Western women are so repressed because they are insecure
His Highness the TibetanMonkey, ComandanteBanana and Chief of Quixotic Enterprises
> On Jun 1, 8:54 am, e_space <espace1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > funny, and here i thought it got hot in the middle east! and yes, you
> > can blame xtians for anything, as you usually do. why change now?
> Good point...also, do you see African men oogling their women dressed
> in such a fashion? No, because it is *normal*. Our women clearly
> *want* to be oogled and so must make it a rarity for fear of its very
> commonness reducing its effect... ;-p
If you think about both the topless and the veil make more sense than
our system:
TOPLESS: Cool, not so much buying of clothing.
VEIL: No expensive plastic surgery.
But Western women are fat because they can't "burn the calories" and
are insecure to show off.
--------------------------------------------------------
THE WISE TIBETAN MONKEY SAYS
"GO TOPLESS FOR THE REVOLUTION!"
His Highness the TibetanMonkey, ComandanteBanana and Chief of Quixotic Enterprises
> =v= You're using the wrong word. The word you're looking for
> is "revulsed," not "repressed."
>
> =v= Also, it's not all Western women. Just the ones who've
> met you.
> <_Jym_>
Unless they go to a gym, they won't have a chance at natural exercise
such as walking or cycling. So they grow fat and stupid watching TV
and driving around in their cages.
I know because my girlfriend is growing fat even though we want to
break away from the cage!
But she ain't getting stupid because she's with me. ;)
His Highness the TibetanMonkey, ComandanteBanana and Chief of Quixotic Enterprises
> On Jun 1, 2:21 pm, "His Highness the TibetanMonkey, ComandanteBanana
> and Chief of Quixotic Enterprises" <comandante.ban...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> > They push the cyclists to the sidewalks
>
> Yah, but some cyclists terrorize peds. Or they don't give a fuck.
I know. And many of them don't give a shit about the revolution
either, which is the only hope.
I say, "ISSUE TICKETS TO CYCLISTS ON SIDEWALK." They do it here but
only in the area where the beautiful people live.
His Highness the TibetanMonkey, ComandanteBanana and Chief of Quixotic Enterprises
Results: The direct costs of lack of physical activity, defined
conservatively as absence of leisure-time physical activity, are
approximately 24 billion dollars or 2.4% of the U.S. health care
expenditures. Direct costs for obesity defined as body mass index
greater than 30, in 1995 dollars, total 70 billion dollars. These
costs are independent of those resulting from lack of activity.
Conclusion: Overall, the direct costs of inactivity and obesity
account for some 9.4% of the national health care expenditures in the
United States. Inactivity, with its wide range of health consequences,
represents a major avoidable contribution to the costs of illness in
the United States and other countries with modern lifestyles that have
replaced physical labor with sedentary occupations and motorized
transportation.
IS THE FAT SHEEP A HAPPY SHEEP?
But if you look on the bright side of it, the Medical Industry reaps
the benefits. ;)
Don Klipstein
>>
>> > They push the cyclists to the sidewalks
>>
>> Yah, but some cyclists terrorize peds. Or they don't give a fuck.
>
>I know. And many of them don't give a shit about the revolution
>either, which is the only hope.
>
>I say, "ISSUE TICKETS TO CYCLISTS ON SIDEWALK." They do it here but
>only in the area where the beautiful people live.
What's so bad about issuing tickets to cagers that violate the law in
ways of pushing cyclists onto sidewalks?
(For that matter, also issuing tickets to cyclists as well as all
other vehicle drivers who fail to yield to pedestrians where the the
law says pedestrians rule over vehicles?)
(I hope enough said by me... If there is debate that I have to get
back into, I disclaim responsibility to get back in quicker than a day or
2 or 3...)
--
- Don Klipstein (d...@misty.com)
Don Klipstein
In addition, many Americans have overweightness short of "obesity" but
bad enough to be an *outright diagnosable bad thing*.
Furthermore, there is the matter of sedentary lifestyle. Plenty of my
fellow Americans like to think that they can diet their way to
healthfulness while being sedentary, especially as espoused by "low carb".
