Re: Boycott Kellogg's!
wis...@yahoo.com
>Kellogg's had withdrawn its sponsorship of Michael Phelps because of
>the photo of him smoking marijuana. If you smoke pot, you are
>probably familiar with Kellogg's products like Pop-Tarts, Froot-Loops,
>Keebler cookies, Cheez-It crackers, and dozens of other brands of junk
>food loaded with sugar, salt, and partially hydrogenated soybean oil.
>
>WTF was Kellogg's thinking? They have no problem with stoners eating
>their junk food, but refuse to let a stoner endorse the same junk
>food. I am calling for a boycott of all Kellogg's products, which
>shouldn't be difficult to comply with because there are plenty of
>other companies that manufacture similar products.
>
>Corporate rivals of Kellogg's include Kraft/Nabisco, Frito-Lay, and
>Proctor & Gamble, and together they manufacture more than enough empty
>calories to satisfy everyone's munchies. Please do not purchase or
>consume Kellogg's products until it reinstates its sponsorship of
>Michael Phelps and apologizes for insulting its target audience.
>
>Contact Kellogg's at:
>http://www2.kelloggs.com/ContactUs.aspx
Phelps puffing $5.00 worth of weed has caused Kellogg's marketing
department to suddenly acquire "negro dignity". Compare Phelp's
treatment to the kid-glove handling of Obama's tax evading nominees!
ted
trigonometry1972@gmail.com |
LOL.
I can't boycott Kellogg's as I don't use any of their
products...........Trig
RF
Exactly my sentiments. I cannot ever remember
buying anything with their brand.
USA1st
to keep his nose clean. If he doesn't want to abide by their
requirements, then he doesn't have to accept their money or be their
spokesman. They are paying him for his image and if they require a
clean cut image, then he should decline being their "face". He has
tarnished their image. I would have been tougher on him than they
were.
On Feb 6, 6:00 am, wis...@yahoo.com wrote:
> ted- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
clams_casino
>If Kelloggs is paying Phelps then they have every right to expect him
>to keep his nose clean. If he doesn't want to abide by their
>requirements, then he doesn't have to accept their money or be their
>spokesman. They are paying him for his image and if they require a
>clean cut image, then he should decline being their "face". He has
>tarnished their image. I would have been tougher on him than they
>were.
>
>
>
>
Bingo - the are paying him millions for an image. Without that image,
he's just another pot smoking teenage - dime a dozen.