Re: Best election analysis: 'GOP allowed neo-cons and Zionists to control the party and the neo-cons/zionists lead us right over a cliff'
wis...@yahoo.com
<jlwebs...@aol.com> wrote:
> Regardless of how one feels about some of Hal Turner's other views,
>his post-election analysis (see http://halturnershow.blogspot.com) is
>by far the most accurate and succinct I've seen thus far and I doubt
>it will be bettered in these regards by any other commentator:
>
> "The GOP allowed neo-cons and Zionists to control the
> party and the neo-cons/zionists lead us right over a
>cliff."
>
> - Hal Turner
> http://halturnershow.blogspot.com/
>
>More key points made by Turner:
>
>* "They (the GOP) waged illegal war in Iraq based upon deliberate lies
>and when the lies were exposed, they CONTINUED waging illegal war.
>
>* "The Republicans spent years catering to big business, and, under
>the guise of "free trade" allowed literally millions of US jobs to be
>exported overseas. They cared nothing about "the little people." The
>little people struck back tonight."
>
>* "The Republicans then made the utterly indefensible mistake of
>offering John McCain as the nominee ... who repeatedly defied the will
>of his own constituents by voting in favor of Amnesty for illegal
>aliens. The GOP thought that McCain, being a "moderate" could inspire
>the electorate to vote GOP. They were wrong."
>
>* "The public viewed McCain as being another 4 years of Bush; and Bush
>is HATED both here in our country and around the world."
>
>* "When the economy tanked, no one in the GOP had balls enough to lay
>the blame on liberal policies of giving mortgages to illegal aliens; 5
>million mortgages totaling over $500 Billion, which they defaulted
>upon, taking most of our financial markets with them."
>
>* "The failure to put the blame where it belonged made it easy for the
>Socialist Democrats to place blame on Bush and the GOP. The socialist
>democrats lied over and over, but no republican had balls enough to
>say the truth."
>
>* "The items above are NOT the worst of it. When the new Congress and
>President are sworn in, they will almost immediately grant Amnesty to
>12-30 million illegal aliens already here. Those aliens will
>vote. . . . . and keep the GOP out of power for the next fifty years."
>
>* "America committed national suicide by allowing millions of illegal
>aliens and other non-citizens, to vote and get away with it. Again,
>republicans were afraid to be called racists by demanding enforcement
>of the law while socialist democrats were willing to lie, cheat and
>multiple-register ineligible people to steal the election."
Let the games begin! President elect Obama is going to get hard
lessons in political reality. Though the airwaves are filled with the
usual blather about "bringing us together" the fact is that Americaa
is becoming more divided.
ted
Chris
> On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 02:12:51 -0800 (PST), Kalimansi
> <jlwebs...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>> Regardless of how one feels about some of Hal Turner's other views,
>> his post-election analysis (see http://halturnershow.blogspot.com) is
>> by far the most accurate and succinct I've seen thus far and I doubt
>> it will be bettered in these regards by any other commentator:
>>
>> "The GOP allowed neo-cons and Zionists to control the
>> party and the neo-cons/zionists lead us right over a
>>
>> * "America committed national suicide by allowing millions of illegal
>> aliens and other non-citizens, to vote and get away with it. Again,
>> republicans were afraid to be called racists by demanding enforcement
>> of the law while socialist democrats were willing to lie, cheat and
>> multiple-register ineligible people to steal the election."
>
> Let the games begin! President elect Obama is going to get hard
> lessons in political reality. Though the airwaves are filled with the
> usual blather about "bringing us together" the fact is that Americaa
> is becoming more divided.
>
> ted
>
the repetition of the worst republican talking points, wrong as they
have always been. Let's turn page, shall we?
clams_casino
> the fact is that Americaa
>is becoming more divided.
>
>ted
>
>
>
I was under the impression that Obama was going to reverse the GW policies.
Are you suggesting he will simply follow in GW's policies?
Lou
"Chris" <Ch...@chris.net> wrote in message news:ges46s$5uf$1...@aioe.org...
Knock it off - these aren't republican views or talking points.
