getting rid of pangk
Anonymous
Let's write those letters to stev...@aol.com. Let him
know about pa...@aol.com and his vulgar language and his
harassment of webg...@javanet.com (not to mention the rest
of us on these newsgroups!)
Anonymous
PangK
>From: nob...@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
>Newsgroups: milw.general
He SISSY BOY, you gonna TELL my MOMMY too??????
For a guy who CLAIMS to be a Marine, you sure come off as a PANSY!
Discberry
Anonymous wrote:
>
> Let's write those letters to stev...@aol.com. Let him
> know about pa...@aol.com and his vulgar language and his
> harassment of webg...@javanet.com (not to mention the rest
> of us on these newsgroups!)
Question: Isn't "Anonymous", "webg...@javanet.com",
and "Stacy Alexander" all the same person?
It appears that a crusade would be relatively easy to get started with
the support of one's multiple alias's!
Just an observation.
Peace,
DB
--
Cybernanc
>Let's write those letters to stev...@aol.com. Let him
>know about pa...@aol.com and his vulgar language and his
>harassment of webg...@javanet.com (not to mention the rest
>of us on these newsgroups!)
>
>
Nice try Stacy. I'm sure Mr. Case has better things to do than to do your
bidding because you can't just ignore Mr. Pangman.
~~nancy~~
"Reputation is what people think of you. Character is what you are regardless
of what people think of you. People with character sometimes are misunderstood,
misquoted and maligned.--C. Swindoll
Anonymous
Anonymous
Cybernanc
I've got a better idea...let's stop spamming the milw.general newsgroup with
this childish "I'm telling daddy" stuff!!! Fight your own battles!
PangK
>From: cybe...@aol.com (Cybernanc)
>Newsgroups: milw.general
>Nice try Stacy. I'm sure Mr. Case has better things to do than to do your
bidding because you can't just ignore Mr. Pangman.
Stacy believes men must "OBEY" her! She has been outraged that AOL won't
kick me off. She has written really venomous letters demanding that a guy in
the AOL Postmaster's office
"intercepts" her email DEMQANDING (frothing at the keyboard)
that I be kicked off. Stacy has the IQ of a rock! She STILL
hasn't figured it out who at AOL she's corresponding with! She hasn't a CLUE!
Which is why she has the ENTIRE office at AOL
rolling on the floor at how "STUPID" she is in her RAGES! You
should see some of them, they are butes! The threats of multi-billion dollar
lawsuits, the papers are on the way etc. Gee
she scares them almost as much as she scares me!!!!
PangK
>Let's write those letters to stev...@aol.com. Let him
>know about pa...@aol.com and his vulgar language and his
>harassment of webg...@javanet.com (not to mention the rest
>of us on these newsgroups!)
David you will HAVE to get someone else to side with you
because you know that AOL won't listen to either YOU or Stacy because you both
were THROWN OFF AOL! Try as hard as you will to deny it. When you do, you LIE!
PangK
Nancy to David Moore:
>I've got a better idea...let's stop spamming the milw.general newsgroup with
this childish "I'm telling daddy" stuff!!! Fight your own battles!
He hasn't the balls!!! He HAS to get somebody else to do it FOR him. Since
he was kicked off AOL for his behavior, he has ZERO credibility there. Same for
Stacy ALexander.
webg...@javanet.com
In article <353619...@globaldialog.com>,
disc...@globaldialog.com wrote:
>
> Anonymous wrote:
> >
> > Let's write those letters to stev...@aol.com. Let him
> > know about pa...@aol.com and his vulgar language and his
> > harassment of webg...@javanet.com (not to mention the rest
> > of us on these newsgroups!)
>
> and "Stacy Alexander" all the same person?
>
> It appears that a crusade would be relatively easy to get started with
> the support of one's multiple alias's!
>
> Just an observation.
>
> Peace,
>
> DB
>
> --
Two out of three ain't bad, Mr. Dingle...I mean...Mr. Disc. I had nothing to
do with the post above. It was unauthorized by me and I didn't make it.
Stacy Alexander
(*)*)()*()*(*)(*)(*)()*(*)(*)(*()*)()*()(*()**)(*)(*)()(*(*))*()*()(**)(*)(*)(
-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/ Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading
Alan Carr
I know this is only gonna get you to start raving at me, too, but have you
ever considered using a spellchecker...or at least calm down and not type
when you are on a rave? Your posts are always filled with such bizarre
typos, that I always have a mental picture of you hunched over your
keyboard, foaming at the mouth and muttering to yourself as you type.
Sorry, but I have been holding that back for far too long! It wasn't meant
to be nasty.
PangK wrote in message <199804162131...@ladder03.news.aol.com>...
>>From: cybe...@aol.com (Cybernanc)
>>Newsgroups: milw.general
>
BmtTex
ARE YOU, OR IS SOMEONE YOU KNOW INVOLVED IN AN E-MAIL RELATIONSHIP THAT YOU
WOULD LIKE TO END?
IF SO CALL 1-800-96-JERRY AND TELL US ABOUT IT!
Anonymous <nob...@REPLAY.COM> wrote in article
<6h5o7v$l...@basement.replay.com>...
Cybernanc
>ARE YOU, OR IS SOMEONE YOU KNOW INVOLVED IN AN E-MAIL RELATIONSHIP THAT YOU
>WOULD LIKE TO END?
>
>IF SO CALL 1-800-96-JERRY AND TELL US ABOUT IT!
>
>
ROFL!!!! A whole panel with Al, Stacy, Pang, and me....now wouldn't THAT be
special??? :-)
PangK
>From: "BmtTex" <dhhu...@worldnet.att.net>
>ARE YOU, OR IS SOMEONE YOU KNOW INVOLVED IN AN E-MAIL RELATIONSHIP THAT YOU
>WOULD LIKE TO END?
>
>IF SO CALL 1-800-96-JERRY AND TELL US ABOUT IT!
Stacy's trailer park doesn't have phone service yet!
Anonymous
.Subject: Re: getting rid of pangk
.From: "Alan Carr" <alan...@execpc.com>
.Date: 1998/04/17
.Message-ID: <6h75oi$a...@newsops.execpc.com>
.Newsgroups: milw.general
Anonymous
It seems that quite a few of the people in
this newsgroup are fed up with Ken Pangborn.
Let's join together. Together we can convince
AOL to make ken stop his abusive behavior on
the internet.
Karl Denninger
In article <6h82la$b...@basement.replay.com>,
It seems to me that someone who wants to bitch about another's conduct
should have the gonads to do so with ther name signed to their postings.
You're nothing but a coward.
Anonymous complaints get tossed unread around here. If you want to bitch
about one of our customers, you have to tell us who *you* are.
Its called the right to face your accuser, in case you're unfamiliar
with the concept.
--
--
Karl Denninger (ka...@MCS.Net)| MCSNet - Serving Chicagoland and Wisconsin
http://www.mcs.net/ | T1's from $600 monthly / All Lines K56Flex/DOV
| NEW! Corporate ISDN Prices dropped by up to 50%!
Voice: [+1 312 803-MCS1 x219]| EXCLUSIVE NEW FEATURE ON ALL PERSONAL ACCOUNTS
Fax: [+1 312 803-4929] | *SPAMBLOCK* Technology now included at no cost
Cybernanc
>t seems that quite a few of the people in
>this newsgroup are fed up with Ken Pangborn.
