The poor has more responsibilities and moral obligations than the rich

[ulti...@gmail.com]

On Sep 28, 12:31 am, nys999 <nys...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> h...@nospam.org wrote innews:d60ud4pg2d6g22ej5...@4ax.com:
>
> > On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 20:00:35 -0700 (PDT), ultim...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >> When it comes to the average citizen, the gov't seems to penny pinch,
> >>and make up all kinds of excuses for denial of social services to save
> >>money. They will even liquidate your property after you die to pay for
> >>some of the services they 'gave' you. How come they aren't doing the
> >>same thing here with the CEOs? How come their assets, their mansions,
> >>their cars, their yachts, their jewelry, and everything else are not
> >>being confiscated, and sold at auction to help with the cost of the
> >>bailout?
>
> > that's what Republicans do. They screw the middle class for the
> > benefit of the wealthy.
>
> If a homeowner's job went to China, or a major illness wiped out his bank
> account and paycheck....too bad he still needs to meet his moral and legal
> responsibility to pay his mortgage off.
>
> But the CEO who uses accounting tricks or fraudulant business practices to
> temporarily boost the company's stock price so he can retire well and cash
> in huge stock options or, if the company begins failing, utilize his golden
> parachute...well, sound business decision-making may be alluded to in a
> executive contract but are never defined.
>
> Morals and ethics are more demanded of the janitorial staff than the
> executive staff. A janitor caught stealing office supplies is fired, a CEO
> who commits fraud is quietly terminated and given a golden parachute.

Well said!