Rod Speed
If it was, they wouldnt have elected a brown man to be Prez, stupid.
Rod Speed
> wis...@yahoo.com wrote
>> the fact is that Americaa is becoming more divided.
> I was under the impression that Obama was going to reverse the GW policies.
Bet you cant list even a single one of the shrubs policys that he plans to reverse.
> Are you suggesting he will simply follow in GW's policies?
No, but he wont be reversing any of them, you watch. Just fiddling
with a bit of the detail like the tax rate for those earning more than
$250K etc and it remains to be seen what Congress will buy anyway.
Dennis
Well for starters, I'd make a bet right now that we are not at
(military) peace in the next 4 years.
Dennis (evil)
--
"Those who cast the votes decide nothing,
those who count the votes decide everything." -Joseph Stalin
Rod Speed
>>> the fact is that Americaa is becoming more divided.
>> I was under the impression that Obama was going to reverse the GW policies.
>> Are you suggesting he will simply follow in GW's policies?
> Well for starters, I'd make a bet right now that we are not at (military) peace in the next 4 years.
Afghanistan wont be fixed in that time, the talibums wont give up that easily, but thats nothing like the shrub's
policy.
Dick Cheney
Dennis <dg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Well for starters, I'd make a bet right now that we are not at
> (military) peace in the next 4 years.
Darn. Shoulda elected YOUR guy.
Bob F
"Lou" <lpo...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:ges6t8$gv3$1...@aioe.org...
No. They are the lies that some repubs spread to (try to) win elections.
Bob F
"Dick Cheney" <wool-p...@peoples.eye> wrote in message
news:wool-pulling-40E0...@news.supernews.com...
Indeed.
clams_casino
JonL
This is the female version of Dan Quayle.
Now some are excusing this poor choice, claiming she wasn't vetted
properly....bullfeathers!!
Palin was chosen way back in February, or even earlier.
McCain-Palin were accepting donations as of March 1st.
from Delaware Sec of State website:
File Number: 4509524
Incorporation Date / Formation Date: 02/25/2008
Entity Name: MCCAIN-PALIN COMPLIANCE FUND
Entity Kind: Corporation Entity Type: Non-Profit or Religious
Residency: Domestic State: DE
Registered Agent Information: Name: THE CORPORATION TRUST COMPANY
Address: Corporation Trust Center 1209 Orange Street
City: Wilmington County: New Castle State: DE Postal Code: 19801 Phone:
(302) 658-7581
==================================================
What is a compliance fund? According to the disclaimer on the
McCain-Palin Compliance Fund site:
"McCain-Palin Victory 2008 is a joint fundraising committee by the
McCain-Palin Compliance Fund, Republican National Committee, and
Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, and Pennsylvania Republican Parties. Because
the McCain-Palin Campaign is participating in the presidential public
funding system, it may not receive contributions for the any [sic]
candidate's election. However, federal law allows the McCain-Palin
Campaign's Compliance Fund to defray legal and accounting compliance
costs and preserve the Campaign's public grant for media, mail, phones,
and get-out-the-vote programs. Contributions to McCain-Palin Victory
2008 will go to the Compliance Fund, and to participating party
committees for Victory 2008 programs."
Lou
"Bob F" <bobn...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:gettdd$dar$1...@registered.motzarella.org...
I've noticed a tendency on the part of some people to all but literally
demonize both the party they don't belong to and its members. The
despicable sentiments expressed above are not views, policies, planks, or
whatever of the republican party. Nor are those who voice similiar views
always republicans, and democrats are no more immune than anyone else.
Dennis
Which guy was that? I'm not a republican nor McCain supporter.
Try again.
Dennis (evil)
--
An inherent weakness of a pure democracy is that half
the voters are below average intelligence.
Dick Cheney
Dennis <dg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Which guy was that? I'm not a republican nor McCain supporter.
The guy you DID support! You know, the one you didn't support. Like all
those Republicans you never voted for. Obviously, you are neither a
Republican nor a McCain "supporter". You speak in meaningless code. If I
must guess, you supported Nobody, because Nobody will cut your taxes.