>Let's join together. Together we can convince
>AOL to make ken stop his abusive behavior on
>the internet.
I think more people are annoyed with Anonymous and Nobody and a few other
posters. Where do we go to report their abusive and annoying behavior? Or do
we just skip their posts like a sensible adult should?
Terence P Higgins
From article <6h82la$b...@basement.replay.com>, by nob...@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous):
> It seems that quite a few of the people in
this newsgroup are fed up with Ken Pangborn.
Let's join together. Together we can convince
AOL to make ken stop his abusive behavior on
the internet.
Much as I'm fed up with pang, stacey alexander nordlander and the
like, all this gutless anonymous reposting from you isn't going to wok on
me. You want some action? Try posting under your real name so we all know
who you are and can evaluate this suggestion accordingly.
--
if it's a temporary lull
why am I bored right outa my skull?
alan carr
3d
Would you all just take your "pissing contest" off this forum.
Enough of frivolous nonsense.
Take it out back.
3d
Anonymous wrote in message <6h4hha$t...@basement.replay.com>...
*The* Didaskalos
"Alan Carr" <alan...@execpc.com> wrote to and milw.general:
== I know this is only gonna get you to start raving at me, too, but have you
== ever considered using a spellchecker...or at least calm down and not type
== when you are on a rave? Your posts are always filled with such bizarre
== typos, that I always have a mental picture of you hunched over your
== keyboard, foaming at the mouth and muttering to yourself as you type.
Pangbreath has to replace his keyboard at least twice a year because
of the extreme pounding it takes. The foam makes the keys kinda
slippery, which explains all the extra letters in the words, e.g.
DEMQANDING, the Q is within slipping distance of the A.
When the computer store tried to sell him a spellchecker, he screamed
"I'm not demon possessed," and crashed through the plate glass exit
door.
==
== Sorry, but I have been holding that back for far too long! It wasn't meant
== to be nasty.
==
== PangK wrote in message <199804162131...@ladder03.news.aol.com>...
== >>From: cybe...@aol.com (Cybernanc)
== >>Newsgroups: milw.general
== >
== >>Nice try Stacy. I'm sure Mr. Case has better things to do than to do your
== >bidding because you can't just ignore Mr. Pangman.
== >
== > Stacy believes men must "OBEY" her! She has been outraged that AOL
== won't
== >kick me off. She has written really venomous letters demanding that a guy
== in
== >the AOL Postmaster's office
== >"intercepts" her email DEMQANDING (frothing at the keyboard)
== >that I be kicked off. Stacy has the IQ of a rock! She STILL
== >hasn't figured it out who at AOL she's corresponding with! She hasn't a
== CLUE!
== >Which is why she has the ENTIRE office at AOL
== >rolling on the floor at how "STUPID" she is in her RAGES! You
== >should see some of them, they are butes! The threats of multi-billion
== dollar
== >lawsuits, the papers are on the way etc. Gee
== >she scares them almost as much as she scares me!!!!
== >
== >
== >
== >
==
==
<><><><><><><><><><><><>
Ye shall know the truth -- *The* Didaskalos
http://www.geocities.com/westhollywood/village/1360
http://www.glinn.com/pink
<><><><><><><><><><><><>
*The* Didaskalos
cybe...@aol.com (Cybernanc) wrote to and milw.general:
== >ARE YOU, OR IS SOMEONE YOU KNOW INVOLVED IN AN E-MAIL RELATIONSHIP THAT YOU
== >WOULD LIKE TO END?
== >
== >IF SO CALL 1-800-96-JERRY AND TELL US ABOUT IT!
== >
== >
==
== ROFL!!!! A whole panel with Al, Stacy, Pang, and me....now wouldn't THAT be
== special??? :-)
==
And "Let's bring out Cybernansense..." as Jerry usually says before
some behemoth comes charging out from backstage and starts pounding on
someone else.
"A woman must learn in silence and be completely submissive.
I do not permit a woman to act as teacher
or in any way to have authority over a man;
she must be quiet."
--St. Paul instructing Timothy, 1Tim2:11f.
"All they that take the bible shall perish by the bible."
Discberry
webg...@javanet.com wrote:
>
> In article <353619...@globaldialog.com>,
> disc...@globaldialog.com wrote:
> >
> > Anonymous wrote:
> > >
> > > know about pa...@aol.com and his vulgar language and his
> > > harassment of webg...@javanet.com (not to mention the rest
> > > of us on these newsgroups!)
> >
> > and "Stacy Alexander" all the same person?
> >
> > It appears that a crusade would be relatively easy to get started
> > with the support of one's multiple alias's!
> >
> > Just an observation.
> >
> > Peace,
> >
> > DB
>
You know Stacy......
It truly amazes me as to why the "infantile", (meaning, "childlike
behavior"), people on this newsgroup, (not implying "everyone" on the
newsgroup is "infantile"), so frequently resort to name calling,
(refering to the "Mr. Dingle" comment above), which often draws a sharp
reply, which most times leads to petty bickering, that is followed
repeatedly by biting insults, escalating through a series of a few more
responses, almost always resulting in a flame war,... that get so out of
hand and so far off of the original topic, that it makes the entire
group participating in it look like a bunch of silly 3rd grade school
children!
If you will, please take the time to look more closely, and you may see
that my original post simply asks a question,... followed by a statement
that was not directed at any one individual, but just makes a factual
point regarding the question.
Now... a few "rhetorical" questions, (no need to start a flaming thread
over these, just some food for thought)....
- Do you feel that it is necessary to start a name calling war over the
statement that follows the question?
- Is your purpose in newsgroup responding to get flame threads started?
- Does the attention of multiple angry responses give you the sense of
power and control?
- Does this make you feel good?
I am now in the midst of a personal E-mail battle of wits with one ...
Mr. sPangKy Pangborn, (you may already be familiar with him. He seems to
have quite an affection for you). Unfortunately for sPangky, when it
comes down to a battle of wits, he usually comes unarmed!!
The entire string started because sPangKy, (which from here on, will be
his Official Discberry name), got his little pee-pee bent out of shape
by my labeling him a "Fraud",... simply due to the fact that he
constantly gripes about you posting to this newgroup from Boston, and
then I find out that he's actually posting from Florida!
My point is this.... I may have been mistaken over the "fraud" comment,
(he WAS actually "raised" here, [notice, I am hesitent to use the term
"Grow-up" because of the fact that he has not done this yet] and only
MOVED to Florida relatively recently), but sPangKy shoots off to me this
45,000 word napalm attack in response over something so little as being
called a "fraud"!
So, a-n-y-w-a-y..... I was only asking if 3 people who responded to
milw.general, who all "SEEMED" to be the same person, were "IN FACT" the
same person. As an answer to my question I get insulting comments and
mountains of e-mail from a psychopath. (Well.. the "mountains of e-mail
from a psychopath" weren't in direct response to THAT question, but it
helps make my point, not to mention sounding cool! <grin>)
Asking legitimate questions in this newgroup is akin self mutilation.
It usually draws numerous mean-spirited responses by a small nucleus of
newsgroup regulars who are low on self esteem and eagerly awaiting some
unsuspecting "newbie" to drag down to their level and verbally devour
with insults and childish name calling.
