WIKILEAKS: "The Truth will set you free"
His Highness the TibetanMonkey, the mundane prophet of the last days before the end of times
On Dec 10, 6:19 am, TLC <tlc.tere...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is the "The damage done to America's image is worse after the arrest
> than before."?
>
> Yes, I'd say it's damaged America's reputation more. It's one thing
> having some of America's more looney politico's making ridicuolous
> statements about Julian should be hunted down and arrested like a
> terrorist, But, the arrest, even though seemingly for another
> incident, brings it into to real life what America's politico's will
> do to keep things quiet, but more because they are embarrassed by what
> people now know and think.
Thanks, the most damage to America's PR is self-inflicted and now the
beast is naked. They may crucify the guy to teach a lesson, but the
harsher they are the more doom the bring upon themselves.
John F. Kennedy had this much to say:
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent
revolution inevitable." -John F. Kennedy
But violent revolutions rarely lead to something good, so we are truly
now living under the Law of the Jungle and things will go downhill
from here. International Law was dismissed in Iraq, and now Decency
Law is brushed aside.
The beast is seldom smart and we'll all go down with it. We don't
deserve any better if we don't speak up.
----------------------------------------------------------
Edward Dolan
> Thanks, the most damage to America's PR is self-inflicted and now the
> beast is naked. They may crucify the guy to teach a lesson, but the
> harsher they are the more doom the bring upon themselves.
>
> John F. Kennedy had this much to say:
>
> "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent
> revolution inevitable." -John F. Kennedy
>
> But violent revolutions rarely lead to something good, so we are truly
> now living under the Law of the Jungle and things will go downhill
> from here. International Law was dismissed in Iraq, and now Decency
> Law is brushed aside.
>
> The beast is seldom smart and we'll all go down with it. We don't
> deserve any better if we don't speak up.
You've got shit for brains all right. Now what else is new?
Fucking Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
His Highness the TibetanMonkey, the mundane prophet of the last days before the end of times
SMART COMMENT:
(not mine)
It's a poor analogy likening governments to individuals. Someone who's
keeping a secret about cheating on their wife in their second year of
marriage has a right to privacy, as long as their conscience can bear
it. A government that has sent espionage task forces into
underdeveloped countries to upset their political system and install
their own "democratic" regime deserves no privacy. You've forgotten,
governments are made to serve individuals, and not the other way
around. Things are so backward nowadays that the US populace is
complacently dependent upon their government and the multinational
corporations that it serves: they're trading their freedom for
material comfort and soothing lies.
***
"Comforting and soothing lies" sound like Jesus, right?
His Highness the TibetanMonkey, the mundane prophet of the last days before the end of times
I've ever met)
On Dec 10, 12:27 pm, Mike Jones <l...@dasteem.invalid> wrote:
> Responding to His Highness the TibetanMonkey, the mundane prophet of the
> last days before the end of times:
> They don't sound like Americans to me.
Yep, it sounds depressing, but don't you worry. The party is coming
soon. ;)
Hey, let's keep partying because we are living in "the last days
before the end of times."
The hope is a sexy revolution out of the jungle, say banana.
Little Red is coming for sure...
http://www.halloweenplayground.com/images/legavenue/miss-little-red-riding-hood-costume.jpg
But we ain't inviting Jesus. He's too depressing.
His Highness the TibetanMonkey, the mundane prophet of the last days before the end of times
On Dec 15, 7:13 am, TLC <tlc.tere...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why I'm Posting Bail Money for Julian Assange
>
> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-moore/why-im-posting-bail-money...
>
> In the Westminster Magistrates Court in London, the lawyers for
> WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange presented to the judge a document
> from me stating that I have put up $20,000 of my own money to help
> bail Mr. Assange out of jail.
>
> Furthermore, I am publicly offering the assistance of my website, my
> servers, my domain names and anything else I can do to keep WikiLeaks
> alive and thriving as it continues its work to expose the crimes that
> were concocted in secret and carried out in our name and with our tax
> dollars.
