 10 or, if they were in the top 10, the top poster.
>>
>>Please keep this possibility mind (as well as the "quality" of the posts) when
>>you decide whether or not to make the information available.
>
>My place is secure as I already have plenty of practice making
>pointless, valueless posts.
My role model.
>
>Neener, neener, neener.
>
Nanooo - Nanooo
....Ross Hansen <surf happens....NOT>
"A man is not defined by his actions, but whatever
it is he denies." -- Pete
Dean C. Harris
>I disagree.
>Clarifications are NEVER a waste of time.
What do you need to clarify?
>So your reply was a waste time and this reply to your reply is a waste of
>time? Or is it a valid qestion and therefore not a waste of time?
Exactly.
>So i'm just wasting time?
Glad you are 'getting it'.
>I'm not sure.
>I think you are deliberately trying to confuse me.
The sun rises not in the east, west, north or south...but somewhere in
between.
>>Nope...it's all very clear...
>
>
>Not to me.
>You are hiding something...
steve stanbach
"Dean C. Harris" wrote:
>
>
> The sun rises not in the east, west, north or south...but somewhere in
> between.
>
Just remember this.... SETS WEST..
steve stanbach
Tom Morley wrote:
Back in the old days, like 1967 or so when Sweeny was alive, I bet england was a
dump.
Pete
>> Why it atrracts so many tourists is beyond me...
Steve said:
Take a guess pete. I would say by now half your city is full of
unproductive pot smoking choads.
Hobbes said:
The good drugs maybe?
Dean said:
Smut and drugs.
Okay, okay, i suspected somthing like that. I just can't imagine there
aren't other counties with a similair drug policy. And a better climate.
But you guys forgot something;
Prostitution is also legal and our whores are cheap, but give fantastic
blowjobs.
And don't forget the charming personality of Dutch people in general, our
generosity, friendlyness, and hospitality towards tourists.
--
Pete
Bob Mann
That, and your capital city is full of big ditches..er...canals, you
have communal toilets, the buildings are really narrow and sinking
into the fill and listening to Dutch girls talk with a throat full of
phlegm is sexy. :-)
bigbootie
>ugly.
>
>
It's the Double-Zout:
http://www.bad-candy.com/doublezout/doublezout.html
====================================================
"...I had a real bowel movement this morning.
It wasn't a bunch of little pellets. It wasn't off color.
Just a regular, normal sized, brown turd."
-Lyle McDonald, "BodyOpus Diaries"
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
Bulldog
Bob Mann <bob...@home.com> wrote
> That, and your capital city is full of big ditches..er...canals, you
> have communal toilets, the buildings are really narrow and sinking
> into the fill and listening to Dutch girls talk with a throat full of
> phlegm is sexy. :-)
I don't think that's phlegm...
- Bulldog
steve stanbach
Pete wrote:
> steve stanbach wrote:
>
> >> Why it atrracts so many tourists is beyond me...
>
> Steve said:
>
> Take a guess pete. I would say by now half your city is full of
> unproductive pot smoking choads.
>
> Hobbes said:
>
> The good drugs maybe?
>
> Dean said:
>
> Smut and drugs.
>
> Okay, okay, i suspected somthing like that. I just can't imagine there
> aren't other counties with a similair drug policy. And a better climate.
>
> But you guys forgot something;
>
> Prostitution is also legal and our whores are cheap, but give fantastic
> blowjobs.
>
> And don't forget the charming personality of Dutch people in general, our
> generosity, friendlyness, and hospitality towards tourists.
>
> --
> Pete
don't forget legoland.
Bob Mann
That's in Denmark.