Ken Lay
lis...@privacy.net wrote:
> Rep. Rahm Benjamin Emanuel, the Democrat congressman for the 5th
> District of Illinois in Chicago is the son of an Israeli terrorist.
> Rahm's father, Benjamin, was a member of the Irgun, the Zionist
> terrorist organization that coined a new word as they blew up hotels,
> train stations, and other buildings in Palestine in the 1930s and
> 40s.
Wow, just like David Ben Gurion, who fought with the Irgun, blew up the
King David Hotel and later served as first Prime Minister of the
newly-created state of Israel.
That's just terrible! Awful! Let's undermine President Elect Obama over
it!
Your highly embroidered article neglects to mention how during the time
of the Irgun, Palestinians and Jews were united in their strife against
British imperialist oppression, rather a worldwide attitude at the
time. Similar sentiments simmered and actions took place in the British
colony of India. God help us if the Obama administration ever includes
a well-qualified Hindu or Sikh.
> Really, I am not making this up, the chief power-broker of the
> Democrat Party, the 5-and-a-half foot foul-mouthed Israeli named
> Rahm, is the son of terrorist – a real living terrorist.
"Go fuck yourself" -- Dick Cheney, in front of the world on the floor
of the United States House of Representatives. I suggest you take his
advice, to which I can only add, "... you racist pinhead".
--
Everybody lies. George W. Bush and Dick Cheney just suck at it.
Truly Stunned
> I've noticed a tendency on the part of some people to all but
> literally demonize both the party they don't belong to and its
> members. The despicable sentiments expressed above are not views,
> policies, planks, or whatever of the republican party.
Perhaps not, but their advocates are well-represented and far too
influential under the Republican's laughably-named "big tent". Indeed,
if there is one major factor that lost John McCain and his party this
election, it is the disproportionately loud voice given them by
Republican leaders' misguided attempts at populism. The diseased
animals comprising this group should definitely be purged from the
party before it becomes irrevocably infected. IOW, force them back
under their uncivilized slimy little rocks and do whatever is necessary
to quarantine them there, and I will reconsider my current Democratic
party affiliation. I've been relatively conservative my entire life, but
conservatism has never meant illiterate, faith-based savagery to me, so
now I'm called a "leftist" a "socialist" and a "liberal" by subhumans
who do not even know the meaning of the words without looking them up.
And Republicans gave them legitimacy and sat back and laughed their
fatcat asses off for eight humiliating, insufferable years.
Who's laughing now?
> Nor are those who voice similiar views always republicans, and
> democrats are no more immune than anyone else.
Agreed, but Republicans have deliberately chosen to make theirs the
most inviting party of choice to those holding such despicable views.
It's why I became embarrassed to be a Republican when they selected
George W. Bush over McCain. I would have happily voted for Willie Brown
himself over any candidate fielded by the Republicans and their thugs.
Their stench became more than I could bear, and apparently the majority
of the rest of the country thankfully felt the same way.
Dennis
Pretty much what I expected -- another incoherent babbler. Come back
when you can write something remotely intelligible.
Or don't.
Dennis (evil)
--
"There is a fine line between participation and mockery" - Wally
Dick Cheney
Dennis <dg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Pretty much what I expected -- another incoherent babbler.
Or not. Babble? You want Babble? You can't handle Babble. I still think
we should have voted your guy, you know, with your ability to accurately
predict war and markets and all. But no, don't worry: you don't babble
at all. And you certainly don't sound Republican.
Dennis
Well, I'm glad you see it my way. Wise choice.
I must admit, I initially thought you might put up more of an
argument, but given your problems with expressing yourself
intelligibly, I guess it was no surprise that you folded so quickly.
Cindy Hamilton
> Son of a Zionist Terrorist: Rahm Emanuel’s Dirty Secret
>
> The new "golden boy" of the Democrat Party, the Israeli-American congressman
> Rahm Emanuel, is the son of terrorist. Really, I am not making this up, the
> chief power-broker of the Democrat Party, the 5-and-a-half foot foul-mouthed
> Israeli named Rahm, is the son of terrorist – a real living terrorist.