>
> We were taken to war in Iraq on a lie. Hundreds of thousands are now
> dead. Just imagine if the men who planned this war crime back in 2002
> had had a WikiLeaks to deal with. They might not have been able to
> pull it off. The only reason they thought they could get away with it
> was because they had a guaranteed cloak of secrecy. That guarantee has
> now been ripped from them, and I hope they are never able to operate
> in secret again.
>
> So why is WikiLeaks, after performing such an important public
> service, under such vicious attack? Because they have outed and
> embarrassed those who have covered up the truth. The assault on them
> has been over the top:
>
> - Sen. Joe Lieberman says WikiLeaks "has violated the Espionage Act."
>
> - The New Yorker's George Packer calls Assange "super-secretive, thin-
> skinned, [and] megalomaniacal."
>
> - Sarah Palin claims he's "an anti-American operative with blood on
> his hands" whom we should pursue "with the same urgency we pursue al
> Qaeda and Taliban leaders."
>
> - Democrat Bob Beckel (Walter Mondale's 1984 campaign manager) said
> about Assange on Fox: "A dead man can't leak stuff ... there's only
> one way to do it: illegally shoot the son of a bitch."
>
> - Republican Mary Matalin says "he's a psychopath, a sociopath ...
> He's a terrorist."
>
> - Rep. Peter A. King calls WikiLeaks a "terrorist organization."
>
> And indeed they are! They exist to terrorize the liars and warmongers
> who have brought ruin to our nation and to others. Perhaps the next
> war won't be so easy because the tables have been turned -- and now
> it's Big Brother who's being watched ... by us!
>
> WikiLeaks deserves our thanks for shining a huge spotlight on all
> this. But some in the corporate-owned press have dismissed the
> importance of WikiLeaks ("they've released little that's new!") or
> have painted them as simple anarchists ("WikiLeaks just releases
> everything without any editorial control!"). WikiLeaks exists, in
> part, because the mainstream media has failed to live up to its
> responsibility. The corporate owners have decimated newsrooms, making
> it impossible for good journalists to do their job. There's no time or
> money anymore for investigative journalism. Simply put, investors
> don't want those stories exposed. They like their secrets kept ... as
> secrets.
>
> I ask you to imagine how much different our world would be if
> WikiLeaks had existed 10 years ago. Take a look at this photo. That's
> Mr. Bush about to be handed a "secret" document on August 6th, 2001.
> Its heading read: "Bin Ladin Determined To Strike in US." And on those
> pages it said the FBI had discovered "patterns of suspicious activity
> in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings." Mr. Bush
> decided to ignore it and went fishing for the next four weeks.
>
> But if that document had been leaked, how would you or I have reacted?
> What would Congress or the FAA have done? Was there not a greater
> chance that someone, somewhere would have done something if all of us
> knew about bin Laden's impending attack using hijacked planes?
>
> But back then only a few people had access to that document. Because
> the secret was kept, a flight school instructor in San Diego who
> noticed that two Saudi students took no interest in takeoffs or
> landings, did nothing. Had he read about the bin Laden threat in the
> paper, might he have called the FBI? (Please read this essay by former
> FBI Agent Coleen Rowley, Time's 2002 co-Person of the Year, about her
> belief that had WikiLeaks been around in 2001, 9/11 might have been
> prevented.)
>
> Or what if the public in 2003 had been able to read "secret" memos
> from Dick Cheney as he pressured the CIA to give him the "facts" he
> wanted in order to build his false case for war? If a WikiLeaks had
> revealed at that time that there were, in fact, no weapons of mass
> destruction, do you think that the war would have been launched -- or
> rather, wouldn't there have been calls for Cheney's arrest?
>
> Openness, transparency -- these are among the few weapons the
> citizenry has to protect itself from the powerful and the corrupt.
> What if within days of August 4th, 1964 -- after the Pentagon had made
> up the lie that our ship was attacked by the North Vietnamese in the
> Gulf of Tonkin -- there had been a WikiLeaks to tell the American
> people that the whole thing was made up? I guess 58,000 of our
> soldiers (and 2 million Vietnamese) might be alive today.
