Some are excellent- for instance, Vidal's "Julian" and some of the
little known gossipy facts he used in his series on USA history. What
makes you think non-fiction history is honest? You are always going to
deal with bias, motive from any author, aren't you? Few authors/
reporters live long enough to trace the consequences of the subject so
they are only as reliable until the next approach/unearthing of
documents, etc. In the Middle East schools have been noted in their
slick use of razors to delete maps, facts from history so as to
control information, for instance. Didn't your parents tell you not to
believe everything you read in the newspapers? And what makes some
think all the political babble in ads and media is "honest"?
On Aug 3, 5:26 am, Allan H <
allanh1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> lol Gabby Personally historical novels have never really been to my
> taste..
> Allan
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 12:16 PM, gabbydott <
gabbyd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Reads like a good read for Vam.
>
> Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living.- Hide quoted text -