Forced study of Homosexuality and Islam on California Students— Public Schools Embrace Debauchery & Apostasy Over Christmas Music
leona...@gmail.com
Public Schools Embrace Debauchery & Apostasy Over Christmas Music
By Dr. Frederick Meekins Thursday, December 31, 2009
Most Americans would agree that freedom of conscience ranks among our
most cherished liberties. As such, the state should protect this
particular right by almost any means necessary and reasonable
(especially for citizens).
In California, an initiative has been undertaken to get a ballot
before voters to determine the propriety of Christmas music in
California public schools. Within the measure is a clause that would
require schools to notify parents 21 days before the specified tunes
would be played or performed so that students can opt out of being
exposed to such material.
Those having embraced a rigorous interpretation regarding the
separation of church and state will applaud the measure as a
enlightened compromise as these voices will be among the first to
point out that, in these swinging days of free thought, not everyone
embraces the Christianity espoused by these Yuletide harmonies. One
must ask then would the exponents of the unsullied conscience be as
outspoken in defense of those wanting to be excused from exposure to
more progressivist causes and material.
Absolutarian relativists claim that, in order to ensure the scholastic
neutrality of the classroom, not even a whiff of religious material
can be permitted to waft across young impressionable minds. That
might be what is claimed in theory, but the reality falls far short as
an exclusionary objectivity is applied only to Christianity with other
worldviews and religions actually imposed upon students.
Any rational person will admit that, in order to have the most
comprehensive understanding of the world possible, one must have an
understanding of religion as one of history’s most influential
motivating forces. However, there is a point at which education
becomes advocacy.
For example, it has already been stated that even if authorized,
traditional Christmas music will be categorized as quasi-subversive in
nature as one has to admit exposure to these lyrics could potentially
alter the very spiritual identity of those exposed to them. However,
such caution is not exercised in regards to Islam.
According to a WorldNetDaily.com story titled “Islamic studies
required in California district” posted 1/2/02, students there are
required to learn about this prominent world religion. However,
students were not going to be doing this via the traditional social
studies methodology of reading a standard text detached in tone about
the tenets of this system of belief and its impact upon the world in
terms of history, geography, and culture. Rather, the curriculum
required students to live out Islam. This was to be achieved by
having students memorize Koranic verses, praying in the name of Allah,
adopting an Islamic name, and staging a pretend jihad.
Wonder if the name Nadal Malik Hassan mmmmmm, mmmmm, mmmmmm is
available with students able to pretend to shoot up an army base.
When one takes all this into consideration, the above lesson plan sort
of looses its grade school charm, doesn’t it?
Mass death brings up yet another disturbing point. According to
Islamic teaching, all one has to do to become a Muslim is to say with
conviction that there is no God but Allah and Muhammad is his prophet.
Parents need to seriously investigate if this is one of the Islamic
phrases being chanted in the public schools where an accommodationist
approach to the study of Islam has been adopted, and if it has,
parents need to be quite insistent as to having their children removed
from the program even if it means withdrawing from the particular
school all together. For you see, to a sizeable percentage of Muslims
around the world, one is justified in murdering someone that
apostasizes or leaves the faith.
To many, this may seem like theological nitpicking on the scale of
debating how many angels can dance on the head of a needle. However,
should we, with little resistance, be giving these fanatics another
reason with a straight face to kill Americans?
Numerous Muslims will insist that their faith does not condone the
slaughter of innocent people. They just don’t tell you that their
definition of innocent is much narrower than ours. Never has an
insincerely or regretfully sung Christmas Carol resulted in anyone’s
death.
The hypertolerant will sneer that this extremism of either Christians
wanting everyone to sing Christmas tunes or Islamists demanding
students recite the Koran and even miss recess as a simulated form of
Ramadan fasting are shortcomings inherent to the traditional religious
mindset irrespective of the belief system in question. However, the
agnostic reprobate can’t resist to impose their belief on everyone
else either.