Let's stop a war before it starts! None of us really have the time for
this sort of nonsense,... unless it is the intended purpose for your
posts and you crave and feed on the tension of violent response to
messages!
Thanks for (partly) answering the original question..... I mean... you
never did get specific on which "Two out of three" that "Mr. Dingle"
hit!
> I had nothing to do with the post above. It was unauthorized by me
> and I didn't make it.
OK! So you had nothing to do with the post. But why on earth would
ANYONE ever feel the need to have any posts "authorized" by you or
anybody else?
(Oh-Oh! Another dumb question Mr. Dingle! LOOK OUT!!!!!)
[Lock n' Load... Flame-suit at the ready!]
Peace by 2000
Discberry
aka/"Mr. Dingle"
--
Discberry
Alan Carr wrote:
>
> I know this is only gonna get you to start raving at me, too, but have
> not type when you are on a rave? Y our posts are always filled with
> such bizarre typos, that I always have a mental picture of you hunched
> over your keyboard, foaming at the mouth and muttering to yourself as
> you type.
>
This message was BRILLIANT! I laughed so hard I had to wipe tears away
to read more messages. It wasn't nasty... it was just plain funny!
Besides, I think a lot of this ng's readers have the same picture in
their minds regarding "sPangKy".... I know I do, only in mine, he's got
a hunchback hump, shreaded clothing and one eye that oozes and is
slightly closed!
BRAVO Mr. Carr... BRAVO!!!
DB
--
Discberry
> > have you ever considered using a spellchecker...or at least calm
> > of you hunched over your keyboard, foaming at the mouth and
> > muttering to yourself as you type.
>
> of the extreme pounding it takes. The foam makes the keys kinda
> slippery, which explains all the extra letters in the words, e.g.
> DEMQANDING, the Q is within slipping distance of the A.
>
> When the computer store tried to sell him a spellchecker, he screamed
> "I'm not demon possessed," and crashed through the plate glass exit
> door.
MAN... Mr.Carr's message was funny, but THIS one was HILARIOUS!!!!
What a RIOT!!! I laughed for 5 minutes, peed in my pants, then nearly
coughed myself to DEATH trying to catch my breath from laughing!
UNBELIEVABLE!!! WAY TOO FUNNY!!!
Now.. In my mind, I see him pounding his fists on his keyboard as he
reads both of your responses, yelling at the top of his lungs about an
inch away from his monitor screen, soaking it with drool and phlem, ...
" I---AM---NOT---AN---AN-I-MAL!!----I----AM-----A-----MAAaann!!!"
Al, you should win an award for this one!
DB
Cybernanc
>From: Discberry <disc...@globaldialog.com>
>It truly amazes me as to why the "infantile", (meaning, "childlike
>behavior"), people on this newsgroup, (not implying "everyone" on the
>newsgroup is "infantile"), so frequently resort to name calling,
>(refering to the "Mr. Dingle" comment above), which often draws a sharp
>reply, which most times leads to petty bickering, that is followed
>repeatedly by biting insults, escalating through a series of a few more
>responses, almost always resulting in a flame war,... that get so out of
>hand and so far off of the original topic, that it makes the entire
>group participating in it look like a bunch of silly 3rd grade school
>children!
>
>If you will, please take the time to look more closely, and you may see
>that my original post simply asks a question,... followed by a statement
>that was not directed at any one individual, but just makes a factual
>point regarding the question.
>
>
>I am now in the midst of a personal E-mail battle of wits with one ...
>Mr. sPangKy Pangborn,
Oh....the irony!!!!
Cybernanc
> I laughed for 5 minutes, peed in my pants, then nearly
>coughed myself to DEATH trying to catch my breath from laughing!
>
>
You said 3rd grade......I'd guess kindergarten as none of my kids peed in their
pants past that age.
Anonymous
Discberry wrote:
> Alan Carr wrote:
> >
> > I know this is only gonna get you to start raving at me, too, but have
> > you ever considered using a spellchecker...or at least calm down and
> > not type when you are on a rave? Y our posts are always filled with
> > such bizarre typos, that I always have a mental picture of you hunched
> > over your keyboard, foaming at the mouth and muttering to yourself as
> > you type.
> >
> > Sorry, but I have been holding that back for far too long! It wasn't
> > meant to be nasty.
>
> This message was BRILLIANT! I laughed so hard I had to wipe tears away
> to read more messages. It wasn't nasty... it was just plain funny!
>
> Besides, I think a lot of this ng's readers have the same picture in
> their minds regarding "sPangKy".... I know I do, only in mine, he's got
> a hunchback hump, shreaded clothing and one eye that oozes and is
> slightly closed!
>
> BRAVO Mr. Carr... BRAVO!!!
>
> DB
> --
Pangborn also claims to have served in the Air Force. But a check of DoD
public records shows no record of him ever having served in any of the Armed
Forces. In my opinion this is a slap in the face to every man or woman who
ever carried a gun in defense of this country.
Cybernanc
>And "Let's bring out Cybernansense..." as Jerry usually says before
>some behemoth comes charging out from backstage and starts pounding on
>someone else.
I think I'd be the "poundee" as I love all of you and would never consider
violence......
However, since you have no moral absolutes except your own, you probably
wouldn't think twice about annihilating anyone who doesn't agree with
you.....am I wrong?
PangK
>It seems that quite a few of the people in
>this newsgroup are fed up with Ken Pangborn.
>Let's join together. Together we can convince
>AOL to make ken stop his abusive behavior on
>the internet.
Gee David, you and Stacy really MUST get threatment for that Multiple
Personality Disorder. WHy not post this grandious claim under your LIBERTY45
Account?????? And you and
Stacy can really start buring AOL with your mail. Do you think they'll listen
to you???????????? DO you think you have the staff fooled?
PangK
>Pangborn also claims to have served in the Air Force. But a check of DoD
public records shows no record of him ever having served in any of the Armed
Forces. In my opinion this is a slap in the face to every man or woman who
ever carried a gun in defense of this country.
Screw you ya little PUSSY! Air Force SN AF16-631-305,
Date of entry 3 Mar 1959, Date of discharge 2 Mar, 1965. Type
of discharge: Honorable under Honorable Conditions."
Shallw e speak of your LESS than Honorable discharge from the Marines Mr.
Chicken??????????
Alan Carr
Where did you do that check? I'd like to see what they have on me.
ANd no, you won't be able to find me there as I changed my name many years
ago.
Anonymous wrote in message <6hamv5$m...@basement.replay.com>...
>Discberry wrote:
>
>> Alan Carr wrote:
>> >
>> > I know this is only gonna get you to start raving at me, too, but have
>> > you ever considered using a spellchecker...or at least calm down and
>> > not type when you are on a rave? Y our posts are always filled with
>> > such bizarre typos, that I always have a mental picture of you hunched
>> > over your keyboard, foaming at the mouth and muttering to yourself as
>> > you type.
>> >
>> > Sorry, but I have been holding that back for far too long! It wasn't
>> > meant to be nasty.
>>
>> This message was BRILLIANT! I laughed so hard I had to wipe tears away
>> to read more messages. It wasn't nasty... it was just plain funny!
>>
>> Besides, I think a lot of this ng's readers have the same picture in
>> their minds regarding "sPangKy".... I know I do, only in mine, he's got
>> a hunchback hump, shreaded clothing and one eye that oozes and is
>> slightly closed!
