Breast-Feeding: Private Act or Public Right?
Wilson
Breast-Feeding: Private Act or Public Right?
It is an act millions of new moms do everyday. But when it comes to
breast-feeding, some argue there is a time and a place for it.
The topic is a provocative one for parents and even those without children.
I think it's perfectly natural and decent," one woman said.
Another man agreed.
"It doesn't bother me," he said. "It's none of my business, to tell you the
truth."
But not everyone was on board for breast-feeding.
"It's something that should be kept behind closed doors," one man said.
Another woman said she found it disgusting and immoral to breast-feed in
public.
"We have a lot of ambivalent feelings about breasts being used to feed
because we see them as sexual objects," said ABC News parenting contributor
Ann Pleshette Murphy.
Rod Speed
> http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Health/story?id=3378982&page=1
> Breast-Feeding: Private Act or Public Right?
> It is an act millions of new moms do everyday.
So is fucking and picking your nose and taking a crap.
> But when it comes to breast-feeding, some argue there is a time and a place for it.
Everyone does, actually.
There's no one actually stupid enough to claim that an
airline pilot should be doing that when landing a plane etc.
> The topic is a provocative one for parents and even those without
> children. I think it's perfectly natural and decent," one woman said.
> Another man agreed.
> "It doesn't bother me," he said. "It's none of my business, to tell you the truth."
> But not everyone was on board for breast-feeding.
> "It's something that should be kept behind closed doors," one man said.
> Another woman said she found it disgusting and immoral to breast-feed in public.
> "We have a lot of ambivalent feelings about breasts being used to feed because we see them as
> sexual objects," said ABC News parenting contributor Ann Pleshette Murphy.
Have fun explaining why almost everyone feels that there is a time
and place for picking your nose, taking a crap, farting, etc etc etc.
bear...@cruller.invalid
jdoe <jd...@aol.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:46:45 -0400, "Wilson" <wil...@universal.com>
> wrote:
>
> >http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Health/story?id=3378982&page=1
> >
> >
> >
> >Breast-Feeding: Private Act or Public Right?
> >
> >
>
> while you might have a right to do something, having that right
> doesn't make it right.
Does make it legal though, which is definitely the right and correct
status for the issue.
> there is a proper time and place for everything and a women whipping
> out a boob to give the kid a feeding in a very public place is rarely
> the right thing to do.
If an infant is hungry the right thing to do it to feed it. There is no
question that breast feeding offers medically-tangible,
solidly-documented nutritional benefits to the child available by no
other means. Besides, there is no way (or need, IMHO) for the parent to
know if she is offending anyone. It is hardly an foregone assumption,
just as its reverse-- assuming that nobody is offended.
> People need a refresher course on discretion
Having recently undergone such an education, I can't really argue with
that.
Bill M
"jdoe" <jd...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:pelp93lvvldm82l1k...@4ax.com...
> >
> >
> >
> >Breast-Feeding: Private Act or Public Right?
> >
> >
>
> doesn't make it right.
> out a boob to give the kid a feeding in a very public place is rarely
> the right thing to do.
And you need to get your head out of your bigoted ass. Women should not need
to go
into hiding in order to feed their baby. Feeding a baby is a totally normal
task that
should not bother you or anyone else.
Vic Smith
wrote:
Sex perverts think that breast feeding is a come-on by the woman.
Had a cracker neighbor who practically drooled all over himself
when he dropped by once while my wife was feeding one of my kids.
That's probably why this guy is bothered. Sad.
--Vic
MarkA
>
> Another woman said she found it disgusting and immoral to breast-feed in
> public.
>
Feeding your infant is immoral? Must be a Republican.
--
MarkA
(My OTHER sig line is clever)
Christopher A.Lee
>On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:46:45 -0400, Wilson wrote:
>
>>
>> Another woman said she found it disgusting and immoral to breast-feed in
>> public.
>>
>
>Feeding your infant is immoral? Must be a Republican.
There was a sketch on Not The Nine O'Clock News with a woman walking
into the house with a breast hanging out, her husband giving her a
funny look, and saying "bloody hell, I left the baby on the bus".
Robibnikoff
"MarkA" <to...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2007.07.17....@nowhere.com...
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:46:45 -0400, Wilson wrote:
>
>>
>> Another woman said she found it disgusting and immoral to breast-feed in
>> public.
>>
>
> Feeding your infant is immoral? Must be a Republican.
Would I do it in public? Probably not. Still, I couldn't care less if
anyone else choose to do so.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557
Denis Loubet
"Wilson" <wil...@universal.com> wrote in message
news:469c4a36$0$23425$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com...
> http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Health/story?id=3378982&page=1
>
>
>
> Breast-Feeding: Private Act or Public Right?
>
>
> It is an act millions of new moms do everyday. But when it comes to
> breast-feeding, some argue there is a time and a place for it.
Ask Vitters.
--
Denis Loubet
dlo...@io.com
http//www.io.com/~dloubet
Anthony Matonak
...
> Sex perverts think that breast feeding is a come-on by the woman.
To be fair, sex perverts can think anything is erotic.
That is because they are perverts and not because of
anything their victims may have done.
Anthony
Vic Smith
I suspect many sex perverts specialize.
But you're right. To be fair, I should have said breast-feeding sex
perverts.
