A Brief History of the New World Order
Richard Moore
r...@quaylargo.com
2 Feb 2009
"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the
political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to
attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim
we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even
believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best
interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as
'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to
build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one
world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am
proud of it."
David Rockefeller, Memoirs, 6-11-6
World War I and the birth of the new-world-order project
The beginning of anything is always problematic to pin down. For every
beginning, there are always antecedents, causes, preparations, broader
canvases to consider, etc. For my money, World War I the war to end
all wars is a sensible choice, as the launch-event into the new
world order project.
Of course one must go further back for motivation, the conception of
means, and for the vision. Some refer all the way back to The
Illuminati, which was (still is?) a real conspiratorial clique aiming
for global governance,. Others refer to Cecil Rhodes, who quite
effectively used his wealth from diamond mining to promote his vision
of global Anglo-Saxon dominance. Regardless of the details of the
preceding historical thread, WWI was the epochal event that began an
identifiable program toward a new world order, a single global
hierarchy, controlling all global affairs, under the control of elite
financiers.
The British Empire represented the ultimate evolution of one
particular path to global dominance: a single hegemonic power, playing
off other powers against one another in a balance of powers strategy.
Certain mechanisms of power were perfected in this era. I refer to the
integration of propaganda, racism, intelligence operations, covert
intervention, diplomacy, financial manipulation, and naked military
power all orchestrated, with considerable art and brutality, in the
pursuit of imperialist objectives.
The real power behind the British government, however, by 1900, had
long been the elite banking families of The City, in league with their
colleagues in Europe and America. In Marxist terms, we would call this
community the capitalist elite of the day, and they were the ones
envisioning our now-unfolding new world order. Within the context of
the British Empire, they had exercised considerable power over global
affairs and finance, and they had outgrown the relatively limited
vision of the British imperial model.
Britain itself, circa 1900, despite being still seen as the greatest
world power, had become only a shadow of its former self. Once the
manufacturer to the world it enjoyed a near monopoly on industrial
production for a century it had now been eclipsed industrially by
both Germany and the USA. Britain was no longer the obvious choice, as
the base for a global power grab.
As Alexis d'Tocqueville had noted earlier in Democracy in America, the
nations most inherently destined for greatness were the USA and
Russia. Of the two, c. 1900, the USA was certainly more promising,
from a capitalist perspective, as a power base. So the decision was
made, to shift hegemony from London to Washington, and to create the
context for a more evolved model of global hegemony.
For centuries The City's banking elite and Britain's nationalist elite
had collaborated harmoniously. One might not have imagined a
distinction between them; they were, it seemed, of a whole. But while
in British circles generally, c. 1900, European dominance and the rise
of Germany were the big issues, the bankers were looking at a broader
canvas, and with a longer-range lens. A splitting of the ways was
beginning, and a betrayal among global elites was in the offing.
In British nationalist eyes, control over the balance of power in
Europe was everything. America was far away, and up until then its
only imperialist adventures were also far away, peripheral to European
affairs. Germany, however, had become an urgent threat to European
dominance, with its industrial productivity and its plans for a Berlin-
Baghdad railway and a wider rail network, undercutting Britain's sea-
based dominance of world trade.
British nationalists, quite naturally, were thinking in terms of war
with Germany, as the only available means of maintaining British
hegemony. The banking elite, more slyly, was seeing such an adventure
as a way to kill several birds with one stone. And thus began a
classic betrayal scenario. For the time being they were still
seemingly one, still comrades, the bankers and the nationalists . They
worked together to set the stage for war, creating encircling
alliances which would bring everyone and their cousin in against
Germany and her allies, once a match was lit under the carefully
prepared conflagration.
And then came the small matter of finance. Long before, the
Rothschilds, the classic model of an elite banking family, learned
that the financing of wars is the most profitable and reliable of all
banking operations. Britain could indeed prosecute the war with
Germany, with the help of her alliances, and prevail, and she could
also stake out strategic claims in the Middle East but where would
she get the money for the troops and ships? Don't worry about that,
we'll take care of you, said the friendly bankers.
So Johnny goes marching off to war, allegedly to end war, while the
British state pursues with vigor its nationalist objectives. Meanwhile
the City's bankers appointed their man in America JP Morgan to
broker America's support of the British war effort. By making America
the financier and goods-supplier of Britain's war on Germany, Germany
could be brought to its knees militarily, and Britain could be brought
to its knees financially while at the same time America could be
turned into a proto-superpower. All of these things coming together at
one time that is why I see WWI as the birth of the new-world-order
project.