>>
>> BRAVO Mr. Carr... BRAVO!!!
>>
>> DB
>> --
>
*The* Didaskalos
Discberry <disc...@globaldialog.com> wrote to and milw.general:
== MAN... Mr.Carr's message was funny, but THIS one was HILARIOUS!!!!
== What a RIOT!!! I laughed for 5 minutes, peed in my pants, then nearly
== coughed myself to DEATH trying to catch my breath from laughing!
==
== UNBELIEVABLE!!! WAY TOO FUNNY!!!
== Now.. In my mind, I see him pounding his fists on his keyboard as he
== reads both of your responses, yelling at the top of his lungs about an
== inch away from his monitor screen, soaking it with drool and phlem, ...
== " I---AM---NOT---AN---AN-I-MAL!!----I----AM-----A-----MAAaann!!!"
==
We can believe that you're carrying on an email war with Pangbreath.
Your posts are beginning to look a lot like his, though without the
typing and spelling errors, other than phlegm.
What troubles us is why you'd waste your time with him.
*The* Didaskalos
pa...@aol.com (PangK) wrote to and milw.general:
== >From: nob...@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
== >Newsgroups: milw.general
==
== >Pangborn also claims to have served in the Air Force. But a check of DoD
== public records shows no record of him ever having served in any of the Armed
== Forces. In my opinion this is a slap in the face to every man or woman who
== ever carried a gun in defense of this country.
==
== Screw you ya little PUSSY! Air Force SN AF16-631-305,
== Date of entry 3 Mar 1959, Date of discharge 2 Mar, 1965. Type
== of discharge: Honorable under Honorable Conditions."
Were you a prurient discharge?
Discberry
*The* Didaskalos wrote:
>
> Discberry <disc...@globaldialog.com> wrote to and milw.general:
>
> == MAN... Mr.Carr's message was funny, but THIS one was HILARIOUS!!!!
> == What a RIOT!!! I laughed for 5 minutes, peed in my pants, then nearly
> == coughed myself to DEATH trying to catch my breath from laughing!
> ==
> == UNBELIEVABLE!!! WAY TOO FUNNY!!!
> == Now.. In my mind, I see him pounding his fists on his keyboard as he
> == reads both of your responses, yelling at the top of his lungs about an
> == inch away from his monitor screen, soaking it with drool and phlem, ...
> == " I---AM---NOT---AN---AN-I-MAL!!----I----AM-----A-----MAAaann!!!"
> ==
>
> We can believe that you're carrying on an email war with Pangbreath.
> Your posts are beginning to look a lot like his, though without the
> typing and spelling errors, other than phlegm.
>
> What troubles us is why you'd waste your time with him.
>
You know... now that you mention it....
I just mentioned his name and made a comment about him in a post and he
SNAPPED!! He started flooding my mailbox with 50,000 word ranting and
raving crazy messages. I did answer him but, you're right... I
shouldn't bother.
As of NOW (from ME anyway), it stops with PangK. I'll just watch and
enjoy the good (funny) stuff the rest of the group posts.
He seems to have enough conflicts with enough other people... he doesn't
need me to add more to his list. I'd hate to feel responsible for the
guy's coronary!
Bye, bye Mr. PangK
DB
Alan Carr
Anonymous wrote in message <6hdsbk$i...@basement.replay.com>...
>"mail-bombed" users in the past, even after they have requested that he
cease
>contact with them by email. He has also mailed dead rats to users' houses.
>
Well, I guess that is better than mailing dead ones!
end
3d
"Honorable under honorable conditions" is not a character of discharge.
It is either "honorable" or "less than honorable under honorable conditions"
There are the other types: general, bad conduct and dishonorable - but thats
not the issue.
If your discharge is "honorable" say just that and nothing else - be proud.
If it is anything other than honorable but "under honorable conditions" you
have nothing to brag about - it's not an honorable discharge.
PangK wrote in message <199804181840...@ladder01.news.aol.com>...
Armed
>
>
Anonymous
Discberry wrote:
My suggestion is to forward the offending emails to stev...@aol.com. If
enough people do this, pang's reign of tyranny of terrorism on usenet will end.
> As of NOW (from ME anyway), it stops with PangK. I'll just watch and
> enjoy the good (funny) stuff the rest of the group posts.
>
> He seems to have enough conflicts with enough other people... he doesn't
> need me to add more to his list. I'd hate to feel responsible for the
> guy's coronary!
>
> Bye, bye Mr. PangK
>
> DB
Yes. Bye, bye, indeed.
Anonymous
3d wrote:
> "Honorable under honorable conditions" is not a character of discharge.
> It is either "honorable" or "less than honorable under honorable conditions"
> There are the other types: general, bad conduct and dishonorable - but thats
> not the issue.
> If your discharge is "honorable" say just that and nothing else - be proud.
> If it is anything other than honorable but "under honorable conditions" you
> have nothing to brag about - it's not an honorable discharge.
I believe that a "general, under honorable conditions" can get upgraded to
"honorable" 6 months after EAS.I don't know firsthand, since I was honorably
discharged.
Pang's mistake was that in one post he claims I was thrown out with a Section 8,
and in another post claims that I was discharged under "other than honorable
conditions". Since Section 8 represents a discharge for medical conditions, it
would not fall into the OTH category. Hence, Pangborn is a liar. But then,
most of us already knew that.
PangK
>From: Discberry <disc...@globaldialog.com>
>Newsgroups: milw.general
>He started flooding my mailbox with 50,000 word ranting and
>raving crazy messages.
MY 50kb rants???? Oh Discberry, let's do a DOSE OF REALITY
SHALL WE?????
YOUR FIRST UNSOLICITED EMAIL TO ME:
_______________________________________________________
Subj: Re: TWO CAN PLAY THIS GAME MR. MOORE!!!
Date: 98-04-17 17:59:42 EDT
From: disc...@globaldialog.com (Discberry)
Reply-to: disc...@globaldialog.com
To: Pa...@aol.com (PangK)
PangK wrote:
>
> Well, you could wait a while and see what the flow is before shooting
> your mouth off.
Don't talk so stupid, sPangKy! What... is censorship OK when it works
in your favor?
> Gee smart ass, the point was that IF you had been ON two or three
> years ago you would KNOW that I moved FROM Wisconsin to Florida. And
> that I grew up there. And have relatives and friends there. Classmates
> from high school and college.
No... The point is that you have an argumentative "TONE" to all your
messages. If you talked that way to people in public places you'd be
picking your crabby ass up off of the floor more often than not!
> And I was just there a week ago.
I thought the air sort-a smelled like rotten pussy! Now I know why!
> Nice that you are so SUPERIOR to us "regulars."
You definitely have a reading problem, (or perhaps it's an EGO problem!)
No... I never said that I was "SUPERIOR", I just stated that I had I
life, (which is something YOU obviously do not), and the so-called
"regulars" waste FAR too much time writting to each other, (as I seem to
be doing now)!
> > I lived a few blocks from there for 14 years.
> Well I lived there for over 40 YEARS!
I lived in the Milwaukee area all of my 42 years. I was simply saying
that I had a place near W.A. Central H.S. for 14 years. I moved when I
bought a place near Menomonee Falls.
[Man-O-Man, sPangKy, you ought to get that inferiority complex of yours
checked out! You're gonna hurt yourself one of these days!]