--Vic
Chloe
> wrote:
>
>>http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Health/story?id=3378982&page=1
>>
>>
>>
>>Breast-Feeding: Private Act or Public Right?
>>
>>
>
> doesn't make it right.
> there is a proper time and place for everything and a women whipping
> out a boob to give the kid a feeding in a very public place is rarely
> the right thing to do.
> People need a refresher course on discretion
I hate to be the one who breaks this to you, but it's perfectly possible to
breastfeed a baby in public without "whipping out a boob" and putting it on
public display. Women manage it with courtesy and discretion all the time,
and shouldn't have to go somewhere to hide. That's not to minimize the
existence of the militant nutbars who want to get right in your face with
the whole thing, as if breastfeeding in general and specifically
breastfeeding THEIR GORGEOUS BABY is some kind of miracle they're the first
ones to ever discover.
I'm gonna mull this over now for a while to figure out its on-topicality to
alt.atheism <g>.
Rod Speed
So is taking a crap.
> that should not bother you or anyone else.
See above.
Anthony Matonak
...
> I'm gonna mull this over now for a while to figure out its on-topicality to
> alt.atheism <g>.
http://www.ridingsun.com/posts/1143201039.shtml
: Aichi, the monthly notes, is home to Mama Kannon, the only Buddhist
: temple in the country devoted entirely to the worship of women's
: breasts.
No doubt there are any number of religious artwork that depict
breastfeeding. I don't know if that makes it a religious act.
Anthony
--
Do dyslexic atheist deny the existence of dog?
Ward Abbott
>People need a refresher course on discretion
Sadly....today's society believe that they are the most important and
to hell with everyone else.
Ward Abbott
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:23:21 -0400, MarkA <to...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>Feeding your infant is immoral? Must be a Republican.
Tell EVERYONE HOW you come to such a conclusion? This will be
interesting....
EVERY REPUBLICAN WANTS A BABY TO DIE.....no wait....isn't it the libs
that demand the right to abortion?
Ward Abbott
wrote:
>breastfeeding THEIR GORGEOUS BABY is some kind of miracle
Not everyone have gorgeous babies.
AllEmailDeletedImmediately
> the street and breast feed, she's making a spectacle of herself.
> it's just as easy and is actually beneficial to the baby to find a
> quiet out of the way spot to feed the child.
>
> Both my children were breast fed and we never had issues because my
> wife had the sense, the dignity and the class to find an appropriate
> place to feed.
>
> yes those places exist everywhere, for example the feministas when in
> an airport would make their statement by breast feeding next to the
> check-in counter, a woman with more class a dignity would go off to ta
> quiet spot away from the hustle and bustle for feeding.
the problem is that women's breasts are viewed as toys instead of the
baby bottles that they are. if a woman has no problem with walking
down the street breastfeeding, it's no one else's business. look away.
surely you can do that, can't you? you shouldn't be looking at her breasts
anyway to notice that there's a baby feeding there. don't you know it was
mohammed's inability to control his sexual desires that made him decree
that women should be covered up?
as for the hustle and bustle, a baby doesn't care; when it's hungry, all it
wants is dinner. a loud noise might startle it, but then it's back to
eating. a baby that needs quiet during feeding needs it all the time.
and most babies can sleep thru quite a bit of noise.
bear...@cruller.invalid
Ward Abbott <pre...@terian.com> wrote:
> EVERY REPUBLICAN WANTS A BABY TO DIE.....no wait....isn't it the libs
> that demand the right to abortion?
Yeah, Republicans are against abortion but only so they can engage in
infanticide in other nations. I hear the party is going to sport
campaign bumper stickers to that effect. Oh wait, they already have
them: Bush/Cheney
Dubh Ghall
wrote:
>http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Health/story?id=3378982&page=1
Aint xtianity wonderful?
Here are women, using their breasts for the purpose that, presumably,
their god intended them; and those good xtian women are offended?
Shit! Where I grew up, that was how *all* babies were fed, and no one
was offended if they were fed in public.
--
The spelling like any opinion stated here
is purely my own
#162 BAAWA Knight.
clams casino
>"
>
>
>
>the problem is that women's breasts are viewed as toys instead of the
>baby bottles that they are.
>
>
and here I thought they were just to sell beer.
Meteorite Debris
at his/her stone these gems of wisdom for posterity ...
> http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Health/story?id=3378982&page=1
>
>
>
> Breast-Feeding: Private Act or Public Right?
There are worst crimes than breast feeding in public.
There is bottle feeding - in public or private.
There is not feeding your baby at all.
There is throwing your baby is the trash.
And if none of the above is bad there are the "starter SUVs" or "my
first SUV" that is an oversized pram with multi level storage for
bottles and disposable nappies (3 evils all rolled into one) and taking
up all the foot path.
Breast feeding is not a problem for me.
--
Remove both YOUR_SHOES before replying
apatriot #1, atheist #1417,
Chief EAC prophet
Jason Gastrich is praying for me on 8 January 2009
Apatriotism Yahoo Group
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apatriotism
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make
you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
Meteorite Debris
> Bill M <wm...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Haven't seen this character since I visited aus.politics years ago.
Google "Rod Speed Christmas" in google groups for a laugh.
Here RS is comparing eating with crapping. I eat in public all the time.
