Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 17:02:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Ed Hagopian To: milwaukeemakerspace@googlegroups.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: [MakerSpace] Single Sided Arduino design MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_199_9443792.1349913763893" ------=_Part_199_9443792.1349913763893 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_200_9354110.1349913763893" ------=_Part_200_9354110.1349913763893 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ooof could we improve the design and get the regulator on it? That's fairly= =20 important IMHO. Even if it was hanging off the side.... via 90 degree bent= =20 posts. On Tuesday, October 9, 2012 10:23:14 AM UTC-5, J.Dugan wrote: > Be a great/cheap alternative to have around for some Arduino based=20 > classes at the space. > > =20 > > Make a few of these.. and every attendee can use one for the =E2=80=98han= ds-on=E2=80=99=20 > classes=E2=80=A6 > > =20 > > Along with the missing reset cap (DTR pin)=E2=80=A6. > > =20 > > There is no voltage regulation on board.. L > > =20 > > =20 > > =20 > > =20 > > =20 > =20 > *From:* milwaukee...@googlegroups.com [mailto: > milwaukee...@googlegroups.com ] *On Behalf Of *Royce Pipkins > *Sent:* Tuesday, October 09, 2012 10:06 AM > *To:* milwaukee...@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* [MakerSpace] Single Sided Arduino design > =20 > =20 > > Via HackADay > > http://vonkonow.com/wordpress/2012/10/nanino-the-diy-friendly-arduino/ > > This is a neat design. Its in the Arduino shield form factor, but is a=20 > completely single sided design. Should be easy to bang one out.=20 > > He made some compromises I don't care for, the worst of which is the lack= =20 > of the reset cap. But I'll bet you could shove that in somehow if you=20 > really worked at it. A jumper wire might not be the worst solution in the= =20 > world. > > It's in Rhino natively. Not sure why, he probably just likes it better.= =20 > --=20 > The real problem is not whether machines think but whether men do. > B. F. Skinner > > --=20 > =20 > =20 > =20 > =20 ------=_Part_200_9354110.1349913763893 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Ooof could we improve the design and get the regulator on it? That's f= airly important IMHO. Even if it was hanging off the side.... via 90 degree= bent posts.

On Tuesday, October 9, 2012 10:23:14 AM UTC-5, J= .Dugan wrote:

Be a great/cheap alternative to = have around for some Arduino based classes at the space.

 

Make a few of these.. and every = attendee can use one for the =E2=80=98hands-on=E2=80=99 classes=E2=80=A6

 

Along with the missing reset cap=   (DTR pin)=E2=80=A6.

 

There is no voltage regulation o= n board..  L

 

 

 

 

 

From: milwaukee...@googlegroups.com [mailto:milwaukee...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of R= oyce Pipkins
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 10:06 AM
To: milwaukee...@googlegroups.com
Subject: [MakerSpace] Single Sided Arduino design

 

Via HackADay

http://vonkonow.com/wordpress/2012/10/nanino= -the-diy-friendly-arduino/

This is a neat design. Its in the Arduino shield form factor, but is a completely single sided design. Should be easy to bang one out.

He made some compromises I don't care for, the worst of which is the lack o= f the reset cap. But I'll bet you could shove that in somehow if you really worked at it. A jumper wire might not be the worst solution in the world.
It's in Rhino natively. Not sure why, he probably just likes it better. --
The real problem is not whether machines think but whether men do.
B. F. Skinner

--
 
 
 

------=_Part_200_9354110.1349913763893-- ------=_Part_199_9443792.1349913763893--