In article <
2vmstal6ipqibutjf...@4ax.com>,
Derald <
der...@invalid.net> wrote:
> I did not listen to the program excerpt but did read the text at
> the citation, which appears to be a transcript of the on-air news item.
> I must say that it is typical NPR drivel. The examples are of the
> extreme stupidity of the calls' recipients and/or the incompetence of
> some unnamed "generic" institution's customer service types. The only
> actual useful _information_ in the entire piece is in the last
> paragraph, which I quote below:
> >The FTC recommends that consumers "just hang up" on the robocalls.
> >
> >"We don't want consumers to engage in any way with robocallers," Hsue says.
> (Patty Hsue, an attorney who leads the FTC's effort against robocalls)
> > "A lot of times when you get a robocall you have the option of pressing 1
> > for more
> > information or pressing 2 to ask to be removed from the list. And in either
> > case,
> > pressing 1 or 2 basically lets the robocaller know that it's a live person
> > on the other
> > line who's willing to engage and that could lead to additional robocalls."
> Seems to me, that's the voice equivalent to the email, "Click this
> link to be removed from future emails", which simply is a way of
> determining the email address to be valid and monitored.
>
> Gratuitous Aside: I don't believe that my long-dead father ever
> "answered" a telephone in his life. He simply put the handset to his
> ear and waited for the calling party to initiate the conversation.
> After all, _they_ interrupted _his_ day ;-)
We never answer the phone. our machine gets every call. so if you call
us.
Leave an interesting message or bazinga !
--
Karma ; what a concept!