'Sacks' In Any Religion and Definition of 'Sacks' - {HRI 20060521-V1.4.1-UAA} (Version 1.4.1 on 13 Nov 2006)
Koos Nolst Trenite
21 May 2006
{HRI 20060521-V1.4.1-UAA}
(Version 1.4.1
on 13 Nov 2006)
(Suitable for foreign
language students)
(for Under-Age
Americans,
Chinese and
Muslims)
'
Men and women are souls, spiritual beings, and all your feeling and
your thinking and your looking and your communicating and your
emotions, are entirely spiritual in nature (which is also called
spiritual Energy).
By DENYING the continuous, spiritual (or spiritual Energy) exchange
between men and women, that takes place all the time, you are then
degrading men and women
as if they are like animals, or worse. Which is a degradation
that any religion opposes.
'
'
There is, there exists, there is taking place, everywhere,
and entirely regardless of whether the body is dressed and
covered, or not - there is
a constant 'Sacks'ual Energy exchange between men and women
(and boys and girls, and girls and men, and boys and women).
'
And this continues to take place also (and even increases, often
considerably) when they do not see each other, as you know very well
to be the case:
Love, or your liking for another, is not at all stopped by walls;
Love, or your liking for another, knows no distance, and neither
does 'Sacks'ual Energy.
And the same applies, of course, to someone who Loves you, or who
has a liking for you - spiritual Energy knows no distance, no
walls, and so it is with 'Sacks'ual Energy too.
Again, whether you are taught, that "you are not a
spiritual being, that you are not a soul, and that 'your
feeling is done with your skin',"
does not make any difference at all as regards the fact of
your spiritual activity - truth is absolute.
'
'
'
It does not wait - and it does not ask whether someone is married - and
it does not ask for someone's age -
but it radiates, it emanates, it is a natural component of Love,
of Love for Life, of Love for people,
as long as someone's soul is alive, as long as your soul is
alive.
'
Now whether that ALSO results in an activity of physically
joining bodies, THAT is an entirely different matter,
and that primarily is guided by the amount of Truth, of
Love and Beauty that would be fulfilled by, is contained
in, and would result from such a union of bodies,
which you may also want to translate as guided and
decided upon by you in relation to your ability to
defend yourself and each other, against Lies, Hate
and Ugliness,
which, the less these are present in you and the
other, as well as in your social environment,
the easier it is to maintain an 'absence of Lies,'
and 'absence of Hate,' and 'absence of Ugliness,'
and to fulfill and enjoy Truth, Beauty and Love
with the union of each other also bodily. *(1)
'
'
'
Again: When you DENY the continuous, 'Sacks'ual, spiritual Energy
exchange, that does take place between men and women all the time
- which exists and which is a natural and vital part of
anyone's life, when you deny the SPIRITUAL activity of
'Sacks' -
then you degrade men and women into being animals.
'
'
Thus any ban on contact between men and women, does oppose, does deny
and does destroy the active, existing, real and true spiritual nature
of man (man meaning mankind, here)
and of course, that destroys ANY religion
- and has indeed destroyed or severely damaged any religion
at times in the past,
and has been A MEANS of destroying religions in the past.
'
'
'
To regard and define "'Sacks'" as (and in terms of) 'PHYSICAL (bodily)
contact between people'
- as has been done at various times in history, by various
Criminally Minded "religious leaders,"
and which was of course not voiced as being such, but
it was done entirely
with the purpose to DESTROY the religion they were part of,
because, to make people regard and define "'Sacks'"
as being a type of 'physical (meaning bodily) contact
between people,'
is degrading people - into regarding people and treating people as if
these "are animals" - or worse.
'
'
And indeed - in order to agree and comply with such doctrines about
"'Sacks'" - THEN many start to behave like animals, and indeed THEN
many start to treat the opposite 'Sacks', as if these "are animals."
But that is exactly what you try to prevent.
And such a "definition" and resulting practice of "'Sacks'," is
indeed wholly opposed to the purpose and activity of ANY
religion.
