On 04/13/2015 01:51 PM,
hchi...@hotmail.com wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:24:36 -0400, Michael Black <
et...@ncf.ca> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 9 Apr 2015,
hchi...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 9 Apr 2015 19:43:10 +0000 (UTC), imascot <im...@mycomputer.now> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm an oldtimer here, not dead, but not on Facebook either. I've never seen
>>>> anybody with a smartphone on USENET.
>>>> I miss the great threads that used to be here.
I'm on facebook, along with a lot of people from other newsgroups. It's
nothing at all like usenet. More pictures, less thinking and
discussion. I've "known" these people since 1995 so perhaps discussion
isn't needed as much -- we all "know" each other.
I just spent a week in Brian Head with half a dozen people from the
skiing newsgroup, and I don't think any of us surprised any others of us
-- it's like we'd been friends, or at least work-friends, for quite a
while.
Usenet was better, though. Even without the dog/cat pictures.
>>> You aren't the only one. Overall, I think it was one of the best groups around
>>> even when it was having bad days. Perhaps it was because it took a little
>>> intelligence to get on usenet, and generally people here had some sort of
>>> cosmopolitan attitude or experience in addition to a frugal nature, compared to
>>> forums and other forms of communication.
>>>
>>> I think that another part of it was that until 2002, and then 2008, a lot of us
>>> had a lot more positive outlook towards the future.
Along the belief that if we could just explain things properly we could
convince the terminally wrong-headed that life would be better if they
could just change their minds and AGREE WITH US.
>>What about people who changed their mind about frugality? They died too,
>>in terms of this newsgroup.
>>
>>I wonder if that factored into some of the people lost over the years.
>>Not recently, but maybe some day someone woke up and decided "frugality is
>>for losers" and went on a buying binge.
Perhaps if you discovered a terminal illness and thought your heirs
would just waste the fruits of your lifelong frugality you might figure
Oh hell, I'm just going to spend it all, but even then I think we would
tend to want to get the best deal. Barring that, such a polar-opposite
switch just doesn't seem reasonable.
> More likely the cost of a newsfeed where Rod was the main poster probably seemed
> NOT frugal... :D
Does anybody still pay for this stuff? NOT frugal whether RS exists or not.
--
Cheers, Bev
---------------------------------------
A recent psychic fair was cancelled due
to unforeseen circumstances.