>More Americans losing jobs daily and we can't pay for gas for gas in our
>cars in order to sit in traffic on our traffic jammed highways; and Bush
>welcomes more immigrants into America. Never mind that we need more people
>here like we need more air, water and habitat destruction; President Moron
>gets a photo-op. I'm only sorry that more people in the audience didn't yell
>for his impeachment. 198 more days and (please Lord) we'll be rid of him. Of
>course, he'll be replaced with someone who will want to throw open America's
>doors to even more legal and illegal "immigrants."
>
>
>Bush Welcomes New American Citizens
>Antiwar Demonstrators Interrupt Annual Naturalization Ceremony at Monticello
>
>Washington Post Staff Writer
>
>Saturday, July 5, 2008; Page A02
>
>CHARLOTTESVILLE, July 4 -- President Bush kicked off the Fourth of July at
>the hilltop estate of one of the nation's Founding Fathers, where he
>welcomed dozens of new American citizens from 30 countries.
>Bush's address Friday at the annual Independence Day naturalization ceremony
>at Thomas Jefferson's Monticello was immediately interrupted by a handful of
>antiwar demonstrators, one of whom repeatedly shouted, "Impeach Bush!" Bush,
>apparently unfazed, offered a holiday-appropriate response.
>"To my fellow citizens-to-be, we believe in free speech in the United States
>of America," Bush said to hearty applause.
>Six protesters, including one in a cartoonish Uncle Sam hat, were
>"voluntarily escorted" away from the crowd of 3,000, and no arrests were
>made, said Lee Catlin, a spokeswoman for Albemarle County.
>The citizenship ceremony has been held annually since 1963 outside
>Jefferson's colonnaded plantation home in the verdant Piedmont hills. Bush,
>the fourth U.S. president to address the event, lauded the "guiding
>principles" Jefferson laid out in the Declaration of Independence, saying
>they had long inspired immigrants like those gathered before him.
>"They've made America a melting pot of cultures from all across the world.
>They've made diversity one of the great strengths of our democracy," he
>said. "And all of us here today are here to honor and pay tribute to that
>great notion of America."
>The 74 new citizens (72 adults and two children) filed one by one across a
>sun-drenched stage, and they shook hands with their new president. There was
>Ali Hussain Al Asady, an Iraqi man with a small U.S. flag sticking out of
>one buttonhole of his striped shirt. There was Sawsan Mohamed El Fatih
>Zeyada, a Sudanese woman wearing a vibrant floral head scarf. And there was
>Julia White Freeman, a petite girl born eight years ago in China, who got
>more than a handshake: Bush lifted her off the ground and propped her on his
>hip.
>Julia, donning a red-white-and-blue dress tailor-made for the occasion,
>smiled sheepishly.
>"I knew already I was an American, but it just made me feel very good and
>different," Julia said after the ceremony, as she soaked in the atmosphere
>with her parents, John Freeman and Jennifer White of Charlottesville, and
>her sister, Emily, who, like Julia, was adopted from China. "I feel that
>it's very exciting."
>The experience was heady for other new citizens, too, all Virginia residents
>who seemed to realize that they were taking the oath under special
>circumstances. Many naturalization ceremonies occur in places such as
>federal courtrooms.
>It was inspiring for Zeyada, 40, a native of Khartoum who is studying for a
>master's degree and hopes to become a psychologist. She, like many others in
>the group, said she was "proud to be an American." But she said that when
>she looked at the cast on the stage -- Bush, Virginia Gov. Timothy M. Kaine
>(D) and a gaggle of federal judges in black robes -- she saw her American
>dream for her four children, ages 7 to 12, who watched from the crowd.
>"My kids have a big chance here," she said, referring to the United States.
>She pointed toward the stage. "Those men up there, maybe they can be one of
>them."
>
The President of the United States of America is worthless. Same for
McCain and Obama. America needs a total rebuild.
ted
http://www.wvwnews.net/ Western Voices World News
http://www.newnation.com/ New Nation News
And what the fuck do you want to do? Decrease the population? How,
smart ass? Hey here's an idea, if you don't like it and don't like
people are free to have kids here, move and get out.