'
'
'
'
Now we have cleared the main subject, and then we can again look at
the details that life provides, also regarding existing 'Sacks'ual
activities:
As in any activity, so also in 'Sacks'ual activities, Religion
may have - and in my opinion should have - legitimate objections
directed against Hatred, against Ugliness and against Lies *(1)
which are injected by Criminal Minds *(2) indeed into ANY
activity of Life, and so
of course also into 'Sacks'ual activities and 'Sacks'ual feelings
and into the creation and exchange of such feelings. *(a)
Criminal Minds can get very Ugly, extremely Hateful, and
utterly Deceptive, also in their 'Sacks'ual "activities,"
often manifesting as forcing others also to create Ugly or
Hateful 'Sacks'ual Energies, and to create Deception. *(4)
'
'
'
Some people have tried to "remedy" evil
- for example the acts of greed and theft by Criminal Minds -
BY NOT HAVING THINGS "that could be the object of evil from anyone"
- for instance, 'to not have things or not to create Energies,'
that Criminal Minds would desire to steal or to misuse or
destroy.
'
This was proclaimed in Communism: to abolish ownership, in
order "to remedy Crime and Criminals," and to remedy corruption
and greed
- while in fact, Communism was designed to ENABLE Criminal
Minds
enabling them to take all your possessions away and to prevent
your responsibility for life and for people, and to dominate
you,
an activity which is of course denying and opposing the
very nature of life itself.
'
This and other types of denial of life, were proclaimed also
in various religious movements at times, pretending it was
"logical," yes, even "mandatory," "in order to diminish or banish
deception or immorality"
- while in fact, forbidding Beauty and Aliveness (as an example,
luxury, and dancing, and expressing one's love for others)
was intended and used BY CRIMINAL MINDS (by individuals known
and named in your history books) as a means of destroying the
religion they belonged to, and through it, to destroy the
society.
'
But, agreeing with such "remedies," is doing exactly what Criminal
Minds want of you: *(9)
They try to get you, in some way or other to destroy life - in
any way that they can trick and force you to.
'
'
Thus also, to "wait with so-called (meaning bodily) 'Sacks'" till you
are married
- while the natural truth is, that men and women, boys and girls,
do have 'Sacks'ual feelings for each other continuously,
and these feelings are not waiting at all, and these are
felt continuously by the opposite 'Sacks' too,
thus you feel and create these things towards many, and
many feel and create these feelings towards you,
because IT IS THE NATURE OF MEN AND WOMEN TO LIKE
PEOPLE,
- yes, some are even so bold and daring as to
state (and in spite of all the "evidence"
given to them by Criminal Minds, nevertheless
they maintain, they feel and observe) that
MOST PEOPLE actually DO LOVE MOST OTHER
PEOPLE, and quite a lot at that -
which automatically generates 'Sacks'ual spiritual
Energy as well, so
you are NOT AT ALL in actual fact "waiting with 'Sacks' till
you are married,"
nor are you, in actual fact, "waiting with 'Sacks' till you
have found 'the very true one,' and certainly not waiting
still then, till after the wedding" -
'
thus such "waiting with so-called (meaning bodily) 'Sacks',"
must be an idiotic lie which has no basis in factual life,
'
UNLESS you define "'Sacks'" as the 'physical joining of bodies,'
suggesting and implying and enforcing in many aspects the
atrocious lie, that "you are a physical object," "a body,"
that "ONLY WHAT YOUR BODY DOES, is done by you;" enforcing,
that "you are not of a spiritual nature," which is an idiotic
lie, and which leads to
'
defining the FEELINGS - the spiritual Energy - as "not 'Sacks'," but
defining the physical touching (which may even be without feeling,
and in many cases is indeed without or with very little feeling) as
"being the so-called 'Sacks'."
'
'
When you (being a girl or woman, or a boy or man, respectively,
and of normal, healthy 'Sacks'ual disposition) when you think of
a Beautiful, Loving man or woman, you NATURALLY create and flow
'Sacks'ual Energy towards him or her!
And vice-versa, this occurs, from him or her, to you as well.
'
To DENY that, IS DENYING your own spiritual nature, and IS
DENYING the spiritual nature of others,
and IS DENYING the spiritual nature of your own body and
the spiritual nature of someone else's body. *(3)
'
'
'
'Sacks'ual activity is thus entirely a spiritual matter, and without it
- if you still would call it "'Sacks'," when it is in fact not
more of an activity, than moving your legs would be -
"'Sacks'" is then a mechanical activity which has nothing to do with
the nature of people,
not with your nature, and also not with the nature of someone
you love, of the opposite 'Sacks', and *(4)
then "'Sacks'" is - at best - a degrading, soul-less activity.
