I think the hope is to optimise away from being so boring on the issue
of sexual orientation as gay, bi, lesbian and straight. Only
godswank prejudice could ever have led us to be bothered.
Orientation towards violent, predatory and exploitative sex does seem
worthy of consideration and there is sadly plenty of it. I suspect
this pathology is the model for our political economy.
I can sympathise with being Molly - Heidegger tortured it death. I
came across a paedophile case recently in which the perpetrator had a
brain tumour. Once removed the behaviour disappeared. The scalpel
saved him rather than introspection. I agree, of course, that we need
more reflection on what we can be and how to live. If life as we know
it (Jim) was a holiday destination, I wouldn't be coming back.
Women (as in cosmetic adverts) make me sick, as would anyone attracted
to Marks and Spencer by its latest clothes-horse marketing. It seems
I have little orientation towards bimboism. Anthropology gives us
reason to suppose sexuality is culturally manufactured in large
degree. I suspect we don't think very clearly about it
Much as I don't like rules, I think we can value them in minimal
form. I'd guess one we're missing on sexuality is its use in
distraction, much like religious rituals. I have to say, Gabs, that
the sexuality of any offspring would be of less concern to me than
general health - thus no doubt making be ableist against the social
model of disability. One might ponder whether one would prefer a
child to carry potential to be a fast-bowling all rounder or born
straight (no contest for me). The Italian aristocracy model from the
17th century was essentially gay - women were just breeding machines.
I am not an aristocrat and, having watched England thrash the West
Indies in women's cricket, am a little sad I'm too old to make a fool
of myself with the whole eleven.