Re: Fecklessness

[Chuggmy_J...@yahoo.com]

On Mar 28, 11:19 pm, ShawnHirnsG...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On Mar 28, 10:15 pm, Shawn Hirn <s...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > In article
> > <3d9c461b-5bbe-4961-afd6-fc015495a...@t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
> >  The BIG N <ni...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> > > With no real rhyme, reason, or purpose, the ineffective Troll Shane
> > > still plods along with his feeble, futile, and aimless net-patter.
>
> > > Sad when such an abnormal need for attention surpasses the
> > > understanding of the essence self-worth, self-respect, and a little
> > > dignity.
>
> > And what's your "rhyme, reason, or purpose" for perpetuating your lies?
>
> Proof????
> Why SURE
> The things LIARS say
>
> "For you to twist that into claiming a protective effect of smoking
> is
> dishonest. Further, that study looked at one disease; lung cancer.
> Smoking and secondhand smoke are associated with my diseases such as
> emphysema which were not addressed in the study you cited."
>
> How's that emphysema doing?
> Cat piss helping any?
> How bout a lil trash fire scarecrow?
>
> Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!
> border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!
> local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.comcast.com!news.comcast.com.POSTED!
> not-for-mail
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2007 19:25:01 -0600
> From: Shawn Hirn <s...@comcast.net>
> Newsgroups: alt.smokers
> Subject: Re: Secondhand smoke
> References: <srhi-28C28D.0...@newsgroups.comcast.net>
> <epnbp9$9e...@aioe.org>
> <1170162076.987098.16...@v45g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>
> <1170182313.101414.299...@k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
> <srhi-85CFD2.22560730012...@newsgroups.comcast.net>
> <a2c0s25903lp2hfbhbvbfv50d8v363c...@4ax.com> <MN1wh.
> 13240$Cg1.4...@bignews8.bellsouth.net>
> <tud1s2duu4lk4bc2nnb9kjqndq3186f...@4ax.com>
> <6eSdnQe_xpi-617YnZ2dnUVZ_rSjn...@rcn.net>
> User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.2 (Intel Mac OS X)
> Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2007 20:25:00 -0500
> Message-ID: <srhi-F6830D.2...@newsgroups.comcast.net>
> Lines: 51
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.44.34.241
> X-Trace: sv3-aCZSKtoaENQuDsvtlVXwCGBEZCrnHgJK9nRqKQ7oPRughBc3VFquh/
> SvrbagFywjIoKJWtb2wn/roMf!R4nVLAjPUpVJ66g4T91PiHEmM/
> sTrqnCgZTc58U4r1+EdiGguRjiDcouosgirmkGVRO5jjrgzyJG!RRSrqbWFERqZYQ==
> X-Complaints-To: ab...@comcast.net
> X-DMCA-Complaints-To: d...@comcast.net
> X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
> X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your
> complaint properly
> X-Postfilter: 1.3.32
>
> In article <6eSdnQe_xpi-617YnZ2dnUVZ_rSjn...@rcn.net>,
>
>
>
>
>
> nightlight <nightlight.s...@skip.omegapoint.com> wrote:
> > Robert wrote:
>
> > >>The WHO tried to blame the results on a small sample size. However, in
> > >>the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, where the results were
> > >>published, the researchers clearly state: "An important aspect of our
> > >>study in relation to previous studies is its size, which allowed us to
> > >>obtain risk estimates with good statistical precision..."
>
> > >>"http://www.davehitt.com/facts/who.html
>
> > > That site has a link to full text of the report.
> > >http://www.obscurious.co.uk/componants/smoking1440.pdf
>
> > You might wish to replace that link with the one to the original JNCI
> > site which published that study and which also has the full (and free)
> > PDF copy of the paper. Otherwise, the antismoking trolls having no other
> > good argument will distract any discussion on this study by dragging in
> > and arguing against whatever else (UFO, consipiracy theories,...) is
> > posted at that "obscurious.co.uk" site, as if the study discussed were
> > published by them (which is probably a front staffed or ran by
> > provocateurs with the sole job to discredit, by association, whatever
> > fact those paying them don't wish to be seen as reputable).
>