There a type of social phobia where the victim can not eat in public
without feeling offensive.
There are worse problems in the world than public breast feeding - not
feeding baby at all.
Meteorite Debris
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:12:31 GMT, Dubh Ghall <pu...@pooks.hill.fey>
> wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:46:45 -0400, "Wilson" <wil...@universal.com>
> >
> >Aint xtianity wonderful?
> >
> >Here are women, using their breasts for the purpose that, presumably,
> >their god intended them; and those good xtian women are offended?
> >
> >Shit! Where I grew up, that was how *all* babies were fed, and no one
> >was offended if they were fed in public.
>
> taking a dump is using your body the way god intended it to be used,
> can I take a dump on your face?
No, but you may spray milk in my face if you want.
Liz
>http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Health/story?id=3378982&page=1
>
>
>
>Breast-Feeding: Private Act or Public Right?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>It is an act millions of new moms do everyday. But when it comes to
>breast-feeding, some argue there is a time and a place for it.
>
>The topic is a provocative one for parents and even those without children.
>I think it's perfectly natural and decent," one woman said.
>
>Another man agreed.
>
>"It doesn't bother me," he said. "It's none of my business, to tell you the
>truth."
>
>But not everyone was on board for breast-feeding.
>
>"It's something that should be kept behind closed doors," one man said.
>
>Another woman said she found it disgusting and immoral to breast-feed in
>public.
>
>"We have a lot of ambivalent feelings about breasts being used to feed
>because we see them as sexual objects," said ABC News parenting contributor
>Ann Pleshette Murphy.
>
There is a strong correlation between those who are pro-birth and
those who find the sight of breast feeding offensive. They want every
pregnancy to come to term, but don't want to feed the infants after
they are born. Go figure.
Liz #658 BAAWA
jheller
in the sand, 2007 American only way "of what you think are facts?
how many other cultures have you been to , ?
how many other ways of life have you studied, do you live beyond your pc
screen?
Frugal? Frugal? Breastmilk is free!!!
" I make milk, What's your superpower?"
J.
Lee K
"Meteorite Debris" <epicurusboth@YOUR_SHOESaapt.net.au> wrote in message
news:MPG.2107f8e7...@news.ade.connect.com.au...
>
> Here RS is comparing eating with crapping. I eat in public all the time.
> There a type of social phobia where the victim can not eat in public
> without feeling offensive.
>
Maybe he eats crap, in which case he is right that eating in public is
offensive.
Rod Speed
> Rod Speed <rod.sp...@gmail.com> wrote>>>> Wilson <wil...@universal.com> wrote
>>>>> http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Health/story?id=3378982&page=1
>>>>> Breast-Feeding: Private Act or Public Right?
>>>> while you might have a right to do something, having that right
>>>> doesn't make it right.
>>>> there is a proper time and place for everything and a women
>>>> whipping out a boob to give the kid a feeding in a very public
>>>> place is rarely the right thing to do.
>>>> People need a refresher course on discretion
>>> And you need to get your head out of your bigoted ass.
>>> Women should not need to go into hiding in order to feed
>>> their baby. Feeding a baby is a totally normal task
>> So is taking a crap.
>>> that should not bother you or anyone else.
>> See above.
<reams of your puerile shit flushed where it belongs>
> Here RS is comparing eating with crapping.
Nope, commenting on what 'totally normal tasks' arent done in public, actually.
> I eat in public all the time. There a type of social phobia
> where the victim can not eat in public without feeling offensive.
And at one time it wasnt considered to be socially acceptible to eat while walking around either.
> There are worse problems in the world than public breast feeding - not feeding baby at all.
Irrelevant to whether there are some totally normal tasks which are better
not done in public, like farting, picking your nose, taking a crap, etc etc etc.
Rod Speed
They just want the brats to be fed other than in public.
> Go figure.
Too much for you to figure, clearly.
Anthony Matonak
...
> There is a strong correlation between those who are pro-birth and
> those who find the sight of breast feeding offensive. They want every
> pregnancy to come to term, but don't want to feed the infants after
> they are born. Go figure.
Do you have anything to back up this unbelievable claim?
Anthony
jheller
>>>>>
snip..
>>
>>>And you need to get your head out of your bigoted ass.
>
>
> feeding baby at all.
>
Fester
"Wilson" <wil...@universal.com> wrote in message
news:469c4a36$0$23425$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com...
> http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Health/story?id=3378982&page=1
>
>
>
> Breast-Feeding: Private Act or Public Right?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> It is an act millions of new moms do everyday. But when it comes to
> breast-feeding, some argue there is a time and a place for it.
>
> The topic is a provocative one for parents and even those without
> children. I think it's perfectly natural and decent," one woman said.
>
> Another man agreed.
>
> "It doesn't bother me," he said. "It's none of my business, to tell you
> the truth."
>
> But not everyone was on board for breast-feeding.
>
> "It's something that should be kept behind closed doors," one man said.
>
> Another woman said she found it disgusting and immoral to breast-feed in
> public.
>
> "We have a lot of ambivalent feelings about breasts being used to feed
> because we see them as sexual objects," said ABC News parenting
> contributor Ann Pleshette Murphy.