> > Didn't any of your teachers or professors teach you that questions
> > should always be followed by a question mark?
>
> Funny.
Well, Well! It seems you DO possess the intelligence to understand
basic humor! I'm impressed! I may have been wrong about you! You
maybe aren't as socially retarded as your messages make you appear!
> I usually be a bit tweaked when some clown leaps in calling me a
> "fraud."
There is a serious difference between "labeling" someone based on their
exhibited traits, and "name-calling" using terms like "dimwit" and
"dillweed", simply because you IQ is slightly bigger than your shoe size
and they come to you easily.
> I don't know why, some personality fault, I suppose.
In your case, they seem to be quite numerous!
> > > I moved to Florida some years ago because of the weather.
Are you sure you just didn't get lost one day, and ended up there? Are
you sure you're in Florida? Could you possibly just be on Florist Ave.,
wandering around, and saw a street sign? You gotta remember that you do
have some problem with your reading comprehension.
> Hmmm, didn't seem to slow you down calling me as "FRAUD." Did it?
<<< SEE EXPLANATION OF "LABELING vs. NAME-CALLING ABOVE. >>>
> > ... but then I don't possess the wealth of experience on this
> > newsgroup that you have... do I?
>
> Right, you DON'T! I was taking part in the newsgropup for several
> years.
Well that sure shows ME who's the better man here... eh, sPangKy!
> Stacy started a pissing contest with me on soc.men. First accusing me
> of being M...@lonenet.ca (Michael) and refusing to admit that I wasn't.
Well that's sure a good enough reason to get "spitting mad" ain't it?!
You sure have got an extremely short fuse... another sign of very low
intelligence!
> Then making a hobby of me following me into EVERY newsgroup I
> participated in and starting her little flame wars.
Only because you keep it up! I'll bet that if you ignored her for a
week or two, she'd get bored with chasing you around the ng's!
Go ahead... try and prove me wrong!
> She has NEVER been within 1,000 miles of Wisconsin in her life!
SO WHAT! Who proclaimed YOU as the "Savior of Wisconsin Based
Newsgroups"? Get off of your "High Horse" your Majesty!
> Sorry, I engage the bicth becaus her agenda is to drive me OFF my
> hometown newsgroups.
Yeah! Right! (Me thinks that you just LOVE the attention she gives you.
It must make your little pee-pee hard like a ROCK!)
> And IDIOTS like you actually ENCOURAGE the bitch!
I don't think so. I do very little encouraging of Stacy Alexander.
In fact, I find her posts as monotonous and as full of bullshit as all
of your's.
But it is very entertaining to see how mad she can get you and how crazy
your responses get! That must be because of your Neanderthal intellect.
It's easy to get a dog foaming-at-the-mouth MAD by poking him with a
stick.... and look how much smarter they are compared to you.
> Stacy posts about 10 messages to my one.
I'd say more like 2 to 1. So ... what's your point?
(Please, don't answer that!)
> No, *I* suffer NO such illusion, but Stacy feeam that important
> because I refused to "OBEY" her!
I'm sorry, but this whole idea of somebody wanting you to "OBEY" her is
just about the dopiest thing you've said in this whole string of
messages. It's about time for you to grow up... especially since you
mentioned earlier that you were over 40!
> > Wars cannot continue unless there are two (or more) participants...
> > someone (like you) who is willing to carry on with the fighting day
> > in, and day out!
>
> Yeah, Neville Chamberlain said the same bullshit in 1938!!!!
And it was just as true then as it is now! Unfortunately, when Hitler
chose to bomb Brittain there was a bit more at stake than getting one's
ego bruised. If you can honestly compare Germany's attack on Brittain
with Stacy "pissing you off", then you are by far a bigger imbusile than
I had previously imagined!!
> > [just an observation here].... you seem to me to be the side of the
> > battle that is always getting "HOT"! Your anger shows up in a
> > multitude of different signals.... you start swearing.... you start
> > name calling, (something that you do wit great frequency), YOU
> > START TYPING IN ALL UPPER CASE and your accuracy drops dramatically.
>
> Yeah, the bitch pisses me off. So?????
Again, short fuse equals low intelect. You should accept the fact that
you are in denial over your mental problems and seek some serious help!
It's for your own good ...... sPangKy!
> > but might I suggest that you stop for awhile and take a break!
>
> No, I suggest YOU take a break from it!
You may be right. I should take your advice! I have a very hard time
dealing with the usual infantile crap that fills those newsgroups. I
don't really need to be engaging in this type of dialog, especially with
someone as mentally challenged as yourself!
> > I'd suggest, as an alternative, go put your newsgroup time into an
> > "Anger Management" course... or at least read a book on the subject.
> > Whatever... you just need yo cool off a bit, my friend.
>
> You could stand to benefit from it yourself. Calling somebody you know
> NOTHING about a "fraud" is hardly a NON-angry statement sonny!
It WASN"T angry... that's the point. You read it as such and then go
off like a nuke because your feathers got ruffled. The "'Anger
Management' course" statement still holds true. You definitely have a
problem and need some help, before you hurt yourself or somebody else!
<<< SEE EXPLANATION OF "LABELING vs. NAME-CALLING ABOVE. >>>
> > > Mainly because I wouldn't "OBEY" her a couple years ago. And add
> > > to that, that AOL refused to kick me off, esentially "OBEY" her as
> > > well.
> >
> > This shows the initial signs of "Psychotic" behavior. You seem to
> > be seeing things that may not actually be there! You don't by any
> > chance hear strange voices, do you?
>
> Oh sonny, don't TRY to play Psychiatrist, we have one PRETEND
> psychologist on the NG now. (Stacy). Stacy herself is the one who
> flipped out saying that her agenda was to make me "OBEY" her! Want
> copies of her posts??????????
PAALL-LEEEEEZE!
> > > Get this through your head, she's a NUT CASE!
> >
> > Well put! Forceful and direct, with just a touch of that witty, but
> > biting sarcasm you're so famous for. Thanks so much for putting me
> > in my place!
>
> You didn't seem to get it, however.
Oh I got it alright, but I believe it went over your flat little head.
"She's a NUT CASE!" Coming from someone as stable as you, that REALLY
means a lot!
> > > Hey dimwit, pick up the Ameritech phonebook, look at PANGBORN....
> > > COUSINS dillweed!
> >
> > It's Mr. Dimwit to you! And I happen to personally know the
> > Dillweeds and they say they've never heard of any "Pangborns", so
> > they couldn't be your "COUSINS".
>
> WHATEVER!
Another attempt at humor that seems to have skipped off of you hardened
skull.
> > And besides... How am I supposed to know what your real name is?
> > - Do you not write under an alias...(i.e. "PangK")?
> > - Am I supposed to assume that your real name is being discussed by
> > those you seem to hate so much in the newsgroups?
>
> Oh gee, MAYBE the thread "PANGBORN FORGES ANOTHER POST" **MIGHT***
> have given you a clue. SILLY ME!!!!!!!!!!!!! Why would I think that
> would give you a clue?
I didn't read any of that thread. I started to scan it but it didn't
have anything of any substance. I just mark BORING threads as 'read'
and skip over them. Like I mentioned before.... I have a life,
(something you could only wish for in your dreams), and don't have time
for every silly little bicker session that is on a newsgroup!
> Did I OVERrate your IQ?
No you were right... I AM really really smart! Duh.. Yup!