'
'
'
Such a degrading, soul-less view of life, is opposed to ANY religion,
and thus,
if the existence and creation of 'Sacks' as an entirely spiritual
activity,
which takes place continuously,
IS DENIED in any religion, then it is destroying itself, and is
destroying any other religions as well. *(5)
'
The purpose of religion is, however, not to diminish, degrade and
destroy, but to MAINTAIN and enhance and protect your spiritual
nature, isn't it.
'
Koos Nolst Trenite 'Cause Trinity'
human rights philosopher and poet
'Men of all nations came
to listen to Solomon's wisdom,
sent by all the kings of the world,
who had heard of his wisdom.'
1 Kings 4:34
________
Textnote:
*(a) In some Islamic cultures, the girls and women are told to cover
their hair, even their whole body, "because they have to stop
(or to 'not invite') 'the bestial desires of men;' they have to
dominate the 'Sacks'ual behavior of men towards women."
Some might give you other "reasons" which are, however,
merely to hide that actual intention:
A destructive intention, which is actually
- and you will understand at some time, that
it is actually -
'to please Criminal Minds' by assuming or practicing
THEIR very false views about people. *(7)
'
Now, it is so, that I happen to be a man, and - like the vast
majority of men - I do not at all have any 'bestial desires that
should be curbed' by anyone, also not by women.
But Criminal Minds want you to think, that "all people
have bestial desires" - which is not true at all, except
for themselves:
Truly Criminal Minds do form only ONE percent of the
living population on Earth, in equal amounts both
as women and as men, and of any age, any religion,
any caste or social position or profession or race,
which, should you have been indoctrinated
and "totally convinced" of that concept,
it
COMPLETELY REFUTES, disproves, goes in
the teeth of anything like "natural or
divine justice," or "Karma" and the
like,
concepts that have been introduced
intentionally and enforced simply, by
Criminal Minds,
purposely and very effectively to
disable you from recognizing or
expecting to see Criminal Minds at
high places of authority, ability,
education and knowledge, or wealth
and beauty,
as the history books profusely tell
you, that such positions are used
by Criminal Minds to hide in,
which is completely refuting
and disproving, anything like
"natural or divine justice,"
or "Karma" and the like, any
such "Divine or Cosmic laws,"
that are thus - by actual proof and to
your intense regret - INTENTIONALLY FALSE
concepts or expectations you are asked
to believe and to work with, "to expect
of life." *(8)
And for the very intelligent and faithful
reader, already from this fact
- combined with the knowledge you may
have restored by now, that everyone is
an immortal soul -
it is obvious, that a Criminal Mind does not
become less so by 'doing good deeds,' nor
become worse, by 'doing bad deeds.' *(8)
'
I thought it is about time, you get used to
having some understanding of Criminal Minds,
rather than eternally complaining about
what these do, and about their deceptions
and about the atrocities that they will
forever try to inflict on you and me and
others you love very greatly, and
it is about time, you get used to
having some understanding of
Criminal Minds,
rather than accepting their eternal - and no
doubt 'exceedingly "Divine," "Holy" and
"Cosmic"' - lies about themselves and about
you,
lies about "people being that evil, that they
have to dwell on Earth, till 'miraculously,'
by some form of non-existing 'spiritual
Darwinism,' they are 'cured,' and according to
some, only, and automatically at that, after
6000 life times," *(8)
the former - Criminal Minds - "to be
'cured'" from something that can not be
cured in them at all, and that nobody
ever has cured in them, for all eternity
*(8)
(indeed it is, in practical terms,
since eternity, that the condition
has been inflicted permanently into
their soul - to be a Criminal Mind,
to ENJOY evil *(8))
and on the other hand, the latter
category - you and me - "to be 'cured'"
"to be cured" from something we do not at all
have or suffer from, and that we never had and
never will have.
'
'
To most men - to me, and to you if you are a man - it is just a
straightforward insult, when a woman wants to show you, that
"she has to control your bestial desires."