Urination is perfectly natural and performed by most men, women and children
as well. I don't have much of an opinion either way on this issue, other
than to say that the majority of the citizens have a right to decide if it
should be allowed in public.
Zilbandy
>If an infant is hungry the right thing to do it to feed it. There is no
>question that breast feeding offers medically-tangible,
>solidly-documented nutritional benefits to the child available by no
>other means. Besides, there is no way (or need, IMHO) for the parent to
>know if she is offending anyone. It is hardly an foregone assumption,
>just as its reverse-- assuming that nobody is offended.
If the parents are going out to eat and taking junior, they should
feed the little guy before they go. Little squirts don't need to eat
at the same time mommy and daddy do. If the little tyke is hungry,
feed him, but not in front of me if I'm at a public outing. Take him
to the bathroom, back to the car, or cover yourself with a sheet that
says, "I'm an inconsiderate and stupid parent that didn't plan for my
child's meal in advance."
--
Zilbandy
Zilbandy
wrote:
>Feeding a baby is a totally normal
>task that
>should not bother you or anyone else.
So, if it's totally normal, it's ok? Lemme know when you're passing
through my town. I'll bring my portapotty and take a dump right in
front of you. After all, it's "totally normal".
--
Zilbandy
bear...@cruller.invalid
Zilbandy <z...@zilbandyREMOVETHIS.com> wrote:
Well it is nice to know that you retain the ability to hold strong
opinions and express them in an objectionable manner.
bear...@cruller.invalid
Anthony Matonak <antho...@nothing.like.socal.rr.com> wrote:
Just reality.
bear...@cruller.invalid
"Lee K" <lee_k...@hotmail.com> wrote:
No, it's entertaining when the monkey is behind bars at the zoo. People
pay to see it.
bear...@cruller.invalid
jdoe <jd...@aol.com> wrote:
> taking a dump is using your body the way god intended it to be used,
> can I take a dump on your face?
Well, let's see. Sure. Just expect to be arrested. Besides, you take
dumps in front of us all the time on Usenet. What's the dif?
Dubh Ghall
>On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:12:31 GMT, Dubh Ghall <pu...@pooks.hill.fey>
>wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:46:45 -0400, "Wilson" <wil...@universal.com>
>>
>>Aint xtianity wonderful?
>>
>>Here are women, using their breasts for the purpose that, presumably,
>>their god intended them; and those good xtian women are offended?
>>
>>Shit! Where I grew up, that was how *all* babies were fed, and no one
>>was offended if they were fed in public.
>
>taking a dump is using your body the way god intended it to be used,
>can I take a dump on your face?
What a childish, petty minded, sad little creature, you are.
Do you really feel that a woman, breast feeding in public, is shitting
on your face?
If so, I suggest that you seek, at the very least, counseling.
AllEmailDeletedImmediately
"Fester" <n...@home.com> wrote in message
news:469d75cb$0$29633$4c36...@roadrunner.com...
>
snip
> Urination is perfectly natural and performed by most men, women and
> children as well. I don't have much of an opinion either way on this
> issue, other than to say that the majority of the citizens have a right to
> decide if it should be allowed in public.
pottying in public needs to be prohibited because of the disease factor.
>
>
>
AllEmailDeletedImmediately
"Zilbandy" <z...@zilbandyREMOVETHIS.com> wrote in message
news:r0uq93556ts00770m...@4ax.com...
infants eat when they want to eat, not when you force them to. obviously
you haven't had one.
AllEmailDeletedImmediately
"Zilbandy" <z...@zilbandyREMOVETHIS.com> wrote in message
i've got no problem with it as long as you totally contain your mess and
take it with you.
however, should it be made legal, we all know that we'd have shit in
the streets. people can't even contain their litter, let alone their shit.
Peter Bruells
That would refer to fecal matter - not to urine, which is usually
sterile.
Robibnikoff
> Last time that great scribe Wilson <wil...@universal.com> chipped away
> at his/her stone these gems of wisdom for posterity ...
>
>> http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Health/story?id=3378982&page=1
>>
>>
>>
>> Breast-Feeding: Private Act or Public Right?
>
> There are worst crimes than breast feeding in public.
>
> There is bottle feeding - in public or private.
Pardon my butting in, but just want to remind everyone that breast feeding
is NOT possible for every woman. I don't appreciate seeing bottled feeding
referred to as a crime.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557
bear...@cruller.invalid
Zilbandy <z...@zilbandyREMOVETHIS.com> wrote:
> If the parents are going out to eat and taking junior, they should
> feed the little guy before they go.
And return before he gets hungry again, otherwise they will turn into
pumpkins.
Vic Smith
<witc...@broomstick.com> wrote:
>
>Pardon my butting in, but just want to remind everyone that breast feeding
>is NOT possible for every woman. I don't appreciate seeing bottled feeding
>referred to as a crime.
Good point. And one advantage of bottle feeding is that it doesn't
attract the complaints of those sexual perverts who complain about
becoming unduly excited at the thought of a woman suckling an infant
in their presence.
--Vic
AllEmailDeletedImmediately
"Peter Bruells" <p...@ecce-terram.de> wrote in message
news:m2bqe9d...@rogue.ecce-terram.de...
true. but have you ever smelled stale urine? i've got no problem with
a guy whipping it out to pee in a bottle as long as he takes it home with
him.
