Re: I'm at a loss to explain why hundreds are suddenly reading this page.
Autymn D. C.
> I'm at a loss to explain why hundreds are suddenly reading this page.
>
> http://www.amperefitz.com/tb1g.htm
>
> All of a sudden it has become the most popular page I have ever
> written.
>
> Why?
>
> I wrote it several years ago but it does explain why the gravitational
> frequency must be higher than any electron frequency.
>Neither gravity nor inertia can be shielded.
This is telling you that gravity is being caused by a far different
frequency than anything in the realm of the electron's frequency.<
They can be shielded, but with negative mass--this is at work in the
Hubble flow and variant cosmoghonic celerity. But it has nothing to
do with another band. I feel gravital quanta share the same Planck's
constand. Each mote however is so leiht, its wave is huge! Celestial
bodies do not make coherent waves; they're not Fermi or Bose
condensate.
>So now ask yourself this question: Is there really any difference between the electron's attraction to the nucleus and light being bent by the star?
The answer has to be NO.
Gravity, therefore, is being caused by the quark's spin just the same
as magnetism is being caused by the electron's spin.<
Non sequitur--gravity is toward a body, not sideward (or tangent); the
latter is frame-dragging or what they call gravitomagnetism (a
misnomer by the way). If neutrinos are heavy (they are) in the
univers, then so are elèctròns, which are heavier.
>I believe in scalar standing wave resonances that I can see as keys on a piano even though we, as yet, do not know their exact frequencies.
The spins of these scalar resonances are also scalar from their same
frequency surroundings but they are not EXACTLY scalar to each other.
The spins are only scalar to the AVERAGE similar resonance and herein
lies the secret of how this universe is built.<
Scalar what? Which property do you mean, and which unit? It can't be
newton or any other moviment.
>When binary stars of the same mass are found to have opposite spins then Milo Wolff, Stephen Wolfram and I will obtain an avalanche of our peers thinking the same way that we presently do.<
why?
-Aut