flint...@gmail.com wrote:
> At this late stage I obviously have little time to provide proof of my
> ability to actually perform any of the projects. Is there something
> specific that I can do or provide before the deadline that would be
> considered a good indicator of my ability?
>
You could try to port some program to Minix that we don't have. Some
ideas are listed on our Wishlist:
http://wiki.minix3.org/wikis/minix3/Wishlist.
> One of the project ideas listed is to write a GDB monitor (or do a GDB
> server port?) in order to support embedded Minix 3. Minix 3 is
> presently tied to the X86 PC architecture. Is there any interest in
> or intention to support embedded minix 3 on any other processor/
> platform architecture (I note that the Apple Mac/PPC port seems to
> have been abandoned)?
>
Yes, we want to support architectures other than x86. An ARM port is in
progress. There was some progress on a PPC port, but no one is working
on it currently. Someone sent news of an initial MIPS port to this group
recently. I should note that we're not interested in architecture
porting projects in the context of GSoC.
> Writing a GDB monitor (for minix 3 on a PC hardware platform), or
> providing a GDB server running on embedded minix 3, seems a little
> light for a three month project; is there something else it might be
> combined with (such as adding a driver port)?
>
Sure, you can propose whatever project you want as long as you can
finish it in the time available.
> In the interest of maximizing my utility to the Minix 3 project as a
> whole I am interested in doing...what most needs doing. Has the minix
> 3 team prioritized the projects in any way? If taken from the
> perspective that you (the Minix 3 organization/team) had me available
> for a Summer to do whatever needed doing most, what would that be?
>
I think they're all valuable projects. I would pick the project you're
most interested in doing.
Best,
Arun