> I thought it at least reached room temperature.
Now there you go! A legitimate attempt at some humor. Maybe after a
couple more tries you could actually be funny!
> No, guy just READ some of what is in the NG before you shoot your
> mouth off making allegations.
I do! That's why I responded to the original message!
> > Reality Check:>>>> What I meant by that statement was to leave the
> > FIGHT not... the group! And "NO", it wasn't really an original
> > idea, it just makes common sense, (something that, so far, seems to
> > elude you).
>
> Son, look.
I'm NOT you son. In fact, I am probably older than you by a year or
two. And with the mindless stuff you write, if that is any indication
of your intelligence, I'd say that mental retardation is very prominent
in the "sPangKy-born" clan! It most likely comes from all that
in-breeding......
["I'd lokk you to meet ma waff and ma sister", and there's only one
woman standing there!]
> Stacy has been AT this for over TWO YEARS! She has been kicked
> OFF more than a dozen servers under perhaps 50 names or more. We TRIED
> ignoriong her for 3 months. Her posts multiplied like minks because
> she thought everyone was AGREEING WITH HER!!!!!
Well fighting with her has really helped a lot, hasn't it Ace?! Boy, ya
really got 'er ta lay off those posts to the newsgroup! Right!?!
> Because stacy has NO interest in Milwaukee. NONE! Can you get it
> through that CONCRETE on your shoulders?????????? She NEVER lived
> there! NEVER has been THROUGH the city! Never been within 1,000 miles
> of Wisconsin! Got that?
Yeah! I got it sport! So Stacy A has never been to Milwaukee! SO
WHAT?!!! Why does this bother you so much there, sPangKy? There ain't
no reason on earth that would make me fight with somebody for two whole
years.... 'specially something so petty and stupid. You definitely need
a hobby!
> SCHEESCH!!! The ************ONLY*********** interest she has, the ONLY
> ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY interest is to drive me OFF.
Well you're stupid enough to give her what she wants.... that is to get
you rabid over the whole thing! GOD...You are so stupid! (hehe-he)
> Do you understand? She has ABSOLUTELY NO interest in Milwaukee outside
> ME!!!!!!!!!
There... SEE!! I told ya she liked ya!
> Sure you can play VICTIM if you like. You started it calling ME a
> "FRAUD!"
"Waahh!! Waaahh!! Mommy! Mommy!! That mean ol' man called me a FROG!"
> But what the hell, don't let reality get in the way of a good
> castigation.
Your brand of reality could be compared to a good acid trip!
> Insult my intelligence.....
Very little to work with!
> ... and COUNT on getting a nast response.
Unfortunately!
> Just don't say INCREDIBLY stupid things and ask me to accept it.
I never did! As far as "accepting INCREDIBLY stupid things", I'd have
to say that the majority of your responses to Stacy A. and the entire
body of this response to my message, are based on your "INCREDIBLY
stupid" and distorted view of what seems, to you, to be going on, on the
newsgroups, and what you think I'm saying in these posts.
In other words... you are so "INCREDIBLY stupid" that I can't imagine
how it is that you come to the conclusions that you do!!
> > If you would stop whimpering, whining, complaining, bitching,
> > crying, griping, carrying-on, and generally acting as juvenile as
> > you usually do... name-calling and yelling (ALL CAPS), conveniently
> > hiding behind the anonymity of your alias's and your internet
> > service provider, your logon names, your computer monitor.....
> > then maybe you'd find more friendly interaction, more
> > respect and support for you opinion and your points of view, and
> > possibly, a lot less strife and conflict from others.
>
> Look DICKHEAD!
Oh-Oh! Looks like I struck a nerve! (That's why I re-posted my quotes
above!) There you go name calling again! Do you really want people to
carry on a reasonable conversation with you, or is your little pea brain
still stuck back in the 3rd grade where name-calling is the main weapon
used to posture on the playground! You are pathetic!
> I do NOT hide behind any ALIAS! Fopr those people with a REASONABLE
> browser and ISP, you get my FULL NAME along with the AOL
> IMPOSED screen name. One I have used for FIVE YEARS!
Anybody who knows ANYTHING about the InterNet knows that AOL SUCKS! AOL
is used by losers like you who got their head up their ass!
As for a "REASONABLE" browsers, I use NETSCAPE... a HELL of a lot better
browser than the garbage that AOL has... A-ssh-OL-e!!
As for ISP... I use a GREAT server, GLOBAL DIALOG INTERNET, INC., 10
times better than that drippy AOL crap!!!
AOL is for the BRAINDEAD! What... did they give you 10 free hours and
you were to stupid to cancel?
> You are really starting to sound terribly LAME young man.
Again, I am older than you, Junior! You're just to dumb to know exactly
how "INCREDIBLY stupid" you really are!!
> Just how long have you had a modem? A week?
I had a modem back when 2400 bps was considered FAST!
> Stick around a while and you MIGHT learn something. But from what I
> have seen so far, I doubt it.
The only things that anyone could possibly learn from you is how to
whimper and whine a lot.... how to cry like a baby.... how to call
people names.... and generally just act foolish in public!
You seem to like names, so here's a few that fit you to a tee:
You are a FUCKING IN-BREAD MORON
an idiot,
a fool,
a loud mouthed imbecile!
a cretin,
a halfwit (which is giving you about 99.9% too much credit),
a simpleton,
an ignoramus,
a dullard,
a geek,
a dweeb,
an ASSHOLE,
a buttwipe,
a dickweed,
a flake,
a..... well, you get the point there now, sPangky!
> You seem to actually think you already KNOW IT ALL!
Compared to your "Shit-4-Brains", I know MORE than "IT ALL"!
It's been a real slice!
BITE ME!!!
Mr. Dimwit
aka: "Dillweed"
--
----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
Return-Path: <disc...@globaldialog.com>
Received: from rly-zc03.mx.aol.com (rly-zc03.mail.aol.com [172.31.33.3]) by
air-zc03.mail.aol.com (v41.15) with SMTP; Fri, 17 Apr 1998 17:59:42 -0400
Received: from msn2.globaldialog.com (ns1.globaldialog.com [156.46.122.10])
by rly-zc03.mx.aol.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/AOL-4.0.0)
with ESMTP id RAA02489 for <Pa...@aol.com>;
Fri, 17 Apr 1998 17:58:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from discberry (mke21tc2.gdinet.com [156.46.244.54]) by
msn2.globaldialog.com (8.8.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id QAA29569; Fri, 17 Apr 1998
16:57:59 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <3537CF...@globaldialog.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 16:54:49 -0500
From: Discberry <disc...@globaldialog.com>
Reply-To: disc...@globaldialog.com
Organization: Discberry's Message De Joir
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: PangK <Pa...@aol.com>
Subject: Re: TWO CAN PLAY THIS GAME MR. MOORE!!!
References: <f85a8b4....@aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
YOU WERE SAYING??????
PangK
>SNAPPED!! He started flooding my mailbox with 50,000 word ranting and raving
crazy messages.
Our poor little VICTIM Discberry. AGAIN:
_________________________________________________________
Subj: Re: TWO CAN PALY THIS GAME MR. MOORE!!!
Date: 98-04-17 12:42:46 EDT
From: disc...@globaldialog.com (Discberry)
Reply-to: disc...@globaldialog.com
To: pa...@aol.com (PangK)
PangK wrote:
>
> Sorry, you obviously haven't followed the newsgroup for long,....