> Hey here's an idea, if you don't like it and don't like
>people are free to have kids here, move and get out.
>
>
>
Actually, the government provides a yearly subsidy for having kids.
Nationlizing helath care will decrease the quality of care recieved
and provide a disincentive to drug companies to come up with drug to
make our lives (or erections) longer. Thus decreasing how long our
elderly hang on. Thus curbing population growth.
You don't think we have enough great drugs to make old people stay alive?
Not say I like universal health care, but, come on, old people are going
to die _earlier_ if it happens unless our doctors/hospitals become shit.
Drugs have nothing to do with it.
Idiot.
That's what I stated.
You agree with an idiot.
You need to drink Drano.
And don't let the door hit your whining ass on the way out!
Nonsense. They just don't want women to enjoy it.
Jim
Completely wrong. They want all couples to be married before having sex,
thereby ensuring that the MAN won't enjoy it.
LG
--
Failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently. - Henry Ford
Mrs. Clam told you she was an R?
PLONK goes Spammy again.
But the lib-dem divorce lawyers will...
> "Clave" <ClaviusNo...@cablespeed.com> wrote in message
> news:W6-dnTvT1pK7aPLV...@cablespeedwa.com...
> > "OrangeSFO" <intang...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:90472b84-f3a1-47b0...@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> >>
> >> Republicans...they want more babies...but they don't want anyone to
> >> fuck.
> >
> > Nonsense. They just don't want women to enjoy it.
>
> Completely wrong. They want all couples to be married before having sex,
> thereby ensuring that the MAN won't enjoy it.
>
>
Marriage is a sham.
--
Emm Oh Oh En. That spells RSPW.
What about the con-rep lawyers?
Right...
Good luck -- that's Spamantha you're dealing with there. Changes her nym a
few times a week in the fevered hope that she'll stay out of people's twit
filters for a few minutes. You just saw pretty much the extent of her
wit/intelligence/entertainment value.
Here's her bio:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crapflooding
HTH,
Jim
Worse. Parents stayed together until I was 18. That and the whole
problem of it being a way to control the animalistic populace.
Clammie gets kicked regularly, sorry...
Bummer.
You didn't want your parents to stay together?
Children in single parent families are more likely to do poorly in
school, drop-out, take drugs, get involved in crime and have children
out of wedlock.
Did you suffer from any of these pitfalls?
--
aem sends...
Exactly. Marriages are a sham. Just like religion and government.
More people to buy gas that current residents are cutting back on --
of course he wants more people.
Well, actually, HE doesn't want them. The puppet masters do.
--
Face your fears.
Live your dreams.
So you are OK with the trend - especially with blacks, which is now
over 50% - to have more single parent households?
~~~~
It's the liberal way. Everyone can be miserable as long as they're all equal
about it.
LG (happy to spite them)
--
The most charismatic and entertaining of the right-wing kooks that lurk
around here. - ViNNY
No such thing. They may mean well, don't get me wrong, but parenting is a
two person, two GENDER job. And I don't give a damn about the politics of
the situation, the fact is men and women bring different abilities to the
table and children benefit from them both. Rather than saying that angry
couples should or should not stay together "for the children", I say the
dumb selfish bastards shouldn't have had the kid(s) to begin with.
> On Jul 6, 5:42 am, "Becoming something you're not [was LH]"
> <lfkkhjsssssssss...@lhhhhggd.com> wrote:
> > In article <lL2ck.99005$102.26...@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > aemeijers <aemeij...@att.net> wrote:
> > > Yer Pal Al wrote:
> > > > On Jul 5, 9:21 pm, "Becoming something you're not [was LH]"
> > > > <lfkkhjsssssssss...@lhhhhggd.com> wrote:
> > > >> In article <2EXbk.184103$fz6.66...@fe08.news.easynews.com>,
> > > >> Craig R <m...@whee.ls> wrote:
> >
> > > >>> Becoming something you're not [was LH] wrote:
> > > >>>> In article <W5Gdndzsw4vt2e3VnZ2dnUVZ uidn...@posted.localnet>,
> > > >>>> "Lord Gow333, Conservative Fullback!" <lord...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>> "Clave" <ClaviusNoSpamDam...@cablespeed.com> wrote in message
> > > >>>>>news:W6-dnTvT1pK7aPLVnZ2dnUVZ r7i...@cablespeedwa.com...