WWI was the making of America, as a world power. Its actual military
participation was minimal, late, and secondary. Much more important
were the internal industrial expansion, the influx of funding to the
domestic economy, and the business consolidation that occurred. Money
went from New York to London, on loan, and then the money was sent
back to Chicago, or Cleveland, or wherever, to purchase the goods of
war. While Europeans and Brits were being slaughtered in their
millions, Americans were experiencing boom times, leading into its
golden age of the roaring 1920s.
When the war ended, Britain had accomplished her imperial objectives,
had won the battle for European hegemony, and eliminated Germany as an
immediate threat. In the process, however, she had inadvertently lost
the war for global hegemony: Europe was no longer the focus of world
power. Guns and troops had won the battle, but debt had won the war.
All of Europe winners and losers alike were destitute as the war
ended, and the victorious allies were encumbered by astronomical debt
to the American Treasury and to the banking elite.
The European economic malaise that emerged out of the Treaty of
Versailles is usually blamed, in popular mythology, on the
'shortsightedness of chauvinistic diplomats', eg. Clemenceau, in
seeking revenge on their erstwhile enemies. Or it is blamed on 'narrow-
minded protectionist measures' adopted by European nations in the
postwar years. In reality, it was the enforcement of debt collection
that caused the malaise, and it was Morgan's men, not diplomats, who
dictated the draconian terms of repayment. The betrayal, of Britain by
the bankers, was now complete, and the dagger was being twisted in the
guts of the betrayed.
Britain and its allies could not afford the repayment terms out of
their own pockets, so the fiction was propagated that Germany had
started the war, and that it must therefore pay reparations to the
innocent victors. As usual, the victors write the histories. The whole
repayment scenario was carefully scripted by Morgan's men, in the
terms of the treaty, so that Europe would be struggling for decades to
pay their debts to America and to Morgan's financing syndicate. The
focus of global hegemony had shifted Westward across the Atlantic.
While Europe had been devastated by war, America had built up its
infrastructures and expanded its industrial base. While Europe emerged
deeply in debt, America emerged with a strong balance sheet and an
astronomical amount in the accounts-receivable column, to be paid by
the war's 'victors', and subsidized by the 'losers'. While Europe
struggled to rebuild requiring still more borrowing America could
continue its economic expansion, capture global markets, and generally
exploit its privileged financial and industrial position.
From a nationalist perspective, we could say that America won WWI,
and all of Europe lost and lost big. The Europeans were bound to pay
America huge sums for the privilege of having devastated one another.
But in America as in Britain, one must draw a distinction between
nationalist-minded elites, and financial elites. During the war the
bankers had shown the face of a true comrade to both Britain and
America enabling the one to win the war, and facilitating the rise
to power of the other. Each of the banker's "friends" got what it
wished for. (One needs to be very careful of what one wishes for.)
We have seen how the banking comrade betrayed his British nationalist
friends, by shifting the ground of hegemony westward while the old
ground was being bitterly contested. It turns out that the American
nationalist friends were also betrayed at the same time, by the same
banking comrade, in a coup that will be described in the next section.
Britain had won the battle for Europe, for a while; America had won
the battle for strongest nation, for a longer while but it was the
banking elite who won the war for discretionary power over the
future course of world affairs.
The Federal Reserve and the subversion of the American republic
"Let me issue and control a nations money and I care not who writes
the laws."
Amshall Rothschild
"If the American people ever allow private banks to control the
issuance of their currencies, first by inflation and then by
deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them
will deprive the people of all their prosperity until their children
will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."
Thomas Jefferson
Even while Britain was arranging its encircling alliances, and
creating the conditions for inevitable war, banking-agent Morgan and
his cohorts were busy arranging the means of financing the adventure,
and creating the conditions so that that the banking elite would be
the decider-behind-the-scenes and a primary raker-in-of-profits, as
America exploited its position of dominance in the post-WWI era.