You're right. I have only discovered it a few months ago, but we all
have to start somewhere.
And from the tone of your messages, (including this one) it appears as
though you are trying to suggest that I couldn't possibly be as cool,
hip, & with-it as you are. I beg your forgiveness, "Sir Pang-a-lot",
for not bowing in your presence! (I just got up from my chair and bowed
to the south... you know... towards Florida.)
Besides I visit the newsgroups twice, maybe three times per week. I do
not live in them and leave the obligatory 72 messages each and every
day, as some of you hip, cool, with-it regulars do. In other words... I
actually DO things in my life other than sit in front of my computer
screen picking fights with people like Stacy Alexander and YOU!! (Hard
to fathom , eh?!) But sometimes I can't help myself..... I just have to
comment on the silly shit that takes place on that newsgroup. I'm weak!
> I grew up in West Allis. Went to McKinley School., John Dewey Jr. High, and
> graduated from Central HS, .....
I lived a few blocks from there for 14 years.
> ...and went to college in Wisconsin. Does THAT qualify as being FROM
> Milwaukee.
Didn't any of your teachers or professors teach you that questions
should always be followed by a question mark?
> It sure as hell does to me.
You sure have a nasty tone to your posts and replies! You need to
lighten up a bit, buddy.
> I moved to Florida some years ago because of the weather.
The way that you talk to me... a person you, in fact, know absolutely
NOTHING about.... I think that, maybe both of us are better off for
that!!!
> The ****ONLY**** reason Stacy is here is to drive me OFF it. The bitch is
> OBSESSED with me.
I don't know... it sound sort of the other way around to me, but then I
don't possess the wealth of experience on this newsgroup that you
have... do I?
Maybe she just LIKES YOU!!! Think about it, you both have very much in
common.
She (like you) seems to be another person without a life, based on the
sheer volume of material she (and you) posts to multiple newsgroups on a
daily basis.
Where does she (and you) find the time? You MUST do other things once
in a while.... that is, of course, assuming that you stop typing long
enough to occasionally eat, requiring you to also stop to periodically
relieve yourself......... unless the two of you (Stacy and you) wear
diapers, or even catheter bags on your legs, or actually have your
computer set up in the bathroom whereas you can just sit on the john all
day long, turning around to flush from time to time after the stink gets
to ya!
> Her goal is to DESTROY me in every way she can.
You flatter yourself! You may be the only person who thinks that you
are that important!
> Which includes going to EVERY newsgroup I participate in and starting these
> flame wars.
Wars cannot continue unless there are two (or more)
participants....someone (like you) who is willing to carry on with the
fighting day in, and day out!
[just an observation here].... you seem to me to be the side of the
battle that is always getting "HOT"! Your anger shows up in a multitude
of different signals.... you start swearing.... you start name calling,
(something that you do wit great frequency), YOU START TYPING IN ALL
UPPER CASE and your accuracy drops dramatically.
You sound proud of the fact that you have been with this newsgroup for
so long, but might I suggest that you stop for awhile and take a break!
I'd suggest, as an alternative, go put your newgroup time into an "Anger
Management" course... or at least read a book on the subject.
Whatever... you just need yo cool off a bit, my friend.
> Mainly because I wouldn't "OBEY" her a couple years ago. And add to that,
> that AOL refused to kick me off, esentially "OBEY" her as well.
This shows the initial signs of "Psychotic" behavior. You seem to be
seeing things that may not actually be there!
You don't by any chance hear strange voices, do you?
> Get this through your head, she's a NUT CASE!
Well put! Forceful and direct, with just a touch of that witty, but
biting sarcasm you're so famous for. Thanks so much for putting me in
my place!
> Hey dimwit, pick up the Ameritech phonebook, look at PANGBORN...... COUSINS
> dillweed!
It's Mr. Dimwit to you! And I happen to personally know the Dillweeds
and they say they've never heard of any "Pangborns", so they couldn't be
your "COUSINS".
But Seriously though.....
Is name-calling something that you learned at Central H.S. here in W.A.,
or is it just a bad habit you've picked up in Florida? In either case,
it never serves your cause, whether that happens to be making a case,
responding to a disagreed upon opinion, or just trying to retaliate
against the insults someone else throws at you.. (this letter is a godd
case in point). It ALWAYS makes you look childish, without the good
sense it takes to respond with some adult \like commentary.
Anybody came resort to name-calling! It never makes someone look
smarter or better, and almost always escalates any confrontation into an
all-out war!!
And besides... How am I supposed to know what your real name is?
- Do you not write under an alias...(i.e. "PangK")?
- Am I supposed to assume that your real name is being discussed by
those you
seem to hate so much in the newsgroups?
- Do you really feel you are so famous that everyone should know, (and
care) who
you are?
- Or do you actually expect me to spend a bunch of time researching your
name
out, simply because you're SOOOOOOooooo important?
> > Go away.... No more harassement!
>
> Why should *I* leave MY hometown newsgroup? That's original thinking. Punish
> the victim. How quaint!
Reality Check:>>>> What I meant by that statement was to leave the
FIGHT not... the group! And "NO", it wasn't really an original idea, it
just makes common sense, (something that, so far, seems to elude you).
As far as YOU being "the victim", I feel you may be more the
"victimizer" than the "victim". Don't believe me?.... just look at a
lot of your posts! What do you base this "victim" idea on? Is it the
fact that people say things that you don't agree with?
I'd have to say that this is a lot less "PangK being the victim", than
it is you being the aggressor or the antagonist, by calling people names
as you have done here, .... to me... "Mr. Dimwit Dillweed". As far as
this response to your response to my message goes...... I think that I'd
appear to be more af a victim than you!
If you would stop whimpering, whining, complaining, bitching, crying,
griping, carrying-on, and generally acting as juvenile as you usually
do... name-calling and yelling (ALL CAPS), conveniently hiding behind
the anonymity of your alias's and your internet service provider, your
logon names, your computer monitor..... then maybe you'd find more
friendly interaction, more respect and support for you opinion and your
points of view, and possibly, a lot less strife and conflict from
others.
You might even enjoy the hobby of newgroup participation.... that is
unless you already enjoy whimpering, whining, complaining, bitching,
crying, griping, carrying-on, name-calling, yelling and generally acting
as juvenile as you usually do!
Whatever the case.... In my opinion, (however little value you may find
in that), you ought to learn a little about dealing with people,....
maybe try improving your sense of humor, and.... Chill!!!
Your Newest & Bestest Pal,
Discberry
http://www.globaldialog.com/~discberry
--
----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
Return-Path: <disc...@globaldialog.com>
Received: from relay29.mx.aol.com (relay29.mail.aol.com [172.31.109.29]) by
air18.mail.aol.com (v42.1) with SMTP; Fri, 17 Apr 1998 12:42:46 -0400
Received: from msn2.globaldialog.com (mail2.globaldialog.com [156.46.122.10])
by relay29.mx.aol.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/AOL-4.0.0)
with ESMTP id MAA09050 for <pa...@aol.com>;
Fri, 17 Apr 1998 12:42:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from discberry (mke37tc2.gdinet.com [156.46.244.70]) by
msn2.globaldialog.com (8.8.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id LAA16397; Fri, 17 Apr 1998
11:42:16 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <353785...@globaldialog.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 11:38:45 -0500
From: Discberry <disc...@globaldialog.com>
Reply-To: disc...@globaldialog.com
Organization: Discberry's Message De Joir
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: PangK <pa...@aol.com>
Subject: Re: TWO CAN PALY THIS GAME MR. MOORE!!!
