I want to clarify that in no way this is discriminatory against men,
and I'm male myself, but I find those balls hanging there absolutely
ridiculous.
By contrast, the shape of the woman is curvacious and has mountains,
cliffs and a jungle. Oh, that jungle is calling you like the call of
the wild, like you got no will whatsover to say "no."
I know we were made to God's image, and he must have had similar
balls, but I find it utterly unbalanced in favor of women. If it
weren't for our superior brain, we would have to live in a cage like a
lesser monkey.
----------------------------------------------------------
"The ways of the jungle are mysterious like the ways of God, but often
there's a simple explanation for things"
Saw a Jeep type vehicle this afternoon with a pair of false balls in a
leather scrotum hanging from the base of the apparantly erect tow ball
and arm.
>
You don't have to cut those pills in half just to save some money.
Try a generic if you need to, but take the full strength by all means.
Yeah, I've seen those "balls" too. I think they have something to do
with machismo or maybe towing another macho toy...
Wise tibetan monkeys only take chill pills.
She replied, "he made me beautiful so you would be attracted to me. He
made be stupid so I would be attracted to you."
That's why women reject the guy on a bicycle.
>
> Why 'god' who according to most mythologies always existed alone till it
> created the world and people would, as a lone entity have developed
> testicles or ovaries come to that is a mystery that only the ancient
> priests and shamans who created the foundation of modern religions
> thousands of years ago could answer.
> Perhaps the emphasis on fertility in religions is something to do with
> the adoption of an agricultural lifestyle about 7-1000 years ago.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
OK, could there be another way for God to put balls on us without the
ugly look? Where is the "intelligent design" in it?
Well, that just proves that women are not that stupid. They just
pretend to be.
You have raised some of the greatest mysteries of the Universe, some
of which bug us every day. No, I won't deny here the act of Creation
(any atheist can tell you that), but I will point out how STUPID that
design was.
First of all, I'd put the balls on the neck. Right, similar to a
chameleon's pouch where they could be retracted at will. But when you
see a girl, hey, you show what you got!
The problem with the balls down there are many. To begin with, it's
not convenient to the cyclists who constantly must use supports and
funny seats. The bicycle by comparison is the product of truly
intelligent design. Pity there's no room for them in this world made
for the big and stupid. Well, that's another flaw in the theory of
intelligent design...
> (You may ask what the heck this is doing in a bicycling forum... but
> then you ask yourself if most cyclists are men or women, and you may
> get the hint).
> I want to clarify that in no way this is discriminatory against men,
> and I'm male myself, but I find those balls hanging there absolutely
> ridiculous.
> By contrast, the shape of the woman is curvacious and has mountains,
> cliffs and a jungle. Oh, that jungle is calling you like the call of
> the wild, like you got no will whatsover to say "no."
> I know we were made to God's image, and he must have had similar
> balls, but I find it utterly unbalanced in favor of women. If it
> weren't for our superior brain, we would have to live in a cage like
> a lesser monkey.
> "The ways of the jungle are mysterious like the ways of God, but
> often there's a simple explanation for things"
http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION
- not to overlook that man created god in mans image or all the gods
and tribes on earth would look alike. We have enough religion in
bicycling to avoid organized ones dedicated to an omnipotent god.
Jobst Brandt
Listen, this no ordinary religion. This is the wise Tibetan Monkey
bringing the path in the jungle, which is Nirvana for cyclists.
I know all you are saying, but using some sublime metaphorical
language. ;)
Today we welcome a new partnership against the predators of the
jungle. The way of the monkeys is COOPERATION...
(yes, we have exchanged links and everything)
> >http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION
>
> dunno about you guys but i feel pretty...
>
> <begins to twirl...slowly building momentum>
>
> I feel pretty,
> Oh, so pretty,
> I feel pretty and witty and bright!
> And I pity
> Any guy who isn't me tonight.
>
> I feel charming,
> Oh, so charming
> It's alarming how charming I feel!
> And so pretty
> That I hardly can believe I'm real.