To both the pagan who sees the natural world as God and the
materialist who believes in nothing beyond the natural world, there is
nothing as important as the reproductive pleasure cravings we all
posses and know as the sex drive. Since it is claimed that there is
no absolute truth in these particular worldviews, the “is”
automatically becomes the “ought” and however the libidinous impulse
manifests itself is acceptable upon the particular social context.
Therefore, those wanting a world with the fewest taboos possible have
a vested interest in convincing the greatest number possible to this
perspective.
And unlike the Christian and even the Muslim for all that matter, this
persuasion is not so much for the benefit of the soul of the person
whose mind the adherents of these respective outlooks are out to
change. Rather those trapped in lives of carnal destitution are so
wracked by personal guilt that they cannot bear the thought of others
disapproving of their individual predilections. That is why students
cannot be permitted to privately make their own decisions about what
we are continually reminded are private decisions.
When it comes to matters of traditional religious belief, the
secularists believe that children should not be exposed to theology
until they reach maturity. However, when it comes to conjugal
relations, indoctrination is suppose to commence nearly the first day
of kindergarten.
In June 2009, a California school district approved a mandatory
homosexual appreciation curriculum. As part of the curriculum, five
year olds will study a book titled “And Tango Makes Three” about two
“gay” penguins that hatch an egg together. They name the chick
“Tango” because “...it takes two to make a Tango.”
This propaganda will cause mental damage that will take years to undue
if it can be done so at all. Likely contrary to the mantra of the
illustrated tractate, these were not the two that made Tango.
Like it or not, a male and a female penguin had to copulate together
in order for little Tango to be brought into existence. All the two
penguins in the story can do is raise him.
Do four and five year olds really need to be exposed to the
intricacies of human relationships and reproduction? Most can barely
tie their own shoes.
The lessons learned about the biological impossibility of a child
having two parents of the same sex and what ought to be a legal
impossibility as well since two unmarried people shackedup should not
be permitted to simultaneously adopt the same child will not stop in
kindergarten. They will be expanded upon from year to year as the
student progresses through the statist school system.
In the first grade, according to WorldNetDaily, the book “Who Is A
Family” will dupe students into believing that “in our school and our
community there are many different kinds of families that provide love
and care to each other. Remind the students that all family
structures are equally important.”
Do these “equally valid family structures” include fundamentalist
polygamist Mormons? Does this also include radical Islamist families
where the fathers murder their daughters in so-called “honor killings”
for exhibiting such proclivities towards harlotry such as wanting to
pursue higher education and not wanting to wear burlap bags over their
faces? After all, even if we find these practices abhorrent, it must
be reminded they fall under the rubric of “all” family structures
being equally valid.
Technically, a number of the social arrangements being promoted as
such aren’t even families. But Western society has become so unhinged
morally that only the most daring are publicly willing to enunciate
these observations.
A family consists of a married man and women and any children that
might result from their fecund union or any children such adults
united together might adopt. If one is feeling especially innovative
and cutting edge, one might be able to expand the definition to
include the unmarried propagating offspring via fornication.
However, no matter how much we might want it to be so, the non-
biologically related unmarried adult residing in the home with the
actual parent is not part of the family. They might be the concubine
or harlot of the adult residing in a particular domicile, but they can
only be a friend or acquaintance of the child not all that different
in terms of relationship than the next door neighbor.
Even if the laws are altered to let anyone live anyway they want with
all the accompanying tax breaks and even welfare handouts to which
they claim they are entitled, it will not be enough. The consciences
of those living in manners contrary to both theology and biology are
so pricked that they will not be content letting you simply put up
with the iniquities they have wrought but also compel you to applaud
and embrace these appalling decisions.
Fourth graders will be required to read an essay titled “My School Is
Accepting—But Things Could Be Better”. Along with this assignment,
elementary students will be required to define “gay”, “lesbian”, and
“LGBT”. By the way, to the pure of mind, that acronym is not a
reference to a deli sandwich.
