New Low for Microsoft

[nunnurbiz]

New Low for microSUCK asshole shit company, dishonest and started by the
THIEF Bill Gates.

They are NOW sending VIRUSES to you Windows OS without notification or
warning under the GUISE of REPAIR WINDOWS such to take control of your
OS and disable it until you PAY UP. Bunch of low life motherfuckers
(incompetent to boot). Bill Gates is living proof that to be successful
in the USA you have to be a THIEF, LIAR and conman. Then you can shovel
your SHIT OS onto the public.

Do NOT choose "repair windows" on startup, you will get infected with the
microsuck virus and your OS will no longer work correctly. You will
receive the message: your windows version is not genuine, click here to
activate it.

What a bunch of morons working at MS. Do they not realize that windows 7
is freely available all over the net, including working keys. I guess the
figure that the mostly ignorant gullible public will fall for their
bullshit?

[ItsJoan NotJoann]

Ummmmmmm, you do know and can recognize spam when you see it, correct??
Garbage like that I forward to a Spam Cop account I have with the full
headers attached. Then I block the pond scum who sent me the slop and
their domain, then delete the offending message, and continue with my day.

Oh, by the way, every few months to maybe once or twice a year I also get
a phone call to return the call immediately as my Microsoft license will
expire immediately!!!!!!!!!!! Those dumbasses are added to my blocked
numbers list and once again I continue with my day. You do know that
computer 'licenses' don't expire? Good, I thought you wouldn't fall for
this scam either.

[pk121]

"nunnurbiz" wrote in message
news:XnsAA1182AAD2B6...@46.165.242.91...

You have Gates mixed up with D.Trump !!

[Dennis]

On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 18:00:28 -0700 (PDT), ItsJoan NotJoann
<itsjoan...@webtv.net> wrote:

>Ummmmmmm, you do know and can recognize spam when you see it, correct??

Ummmmmmmm, you do know and can recognize a troll when you see it,
correct?

Dennis (evil)
--
"There is a fine line between participation and mockery" - Wally

[ItsJoan NotJoann]

On Thursday, March 14, 2019 at 1:38:27 PM UTC-5, Dennis wrote:
>
> Ummmmmmmm, you do know and can recognize a troll when you see it,
> correct?
>
> Dennis (evil)
>

Yes, there is that great possibility he is a troll and there is also the
possibility he doesn't recognize spam. Hard to believe, but some people
still don't. They're the same people who believe that really is the IRS
on the phone demanding they pay their back taxes with an iTunes card. Or
their loved one is sitting in a jail somewhere and need bail money.

[n/a]

"nunnurbiz" wrote in message
news:XnsAA1182AAD2B6...@46.165.242.91...

snip....

reads like a troll, smells like a troll, quacks like a troll, must be a
troll.....

[nunnurbiz]

"n/a" <go...@phoenix.com> wrote in news:q6ettb$3k9$1...@dont-email.me:

If you dummies knew how to use google search, you would see that MS has a
license expiration date on most of it's OS versions, including Win10-7.
This allows them to shut down or limit your OS until you have what they
consider a "genuine" version of windoze. They also built in hardware
recognition such that you cannot change your hardware and continue to use
the same OS you were always using prior to the change. There are several
hack programs to overide this hijacking by Microsuck. And if you search
further you will find that it is difficult but not impossible to turn off
windows update. Even if you set one of the many setting to no update,
Microsuck takes control of your machine and updates anyways.

As to the asshole thief, con man Billy BOy gates. There was a movie made
about him and how he STOLE DOS from a professor, then STOLE windows from
Apple. He is a fucking dishonest thief. A thief does not change its
colors, he will always be a thief. These movies are NOT released until
they go through a panel of attorneys to eliminate anything untrue and
potentially libelous. So, you see, he IS a thief and he did steal to get
where he is today.

You can scream spam all you want, but the fact is, you're ignorant.

[Paul]

You toss some of the usual terms around, but you seem to have
them a bit twisted.

1) It *is* possible for install media to be booby-trapped. I've
seen this precisely once. They can arrange "winload.exe" to have
a signing certificate that expires. During the boot process, booting
will stop if this signing is not valid. Such mechanisms are intended
to stop the hacking of media, at least for some simple changes.

I think that might have been one Windows Insider version, valid
for about a week or so. The signing was only valid for several
months perhaps.

No other media I've used, suffers from such a setting.

2) When you install the OS, there is a thing called the "grace
period". The OS is not dependent on the key at that time.

This mechanism exists so IT personnel can build an image,
do SYSPERP or sealing or the like.

The grace period can be rearmed. On the 29th day or 59th day

slmgr.vbs -rearm

rundll32.exe syssetup,SetupOobeBnk # WinXP

that resets the grace period.

On some OS, this can be repeated up to four times, for
150 days of grace period usage (possibly Enterprise).

Someone in the groups once claimed to be able to do this
forever - YMMV.

3) The OS response to the grace period varies.

Windows 10 installs outside grace period, continue to run.

Windows 7 Enterprise (I have a VM) continues to run outside
the grace period. It will run for around 30 minutes, before
it spontaneously reboots (dirty shutdown and all). This is,
again, a courtesy to IT staff, allowing them to retrieve files
or do tiny things, on an out-of-grace image. I have a compiler
seated in that OS, and I can "squeak in a compile" in the 30 minutes :-)
I keep MinGW in there.

On some of the older OSes, if you move the hard drive,
the OS basically "Seizes up" or "freezes". That's the worst.
Of course, you could get 30 days grace by just installing
that OS over again. Not a big deal.

