Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: ?? Why

0 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted

clams casino

unread,
Jul 29, 2007, 5:05:34 PM7/29/07
to
Derald wrote:

>do some folks seem to believe that the retail price of an item when new has some
>relationship to its secondhand price?
>
>
>
Probably for the same reason folks believe a retail price has some
relationship to the worthiness of that product.

Al Bundy

unread,
Jul 29, 2007, 5:17:27 PM7/29/07
to
On Jul 29, 4:43 pm, Derald <der...@invalid.net> wrote:
> do some folks seem to believe that the retail price of an item when new has some
> relationship to its secondhand price?

I'd say because it's true. It works for almost everything. Used cars
are priced this way. Leases are calculated this way. I shop garage
sales looking for 10¢ on the dollar or less.

Chloe

unread,
Jul 29, 2007, 8:05:52 PM7/29/07
to
"Derald" <der...@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:f_6ri.13163$Od7....@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...

> do some folks seem to believe that the retail price of an item when new
> has some
> relationship to its secondhand price?

Well, for items which are durable and which retain their desirability (i.e.,
haven't become obsolete, etc.) there probably is some relationship. For
example, I've found I can use 25% of original purchase price for used
furniture that's in good condition, assuming an individual-to-individual
sale. And a lot of books seem to sell okay on half.com. Pricing for a church
rummage sale, we often go for about 10 cents on the dollar.

Dennis

unread,
Jul 29, 2007, 9:32:27 PM7/29/07
to
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 20:05:52 -0400, "Chloe" <just...@spam.com>
wrote:

Likewise, aparently many Ebay bidders seem to use the original retail
price as a guide as they bid up the price on some items to 110%, 120%,
even 125% of what the same item costs retail. ;-)


Dennis (evil)
--
I'm a hands-on, footloose, knee-jerk head case. -George Carlin

Rick

unread,
Jul 30, 2007, 12:27:58 AM7/30/07
to
Derald wrote:
>
> do some folks seem to believe that the retail price of an item when new has some
> relationship to its secondhand price?

Since your question is rhetorical to a ridiculous degree, would you care
to explain if you are:

Someone grousing because you can't get 99% of what you paid for an item
when trying to resell it.

Someone grousing because you can't get an item for 1% of what someone
else paid for it when trying to buy it.

There is *always* going to be a relationship, of some sort, between the
retail price of an item and it's second hand price. What's your point?

Rick

Seerialmom

unread,
Jul 30, 2007, 11:52:59 AM7/30/07
to
On Jul 29, 1:43 pm, Derald <der...@invalid.net> wrote:
> do some folks seem to believe that the retail price of an item when new has some
> relationship to its secondhand price?

Yes. That's why I won't pay more than half of what the retail price
was for a "used" item...and at garage sales less than half. But that
only applies to relatively new items; obsolete technology, for
example...you may have to pay me to take it. Forget that you paid
$3G's for a laptop in 2000...it's work $50 or less now.

James

unread,
Jul 30, 2007, 2:32:39 PM7/30/07
to


Thats a big point. Particularly with technology, the market drops with
every new improvement.

I see a lot of posters on craiglist or the forsale newsgroups trying
to get 2/3 of the retail price for 4 year old equipment.

Similarly I see people selling stuff thats just a few weeks old for
90%. They argue that since its used, I won't pay taxes and I will save
more. Well since I may not be able to use the warranty or exercise the
return priveleges that original buyer had, I think maybe the discount
should be a little higher.

I check prices with a store that sells refurbished computer equipment
and offers a 30 day warranty. If I buy used from a stranger, it has to
be much less that the refurbished with warranmty version would cost.

James

Steve

unread,
Jul 30, 2007, 5:14:26 PM7/30/07
to
Derald <der...@invalid.net> wrote:
>do some folks seem to believe that the retail price of an item when new has some
>relationship to its secondhand price?

It clearly doesn't. On ebay, stuff is routinely sold for more than
retail...


--

I have such poor vision I can date anybody.

...Garry Shandling

ChairMan

unread,
Jul 30, 2007, 6:15:50 PM7/30/07
to
In news:63lsa35ccqoscfq3e...@4ax.com,
Steve <d...@whc.inv>spewed forth:

> Derald <der...@invalid.net> wrote:
>> do some folks seem to believe that the retail price of an item when
>> new has some relationship to its secondhand price?
>
> It clearly doesn't. On ebay, stuff is routinely sold for more than
> retail...

which brings us back to the original ?, WHY?<g>
Stupidity?


clams casino

unread,
Jul 30, 2007, 7:01:25 PM7/30/07
to
Steve wrote:

>Derald <der...@invalid.net> wrote:
>
>
>>do some folks seem to believe that the retail price of an item when new has some
>>relationship to its secondhand price?
>>
>>
>
>It clearly doesn't. On ebay, stuff is routinely sold for more than
>retail...
>
>
>
>

I'd surely like to see a few examples. I'm sure there are a few, but
most of eBay sales of new items I've ever seen tend to be about half of
retail.

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
0 new messages