The faithful reader understands, that I am
talking about absolute truth
which means - regardless of whether
something is voiced, or understood, or
even known - that that, what is going
on, IS going on, and that is absolute
truth.
(I have explained this elsewhere very
thoroughly, and easily understandable
for you.)
'
On top of that insult, the girls and women are taught, either
directly, or by implying it, the ATROCIOUS LIES,
that "most men are evil,"
and that "a person who is close family, 'BY DEFINITION' IS NOT
evil,"
and that it is women who "must control men's bestial
desires,"
that men must be dominated by the manner in which women
dress - in this case, by covering anything
"that could remind men of ''Sacks',' yes, even of the
Beauty of women ...which would again unleash his
bestial desires" - a very repulsive and very
destructive lie, as promoted by Criminal Minds
who do, of course, TALK ABOUT THEMSELVES.
'
'
The practice of hiding the body's beauty from sight, is a
straightforward denial of the spiritual nature of life,
in this way too:
YOU FEEL people, because you are a spirit, a soul, and
because others are a spirit, a soul - and this has nothing
to do at all with the clothing worn, unless you are in a
culture where 'Sacks' (the spiritual Energy of 'Sacks') is
heavily denied to exist,
where the senses are supposed to be those of the
body only, without feeling or seeing the soul of
another - which means - without Love, without
Understanding, without Responsibility or Care for
another. *(3)
'
A normal man or boy FEELS how women or girls feel, and equally,
a normal woman or girl FEELS how men or boys feel - and that has
nothing at all to do, with whether they are dressed or not, or
whether they are in another room, or whether they are married or
not:
You still FEEL them, simply by the fact of your being
alive, and the fact of their being alive; and spiritual
Energy knows no distance, and no walls.
'
But DENYING that, is the behavior of animals - and even animals
usually are not that stupid - to refuse to know, that they are
entirely spiritual in nature. And
by DENYING that, you would also be refusing to act according to
your own nature which IS entirely spiritual:
People are souls, and they feel and think as souls, which
IS done spiritually, of course.
'
If you DENY that, then normal men, of decent nature, are indeed
told to behave like animals, also towards women:
They may start to prevent women from showing their Beauty
in public, and (prevent women) from using their many other
talents to enhance and enliven and protect the society; and
they may develop customs of locking their wives up in their
houses, and to forbid women to take part in social life.
Which is - if you like - the automatic and indeed the historic
'retaliation' of enforcing the ugly lie, the very destructive
lie, on men and women and children, that
"women must be dominated" - "else they will be evil to men."
And as there is already that heavy agreement on
being dominated, then the men are ALSO easily
dominated,
which you see in such countries and societies.
'
If you trace these customs back in history, you will find some
Criminal Minds, who intended to destroy the religion they were
part of. *(6)
'
_________
Footnotes:
(1) 'The Trinity Of Science - Truth, Love and Beauty'
{HRI 20030307-pi-1-V2.1}
(7 Mar 2003 - Version 2.1 on 17 Oct 2003)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.europe/msg/4129fa4f1a67840e?fwc=1
(2) 'Rights of Criminal Minds'
{HRI 20040108-V1.0.1}
(8 January 2004 - Version 1.0.1 on 12 Nov 2005)
http://groups.google.com/group/human-rights-issues/msg/2d74f7c389973d14?fwc=1
(3) 'Plato On Making Love - And Defining Loneliness'
{HRI 20041114-V2.0.2}
(14 November 2004 - Version 2.0.2 on 29 June 2005)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.europe/msg/a8326be589085802?fwc=1
{HRI 20041114-V2.0-UAA}
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.education/msg/ebdd8f227dd037e2?fwc=1
(4) 'About 'Sacks'ual Orientation'
{HRI 20050619}
(19 June 2005)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.anthropology/msg/8b802829a1da95d8?fwc=1
(5) 'Religious Freedom - (Definition for Human Rights enforcement)'