>
> Instead, secrets killed them.
>
> For those of you who think it's wrong to support Julian Assange
> because of the sexual assault allegations he's being held for, all I
> ask is that you not be naive about how the government works when it
> decides to go after its prey. Please -- never, ever believe the
> "official story." And regardless of Assange's guilt or innocence (see
> the strange nature of the allegations here), this man has the right to
> have bail posted and to defend himself. I have joined with filmmakers
> Ken Loach and John Pilger and writer Jemima Khan in putting up the
> bail money -- and we hope the judge will accept this and grant his
> release today.
>
> Might WikiLeaks cause some unintended harm to diplomatic negotiations
> and U.S. interests around the world? Perhaps. But that's the price you
> pay when you and your government take us into a war based on a lie.
> Your punishment for misbehaving is that someone has to turn on all the
> lights in the room so that we can see what you're up to. You simply
> can't be trusted. So every cable, every email you write is now fair
> game. Sorry, but you brought this upon yourself. No one can hide from
> the truth now. No one can plot the next Big Lie if they know that they
> might be exposed.
>
> And that is the best thing that WikiLeaks has done. WikiLeaks, God
> bless them, will save lives as a result of their actions. And any of
> you who join me in supporting them are committing a true act of
> patriotism. Period.
>
> I stand today in absentia with Julian Assange in London and I ask the
> judge to grant him his release. I am willing to guarantee his return
> to court with the bail money I have wired to said court. I will not
> allow this injustice to continue unchallenged.
>
> P.S. You can read the statement I filed today in the London court
> here.
Gee, I'm about the recover my faith in the human race when I realize
that not everyone runs for cover under intimidation. Yes, I believe
that intimidation was part of it so no one would ever leak anything or
even try to deviate from the sheep. One mundane KMart employee told me
--in his own wisdom, that of the Three Wise Monkeys-- that they could
make you disappear for speaking the truth. Funny that perception is
out there. When the lion roars all the little animals tremble in fear.
That's the reason he roars, right? I believe most Christians also
practice that "wisdom." And we are being the Black Sheep here...
MOTTO:
"May the sun shine upon you in the shady jungle"
Tru Dat
<3a217cc9-2ac3-47ee...@f20g2000prn.googlegroups.com>,
"His Highness the TibetanMonkey, the mundane prophet of the last days
and;
Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:
>
> U.S. Tries to Build Case Against WikiLeaks Founder
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/16/world/16wiki.html
A discussion here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2643320/posts
Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti
--
Karma, What a concept!
His Highness the TibetanMonkey, the mundane prophet of the last days before the end of times
> In article
> <3a217cc9-2ac3-47ee-a3b0-b59fae945...@f20g2000prn.googlegroups.com>,
> "His Highness the TibetanMonkey, the mundane prophet of the last days
>
>
>
> > SMART COMMENT:
>
> > (not mine)
>
> > It's a poor analogy likening governments to individuals. Someone who's
> > keeping a secret about cheating on their wife in their second year of
> > marriage has a right to privacy, as long as their conscience can bear
> > it. A government that has sent espionage task forces into
> > underdeveloped countries to upset their political system and install
> > their own "democratic" regime deserves no privacy. You've forgotten,
> > governments are made to serve individuals, and not the other way
> > around. Things are so backward nowadays that the US populace is
> > complacently dependent upon their government and the multinational
> > corporations that it serves: they're trading their freedom for
> > material comfort and soothing lies.
>
> > ***
>
> > "Comforting and soothing lies" sound like Jesus, right?
>
> and;
>
> Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:
>
>
>
> > U.S. Tries to Build Case Against WikiLeaks Founder
>
> >http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/16/world/16wiki.html
>
> A discussion here:
>
> http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2643320/posts
I find it funny that they "try to shoot the messenger," and not, say,
some Afghan big shot who landed with $54 million in another country as
revealed in the leaks.