RFID chip implants solidly linked to animal tumors

[bear...@cruller.invalid]

According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, these chip implants
are not only safe, they will save lives by allowing the human bearer to
effortlessly carry his entire medical history around with him wherever
he goes. Indeed, the FDA assurances sound almost *exactly* like the chip
manufacturer's sales literature, but with the added ring of "authority".
The chips were enthusiastically endorsed by the agency during the Bush
appointment of Tommy Thompson, Republican from Wisconsin, working in
concert with Jim Sennsenbrenner, Republican Congressman also from
Wisconsin, who also peddled the chips his so-called "Real I.D." Act (HR
418).

So why won't the FDA divulge to the press exactly *which* studies it
reviewed to make this assessment? What's the big secret, FDA? Is it that
a Federal Agency obligated to protect the American people has happily,
blithely approved a passive surveillance device which is now shown to
nourish malignent cell growth in microchipped animals? I wonder if
Thompson and Sennsenbrenner have had their pets or children injected
with these things?

<http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hYssebw3_FRuof2bdR1YdCo8OgXA>

[ulti...@hotmail.com]

On Sep 9, 3:58 am, bearc...@cruller.invalid wrote:
> According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, these chip implants
> are not only safe, they will save lives by allowing the human bearer to
> effortlessly carry his entire medical history around with him wherever

They can chip my cold, dead, lifeless body.

[ulti...@hotmail.com]

On Sep 9, 3:58 am, bearc...@cruller.invalid wrote:

They can chip my cold, dead, lifeless body.

[Jeff Jonas]

> They can chip my cold, dead, lifeless body.

Already common practice, particularly in disasters such as Katrina.
--

-- mejeep deMeep ferret!