If you intend to help other people by posting to a group like this,
please do not post no-archive. If you are just a troll, posting
no-archive helps hide your trolling...
--
Derald <derald
invalid.net> wrote in news:te3s5ad5g5h70hhjcic1q1veomleile5fg
4ax.com:
> Path:
eternal-september.org!
mx02.eternal-september.org!
feeder.eternal-september.org!
news.glorb.com!
peer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!
news.highwinds-media.com!
feed-me.highwinds-media.com!
Xl.tags.giganews.com!
border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!
nntp.giganews.com!
local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!
nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2014 07:15:06 -0600
> From: Derald <derald
invalid.net>
> Newsgroups: misc.consumers.frugal-living
> Subject: Re: Does Walmart inspect your receipt when you are leaving the store?
> Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2014 08:15:30 -0500
> Message-ID: <te3s5ad5g5h70hhjcic1q1veomleile5fg
4ax.com>
> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.92/32.572
> X-No-Archive: yes
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-NFilter: 1.2.0
> Lines: 32
> X-Trace: sv3-vPjJ+1JjL6XnE5Wom3PoaGOWPajqBwEa51FiwOswvv+R2aWE4MxjZ8DvB+jRGOtwcEFBPeI+VmyAfdJ!CA4b+LHL05WsBFHYKdlHRUk+V0cEQnhzmcLsnTzHbhJ+gmi2G8uIowDKTJVNm5S/x0mTufdiM7Jf!hJ5iuGbUvMKxU+SaUnx3raSz+Ov0
> X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
> X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
> X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
> X-Original-Bytes: 2700
> X-Received-Bytes: 2812
> X-Received-Body-CRC: 1374090941
> Xref:
mx02.eternal-september.org misc.consumers.frugal-living:31435
>
> "Bob F" <bobnospam
gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>John Doe wrote:
>>> Does Walmart inspect your receipt when you are leaving the store?
>>>
>>> snip <<
>>> I suppose one could refuse the inspection. Their only recourse being
>>> to disallow your entrance to the store. But that hassle isn't worth
>>> it IMO.
>>
>>There are much better reasons to not give your business to WalMart.
>>
> I agree with you on that one but, unfortunately, in many
> communities it now is impractical, if not impossible for some items, to
> avoid shopping at Wallyworld thanks, in large part, to Wallyworld -- in
> concert with other "big box" stores -- and their brutally predatory
> "competition".
> To OP's point, I had the experience sometime in the late '90's but
> it was because I was leaving the store with an item too large to bag.
> Gratuitous Aside: In 2000, while comparison shopping automobile
> tires, I toured a Sam's Club to determine whether it could ever possibly
> be worth actually _paying_ someone just to shop in his store and there
> witnessed customers dutifully lining up like cattle in a chute so that a
> Sam's minion could compare the contents of their shopping carts to their
> receipts. It didn't seem to matter to any of them that the items being
> "verified" already belonged to _them_!
>
> --
> Derald
> They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
> temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
> -B. Franklin
>
>