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > "Multicenter case-control study of exposure to environmental
> > tobacco smoke and lung cancer in Europe."
> > J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998 Oct 7;90(19):1440-50.
>
> > Boffetta P, Agudo A, Ahrens W, Benhamou E, Benhamou S, Darby SC, Ferro
> > G, Fortes C, Gonzalez CA, Jockel KH, Krauss M, Kreienbrock L, Kreuzer M,
> > Mendes A, Merletti F, Nyberg F, Pershagen G, Pohlabeln H, Riboli E,
> > Schmid G, Simonato L, Tredaniel J, Whitley E, Wichmann HE, Winck C,
> > Zambon P, Saracci R.
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > Journal of the National Cancer Institute (full text)
> >http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/90/19/1440
>
> This study said absolutely nothing about protective effects; what it
> said was they simply found no reason to believe that children who
> were
> exposed to secondhand smoke were no more likely to get lung cancer
> then
> kids who were not exposed to secondhand smoke.
>
> For you to twist that into claiming a protective effect of smoking is
> dishonest. Further, that study looked at one disease; lung cancer.
> Smoking and secondhand smoke are associated with my diseases such as
> emphysema which were not addressed in the study you cited.
>
> Path: aioe.org!news.germany.com!postnews.google.com!news1.google.com!
> border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!
> local02.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.comcast.com!news.comcast.com.POSTED!
> not-for-mail
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:45:57 -0500
> From: Shawn Hirn <s...@comcast.net>
> Newsgroups: alt.smokers
> Subject: Re: Eliot Spitzer, antismoking leader, self-destructs
> References: <tplbt39nk4m6dt1ab6lom2g4a20ej0i...@4ax.com>
> <f39fcc37-7f5e-428c-98be-368059f51...@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
> User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b1 (PPC Mac OS X)
> X-No-Archive: yes
> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:45:57 -0400
> Message-ID: <srhi-FCD465.20455710032...@comcast.dca.giganews.com>
> Lines: 22
> X-Usenet-Provider:http://www.giganews.com
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.44.35.193
> X-Trace: sv3-aeDk2kBlLjjuTZ2wUblP+08Zus46uGKnxaEc1XrET/
> q75f5OjHm8o5bW0ZNHuQMmv9BNYCI5799R/jx!
> gSFiBZjZqnAt0Un58keYpoLSw7UmS1VVtjGDcvWzkUZnGDB10faMjmGTa9+mr9Iqp5qKoi7zwu6­t!
> DoMgOytpZumi6ZHC/Yy4SnXV1IPl7IKM3gGHBA==
> X-Complaints-To: ab...@comcast.net
> X-DMCA-Complaints-To: d...@comcast.net
> X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
> X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your
> complaint properly
> X-Postfilter: 1.3.37
>
> "Shawn Hirn" <s...@comcast.net> wrote in message news:srhi-
>
> FCD465.20455710032...@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article
> > <f39fcc37-7f5e-428c-98be-368059f51...@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
> > The BIG N <ni...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> >> On Mar 10, 8:51 pm, Robert <n...@e.mail> wrote:
> >> > Zero tolerance, no compromise, no mercy.
>
> >> > Bye bye, hypocrite.
>
> >> Sooner or later the zealot and control-freak, right, left or
> >> otherwise, is going to trip over his own feet. Look at Troll Shane and
> >> Babs Broughton, for just one example.
>
> > You really can't count. That's two examples, not one. It sounds like
> > you're a fifth grade drop out.
>
> > Spitzer kind of reminds me of Bill Clinton, where they both obviously
> > got caught in outrageously stupid acts. Just like smokers who think they
> > are immune to the consequences of their actions, Spitzer obviously
> > thought that somehow, he was better than all the johns that got nabbed
> > for prostitution. I agree, Spitzer is a hypocrite, especially since
> > prostitution should be legalized.
>
> Yep ! Gotta buy your women , such a LIAR can' t possibly
> smoth talk and get one that stay's with you huh?
>

Shame Him is such a liar he' ll never realize what an incredible ass
he has
made of himself.

He cares not about anything but his agenda.

Ken Pangborn has more credibility.

see for yourself Shame Him

http://tinyurl.com/ys3oqd

http://tinyurl.com/26wrgc

Chugg