The time-tested formula, by which banking elites had come to dominate
European governments, was the creation of a privately-owned central
bank. Such a bank, according to the trusty formula, has the power to
control credit, the money supply, and interest rates, to issue the
currency of the nation, and to loan that currency at interest to the
government. The implementation of that fatal formula in America,
however, had severe obstacles to overcome. The dangers of a central
bank were well known to the Founding Fathers, and sentiment among
political elites remained strong in the republic against such an
institution. Earlier implementations had occurred, and each had been
dissolved, to beneficial effect, by a subsequent administration.
In order to overcome these political obstacles, the bankers employed
two other time-tested formulas: buying politicians, and creating panic
through engineered crisis.
Like so many well-minded politicians, who for the most part try to do
good during their tenure, Woodrow Wilson found it necessary, at a
critical juncture in his career, to make a pact with the devil. The
path to the Presidency would be opened to him, and in most things he
could have his own mind, but if a bill came before him establishing a
central bank, he was to sign it. The pact was made, the coffers were
opened, and the road to the Presidency was successfully travelled.
With Wilson elected, and his signature assured, it remained only to
manipulate the Federal Reserve Bill (which was written by banking-
agent Paul Warburg) through Congress. Step One was to create a banking
panic, which JP Morgan was able to accomplish simply by leaking rumors
to the press that a certain New York bank was in trouble, causing a
run on the bank, and from there the crisis spread domino-fashion and
general panic ensued.
When the panic was at its peak, the Federal Reserve Bill was
introduced into Congress, along with false and sombre assurances that
the result would be financial stability, and an end to boom-bust
cycles. The general panic created enough political support that a
vocal minority of Congress came to support the bill. Step Two, in
manipulating the bill through Congress, was to call for a vote late
one night, when most of Congress had gone home for Christmas, while
the minority-in-favor had been tipped off to stick around. The bill
passed, Wilson signed it promptly, and the coup was complete. The
devil got his due, and just in time to maximize elite gains (both
political and economic) from the financing of WWI.
Wilson lived to rue the day he shook hands with the devil. He
expressed this later in strong terms:
"We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely
controlled and dominated Governments in the world no longer a
Government of free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and
vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of
small groups of dominant men."
"Some of the biggest men in the United States are afraid of something.
They know there is a power somewhere, so organised, so subtle, so
watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive that they had
better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of
it"
The war had served as a vehicle to transfer the focus of hegemony to
America, and much else was shipped across the Atlantic along with that
focus. The lessons Britain had learned in its centuries of empire were
brought over as well the sly coordination of the overt and the
covert, secret collaborations between private and public actors, the
artful use of deception and betrayal, and all the other tricks of
internal intrigue and geopolitical dominance. The Council on Foreign
Relations was established, directly on the model of a similar British
organization. The emerging American giant was being carefully tutored
by past masters of global games.
In a single decade the Anglo-American banking elite had managed to
devastate Europe, launch America on the path to hegemony, secure
direct control of American finance and behind-the-scenes control of
American political affairs and rake in astronomical profits in the
process. Let this be a lesson to those who assume that elites aren't
clever enough to carry out big projects successfully in this
complicated world of ours.
And in fact these kinds of elite manipulations are not really rocket
science. When you have control over finance, and you have your
tentacles into high-level political circles and you have centuries
of experience at this kind of thing there's a lot you can accomplish
using routine methods.
Among the routine methods are deception, betrayal, artificial crises,
bubble and burst economic cycles, engineered conflicts and above all
never hesitating to finance wars to get what you want; genocide is a
legitimate means. As Henry Kissinger put it, when America betrayed the
Kurds and was enthusiastically supporting Saddam Hussein, "You can't
make an omelette without breaking eggs". It's really just a matter of
thinking big, and not giving a damn about anyone else but you and your
friends and your shared power. These people have a philosophy: if we
weren't on top, someone else would be. Typical gangster reasoning.
World War II and the consolidation of American hegemony
WWI had been such a successful project that planning began immediately
for a grander sequel, another giant step toward a new world order. In
the early 1920's, still in the days of the Weimar Republic, a team of
Krupp engineers were secretly tasked with a project: come up with
designs for a line of military equipment suitable for a war twenty
years from now. Thus were conceived the advanced weapons that served
the Reich so well when the time came. Even though Germany was
destitute, and treaty-bound not to rearm, someone knew, and told
Krupp, that all this would change and within the designated timeframe.