>
> See the pretty dude in that mirror there:
> Who can that attractive stud be?
> Such a pretty face,
> Such a pretty bulge,
> Such a pretty smile,
> Such a pretty me!
>
> I feel stunning
> And entrancing,
> Feel like running and dancing like hogs,
> For I'm loved
> By pretty wonderful dogs!-
Dogs' balls make me feel good.
Actually, all about me is better than a dog!
I think God didn't pay that much attention to the creation of the dog.
SMS, you have got it exactly right. But still it is mystery to me what women
see in men.
One thing is for sure, I never want to see a naked man. The more clothes we
wear, the better. Most women are not all that beautiful, only the very young
and slender are. By the time a female is out of her teens, it is all over.
I swear to God I think the most popular thing on the Internet is the porn.
But it all tends to younger and younger. Porn is strictly a male thing of
course. Next to eating, sex (reproduction) is our strongest instinct. And it
is all ruled by male hormones. Yup, nothing but chemistry!
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
> Saw a Jeep type vehicle this afternoon with a pair of false balls in a
> leather scrotum hanging from the base of the apparantly erect tow ball
Like these?
http://www.bumpernuts.com/
It's totally nuts, don't you think? That's degrading... to us.
Where can we put similar balls on a bike to keep up with the
competition?
They are there for a reason - it increases sperm count because they stay cooler.
Evolution in action.
I pity you as you age.
Just look in the mirror at yourself nude and you will see what I mean.
Better yet, look at any naked woman over the age of 20. Ugh!
Romaitc love is fine with teenagers. Once you are out of your teens, it is
all a farce. To get a clue, spend several hours with "Der Rosenkavalier" by
Richard Strauss. You will come away from it wiser.
They are still a nuisance for biking. At least at much as SUVs. ;)
I still see women in their fifties pretty. Some of them. I'd be in
trouble if I didn't.
This thread of yours is borderline. Be sure you do not offend me or you will
regret it.
Mature women are no more sexy than mature men are. Let's face it, we all
become slobs somewhere in our late 20's. The most pitiful sight in the world
is an older person pretending that he is still young. I urge you to think
more on gravestones and less on sensual delights. They are reserved for the
very young exclusively.
> They are still a nuisance for biking. At least at much as SUVs. ;)
You're always free to cut them off. Use a rusty hacksaw.
You are going to have a miserable life.
You have no clue just how sexy mature women can be. 20 year olds are nothing in
comparison.
Mature women are basically mothers. Sexy is all about the young.You must be
some kind of pervert not to know that.
The only time "Romeo and Juliet" ever made any sense to me was when I saw
the film which featured teenagers. Romantic love is reserved for the young.
When you are much past 20, you are into nothing but farce. Women know this
even if you do not.
>>> Mature women are no more sexy than mature men are. Let's face it, we
>>> all become slobs somewhere in our late 20's. The most pitiful sight
>>> in the world is an older person pretending that he is still young. I
>>> urge you to think more on gravestones and less on sensual delights.
>>> They are reserved for the very young exclusively.
>> You are going to have a miserable life.
>> You have no clue just how sexy mature women can be. 20 year olds are nothing in comparison.
> Mature women are basically mothers.
Plenty of them aint.
> Sexy is all about the young.You must be some kind of pervert not to know that.
> The only time "Romeo and Juliet" ever made any sense to me was when
> I saw the film which featured teenagers. Romantic love is reserved
> for the young. When you are much past 20, you are into nothing but
> farce. Women know this even if you do not.
> Regards,
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
Wota fucking wanker.
>>>>> I still see women in their fifties pretty. Some of them. I'd be in trouble if I didn't.
> This thread of yours is borderline. Be sure you do not offend me or you will regret it.
Only in your pathetic little drug crazed fantasyland.
> Mature women are no more sexy than mature men are. Let's face it, we
> all become slobs somewhere in our late 20's. The most pitiful sight
> in the world is an older person pretending that he is still young. I
> urge you to think more on gravestones and less on sensual delights.
> They are reserved for the very young exclusively.