Peter Bruells
Actually, I'd rather not smell fresh nor stale urine. And I'd also not
see anyone urinating in public. Then again, I also prefer not to see
people chwing gum with their mouth open (if they do have to chew gum),
yawning without bothering to use ther hands and I can also do without
them farting and burping to their hearts content, though I realize
that this can't be helped sometimes.
Lee K
"Liz" <ehu...@donotspam.com> wrote in message
news:p5mq93lg08h0lmced...@4ax.com...
>
> There is a strong correlation between those who are pro-birth and
> those who find the sight of breast feeding offensive. They want every
> pregnancy to come to term, but don't want to feed the infants after
> they are born. Go figure.
>
And what's to be made of the views of those who are pro-abortion? It's a
great leap from finding public breastfeeding offensive and finding the very
existence of babies to be offensive.
Christopher A.Lee
wrote:
Nobody is "pro-abortion" outside the imagination of the anti-abortion
liars.
Beeblebrox
it still stinks
Beeblebrox
really? hmm if you had no other options, i'm sure almost all of those
who aren't "able" to breastfeed, would be able to pull it off!
Robibnikoff
"Vic Smith" <thismaila...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:ej5s9396tqb4a39kn...@4ax.com...
True.
And often, it's the only way you can get your infant to eat.
Cary Kittrell
Well, we got yer good news and yer bad news on that one.
The good news is that such "counseling" is widely available.
The bad news is that shitting on your face if $50 dollars extra
(same as downtown).
-- cary
Robibnikoff
"Beeblebrox" <beeblebrox...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:YTqni.89551$aP2....@newsfe16.lga...
> Robibnikoff wrote:
>> "Meteorite Debris" <epicurusboth@YOUR_SHOESaapt.net.au> wrote in message
>> news:MPG.2107f6a08...@news.ade.connect.com.au...
>>
>>>Last time that great scribe Wilson <wil...@universal.com> chipped away
>>>at his/her stone these gems of wisdom for posterity ...
>>>
>>>
>>>>http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Health/story?id=3378982&page=1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Breast-Feeding: Private Act or Public Right?
>>>
>>>There are worst crimes than breast feeding in public.
>>>
>>>There is bottle feeding - in public or private.
>>
>>
>> Pardon my butting in, but just want to remind everyone that breast
>> feeding is NOT possible for every woman. I don't appreciate seeing
>> bottled feeding referred to as a crime.
>
> really?
Yes, really.
hmm if you had no other options, i'm sure almost all of those
> who aren't "able" to breastfeed, would be able to pull it off!
Whatever. I had a pre-term baby with jaundice that couldn't get the hang of
breastfeeding, but took to the bottle.
Guess I should have just let her starve to death, eh?
pba...@worldonline.nl
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:46:45 -0400, "Wilson" <wil...@universal.com>
>
> >http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Health/story?id=3378982&page=1
>
> >Breast-Feeding: Private Act or Public Right?
>
> doesn't make it right.
> there is a proper time and place for everything and a women whipping
> out a boob to give the kid a feeding in a very public place is rarely
> the right thing to do.
> People need a refresher course on discretion
Discretion?
You mean the woman and the baby should not be seen together in public?
You see: If they are seen together: A baby without teeth and a woman,
everyone will assume she is his mother, and would normally be
breastfeeding that baby every few hours. The whole discretion
bussiness would then be useless.
Peter van Velzen
July 2007
Amstelveen
The Netherlands
Davej
> http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Health/story?id=3378982&page=1
>
> Breast-Feeding: Private Act or Public Right?
The article says; "46 states allow a woman to nurse in public or at
least exempt them from prosecution"
so what is the problem?
Rod Speed
Yep, the last thing we need is more like you.
Rod Speed
There is no 'disease factor'
With picking your nose in spades.
Robibnikoff
"Rod Speed" <rod.sp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5g749cF...@mid.individual.net...
LOL - Another first grader who figured out how to work mommy's computer.
Have a nice life, cocksucker.
Dubh Ghall
It is a good job that these flat screens are tea proof.
Rod Speed
Can't even manage its own lines, or anything else either.
> Have a nice life, cocksucker.
Thanks for that completely superfluous proof of what I meant.
parsi...@gmail.com
> http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Health/story?id=3378982&page=1
>
> Breast-Feeding: Private Act or Public Right?
>
> breast-feeding, some argue there is a time and a place for it.
>
> The topic is a provocative one for parents and even those without children.
> I think it's perfectly natural and decent," one woman said.
>
> Another man agreed.
>
> "It doesn't bother me," he said. "It's none of my business, to tell you the
> truth."
>
> But not everyone was on board for breast-feeding.
>
> "It's something that should be kept behind closed doors," one man said.
>
> Another woman said she found it disgusting and immoral to breast-feed in
> public.
>
> "We have a lot of ambivalent feelings about breasts being used to feed
> because we see them as sexual objects," said ABC News parenting contributor
> Ann Pleshette Murphy.
What's the deal with Americans and breasts?
Where I live, going topless on public beaches and pools is legal, so
is breast feeding... and guess what, our crime-rate is way lower than
the US', our teen pregnancy rate and our teen abortion rate as well...
Why are Americans so repressed when it comes to the human body but so
open-minded when it comes to destroy it with guns?
