There are currently 12 contributors to the project, according to Github. I give my permission, obviously, and technomancy and calavera have given theirs. That leaves:
Of these, only the ones marked with ++ have contributed 20 or more lines of code, which is the FSF's cut-off for copyright. So we need those authors to grant permission for sure, and the others would be nice as well. THIS IS A CALL TO ACTION. I will forward this to individual 20-plus contributors as well.
Commits going forward will be Apache 2.0 licensed.
> Ok ok, enough people finally hassled me about picking a license > formally that we're going forward with it. I'd like to use the Apache > 2.0 license
> There are currently 12 contributors to the project, according to > Github. I give my permission, obviously, and technomancy and calavera > have given theirs. That leaves:
> Of these, only the ones marked with ++ have contributed 20 or more > lines of code, which is the FSF's cut-off for copyright. So we need > those authors to grant permission for sure, and the others would be > nice as well. THIS IS A CALL TO ACTION. I will forward this to > individual 20-plus contributors as well.
> Commits going forward will be Apache 2.0 licensed.
> - Charlie
I grant permission for my contributions to the Mirah github project to be licensed under the Apache License Version 2.0.
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:17 AM, consiliens <consili...@gmail.com> wrote: > I grant permission for my contributions to the Mirah github project to be > licensed under the Apache License Version 2.0.
I'll repeat my consent here for the record: I grant permission as well.
> Ok ok, enough people finally hassled me about picking a license
> formally that we're going forward with it. I'd like to use the Apache
> 2.0 license
> There are currently 12 contributors to the project, according to
> Github. I give my permission, obviously, and technomancy and calavera
> have given theirs. That leaves:
> Of these, only the ones marked with ++ have contributed 20 or more
> lines of code, which is the FSF's cut-off for copyright. So we need
> those authors to grant permission for sure, and the others would be
> nice as well. THIS IS A CALL TO ACTION. I will forward this to
> individual 20-plus contributors as well.
> Commits going forward will be Apache 2.0 licensed.
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Nick Howard <n...@baroquebobcat.com> wrote: > I grant permission for my contributions to the Mirah github project to be > licensed under the Apache License Version 2.0
We probably could have argued that, but most of the contributions came after it moved to Github and became Mirah, and there was never a LICENSE file to tell people what they were getting into...so better to tidy it up.
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:35 PM, John Woodell <mando.woo...@gmail.com> wrote: > My impression was that Mirah had inherited the Apache 2 license from Duby on > Project Kenai.
> Ok ok, enough people finally hassled me about picking a license > formally that we're going forward with it. I'd like to use the Apache > 2.0 license
> There are currently 12 contributors to the project, according to > Github. I give my permission, obviously, and technomancy and calavera > have given theirs. That leaves:
> Of these, only the ones marked with ++ have contributed 20 or more > lines of code, which is the FSF's cut-off for copyright. So we need > those authors to grant permission for sure, and the others would be > nice as well. THIS IS A CALL TO ACTION. I will forward this to > individual 20-plus contributors as well.
> Commits going forward will be Apache 2.0 licensed.
> I grant permission for my contributions to the Mirah github project to be
> licensed under the Apache License Version 2.0.
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter
> <head...@headius.com>wrote:
> > Ok ok, enough people finally hassled me about picking a license
> > formally that we're going forward with it. I'd like to use the Apache
> > 2.0 license
> > There are currently 12 contributors to the project, according to
> > Github. I give my permission, obviously, and technomancy and calavera
> > have given theirs. That leaves:
> > Of these, only the ones marked with ++ have contributed 20 or more
> > lines of code, which is the FSF's cut-off for copyright. So we need
> > those authors to grant permission for sure, and the others would be
> > nice as well. THIS IS A CALL TO ACTION. I will forward this to
> > individual 20-plus contributors as well.
> > Commits going forward will be Apache 2.0 licensed.
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Bob Zoller <b...@zoller.us> wrote: > I grant permission for my contributions to the Mirah github project to > be licensed under the Apache License Version 2.0.
> On Dec 2, 12:09 am, Rib Rdb <rib...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I grant permission for my contributions to the Mirah github project to be >> licensed under the Apache License Version 2.0.
>> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter >> <head...@headius.com>wrote:
>> > Ok ok, enough people finally hassled me about picking a license >> > formally that we're going forward with it. I'd like to use the Apache >> > 2.0 license
>> > There are currently 12 contributors to the project, according to >> > Github. I give my permission, obviously, and technomancy and calavera >> > have given theirs. That leaves:
>> > Of these, only the ones marked with ++ have contributed 20 or more >> > lines of code, which is the FSF's cut-off for copyright. So we need >> > those authors to grant permission for sure, and the others would be >> > nice as well. THIS IS A CALL TO ACTION. I will forward this to >> > individual 20-plus contributors as well.
>> > Commits going forward will be Apache 2.0 licensed.
