>do some folks seem to believe that the retail price of an item when new has some
>relationship to its secondhand price?
>
>
>
Probably for the same reason folks believe a retail price has some
relationship to the worthiness of that product.
I'd say because it's true. It works for almost everything. Used cars
are priced this way. Leases are calculated this way. I shop garage
sales looking for 10¢ on the dollar or less.
Well, for items which are durable and which retain their desirability (i.e.,
haven't become obsolete, etc.) there probably is some relationship. For
example, I've found I can use 25% of original purchase price for used
furniture that's in good condition, assuming an individual-to-individual
sale. And a lot of books seem to sell okay on half.com. Pricing for a church
rummage sale, we often go for about 10 cents on the dollar.
Likewise, aparently many Ebay bidders seem to use the original retail
price as a guide as they bid up the price on some items to 110%, 120%,
even 125% of what the same item costs retail. ;-)
Dennis (evil)
--
I'm a hands-on, footloose, knee-jerk head case. -George Carlin
Since your question is rhetorical to a ridiculous degree, would you care
to explain if you are:
Someone grousing because you can't get 99% of what you paid for an item
when trying to resell it.
Someone grousing because you can't get an item for 1% of what someone
else paid for it when trying to buy it.
There is *always* going to be a relationship, of some sort, between the
retail price of an item and it's second hand price. What's your point?
Rick
Yes. That's why I won't pay more than half of what the retail price
was for a "used" item...and at garage sales less than half. But that
only applies to relatively new items; obsolete technology, for
example...you may have to pay me to take it. Forget that you paid
$3G's for a laptop in 2000...it's work $50 or less now.
Thats a big point. Particularly with technology, the market drops with
every new improvement.
I see a lot of posters on craiglist or the forsale newsgroups trying
to get 2/3 of the retail price for 4 year old equipment.
Similarly I see people selling stuff thats just a few weeks old for
90%. They argue that since its used, I won't pay taxes and I will save
more. Well since I may not be able to use the warranty or exercise the
return priveleges that original buyer had, I think maybe the discount
should be a little higher.
I check prices with a store that sells refurbished computer equipment
and offers a 30 day warranty. If I buy used from a stranger, it has to
be much less that the refurbished with warranmty version would cost.
James
It clearly doesn't. On ebay, stuff is routinely sold for more than
retail...
--
I have such poor vision I can date anybody.
...Garry Shandling
which brings us back to the original ?, WHY?<g>
Stupidity?
>Derald <der...@invalid.net> wrote:
>
>
>>do some folks seem to believe that the retail price of an item when new has some
>>relationship to its secondhand price?
>>
>>
>
>It clearly doesn't. On ebay, stuff is routinely sold for more than
>retail...
>
>
>
>
I'd surely like to see a few examples. I'm sure there are a few, but
most of eBay sales of new items I've ever seen tend to be about half of
retail.