There were two primary elite objectives for the inter-war years:
collecting the WWI debts, and creating the conditions for a larger-
scale war that would consolidate America's hegemonic role in world
affairs. As in WWI, the plan would be to get others to do the hard
work, and for the yanks to come in when most of the fighting was over,
pick up all the marbles, and score the points for victory. And once
again, the banking elite would be financing the war (as it turns out,
all sides) and raking in profits beyond measure.
Ongoing destitution in Europe was useful for two reasons: it maximized
debt repayment, and it created the conditions in which elites could
socially engineer the reconstruction process. Destitute people are
likely to accept whatever crumbs of hope are thrown their way. When
Mussolini came along, with his vision of fascism, elites saw a man who
could 'instill the discipline' necessary to enable debt repayment. He
was promptly funded by the Anglo-American bankers.
Mussolini's fascist ideas resonated with ideas popular among American
elites. Eugenics, for example, including the killing or sterilizing of
"undesirables", was a cause promoted by Rockefeller, Ford, and many
others. And the primary tenet of fascism the individual is
subservient to the needs of the state is music to the ears of
ruthless elites everywhere, and in particular to our friendly banking
elites.
Hitler was a project of the Anglo-American bankers. His charismatic
brilliance was noticed early, and his Mein Kampf served as an
effective marketing brochure for himself: here was a man determined to
do exactly what the financial elite would love to see happen he
wanted to invade and decimate the anti-capitalist Soviet Union. His
rise to power was funded largely through the auspices of the Anglo-
American bankers, and immense profits were made by investing in the
German rearmament process. And he was good about debt repayments.
Germany fighting Russia, that was a good start for the next war
project. Meanwhile, in the Pacific, Japan was looming as a new power.
In 1905 she had bettered Russia in the Russo-Japanese war and she was
rapidly industrializing. Japan had imperialist aspirations and this
fit perfectly into elite planning. Japan against China, and Germany
against Russia, was precisely the kind of global war that elites,
comfortable in New York, would be happy to fight, and win. Many a
dollar was made investing in Japan's imperialist adventures, and
selling them supplies and equipment, prior to Pearl Harbor.
Meanwhile, in the USA, there were profits and gains of other kinds to
be made during the inter-war years. First came the bubble, aka the
roaring twenties. Everyone and his cousin was playing the market.
Everything was going up, as carefully stage managed by the new Federal
Reserve financial autocracy. With a strong economy, and all that cash
coming in from debt repayments, the bubble was easy to manage. Lots of
people made a bundle, but the biggest bundles were stashed away by
those at the top who financed the episode. The house always wins.
Next came the consolidation phase, aka the Great Depression. If
America was to emerge from the next war project as global hegemon, the
important thing was to own as much of America as possible. By
comparison, current profits were secondary. And the most convenient
way to buy up American assets was to create a depression, whereby
everything would be on the market at fire-sale prices. Elementary, my
dear Watson.
All of these threads wove together perfectly as WWII began. The masses
of people in Europe and Asia were engaged in murdering one another,
and destroying one another's countries, while the USA continued to
stay out of the fray, and the Anglo-American banking elite was
profiting from its investments and loans to all sides of the
conflicts. America's entry into the war was carefully delayed, coming
just in time to determine the outcome, but after much of the fighting
had already occurred. In order to facilitate this delay, the virtues
of neutrality were promoted in the mainstream media right up until
Pearl Harbor, despite considerable grassroots anti-fascist sentiment.
When the right time came for entry, banking-agent Roosevelt initiated
a series of provocations against Japan, designed to force them to
attack. The Japanese codes had been broken, the date of the attack on
Pearl Harbor was known, and the valuable aircraft carriers were put
safely out to sea. Out-of-date ships were left as sacrificial lambs,
eg the Arizona. Day of Infamy indeed. By such an arranged incident,
the neutrality propaganda could be instantly reversed, and a
declaration of war readily obtained from a neutralist-minded Congress.
Many of them pacifists yesterday, the young men of America were now
all lining up to enlist. So easy, when you pull all the strings, to
turn a whole nation around on a dime.
"If we see that Germany is winning we ought to help Russia and if
Russia is winning we ought to help Germany and that way let them kill
as many as possible, although I dont want to see Hitler victorious
under any circumstances."
Harry S. Truman, New York Times, June 24, 1941
Even after declaring war on Japan and Germany, America participated
only marginally, with a holding action in the Pacific, a troop buildup
in the British isles, and a bombing campaign against the Reich. The
real fighting was happening in China and on the Eastern Front of the
German campaign. America was happy for the fighting to go on, as long
as a big winner didn't emerge, a potential threat to US hegemony.
