In article <28mXq.3629$_q...@newsfe21.iad>,
terrable <
terr...@terrable.net> wrote:
>I watched This Old House tonight and they happened to talk about the water
>heater they put in the lastest fixed up house. After years of pimping
>tankless water heaters as the greatest thing since the invention of indoor
>plumbing the smiling faces finally realized that tankless water heaters have
>drawbacks and just suck. So now they are pimping hybrid waster heaters.
>So I figured given the track record of This Old House that hybrid waster
>heaters must be even more expensive than tankless water heaters, still
>manage to suck and make no economic sense.
>I was right. One of the cheaper ones, at a discount price, is $1655. And the
>3 out of 4 reviewers agree it sucks.
[ ... ]
I looked into a tankless water heater a few weeks ago; not only would it
cost $1600 for the heater, all tankless water heaters require at least a
3/4" gas line (the one to my water heater was 1/2"), changing the gas
pipe requires a permit from the city, which would take a week, and they
require cleaning every four months--or they clog with scale.
Not being interested in cold water showers for a week in January, or the
nearly 3x price for the heater, I stuck with a tank-style heater.
In the course of all this, I discovered that Mr. Rooter bases prices for
water heaters on popularity--the most popular (30 gallon) are the most
expensive at $750. I ended up with a $675 40 gallon, because a even
cheaper 50 gallon wouldn't fit.
This is one case where higher volume production doesn't lead to lower
prices.
Gary