{HRI 20030407-3-V1.0.1}
(7 April 2003 - Issue 3 - Version 1.0.1 on 6 Oct 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.europe/msg/9308443aa2e9bf31?fwc=1
(6) 'The Nature Of Life As Seen From Earth - Introduction: Life Forms'
{HRI 20010829-pi1-V1.1.1}
(29 August 2001 - part issue 1 Version 1.1.1 on 11 Sept 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med/msg/88a7a7b2d830d5e6?fwc=1
(p2) 'The Nature Of Life As Seen From Earth - Introduction: Our Planet'
{HRI 20010829-pi2-V1.2}
(29 August 2001 - part issue 2 Version 1.2 on 12 Sept 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med/msg/06119c3448d82941?fwc=1
(p3) 'The Nature Of Life As Seen From Earth - The Denial'
{HRI 20010829-pi3-V1.2}
(29 August 2001 - part issue 3 Version 1.2 on 13 Sept 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med/msg/2c7d720f49c84375?fwc=1
(p4) 'The Nature Of Life As Seen From Earth
- Some Fine Particle Physics' {HRI 20010829-pi4-V3.0}
(29 August 2001 - part issue 4 Version 3.0 on 14 Sept 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med/msg/c99ab8c8bdd57a1c?fwc=ccc1
(p5) 'The Nature Of Life As Seen From Earth
- The Nature Of The Physical Universe' {HRI 20010829-pi5-V3.2.1}
(29 August 2001 - part issue 5 Version 3.2.1 on 18 Sept 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.japan/msg/f433f1aa6f29a904?fwc=1
(p6) 'The Nature Of Life As Seen From Earth
- Opposing The Nature Of The Creation' {HRI 20010829-pi6-V4.3.1}
(29 August 2001 - part issue 6 Version 4.3.1 on 27 Sept 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.japan/msg/2978c2606a0953c0?fwc=1
(p7) 'The Nature Of Life As Seen From Earth
- Life Energy Particles And Your Body' {HRI 20010829-pi7-V2.1}
(29 August 2001 - part issue 7 Version 2.1 on 28 Sep 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.japan/msg/bd8c8b7f79027767?fwc=1
(p8) 'The Nature Of Life As Seen From Earth - Life Energy Particles
- Perception And Motion' {HRI 20010829-pi8-V1.3.1}
(29 August 2001 - part issue 8 Version 1.3.1 on 9 Oct 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.japan/msg/50b5bc5307f3fdf1?fwc=1
(p9) 'The Nature Of Life As Seen From Earth - Life Energy Particles
- Perception At A Distance' {HRI 20010829-pi9-V3.0}
(29 August 2001 - part issue 9 Version 3.0 on 11 Oct 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.japan/msg/507d3a77159c02fe?fwc=1
(p10)'The Nature Of Life As Seen From Earth - Content Of Life Energy
Particles - Mechanics of Deception {HRI 20010829-pi10-V2.3}
(29 August 2001 - part issue 10 Version 2.3 on 22 Oct 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.japan/msg/6e9224264ec0595c?fwc=1
(p11)'The Nature Of Life As Seen From Earth - Certainty of Perception'
{HRI 20010829-pi11-V2.0}
(29 August 2001 - part issue 11 Version 2.0 on 30 Oct 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.japan/msg/1d8d3f2a78ab95fe?fwc=1
(7) 'Obviously The Second Law of Human Rights'
{HRI 20060924}
(24 September 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/human-rights-issues/msg/114acdcfb40a7962?fwc=1
(8) 'Penetrating and Exposing Hinduism and Buddhism'
{HRI 20060816-V5.0}
(16 August 2006 - Version 5.0 on 1 Nov 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.japan/msg/ccbd175e3fca1cdc?fwc=1
(9) 'The First Law of Human Rights'
{HRI 20060601-V2.2.2}
(1 June 2006 - Version 2.2.2 on 8 Sept 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.japan/msg/3b9985c64f1287f1?fwc=1
'
____________
Verification:
http://www.angelfire.com/space/platoworld
Copyright 2006 by Koos Nolst Trenite - human rights philosopher
and poet
This is 'learnware' - it may not be altered, and it is free for
anyone who learns from it and (even if he can not learn from it)
who passes it on unaltered, and with this message included,
to others who might be able to learn from it.
None of my writings may be used, ever, to support any political
or religious or scientific agenda, but only to educate, and to
encourage people to judge un-dominated and for themselves,
about any organizations or individuals.
Send free-of-Envy and free-of-Hate, Beautiful e-mails to:
PlatoWorld at Lycos.com
(address unreadable for Internet robots
- replace ' at ' with the '@' symbol)