In article <
ve0lp8t1mdsequdal...@4ax.com>,
M C Hamster <
davo...@nospam-speakeasy.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 16 May 2013 23:22:47 -0700, BillTurlock wrote:
>
> >
> >Bright Explosion on the Moon
> >NASA Science News for May 17, 2013
> >
> >NASA researchers who monitor the Moon for meteoroid impacts have
> >detected an explosion ten times brighter than anything they've seen
> >before.
> >
> >FULL STORY:
> >
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2013/16may_lunarimpact/
> >
> >VIDEO:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYloGuUZCFM
>
> The meteoroid is estimated to have been travelling at 56,000 miles per
> hour when it collided with the moon. The earth-moon system itself is
> travelling about 66,000 miles per hour in its orbit around the sun.
> This made me wonder what other zippy objects are flying around the
> universe. Here's a nice article on the subject:
>
http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/features/extreme-speed/
>
> A few numbers: Mercury travels at a speed of over 105,000 MPH.
> Astronomers have identified a planet in a distant solar system which
> is traveling at 528,000 mph. The solar system is traveling at a
> speed of 568,000 MPH around the center of the Milky Way galaxy.
>
> The article also cites a distant star estimated to be travelling at a
> speed of 1.55 million miles per hour, but now we're just getting
> silly.
>
> What seems odd to me is how to think about velocity for some of these
> objects... against what frame of reference?
Why, the ether of course. For solar system objects, I think you can
reason out the orbital velocity given the radius and masses involved.
Those are reasonably frame-independent.
--
-eben QebWe...@vTerYizUonI.nOetP
royalty.mine.nu:81
LIBRA: A big promotion is just around the corner for someone
much more talented than you. Laughter is the very best medicine,
remember that when your appendix bursts next week. -- Weird Al