You're fucking sick...
AllEmailDeletedImmediately
<parsi...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1184787492.1...@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
because for many, many yrs, it was only men who made these types of laws,
and
they didn't want another man viewing their toys.
>
William Wingstedt
>you should limit the time you spend in the hash houses, you're logic
>is idiotic
Quite to the contrary, you should consider regular visits in pursuit
of your edification.
William Wingstedt
What we don't need is people like you deciding what "we" don't need.
>
>
Rod Speed
You in spades.
Lee K
"Christopher A.Lee" <ca...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:0j9s93plpgb3oohpd...@4ax.com...
If one is a supporter of pregnancy terminations, then one is pro-abortion.
Or perhaps you prefer 'pro-death' as the corollary to 'pro-life'?
Brian E. Clark
Rod Speed said...
> > Whatever. I had a pre-term baby with jaundice that couldn't get the
> > hang of breastfeeding, but took to the bottle.
> >
> > Guess I should have just let her starve to death, eh?
>
> Yep, the last thing we need is more like you.
People like her?
You mean a woman capable of making you and your
ilk look like gibbering jackasses by means of one
short sentence? Yeah, it's obvious why you fear
having to deal with more women like her.
--
-----------
Brian E. Clark
No 33 Secretary
news:UPuni.50559$5j1....@newssvr21.news.prodigy.net:
The deliberate lie being that there are a a large number of people
who are supporters of pregnancy terminations.
> Or perhaps you prefer 'pro-death' as the corollary
> to 'pro-life'?
>
"Pro life" really means "life as we tell you to or we'll kill
you." "Pro choice" really means "make your own decisions how to
live."
Pro-death *is* a corrollary to pro-life. In your ignorance and
illiteracy, you have hit on a hidden truth.
Main Entry: cor·ol·lary
Pronunciation: 'kor-&-"ler-E, 'kär-, -le-rE, British k&-'rä-l&-rE
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -lar·ies
Etymology: Middle English corolarie, from Late Latin corollarium,
from Latin, money paid for a garland, gratuity, from corolla
1 : a proposition inferred immediately from a proved proposition
with little or no additional proof
2 a : something that naturally follows : RESULT b : something that
incidentally or naturally accompanies or parallels
- corollary adjective
--
"If he does that shit again I'm going to tie his ass hairs together
and kick him in the shin."
Terry Austin
Bob F
"A. Nonymoose" <SendJun...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ri6s9316jnhqr2bjn...@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 12:28:51 GMT, "AllEmailDeletedImmediately"
> <der...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>infants eat when they want to eat, not when you force them to.
>>obviously
>>you haven't had one.
>
> For which, let us all give thanks.
>
LOL!!
I can't believe the idiots who object to babies eating in public. I
bet every one of them eats in public themselves.
I guess it does say something about americans screwed up "morality".
Breasts - bad. Causing the deaths of 100,000's of innocent Iraqis -
OK. I just don't get it.
Bob
Frank Mayhar
What is it with you idiots and your apparent belief that "I know you are
but what am I" is a valid argument?
Never mind, you're not worth the time. *plonk*
--
Frank Mayhar fr...@exit.com http://www.exit.com/
Exit Consulting http://www.gpsclock.com/
http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/
http://www.zazzle.com/fmayhar*
Brian E. Clark
@nowhere.com>, MarkA said...
> > Another woman said she found it disgusting and immoral to breast-feed in
> > public.
> >
>
> Feeding your infant is immoral?
> Must be a Republican.
Fundamentalism warps. Example:
"Is it enough for me to say that the last thing
that a person - especially a teen or preteen -
having trouble with pornography, resisting
thoughts and urges of sexual violence, or even
suicide because of low self esteem needs is for
some gorgeous woman with gigantic breasts - the
sort who would have made a bundle in modeling and
acting before Hollywood and Madison Avenue
started preferring grown women that look like
preteen boys - to sit down right in front in
front of them on a bus, train, plane, subway, or
some other situation where you can=3Ft leave even
if you want to and thoroughly expose herself for
a half hour or longer under the guise of
breastfeeding when all she really wants is to
make you look at her whether you want to or not
thanks to the demons that have taken over her
mind? Oh sure, maybe the rapist with a knife in
his pocket won=3Ft violate HER and then slit HER
throat because they ARE on a bus, train, or what
have you. But YHWH help (and I am NOT taking His
Name in vain, I am totally serious!) the next
woman, girl, or boy that stumbles across him in
the dark alley!"
http://healtheland.wordpress.com/2007/02/11/
Brian E. Clark
4ax.com>, jdoe said...
> >Shit! Where I grew up, that was how *all* babies were fed, and no one
> >was offended if they were fed in public.
>
> taking a dump is using your body the way god intended it to be used,
> can I take a dump on your face?
There are sound health-related reasons why public
defecation is discouraged. Can you lay out good
reasons why public breast-feeding should be
prohibited?
Bob F
"AllEmailDeletedImmediately" <der...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7Knni.6187$s25.3730@trndny04...
>
> "Zilbandy" <z...@zilbandyREMOVETHIS.com> wrote in message
> news:59uq93l4o40hch5jr...@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:39:16 -0400, "Bill M" <wm...@bellsouth.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Feeding a baby is a totally normal
>>>task that
>>>should not bother you or anyone else.