About all children need to know about human reproduction at that age
is that babies somehow grow inside women’s stomachs. My grandfather
didn’t know what the word “pregnant” meant until after he got married
in his early 20’s and he came from a family of ten kids that lived on
a farm. Things might not need to be that hushed over, but neither
does everything need to hang out in the open classroom either.
As part of the curriculum, students will be extended the opportunity
to learn of the warped affections of Elton John, Ellen Degeneres,
Christina Aguilera, and Lance Bass. Are we going to also learn about
the preferred bodily orifices of other historical figures such as
Thomas Jefferson’s alleged bout of jungle fever?
In all likelihood, his name won’t even come up in class. Familiarity
with the primary author of the Declaration of Independence and third
president might fortify students against the efforts to deprive them
of their liberty.
In their preparation for world conquest and hegemony, do Red Chinese
pupils sit around discussing what celebrity likes what hole? Maybe if
American students spent less time on these frivolities, educators
would find the traditional 180 day school year sufficient and no
longer need a reason to threaten an extended academic calendar.
It is claimed such acculturation (more accurately indoctrination) is
necessary to prevent bullying. However, wouldn’t a generalized policy
of don’t make fun of anyone at school without bogging down young minds
with things that would make even grown adults blush and giggle in
mixed company be enough?.
Familiarity breeds contempt. Though social engineers might try their
hardest, human nature is pretty set within established parameters and
as such these educators might end up stirring up the very animosities
this ideological indoctrination is suppose to prevent.
Whether this contraindicated outcome is what is actually desired or
not could be open to debate. The state benefits even more when the
results are the opposite of peace and understanding as activists
believe they are then justified in calling for additional restrictions
on speech and thought.
Isaiah 5:20 warns, “Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil;
that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter
for sweet, and sweet for bitter!” American society is swiftly
approaching the point of no return when those that run our educational
institutions would rather the nation’s children be acquainted with the
most shameful of deeds and desires rather than the noblest of truths
that have inspired the highest of ideals for millennia
.o0o.
Frederick Meekins is a worldview consultant and Internet columnist. He
holds a BS from the University of Maryland in Political Science/
History and a MA in Apologetics & Christian Philosophy from Trinity
Theological Seminary. Frederick holds a Doctor of Practical Theology
through the Master’s Graduate School Of Divinity in Evansville,
Indiana. His research interests include Worldview Application,
Christian Apologetics, The Implications of Aberrant Theologies &
Ideologies, Futurology, Eschatology, Science Fiction, Terrorism
Studies, Environmentalism, Education Policy and America’s Judeo-
Christian Foundations. Dr. Meekins is also an ordained Non-
Denominational Minister.
Topaz
The USA is having homosexually perverted marriages. What would the
neocon bootlickers of Jews be saying if a Muslim country did that?
The Culture War:
Israel Line - Friday, June 10, 2005
Thousands Participate in Gay Pride Parade in Tel Aviv.
Thousands of people took to the streets of Tel Aviv this
afternoon to participate in the city's annual gay pride parade,
HA'ARETZ reported. The parade set out from Rabin Square and was to end
in Yarkon Park, where musical performances were planned.
MKs Yosef Lapid (Shinui), Eitan Cabel (Labor) and Zehava Gal-On
(Yahad), as well as Tel Aviv Mayor Ron Huldai, were set to speak at
the event.
The chairman of the national Association of Gay Men, Lesbians,
Bisexuals and Transgender in Israel, Mike Hamel, said today the parade
was organized with the "close cooperation" of the Tel Aviv
municipality. "It's great to see it, and great that it's one of the
few places in the world that has the support of a municipal body, a
government body," he said.
Hamel said the event is called a "pride parade," because it has
to do with "being proud of the way we are and the demand to accept
every person as a person, as he is, and not trying to change him."