Every day the fighting continued, the bankers were profiting from the
financing, and potential rivals to America were being weakened.
Only when Germany was defeated at Stalingrad, and the huge Russian
army began advancing westward, did America finally commit masses of
ground troops to combat. There was no need to defeat Hitler; Stalin
was taking care of that business on the Eastern Front, where 80% of
the German divisions were fighting. The task of the American troops
was to race eastward to halt the advance of Russia as quickly as
possible. Much to the consternation of Stalin, after the allies landed
in Italy, the yanks allowed three more German divisions to transfer
unmolested from Italy to the Eastern Front, as one way of slowing down
the Russian advance. Once again betrayal, this time of ally Russia.
The WWII project achieved all of its objectives admirably. While
having fought only marginally, and suffered negligible casualties in
comparison with the other major combatants the US emerged with an
intact infrastructure, 40% of the world's wealth and industrial
capacity, control of the seven seas, a monopoly on atomic weapons,
strategic footholds in the Middle East oil sheikdoms, and general
popular acclaim as the heroic champion of democracy. Quite naturally,
the world's eyes turned to Washington for leadership in shaping the
postwar world.
And America was ready with a blueprint. The bankers had selected a
committee, from their Council on Foreign Relations, and sent it over
to the White House to design the postwar architecture. America was now
secured as a hegemonic base of operations, more viable for that role
than Britain had been, and it was time to move forward with the next
phase of the new-world-order project. Thus were launched, promptly
after the war ended, the Bretton Woods globalist institutions the
UN, IMF, and World Bank the early foundation stones for an eventual
one-world government.
Note to the reader: In my harsh description of America's participation
in WWII, I in no way mean to dishonor the brave men and women who
fought and sacrificed in that war as GI's. They were not deceiving or
betraying, they were fighting with all their hearts for freedom. They
were as much the victims of elite games as were all the others who
lost their lives.
The short American Century: preparing the world to accept global
governance
The WWII project was, like the first war project, a remarkable success
for the banking elites. Again, as before, the next stage of the larger
new-world-order project was promptly set in motion. With its hegemonic
position, America would serve as an ideal base of operations for this
next stage, but a global American Empire was not to be the final
outcome. America was to be used and betrayed, like Britain before it,
and this time the plan called, and still calls, for a world government
to be installed, making the whole Earth into a base of operations, a
private fiefdom, to be owned and ruled directly by the banking elite.
The unfolding of this third phase of the new-world-order project took
about six decades, and as we lived through it we saw what seemed to be
many surprising and unpredictable episodes. However, if we step back
and look at the big picture, the key elements of the project become
clear. The following objectives have all been achieved, and they were
all carefully orchestrated to reach their conclusions at about the
same time, which turned out to be the end of 2008:
the rise and fall of America as hegemonic imperial power
the preservation of American military supremacy as its only major
asset
the universal destabilization of localized economic systems
a worldwide extended boom-bust cycle, ending with most of the world
destitute and hopelessly in debt
In the final section of this article we will examine how these
conditions are currently being exploited, under the charismatic and
deceptive leadership of banking-agent Barak Obama, to bring about the
final installation of the New World Order. In this section, we'll
briefly review how each of these objectives was systematically achieved.
As it was in the heyday of the British Empire, the interests of
banking elites and nationalist-minded elites (in America this time)
were more or less aligned as the postwar era began. A grand campaign
of imperialist operations in the Global South served both their
interests. With a policy of containment with respect to the communist
world, and of Pax Americana with respect to Europe precluding Europe
from becoming a military competitor America was able to maintain
military hegemony in the "free world" and use its forces to achieve
direct imperialist objectives in the Global South, without needing to
directly confront other major powers.
America employed a much more refined and efficient model for imperial
management than the British Empire had ever been able to achieve.
Besides avoiding direct military conflicts with major competitors,
Washington spurned the burden and expense of colonial administration,
and instead focused on regime-change operations as a way of keeping
small nations under control. The installation of corrupt dictators was
the preferred model (eg, the Shah, Noriega, Marcos, Saddam, etc ad
nauseum), who once installed were encouraged to enrich themselves and
their cronies as they suppressed their populations, so that investors
from the North could exploit the nation's resources and workers.