I see higher success rate from being physically active. My best friend
other than my boyfriend is known to have above-USA-average percentage of
dietary calorie intake being in form of carbs, and is a lean 130 pounder
whose height is 5-foot-7-inches. His blood analysis is high-to-new-record
expectable from his cardiologist after making dietary changes (away from
fatty stuff, meats and cheese and oil-rich salad dressings) and to spend
on daily average maybe 1.5 hours of "walking his ass off". That includes
blood concentration of triglycerides!
That friend of mine did this to successfully minimise repeating a heart
attack that he survived so far, already 2-plus years and 25-30 pounds of
body fat poundage [as in burned off in recent years as opposed to gained]
after the heart attack that he is surviving so far.
His Highness the TibetanMonkey, Creator of the Movement of Tantra-Hammock
> In <86e2ac01-ce28-40af-aeae-52242f4d1...@q13g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>,
There's something very old called "safety in numbers." Key West
cyclists are respected, but Miami drivers are somewhat less valuable
than dogs and cats because they can only blame themselves for being
on the road...
So the solution is as complex as the jungle: Educate drivers, enforce
the laws, give tickets to cyclists on sidewalks.
His Highness the TibetanMonkey, Creator of the Movement of Tantra-Hammock
> In <d2f783c6-a19d-4187-a580-4df6357af...@q33g2000vbt.googlegroups.com>,
>
>
>
> TibetanMonkey wrote:
> >These are the causes and consequences of obesity in America...
>
> >Results: The direct costs of lack of physical activity, defined
> >conservatively as absence of leisure-time physical activity, are
> >approximately 24 billion dollars or 2.4% of the U.S. health care
> >expenditures. Direct costs for obesity defined as body mass index
> >greater than 30, in 1995 dollars, total 70 billion dollars. These
> >costs are independent of those resulting from lack of activity.
>
> >Conclusion: Overall, the direct costs of inactivity and obesity
> >account for some 9.4% of the national health care expenditures in the
> >United States. Inactivity, with its wide range of health consequences,
> >represents a major avoidable contribution to the costs of illness in
> >the United States and other countries with modern lifestyles that have
> >replaced physical labor with sedentary occupations and motorized
> >transportation.
>
>
> >IS THE FAT SHEEP A HAPPY SHEEP?
>
> >But if you look on the bright side of it, the Medical Industry reaps
> >the benefits. ;)
>
> In addition, many Americans have overweightness short of "obesity" but
> bad enough to be an *outright diagnosable bad thing*.
>
> Furthermore, there is the matter of sedentary lifestyle. Plenty of my
> fellow Americans like to think that they can diet their way to
> healthfulness while being sedentary, especially as espoused by "low carb".
> I see higher success rate from being physically active. My best friend
> other than my boyfriend is known to have above-USA-average percentage of
> dietary calorie intake being in form of carbs, and is a lean 130 pounder
> whose height is 5-foot-7-inches. His blood analysis is high-to-new-record
> expectable from his cardiologist after making dietary changes (away from
> fatty stuff, meats and cheese and oil-rich salad dressings) and to spend
> on daily average maybe 1.5 hours of "walking his ass off". That includes
> blood concentration of triglycerides!
> That friend of mine did this to successfully minimise repeating a heart
> attack that he survived so far, already 2-plus years and 25-30 pounds of
> body fat poundage [as in burned off in recent years as opposed to gained]
> after the heart attack that he is surviving so far.
> --
> - Don Klipstein (d...@misty.com)
I always mention this word and my girlfriend was reading me some diet
that mentions it by name: WE WERE 'HUNTER-GATHERERS,' and all of a
sudden became couch potatoes.
But nobody really minds that we get diseases because we got the
Medical Industry to take care of us. :(
Paul O
You're engaged in a debate with a troll who calls himself TibetanMonkey
and ComandanteBanana. Take your time getting back to this thread. I can
assure you that the monkey will still be here posting illogical
statements and spewing incendiary comments.
--
Paul D Oosterhout
I work for SAIC (but I don't speak for SAIC)
His Highness the TibetanMonkey, ComandanteBanana and Chief of Quixotic Enterprises
> Don Klipstein wrote, On 6/2/2010 10:27 PM:
>
Just put away the flammable conditions in the jungle and the risk goes
away.