> Regards,
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
Wota fucking wanker.
The very young act like wild monkeys and we learn to use more
sophisticated techniques like Tantra. My sex life is better at 55 than
25. But that's me. ;)
Some wrapping similar to the Hindus could be a possibility. But
ordinary underwear can do some nice job at that.
Use the belt/pully of a machine tool!
Scrotum Self-Repair:
http://www.darwinawards.com/stupid/stupid1998-10.html
--
Tad McClellan
email: perl -le "print scalar reverse qq/moc.liamg\100cm.j.dat/"
I want you to be honest and tell me if you think God used a higher
design in our balls compared to the balls of, say, a dog or bull.
But God did show better design in the tits of a woman as opposed to a
bitch or cow... Get my point?
Nope, there is no god, just an endless variety of crutches for pathetically inadequate 'minds'
> But God did show better design in the tits of a woman as opposed to a bitch or cow... Get my point?
Nope, you dont have one.
You're kidding, right? You can't really be that clueless, can you?
Well,
yeah, by the content of the rest of your post, you clearly are that
clueless. PLONK!
>> The very young act like wild monkeys and we learn to use more
sophisticated techniques like Tantra. My sex life is better at 55 than
25. But that's me. ;)
Just be sure to keep your wretched sex life undercover. The rest of us have
weak stomachs and can only take so much revulsion.
Women are the objects of porn. Men are the subjects of porn. Glad I was able
to clear that up for you.
Now excuse me while I continue with my reading of St. Augustine's "The City
of God."
On Jan 22, 4:13 pm, Neil Kelsey <neil_kel...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 22, 12:36 pm, e_space <espace1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > a cow may not agree with you ... ever think of that?
>
> When did the topic get switched to lesbian cows?
I hear most cows are inseminated nowadays, so they must get "horny,"
if you know what I mean.
They are sexy for sure...
http://ombakblog.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/eagleclaw-sexy-cow1.jpg
I'm just having a blast thinking of God tinkering with the creation of
the balls and tits... And the stupid sheep are so conceited to believe
they are "perfect," so far above all "lesser" animals! Funny they are
also so stupid to go later to the plastic surgeon!
To be honest, I feel a bit resentful about this humanity that
arrogantly destroys natures and wipes out species, while claiming to
believe in a "just" god, who will "only" save them and condemn the
rest to eternal BBQ.
Hopefully though I will be able to free the "monkey within," who's
more humble and knows things about evolution, like it is time to
change, stop all those crazy wars, junk all those SUVs and ride a bike
in the cool morning breeze.
Your hungry Christian lion is doomed to extinction, brother.
This is the movie: MONGOL, and this is one review:
Mongols need laws. I will make them obey -- even if I have to kill
half of them.
--Genghis Khan
By Roger Ebert
Sergei Bodrov's "Mongol" is a ferocious film, blood-soaked, pausing
occasionally for passionate romance and more frequently for torture.
As a visual spectacle, it is all but overwhelming, putting to shame
some of the recent historical epics from Hollywood. If it has a flaw,
and it does, it is expressed succinctly by the wife of its hero: "All
Mongols do is kill and steal."
She must have seen the movie. That's about all they do in "Mongol."
They do not sing, dance, chant, hold summit meetings, have courts,
hunt, or (with one exception) even cook and eat. They have no culture,
except for a series of sayings: "A Mongol does, or does not ..." a
long list of things, although many a Mongol seems never to have been
issued the list, and does (or does not) do them, anyway.
more...
http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080619/REVIEWS/944262138
***
MY ANALYSIS:
The Law of the Jungle prevails in Mongolia and Genghis Khan brings
laws necessary for civilization. What a wonderful thing! It reminds me
how badly laws are need on our roads, where still the weak find no
place to hide. I've been savagely attacked and spit upon for riding a
bike on a road while the police stood there catching $peeder$, and he
saw nothing. The hordes of drivers will some day be tamed, I'm sure.
But I'm also sure you may interpret this movie in many ways.
And how old are you kid?
Obviously not old enough to know what you are talking about.