Eventually such dictators would always outlive their usefulness.
Either they would lose control of rebellious populations (eg Marcos),
or they would get uppity and start defending their national interests
(eg Noriega). When such a time came, the elite-controlled mass media
would suddenly discover that there was a ruthless dictator loose in
the world, and the successor regime change would be widely welcomed as
a 'victory for democracy'. The faces would change, and perhaps some
reforms would be implemented, but in the end there would be another
proxy in place doing whatever needs to be done to facilitate
exploitation by foreign investors. Such has been the nature of the
free world era in the South.
A critical underpinning of the Cold War and the Pax Americana regime
was the mythology of a communist threat. In fact Russia posed no real
threat, not militarily nor in terms of covert subversion. Russia had
been devastated by the war, and the last thing it wanted was to get
involved in another one. It had been invaded by Europe time and again,
WWI being only the most recent example, and its main concerns were
security and national development. Russia tried time and again to
normalize relations with the West, and to pursue large-scale nuclear
disarmament, but was each time rebuffed.
With the destruction caused by WWI, and with the West again exhibiting
hostility, Russia had little choice but to hold on to Eastern Europe
as a protective barrier against another attack. Certainly Eastern
Europeans were not happy with clumsy, autocratic Russian rule, but
they were not being economically exploited as was the Southern "free
world". Living conditions in Eastern Europe were typically better
than in the Soviet Union itself, and better than in the South. It's
"satellites" were an economic and political burden to the Soviets, an
investment not in imperialism but in national security. Now that
Eastern Europe has been separated from Russia, and Washington is
putting missiles and radar installation there and extending NATO, it
is clear that Russia's attempt to maintain a buffer made perfect
defensive sense.
The "communist threat" provided a handy excuse for US interventionism,
for maintaining a strong US military, and for the ongoing development
of America's nuclear arsenal. Equally important, enabled by the
fiction that Russia threatened the entire West, America was able to
portray itself as the 'friend and protector of Europe', justify the
economic isolation of the socialist block, and justify as well the Pax
Americana regime in the "free world".
But as in Britain before, the interests of nationalism and of the
banking elite were not to remain aligned. Even as America continued to
extend its hegemony in a geopolitical and military sense, the seeds of
economic decline were being planted by the bankers. The first step was
to start moving manufacturing overseas, leading to the de-
industrialization of America and yielding increased profits to
investors and transnational corporations. After that Reagan was
ushered into power, bringing with him a full scale assault on the
stability of the American national economy. The program of economic
destabilization was then extended globally, as the globalization
project.
Globalization, with its deregulation of corporations and international
finance, has certainly been a profit bonanza for international banks
and transnational corporations. It's deeper purpose, however, has been
to destroy localized economic systems and to make everyone dependent
on the global marketplace for essential goods and services. Not only
has self-sufficiency been undermined for nations everywhere, but
mutual-benefit bilateral trade arrangements have been largely
eliminated as well.
Under the hocus-pocus doctrine of free trade, a situation has been
created where, to the maximum extent possible, all goods and services
are generated in the lowest-waged parts of the world, and then sold on
the global market to the highest bidders. Not only does this maximize
the profits of the middlemen (the bankers and transnational
corporations), and drive wages down everywhere, but it also results in
market prices that are largely beyond the reach of the Global South.
Under globalization, we've seen the most draconian system of
imperialism every imposed on the South, and it's an imperialism
managed by the bankers (via their globalist institutions) directly,
not by an imperialist nation, as in the days of earlier empires.
Just as with the Native Americans and the Australian Aborigines in the
1800's, the whole population of the South is now considered to be 'in
the way' of ongoing economic development and the accelerated
exploitation of Southern resources. A program of wholesale genocide,
on a scale much larger than the Holocaust, is now underway in the
South, facilitated by economic and social destabilization, in turn
facilitated by "free trade" and by covert interventions. The campaign
for biofuel development, which makes little or no sense from an energy
perspective, has the main (and intended) consequence of accelerating
the program of genocide by substantially increasing the price of food
on the global market. Keep this in mind when next you listen to
banking-agent Al Gore's inspiring speeches about "energy independence".