4) Some of the install media is "gated by keys". It won't
allow you to install, without a key. There are three possibilities.

a) doesn't care about key (Win10) - you can load a key later
b) will accept an available install-only key (Win8)
c) absolutely needs a key (WinXP SP3 maybe? varied
between WinXP Service Pack versions, four different discs)

5) Ability to move a licensed product is clearly defined in
the terms of use. A "System Builder OEM" stays with the
original hardware it is installed on. This can be remedied
with a phone calls, if you haven't been abusing the license
key. A person who installed once, had a hardware failure two
years later, could request that their install work on a new
replacement motherboard which isn't actually the same. The
automated telephone challenge might be all that's needed.

There are "Retail" SKUs that allow moving the OS, but
the license had better not be "visible" on the old machine,
or it could be cut off. The "Retail" SKU, because of this
flexibility, the market will bear a higher price for this
(if not, they'd never sell any).

6) There are tools for activating stuff anyway, like
"DAZ's loader". And there are enough abuses of volume
licensing by mom and pop computer stores, to make even
your "installed by mom and pop" OS, not be legitimate.
That's why mom or pop "only charged $50 for the job".

You can really have, just about anything you want,
at any price you're willing to pay. Right now, you
could use the Heidoc downloader to generate a URL for
Win7 ISO media. Download the media. Then use DAZ's loader
to make it "legit". And be off and running with no grace
period. And it costs you... nothing. Just a little hair loss.

And I don't think Gates had too much of a hand in the
software itself. He wasn't a coding machine or anything.
And GUI/UI concepts are reused from all sorts of OSes,
when making newer OSes. Lots of ideas were "borrowed"
from Xerox PARC, once upon a time.

Paul

[micky]

In alt.windows7.general, on Wed, 13 Mar 2019 19:50:38 +0000 (UTC),

nunnurbiz <whod...@notme.org> wrote:

>New Low for microSUCK asshole shit company, dishonest and started by the
>THIEF Bill Gates.
>
>They are NOW sending VIRUSES to you Windows OS without notification or

I read in a software journal that they do do this, but only to people
who use foul language online.

[ItsJoan NotJoann]

On Friday, March 15, 2019 at 5:30:30 AM UTC-5, Paul wrote:
>
> You toss some of the usual terms around, but you seem to have
> them a bit twisted.
>

> Paul
>
(LOTS of helpful information from Paul snipped for length.)

Careful there Paul, you're confusing someone off their medications with
facts. It will not be appreciated by the original poster.

:-)

[nunnurbiz]

Paul <nos...@needed.invalid> wrote in news:q6fus3$1km$1...@dont-email.me:

Much thanks for an educated look at windows OS.

[nunnurbiz]

ItsJoan NotJoann <itsjoan...@webtv.net> wrote in news:c9a971f6-
8340-46d8-9f0...@googlegroups.com:

Least I am not a thief. Guys like Gates and his illegitmate son
Fuckerberg are living proof you have to be a thief and a scammer to be
eminently successful in the go ol' corrupt USA.

[nunnurbiz]

micky <NONONO...@bigfoot.com> wrote in
news:qtkn8epsl1iqssoqe...@4ax.com:

as opposed to spreading ignoramus remarks?

[nunnurbiz]

Ned Ludd <Ned_Ludd@Sherwood_Forest.web> wrote in
news:rv8g9eps5t1one9um...@4ax.com:

> On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 19:50:38 +0000 (UTC), nunnurbiz
> <whod...@notme.org> wrote:
>
>>You will
>>receive the message: your windows version is not genuine, click here
to
>>activate it.
>>

>>Do they not realize that windows 7
>>is freely available all over the net, including working keys.
>

> Sounds like some "everything should be free" snowflake found a pirate
> copy of Windows on the web and now he's mad because he's too dumb to
> make it work.

No, it's working fine. I also have w10 and most all other versions of
the basically shit OS from windows. You sound like your one of windows
dummy developers that STILL cannot produce a good OS after years of
trying. If Linux users weren't such assholes I would be using that
instead long ago.

>
>>then STOLE windows from Apple.
>

> Both Apple and Microsoft "stole" the idea from the Xerox advance
> development laboratories. Xerox didn't really want to follow that line
> of business.
>
> MS chose to ride on their DOS for IBM PC hardware; Apple used
> different hardware and wrote a version that ran on their (different)
> DOS. Both found markets.
>
> There were a dozen Graphical User Interfaces marketed to ride on top
> of MS DOS. HP's New Wave, GEM, others. MS was the version that caught
> on in the market place. The others had a fair shot.
>
> Oh, God! Am I defending MS? Sorry about that.

[J. P. Gilliver (John)]

>Paul <nos...@needed.invalid> wrote in news:q6fus3$1km$1...@dont-email.me:

[]

>> And I don't think Gates had too much of a hand in the
>> software itself. He wasn't a coding machine or anything.

[]
I think he did start out with coding ability: I originally had a home
computer (Tangerine), which had BASIC in ROM; ISTR seeing two names
actually in the precious ROM space, and I think BG was one of them.
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

one can't go from `supposed crackpot ideas have been right before' to `we should
take this latest crackpot idea onboard without making it fight for acceptance
like all the previous ones'. - Richard Caley, 2002 February 11 00:02:28

[up2u]

"J. P. Gilliver (John)" <G6JP...@255soft.uk> wrote in
news:bkUmuOaE...@255soft.uk:

>>Paul <nos...@needed.invalid> wrote in news:q6fus3$1km$1...@dont-email.me:
> []
>>> And I don't think Gates had too much of a hand in the
>>> software itself. He wasn't a coding machine or anything.
> []
> I think he did start out with coding ability: I originally had a home
> computer (Tangerine), which had BASIC in ROM; ISTR seeing two names
> actually in the precious ROM space, and I think BG was one of them.

His main "coding ability" seems to have always been taking advantage of
others accomplishments. But thanks for the new tidbit of info.