>>
>> So, if it's totally normal, it's ok? Lemme know when you're passing
>> through my town. I'll bring my portapotty and take a dump right in
>> front of you. After all, it's "totally normal".
>
> i've got no problem with it as long as you totally contain your mess
> and
> take it with you.
>
> however, should it be made legal, we all know that we'd have shit in
> the streets. people can't even contain their litter, let alone
> their shit.
>
I saw a slide show of someones trip to china years ago. One of the
pictures was of a baby in mothers arms pissing on the steps of some
government building. The Story was that it is common there for babies
to wear split pants, so they can do their business when and where they
are without the need for diapers. I bet THEY aren't concerned about
breast feeding.
Bob
Bob F
"Brian E. Clark" <re...@newsgroup.only.please> wrote in message
news:MPG.2108570e9...@216.196.97.136...
Plenty of societies have survived just fine with bare boobs
everywhere. It's the stupid prohibitions that create the problems. Why
on earth are people so hung up about this? Breasts are breasts.
Nothing more.
Bob
Bob F
"Dubh Ghall" <pu...@pooks.hill.fey> wrote in message
news:5lpr9394thi2a5a2p...@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:16:41 -0400, jdoe <jd...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:12:31 GMT, Dubh Ghall <pu...@pooks.hill.fey>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>Here are women, using their breasts for the purpose that,
>>>presumably,
>>>their god intended them; and those good xtian women are offended?
>>>
>>>one
>>>was offended if they were fed in public.
>>
>>taking a dump is using your body the way god intended it to be
>>used,
>>can I take a dump on your face?
>
>
> Do you really feel that a woman, breast feeding in public, is
> shitting
> on your face?
>
And where does that put smoking?
Bob
Bob F
"Robibnikoff" <witc...@broomstick.com> wrote in message
news:5g6itaF...@mid.individual.net...
>
> "Meteorite Debris" <epicurusboth@YOUR_SHOESaapt.net.au> wrote in
> message news:MPG.2107f6a08...@news.ade.connect.com.au...
>> Last time that great scribe Wilson <wil...@universal.com> chipped
>> away
>> at his/her stone these gems of wisdom for posterity ...
>>
>>> http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Health/story?id=3378982&page=1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Breast-Feeding: Private Act or Public Right?
>>
>> There are worst crimes than breast feeding in public.
>>
>> There is bottle feeding - in public or private.
>
> Pardon my butting in, but just want to remind everyone that breast
> feeding is NOT possible for every woman. I don't appreciate seeing
> bottled feeding referred to as a crime.
Yeah! And most men have difficulty with it also.
Bob
Bob F
"Frank Mayhar" <fr...@exit.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2007.07...@exit.com...
What took you so long?
Bob
Bob F
<bear...@cruller.invalid> wrote in message
news:bearclaw-1F9751...@news.supernews.com...
> In article <469d65d2$0$4678$4c36...@roadrunner.com>,
> Anthony Matonak <antho...@nothing.like.socal.rr.com> wrote:
>
>> Liz wrote:
>> ...
>> > There is a strong correlation between those who are pro-birth and
>> > those who find the sight of breast feeding offensive. They want
>> > every
>> > pregnancy to come to term, but don't want to feed the infants
>> > after
>> > they are born. Go figure.
>>
>>
>> Anthony
>
> Just reality.
That's cheating. You know they can't handle that.
Zilbandy
<der...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>infants eat when they want to eat, not when you force them to. obviously
>you haven't had one.
I have, he's grown, and my wife didn't need to resort to breast
feeding when we were at a restaurant. I guess your parenting skills
are the ones that need criticizing.
--
Zilbandy
Rod Speed
They dont in fact breast feed in public. Not sure why.
And in more tropical climes they let the little kids run around with
no pants on, presumably shitting and pissing wherever they feel like.
Corse the adults shit and piss in the water supply too.
Rod Speed
Can you lay out good reasons why public fucking and nose picking should be prohibited?
Rod Speed
> Rod Speed said...
>
>>> Whatever. I had a pre-term baby with jaundice that couldn't get the
>>> hang of breastfeeding, but took to the bottle.
>>>
>>> Guess I should have just let her starve to death, eh?
>>
>> Yep, the last thing we need is more like you.
>
> People like her?
> You mean a woman capable of making you and your ilk look
> like gibbering jackasses by means of one short sentence?
Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys.
> Yeah, it's obvious why you fear having to deal with more women like her.
Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys.
And that's not a woman anyway.
Jim P Sharma
Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys.
> Never mind, you're not worth the time. *plonk*
Fat lot of good that will ever do you, fuckwit.
Rod Speed
> "Lee K" <lee_k...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:UPuni.50559$5j1....@newssvr21.news.prodigy.net:
>
>>
>> "Christopher A.Lee" <ca...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>> news:0j9s93plpgb3oohpd...@4ax.com...
>>> On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 14:33:30 GMT, "Lee K"
>>> <lee_k...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Liz" <ehu...@donotspam.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:p5mq93lg08h0lmced...@4ax.com...
>>>>>
>>>>> There is a strong correlation between those who are pro-birth
>>>>> and those who find the sight of breast feeding offensive.