Full story:
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/586950.html
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -
- -- - -- -
http://www.commondreams.org/news2005/1122-03.htm
Iran: Two More Executions for Homosexual Conduct
NEW YORK - November 22 -
Iran's execution of two men last week for homosexual conduct
highlights a
pattern of persecution of gay men that stands in stark violation of
the rights
to life and privacy, Human Rights Watch said today. On Sunday,
November 13, the semi-official Tehran daily Kayhan reported that the
Iranian
government publicly hung two men, Mokhtar N. (24 years old) and Ali A.
(25 years old), in the Shahid Bahonar Square of the northern town of
Gorgan. The government reportedly executed the two men for the crime
of "lavat." Iran's shari'a-based penal code defines lavat as
penetrative and non-penetrative sexual acts between men. Iranian law
punishes all penetrative sexual acts between adult men with the death
penalty.
Non-penetrative sexual acts between men are punished with lashes until
the fourth offense, when they are punished with death�
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - -
-
NEA, Gay Militants: Joined At The Hip
Lee Duigon
If a private citizen tells his neighbor's children that they ought to
try gay sex, he might wind up in a correctional facility. If he talks
that way to your 13-year-old son, you'll want him put away-pronto.
But when this very same behavior, toward the same children, is
displayed by adults who belong to America's biggest teachers' union,
most parents simply let them do it. In fact, they pay them to.
The NEA is committed to the cause of militant homosexuality. It's the
richest, most politically powerful union in America, and it has daily
access to most of America's children. And it wants to recruit them for
the homosexual lifestyle.
Lean this equation, America:
Public schools=The homosexual agenda
If you don't believe it, visit nea-glc.org/, the website of the
National Education Association's Gay and Lesbian Coalition. There,
among their "great achievements" in shaping NEA policy, the homosexual
militants cite the NEA's promotion of "the lesbian-gay-bisexual
curriculum" and "family life education... regarding the diversity of
sexual orientation."
The NEA has also campaigned for the proclamation of
"Gay-Lesbian-Bisexual-Transsexual History Month" (try putting that on
a T-shirt), homosexual studies at Catholic colleges--and, of course,
homosexual "marriage."
The people of Massachusetts know the teachers' union's commitment to
"gay marriage." Aline Isaacson of GLSEN (Gay-Lesbian-Straight
Education Network), the media's favorite poster gal for "gay
marriage", is also--surprise!-a paid consultant to the Massachusetts
teachers' union. Paid in taxpayer dollars, to boot. (You may remember
Massachusetts GLSEN from a few years ago as the organizers of graphic,
intensely perverted sex "workshops" for public school children--a
scandal that came to be known as "fist-gate.")
Ms. Isaacson, according to the grass-roots Article 8 Alliance, these
days makes it a full-time job lobbying state legislators to keep them
from jumping ship on "gay marriage" and voting for the Bill of Address
which would remove the outlaw Supreme Judicial Court judges who
imposed this oxymoron on the people of Massachusetts. Supported by
taxpayers' money, she makes daily, face-to-face visits to individual
lawmakers. Nice work if you can get it.
Too bad you couldn't make it to the gym teachers' state convention in
New Jersey, in February. It wasn't about volleyball. For public school
gym teachers, Job One--according to the convention's floor displays,
handouts, posters, and workshop topics (all of which I saw
personally)--is getting the kids comfy with homosexuality. To this
end, they handed out a "resource guide"--handsomely produced, slick,
paid for largely by Fleet Bank
Inc.--intended for distribution in all the public schools. (For more
information, see my article, "Now It's the Gym Teachers," in the
February archive of the Chalcedon website, chalcedon.edu.)
You would have seen even more of the same at "Twenty Years of Great
Sex (Ed)" last year, a national conference of "sex educators" hosted
by Rutgers, New Jersey's taxpayer-funded state university. Again,
there was no effort to hide the educators' whole-hearted penchant for
homosexuality...
http://www.ihr.org/ www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/
http://www.natvan.com http://www.nsm88.org
http://heretical.com/ http://immigration-globalization.blogspot.com/