>
> fighting the War on Terror? Do we run and hide from the foul-mouthed little
> Israeli who danced ballet and swears for effect - or do we laugh? Or do we
> demand answers? How can we respect a U.S. Congressman who served in a foreign
> army and whose father was a terrorist?
What possible difference could his height make?
What earthly significance does ballet have?
This is simply laughable. The author might as well have based his
analysis on whether
the gentleman drinks skim milk or 2%.
Cindy Hamilton
Rod Speed
Wot if he drinks baby blood ?
Dick Cheney
Dennis <dg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Well, I'm glad you see it my way. Wise choice.
Well thanks. Mighty white of you.
> I must admit, I initially thought you might put up more of an
> argument
Why would I argue with someone against whom Nobody can win?
> but given your problems with expressing yourself intelligibly, I
> guess it was no surprise that you folded so quickly.
Like a sheet of Charmin.
Dennis
Oh, Ithought that was chocolate on your face. My mistake.
Y'know, you sound an awful lot like my old pal bearclaw. But I
thought he had some terminal disease or something.
JonL
Imo, that's not his biggest flaw, being the son of a terrorist.
Dick Morris on Faux News knows him well. Sez even Clinton didn't trust
him. He's a snitch, leaks to the Washington Post.
JonL
> On Nov 6, 6:16 pm, lisa...@privacy.net wrote:
>> Son of a Zionist Terrorist: Rahm Emanuel’s Dirty Secret
>>
>> The new "golden boy" of the Democrat Party, the Israeli-American congressman
>> Rahm Emanuel, is the son of terrorist. Really, I am not making this up, the
>> chief power-broker of the Democrat Party, the 5-and-a-half foot foul-mouthed
>> Israeli named Rahm, is the son of terrorist – a real living terrorist.
>>
>> So, what do we do as citizens of the land of the free and the home of the brave
>> fighting the War on Terror? Do we run and hide from the foul-mouthed little
>> Israeli who danced ballet and swears for effect - or do we laugh? Or do we
>> demand answers? How can we respect a U.S. Congressman who served in a foreign
>> army and whose father was a terrorist?
>
A sure sign he's "differently normal". Ballet dancing is often a
"gateway" hobby, leading to worse things, such as cross-dressing and
even homersexuality, imo.
Might we have a drag queen in the White House.....??
Bob F
"JonL" <Jo...@Mayday.com> wrote in message news:49158B85...@Mayday.com...
I guess that tells us what your opinion is worth.
Dick Cheney
Dennis <dg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Oh, Ithought that was chocolate on your face. My mistake.
No, and it's not minstrel makeup, either.
> Y'know, you sound an awful lot like my old pal bearclaw.
You have old pals? I didn't realize you are a geezer. Are you going to
start reminiscing fondly about when the Internet was text and markets
were free?
> But I thought he had some terminal disease or something.
Okay, maybe you are more familiar with babble than I thought.
But I still think its sad that your guy lost, and I wish that people
didn't feel such a need to hide their political affiliations.
Dennis
<wool-p...@peoples.eye> wrote:
>In article <94u9h4lkn3kq1mdjn...@4ax.com>,
> Dennis <dg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Oh, Ithought that was chocolate on your face. My mistake.
>
>No, and it's not minstrel makeup, either.
After you comparing yourself to Charmin, it's pretty clear what it is
and how it got there. I just gotta say: eew!
>> Y'know, you sound an awful lot like my old pal bearclaw.
>
>You have old pals? I didn't realize you are a geezer. Are you going to
>start reminiscing fondly about when the Internet was text and markets
>were free?
>
>> But I thought he had some terminal disease or something.
>
>Okay, maybe you are more familiar with babble than I thought.
>
>But I still think its sad that your guy lost, and I wish that people
>didn't feel such a need to hide their political affiliations.
No need, just a delight in tweaking snarky little blowhards who make
rash assumptions and then can't figure out how to back out without
making even bigger public fools of themselves.
Now, which guy was that again? (Here, borrow my shovel ;-)
Dennis (evil)
--
I'm behind the eight ball, ahead of the curve, riding the wave,
dodging the bullet and pushing the envelope. -George Carlin