>>>>> They want every pregnancy to come to term, but don't want to
>>>>> feed the infants after they are born. Go figure.
>>>>>
>>>>> Liz #658 BAAWA
>>>>
>>>> And what's to be made of the views of those who are
>>>> pro-abortion? It's a great leap from finding public
>>>> breastfeeding offensive and finding the very
>>>> existence of babies to be offensive.
>>>
>>> Nobody is "pro-abortion" outside the imagination of the
>>> anti-abortion liars.
>>
>> If one is a supporter of pregnancy terminations, then one is
>> pro-abortion.
>
> The deliberate lie being that there are a a large number of people
> who are supporters of pregnancy terminations.
It aint a lie, there clearly are a large number of people who are supporters
of pregnancy terminations with all those pregnancys that get terminated.
>> Or perhaps you prefer 'pro-death' as the corollary to 'pro-life'?
> "Pro life" really means "life as we tell you to or we'll kill you."
Nope, hardly any of those are into killing anyone, just the rabid fruit loops.
> "Pro choice" really means "make your own decisions how to live."
Pity we dont allow that with murder. There is probably a reason for that.
> Pro-death *is* a corrollary to pro-life.
Nope.
> In your ignorance and illiteracy, you have hit on a hidden truth.
Nope.
> Main Entry: cor·ol·lary
> Pronunciation: 'kor-&-"ler-E, 'kär-, -le-rE, British k&-'rä-l&-rE
> Function: noun
> Inflected Form(s): plural -lar·ies
> Etymology: Middle English corolarie, from Late Latin corollarium,
> from Latin, money paid for a garland, gratuity, from corolla
> 1 : a proposition inferred immediately from a proved proposition
> with little or no additional proof
> 2 a : something that naturally follows : RESULT b : something that
> incidentally or naturally accompanies or parallels
> - corollary adjective
Doesnt say that pro-death *is* a corrollary to pro-life.
And its corrollary of, not to.
OJ
"Wilson" wrote
>
>
> Breast-Feeding: Private Act or Public Right?
I encourage public breast feeding. I make a pretty good $ on putting
pictures and videos of this on my site.
Terry Austin
Yes, it is.
When you're ready to admit you deliberate lied, we can continue this.
Until there, there's no point in anything other than to point out that
you're a known liar.
--
Terry Austin
History is made at night. Character is what you are in the dark.
Rod Speed
> Rod Speed <rod.sp...@gmail.com> wrote>>>> Christopher A.Lee <ca...@optonline.net> wrote
>>>>> Lee K <lee_k...@hotmail.com> wrote
>>>>>> Liz <ehu...@donotspam.com> wrote
>>>>>>> There is a strong correlation between those who are pro-birth
>>>>>>> and those who find the sight of breast feeding offensive.
>>>>>>> They want every pregnancy to come to term, but don't want to
>>>>>>> feed the infants after they are born. Go figure.
>>>>>> And what's to be made of the views of those who are
>>>>>> pro-abortion? It's a great leap from finding public
>>>>>> breastfeeding offensive and finding the very
>>>>>> existence of babies to be offensive.
>>>>> Nobody is "pro-abortion" outside the imagination of the anti-abortion liars.
>>>> If one is a supporter of pregnancy terminations, then one is pro-abortion.
>>> The deliberate lie being that there are a a large number
>>> of people who are supporters of pregnancy terminations.
>> It aint a lie,
> Yes, it is.
No it aint. You've only got to look at the number of pregnancy terminations
done in any country where that is legal to see that its a bare faced lie.
> When you're ready to admit you deliberate lied, we can continue this.
> Until there, there's no point in anything other than to point out that
> you're a known liar.
Never ever could bullshit and lie its way out of a wet paper bag.
Frank Mayhar
Were you born this infantile or did you grow into it?
Well, no, don't answer, I'll just assume that you were born this way and
just never grew out of it.
Oh, and *plonk* to you, too, dipshit.
Terry Austin
> Terry Austin <terry.nota...@gmail.com> wrote
>> Rod Speed <rod.sp...@gmail.com> wrote
>>> No 33 Secretary <terry.nota...@gmail.com> wrote
>>>> Lee K <lee_k...@hotmail.com> wrote
>>>>> Christopher A.Lee <ca...@optonline.net> wrote
>>>>>> Lee K <lee_k...@hotmail.com> wrote
>>>>>>> Liz <ehu...@donotspam.com> wrote
>
>>>>>>>> There is a strong correlation between those who are pro-birth
>>>>>>>> and those who find the sight of breast feeding offensive.
>>>>>>>> They want every pregnancy to come to term, but don't want to
>>>>>>>> feed the infants after they are born. Go figure.
>
>>>>>>> And what's to be made of the views of those who are
>>>>>>> pro-abortion? It's a great leap from finding public
>>>>>>> breastfeeding offensive and finding the very
>>>>>>> existence of babies to be offensive.
>
>>>>>> Nobody is "pro-abortion" outside the imagination of the
>>>>>> anti-abortion liars.
>
>>>>> If one is a supporter of pregnancy terminations, then one is
>>>>> pro-abortion.
>
>>>> The deliberate lie being that there are a a large number
>>>> of people who are supporters of pregnancy terminations.
>
>>> It aint a lie,
>
>> Yes, it is.
>
> No it aint.
Liar.