I never said anything about single-parent households. Just marriages.
Two gender job eh? So you are saying same sex couples can be the two
parents if one is masculine and the other is feminine. That lib talk
there, buddy.
But reproduction, like love and lust, is by definition an irrational
process. The genes want what the genes want. And once the kids are
there, you don't get a do-over. You have to make do as best you can.
But I still say a single parent household is better than a broken
2-parent household. BTDT, from the kid side. Once they only saw each
other a few hours a month, they got along a lot better. And both of them
were able to devote quality time to us young ones. The older kids,
separated from us younger ones by several years, said it was traumatic
as hell to be going through adolescence in a battle zone.
--
aem sends...
Gender is more than role playing.
LG
--
"Keep it simple. If it takes a genius to understand it, it will never work."
- Clarence Leonard “Kelly” Johnson
As long as both parents get time with the kids, and avoid stabbing each
other in the back, then, yeah, I agree. If babydaddy (or momma) disappears
or is cut out tho I'd seriously wonder about it.
Regardless tho we can agree that it sucks either way and some kids would be
better off being raised by wolves ($1 to Adam Carolla).
LG (raised by two loving parents, and eternally thankful for it)
If you're concerned about the population, why not start by kicking out
20,000,000 illegal immigrants?
Irish Mike
Which part of "illegal" didn't you understand? BTW, I'm from Kerry, you
stupid ass wipe.
Irish Mike
If Mexico can succeed in sending them here, certainly the great US can
manage to send them back. Considering the amount of resources they are
using, my tax money in particular, it would be cheaper to send them back
than to keep them here or offer the criminals citizenship and still end
up paying for their six or more stair-step kids.
Also we might see that true, legal Americans really would do the less
than average pay jobs. Consider that the unemployment rate represents
the people on the dole not all the hundreds of thousands that never did
find a job and ran out of unemployment benefits.
The cheapest way to get rid of them would be the cost of ammunition; this
may occur sooner than you think if the economy does tank completely.
Texans are gun-toters and Texas is overrun with them. Think about it.
nero
____________
ps--my family came from Barcelona in 1919. Legal immigrants, notice?! as
all should be. No exceptions.
--
"Lighthouses are more helpful than churches." - Benjamin Franklin
Nobody said anything about roleplaying you flipflopping lib.
Are you stupid or just contradictory?
LG
--
Visit www.fairtax.org , sign the petition, and make America what it could
be.
If everyone was as cynical about marriage as you would there be more
or less single parent households?
Only in your trailer park.
Irish Mike
>
>
Especially when paired with John.
LG
The same.
Failure to understand and properly apply the sociological application
of the term gender noted.
How does that work. Those people who decide not to get married somehow
don't have children?
Failure to converse like a normal person and not a self absorbed anal
retentive jackass noted and laughed at.
LG (noting and laughing)
Laughing because you're ignorant saddens me.
My ignorant?
LG (usually above grammar flames but considering the gist of the thread)
*slowly shaking head*
The gist of the thread seems to be you being dumb as hell, and you're
doing nothing to halt that train here!
--
Milhouse Guidry of the mWo
Fuck off.
LG
SNAP!!! Damn that hurt...
LG (trapped)
Haha. YOU'RE an adorable, petulant child, aren't you?. YOU'RE making a
fucking dumbass mistake, YOU'RE refusing to realize it, and YOU'RE
turning into a big baby when called on it. YOU'RE priceless.
His adorable petulant child what? His making a fucking dumbass
mistake what? His refusing to to realize it what? His turning into a big
baby when called on it what? His priceless what?
Two jackasses braying on about a punctuation error calling me childish.
Wounded. Wounded, I am...
LG (cut to the quick)
YOU'RE hanging of LH's ass hairs like an rwa-esque cling-on.
LG
--
The shining beacon of truth in a newsgroup full of liberals. - rafiki