The Stock Market Explained…
tg
villagers that he would buy monkeys for £10 each. The villagers,
seeing that there were many monkeys around, went out to the forest,
and started catching them.
The man bought thousands at £10 and as supply started to diminish, the
villagers stopped their effort. He then announced that he would now
buy at £20. This renewed the efforts of the villagers and they started
catching monkeys again.
Soon the supply diminished even further and people started going back
to their farms. The offer increased to £25 each and the supply of
monkeys became so little that it was an effort to even see a monkey,
let alone catch it!
The man now announced that he would buy monkeys at £50. However, since
he had to go to the city on some business, his assistant would now buy
on behalf of him.
In the absence of the man, the assistant told the villagers, “Look at
all these monkeys in the big cage that the man has collected. I will
sell them to you at £35 and when the man returns from the city, you
can sell them to him for £50 each.”
The villagers hurried round with their savings and bought all the
monkeys.
Then they never saw the man nor his assistant again, only bloody
monkeys everywhere!
Now you have a better understanding of how the stock market works.
abelard
looks like another dumb bollix n pricks socialist post....
what is the meaning of this idiot's tale/tail?
is it to advertise plentiful meat?
or is
it to ask what the fool and his assistant achieved with all
their unproductive efforts....a pile of paper perhaps....
and now how are they going to spend the paper?
buy meat at 20,000,000,000,000,000 zimbabwean socialist dollars
an ounce?
--
web site at www.abelard.org - news comment service, logic, economics
energy, education, politics, etc 1,552,396 document calls in year past
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
all that is necessary for [] walk quietly and carry
the triumph of evil is that [] a big stick.
good people do nothing [] trust actions not words
only when it's funny -- roger rabbit
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
weary flake
> >http://www.bnp.org.uk/2008/10/the-stock-market-explained/
>
> looks like another dumb bollix n pricks socialist post....
yeah, I don't get it, except that Britain has too
many monkees. here's some "classic" parable:
weary flake
Here's how you're .sig reads:
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> all that is necessary for [] walk quietly and carry
> the triumph of evil is that [] a big stick.
> good people do nothing [] trust actions not words
> only when it's funny -- roger rabbit
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
'all that is necessary for [to] walk quietly and carry
the triumph of evil is that [you have] a big stick.
good people do nothing [but] trust actions not words
only when it is funny -- roger rabbit'
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) -- NO FACTS Support the RRR Cult's Loathsome Agendas!
tg <D2Za...@googlemail.com> wrote:
For the sake of us Americans who barely use the word "bloody" in
the British context, it might be noteworthy to mention that no monkeys
were slaughtered in the course of all of this. :)
> Now you have a better understanding of how the stock market works.
Interesting analogy.
>http://www.bnp.org.uk/2008/10/the-stock-market-explained/
-- (¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯)
xana...@mchsi.com -- To E-Mail me.
http://www.roadrat.com -- Learn how to get PAID to TRAVEL.
http://apifar.blogspot.com -- Great TACTICS to Fight Bigotry.
http://pro-christian.blogspot.com -- Christianity *vs.* Bigotry.
And with Election Day looming, THIS site is a MUST:
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
MORE THAN EVER BEFORE...
"It IS The SUPREME COURT, Stupid!"
Earl Weber ("duke") <duckg...@cox.net> wrote, 10-8-08 --
> I know how the system is supposed to work. But we have
> too many judges that decide based not on the Constitution
> but on their version of social justice.
There can't possibly BE too many egalitarian judges, since ALL
of them are constrained to rule *within* the parameters of the
Constitution. NO judge can *contradict* the Constitution. In
any given case, there is only so much potential "gray area" wiggle
room within which one must rule, or contradiction would occur.
The BEST judges are the fair-minded, sensible, and compas-
sionate ones who rule as close as they possibly can to the param-
eter that affords the most personal freedom for individuals. As
an envelope is defined by it's edges, it's a case of staying inside
of the envelope so as to still be mailable, with the *content*
always being snugly against the edge called "liberty."
Individual freedom should be PARAMOUNT, and NO President
or Senate should EVER be responsible for appointing/confirming
a Justice that doesn't make it unequivocally *clear* that he/she
will steadfastly seek to defend and support it to the fullest extent
possible. There is NOTHING good to be gained by installing a
repressive Justice. That is one of the most *harmful* actions that
a President or Senator can do to his/her country.
We MUST **keep** EGALITARIAN judges in the majority in
the U.S. Supreme Court. And to do that, we MUST elect Obama.
For more important information and talking points, go here:
http://apifar.blogspot.com/2007/11/vital-warning-unseen-unheeded-now.html
http://apifar.blogspot.com/2007/12/surreal-alternate-reality-if-democrats.html
The above articles are clear, concise, totally factual, and are
HIGHLY useful and thought-provoking.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Steve Slatcher
wrote:
>>http://www.bnp.org.uk/2008/10/the-stock-market-explained/
>
>looks like another dumb bollix n pricks socialist post....
About what you can expect from the BNP website :)
--
Steve Slatcher
http://pobox.com/~steve.slatcher