Of all the advantages the banking elites enjoy from this globalized
and unregulated economic system, the most strategic is the
discretionary power they have to arbitrarily manipulate global
affairs. And of the tools available to them under this regime, the
most potent is the ability to manipulate high-level finance. By such
means Japan and the Southeast "Tigers" were cut down to size, and any
number of other boom-bust cycles have been engineered over the past
several decades (eg Brazil, Argentina).
It is this ability to manipulate high-level finance that has been used
to create the climactic conclusion of this short American Century: the
engineered global banking collapse and the ensuing general panic. This
manufactured panic was then exploited to push through the disastrous
bailout schemes that are transferring insolvency from the banks to the
governments. By intentionally committing economic suicide, the bankers
have managed to kill not their banking system, but the economic
viability of nations worldwide.
From a big-picture perspective, the entire period since the end of
WWII can be seen as one big boom-bust cycle. It brought us the
greatest period of sustained economic growth the world has ever seen,
and in the end, with the engineered collapse and bailouts, all the
marbles are now being picked up by the banking elites. Game over.
Obama and the marketing of subservience: installing the New World Order
As with the two world-war projects, the short-American-Century project
was a complete success, in preparing the ground for a global system of
governance by, of, and for the elite bankers. Again, the main elements
of this penultimate sub-project:
the rise and fall of America as hegemonic imperial power
the preservation of American military supremacy as its only major
asset
the universal destabilization of localized economic systems
a worldwide extended boom-bust cycle, ending with most of the world
destitute and hopelessly in debt
To be more precise, the destitution and hopelessness are only now
beginning to unfold. We've seen the first wave of business failures
and personal insolvencies, but many more will follow domino fashion.
The amount of the losses the banks have suffered have still not been
disclosed, and massive credit-card defaults are yet to come, as the
ranks of the unemployed continue to soar globally.
The classic, time-tested way to implement big social-engineering
changes is to first create a crisis, and then in the ensuing panic to
offer a solution the 'solution' being the original goal of the
entire exercise. We've seen this formula used to facilitate the
installation of the Federal Reserve system, the passage of the bailout
schemes, the entry of America into WWII, etc. On a still-grander
scale, it is the formula that will lead to the creation of a one-world
government.
The problem in this case is the collapse of national economies and the
global financial system; the solution will be a Global Central Bank
in sum, a global-scale replay of the Federal Reserve project. Banking-
agent Gordon Brown seems to be the one who has been assigned the task
of moving this agenda forward. In a recent article in BBC News he
begins framing the context of the debate to come:
Gordon Brown sets stage for the New World Order
https://lists.riseup.net/www/arc/newslog/2009-02/msg00007.html
Once a global central bank has been achieved, using the IMF and World
Bank as a starting point, the consolidation of a one-world government
will be straightforward to achieve. The ability to manipulate global
and national finance will be centralized in that elite-run bank, and
the UN provides the nucleus from which a formal governmental structure
can be fashioned. UN "reform" will of course be required to
eliminate whatever vestiges of democratic representation still exit
there and appropriate reform measures are already underway,
although, not surprisingly, this process hasn't been featured
prominently (yet) in mainstream news reports. That will soon change.
Now let us examine the Obama phenomenon, how he was brought to power,
what he has said, and what he has done.
Obama's primary skill is his amazing charismatic ability to woo
progressives, who are in the overwhelming majority worldwide. His
skill was recognized when he was a relative nobody, and he was ushered
along a fast-track into national politics, and ultimately into the
White House still with no significant experience of any kind to
qualify him for such a job. His Presidential campaign was funded out
of elite coffers, he was championed throughout by the elite-controlled
media, his inauguration was featured worldwide, and commentators were
saying that he was not just the new American leader, but also the
global leader that the world needs at this time. He is quite clearly
the elite choice for the Presidency at this most pivotal time in
history.
Nonetheless a testament to his charisma he managed to position
himself as a people's candidate, and all those thousands of volunteers
who campaigned and canvassed for him, and raised funds for him,
believe that it was their efforts that brought him to power. They saw
McCain and Palin as the enemies who needed to be defeated, while in
fact they were unelectable sacrificial lambs put forward in order to
help assure Obama's victory.
Obama promises change, warns us that there will be hard times ahead,
and says he will need our help and support in getting through his
difficult changes. People everywhere are prepared to give him that
support. If he were really a people's candidate, he would be saying
the same things, and the difficult changes would involve the unseating
of the banking elite, the restoration of strong national sovereignty
and currencies, an end to US military aggressiveness, a campaign for
nuclear disarmament, a restoration of civil liberties, and the
establishment of cooperative international relations, particularly
with the Russian Federation. With the universal respect and admiration
he has garnered, and given that the support is strongest in
progressive circles, such changes would not be beyond his abilities to
pursue, provided he was not assassinated JFK style.
