------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
DonorsChoose. A simple way to provide underprivileged children resources
often lacking in public schools. Fund a student project in NYC/NC today!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/EHLuJD/.WnJAA/cUmLAA/zgSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->

PRESS RELEASE:
Springfield, MA

Appeal Filed in Flight 800 Shrapnel Lawsuit

5/31/05

Appeal filed in Flight 800 shrapnel lawsuit.

On 5/27/05 an appeal was filed to the First Circuit Appeals Court in
a freedom of information lawsuit against the FBI to obtain forensic
details about the explosion in1996 of TWA Flight 800.

This appeal follows on a judgment in favor of the FBI issued in March
by Federal Judge Michael Ponsor in Sephton V. FBI .  In the course of
this 5 year legal battle to obtain certain forensic details, FBI
documents have now been released that catalog scores of mysterious
metal fragments and pellets discovered during the autopsies of the
230 victims.  According to the county coroner, the FBI took all such
foreign objects for intensive lab analysis.

However the FBI claims it cannot find any of the forensic results of
that analysis whatsoever.  Such shrapnel was potentially the most
significant and explicit direct evidence about the explosion in the
whole of the investigation.

In 2000 the NTSB concluded that the explosion was probably caused by
the center fuel tank exploding, but they could find no explicit
evidence of the cause.  The source of the explosion is still a
mystery.

Supporters of this litigation contend that the never-released
shrapnel analysis evidence is still worth examining because of what
it might reveal about the nature of the explosion; either the metal
fragments match the metal from the fuel tank and the residues confirm
explosive fuel residues, or it indicate some other type of residue
and source of explosion.

In a 28 page ruling Judge Ponsor determined that the FBI's search for
the critical documents met the legal standards for an "adequate
search." But he noted his "sharp disappointment" that in the final
days of the lawsuit the FBI refused the judge's request for a sworn
statement about the adequacy of the search.  The refusal gave the
impression that the FBI was not confident that an adequate search had
been performed.

Judge Ponsor also conceded that the performance of the FBI in the
case overall had been very poor; refusals, delays, partial record
releases and arbitrary reversals.  

Ultimately, if this becomes the new standard for an "adequate search"
then the freedom of information laws and principles of government
accountability and transparency will have been further eroded. It
will be even easier for government agencies to conceal their mistakes.

Details about the litigation can be seen at:
www.foiac.org
or
www.twa800.com
or
www.flight800.org

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Flight800/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Flight800-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/