But if he were of JFK's caliber, a man who followed his own mind at
great risk to himself, he would never have been selected early and
fast-tracked into the White House. He, like Woodrow Wilson and many
others before him, has clearly made his own pact with the devil. Obama
may indeed have a fundamentally good heart, and he may try to 'do
good' within the constraints of his situation, but on the big
decisions, like Wilson before him, he will fulfill the terms of his
pact or he will be eliminated. And as far as his actual program has
been revealed so far, it all lines up perfectly with elite plans to
install the New World Order.
In particular, his embracing of the bailout schemes he made a point
of lobbying to release the final funds in Bush's phase of the bailout
reveals his true colors. His plans to spend billions on
infrastructure development will cement the hopeless indebtedness of
America to the elite bankers, while doing little for ordinary people.
Rather than abandoning military aggressiveness, he has announced an
intention to shift the focus of US military operations to Afghanistan,
close on the Russian border. Although he has talked about ending
torture, and made a big splash about closing Guantanamo eventually
he left renditions as a gaping loophole:
Obama continues torture policy
https://lists.riseup.net/www/arc/newslog/2009-02/msg00004.html
When Russia and China were ideologically communist, they were
demonized for that and were 'outsiders' to the elite global system.
Now that Russia and China have embraced capitalist ways, they still
remain 'outsiders', and are routinely condemned in the elite media for
'human rights violations', 'currency manipulations', and whatever
other 'crimes' can be dreamed up against them. No matter that most of
the regimes supported by Washington are corrupt and brutally
dictatorial, the condemnations are reserved for Russia and China. One
might ask why.
The answer is that neither Russia nor China have submitted themselves
to the elite's central bank formula. They have central banks of
course, but the government controls them, and uses them to achieve
national objectives. In the elite's central bank model, the central
banks must be for-profit institutions, privately owned by elements of
the international banking elite not subservient instruments of
national policy. In the global struggle between nationalist interests
and elite banking interests, Russia and China are the last major
holdouts for national sovereignty. They stand in the way of the New
World Order.
This is why it has been essential for America, even while being
brought to its knees economically and in most other industrial
sectors, to maintain military superiority, particularly in the realm
of nuclear weapons and space-based command-and-control systems. An
attempt was made to subvert Russia by non-military means, in the wake
of the collapse of the Soviet Union, but thanks to Putin that effort
finally failed. China jumped into the capitalist game, in terms of
trade and exports, but it has maintained strict control over its
domestic economy and it has been rapidly upgrading its military,
employing the cost-effective doctrine of asymmetric warfare.
Surely Russia and China will be given an opportunity to submit to the
new-world-order's central government on elite banker's terms and
they might, just possibly, in desperation, go along. But quite likely
they will refuse, and that's the real reason that America has been
urgently pursuing its agenda of space-based, whole-theater, military
dominance. Such esoteric capabilities serve no significant purpose in
'fighting 'terrorism' or in peripheral conflicts such as those in Iraq
and Afghanistan but they are essential if a 'successful' nuclear
first-strike is to be carried out against Russia and China. Even if
'successful', the West is likely to lose several major cities in the
exchange, and that's why deep underground bunkers have been prepared
for the elites, and for those they consider to be essential operatives
in the new-world-order regime.
If and when World War III comes about, it will be over within hours,
and nothing will then stand in the way of the New World Order. All
other ducks have been carefully lined up, and Obama is the perfect
fellow to keep us hypnotized while our freedoms, and all vestiges of
democracy, are erased once and for all from the face of the Earth.
Welcome to the new world order; please install your chip according to
the enclosed instructions.
rkm
___________________________
subscribe mailto:
cyberjourna...@googlegroups.com
websites:
http://www.governourselves.org/
http://escapingthematrix.org/
http://cyberjournal.org
recent archives:
http://groups.google.com/group/cyberjournal
http://groups.google.com/group/newslog
old archives:
http://cyberjournal.org/show_archives/
http://cyberjournal.org/show_archives/?lists=newslog
Moderator: r...@quaylargo.com (comments welcome)