References: <353659...@globaldialog.com>
<199804162147...@ladder01.news.aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding
PangK
>My suggestion is to forward the offending emails to stev...@aol.com. If
enough people do this, pang's reign of tyranny of terrorism on usenet will end.
Yes, David Moore, let's see what a snivelling little pussy writes to
peoploe to raise hell and cause personal injury to them. You are getting just a
little DESPERATE aren't you David?????
________________________________________________________
<---- Begin Forwarded Message ---->
Return-Path: <libe...@mediaone.net>
From: libe...@mediaone.net
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 1998 13:43:36 -0500
To: nc...@liii.com, ChipN...@aol.com, postm...@astcweb.org,
rod...@nwlink.com
Subject: about ken pangborn
I read your referral concerning Ken Pangborn on your webpage.
I participate heavily in usenet newsgroups, and have seen Ken's postings as
"pa...@aol.com". In these forums, he seems to be extremely irrational, often
attacking other newsgroup members and calling them vulgar names. Most of the
time, it seems that the man can barely even type coherently, as his messages
are often filled with spelling errors. One gets the impression of a man hunched
over his keyboard shaking with rage, pounding on the keys. In a word, it is
frightening. You can surf to http://www.dejanews.com and do an author search
on pa...@aol.com and you will see what I mean. The profanity and flaming is
just awful.
I'm surprised that you and others hold Mr. Pangborn in such high regard when he
carries on in this manner in a public forum.
---------------------------------------
http://people.ce.mediaone.net/liberty45
---------------------------------------
For a man with such a LITTLE weenie you DO like to PLAY
as an adult don't you Mr. Moore? Tell me, did they teach you this in the Marine
Corps? SO BRAVE, aren't you? <Chuckle>
Which is why they kept you IN the Corps, right Davie?????
I think this can show you what a pathetic LITTLE man you are. No wonder your
wife left you!
PangK
>From: "3d" <dubi...@execpc.com>
>Newsgroups: milw.general
>"Honorable under honorable conditions" is not a character of discharge. It is
either "honorable" or "less than honorable under honorable conditions" There
are the other types: general, bad conduct and dishonorable - but thats not the
issue.
In the era of MY discharge one could get an "Honorable Discharge" under
GENERAL conditions, usually for medical reasons. I have a freid who was
discharged for "bet wetting"
and he got one. My original discharge cewrtificate had "HONORABLE DISCHARGE" in
large printing, and below, it said "served under honorable conditions" that
language could change back then. I undersatand it is slightly different today.
>If your discharge is "honorable" say just that and nothing else - be proud. If
it is anything other than honorable but "under honorable conditions" you have
nothing to brag about - it's not
an honorable discharge.
Mine was a "HONORABLE DISCHARGE" and the conditions of service were
"honorable." Meaning I kept my little nose clean
for those 6 years. My 201 file is also one I am proud of with a half dozen or
so commendations from my commanders up to the base commanders.
Let's not forget that little David Moore who BEGAN this thread with the
claim that I was a 'draft dodger." Sorry.
PangK
>I believe that a "general, under honorable conditions" can get upgraded to
"honorable" 6 months after EAS.I don't know firsthand, since I was honorably
discharged.
<chuckle> SURE DAVID!!!!
alan carr
Actually, while BOTH of you sound like children in that exchange. I'd say it
is Discberry 1, PangK 0.
--
*****************************************
Alan Carr
Any opinions stated here are mine
and are not intended to reflect on
my ISPs, employers or anyone else.
To contact me personally use:
alan...@uwm.edu
alan...@execpc.com
ICQ: 11110724
*****************************************
PangK wrote in message <199804201409...@ladder03.news.aol.com>...
>>From: Discberry <disc...@globaldialog.com>
>>Newsgroups: milw.general
>
>>He started flooding my mailbox with 50,000 word ranting and
>>raving crazy messages.
>
>MY 50kb rants???? Oh Discberry, let's do a DOSE OF REALITY
>SHALL WE?????
>
>YOUR FIRST UNSOLICITED EMAIL TO ME:
>_______________________________________________________
<<<SNIP>>>
end
alan carr
Discberry 2, PangK 0
Best 3 out of 5, boys?
--
*****************************************
Alan Carr
Any opinions stated here are mine
and are not intended to reflect on
my ISPs, employers or anyone else.
To contact me personally use:
alan...@uwm.edu
alan...@execpc.com
ICQ: 11110724
*****************************************
PangK wrote in message <199804201412...@ladder01.news.aol.com>...
>>From: Discberry <disc...@globaldialog.com>
>>Newsgroups: milw.general
>
>>SNAPPED!! He started flooding my mailbox with 50,000 word ranting and
raving
>crazy messages.
>
> Our poor little VICTIM Discberry. AGAIN:
>
>_________________________________________________________
<<<SNIP!!!>>>
end
Discberry
alan carr wrote:
>
> Discberry 2, PangK 0
>
> Best 3 out of 5, boys?
>
> --
Alan, the following is a compilation all coming from ONE 15K message
sent to me by sPangKy. It took a half hour to read due to the excessive
amount of typos and twisted sentences. I thought others may enjoy the
breakdown.
Forgive my attempt at grabbing that last point in the 3 out of 5!
Discberry
---
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
sPangky,
Your crazy messages are quite funny. Without getting into any of the
actual content, (which, by itself sounds like the babbling of a ravenous
schoolboy), I've grouped some of the more comical elements.
If I laughed as hard, at you in person, that I laugh at your messages,
you'd get so blazing mad that you'd pop a blood vessel in you head so
violently that people within a 2 mile radius would hear it explode!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
First, you've got this way with puctuation marks that defy description.
They give me this mental picture of a red-faces psycho, waving his arms,
pounding his fist into his hand, while spitting and
SCREEEEEEEMING at me, (similar to those old B&W films of Adolf Hitler's
famous speeches that they sometimes show on the History Channel)!
PangK wrote:
>
> WHAT AN INTELLECT!!!!!! AMAZING!!!!
> Gives you that feeling of SUPERIORITY all over, doesn't it??????
> And you said about your air of "SUPERIORITY?" ?????????????????
> ...that I OWE you an explanation??????????????
> ...on people's education, mental state etc?????
> Are you STARTING to get a picture here????? NAW!
> Can you even BEGIN to understand that???????????????
> ... ON the newsgroup and me OFF!!!!!!!
> ... qualifications for this diagnosis , Doctor ARE??????????????????
> No, one ALWAYS refers to someone as a "FRAUD!!!!!"
> Want copies of her posts??????????
> Your qualifications ARE????????????
> What a SUPERIOR INTELLECT!!!!!!!
> > SILLY ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> > ... ever born on this planet! AMAZING!!!!!!!!
> ... she thought everyone was AGREEING WITH HER!!!!!
> ... through that CONCRETE on your shoulders??????????
> Can you GET THAT????
> I mean just even the tip of it???????????
> Just a molecule of it?????
> ... NO interest in Milwaukee outside ME!!!!!!!!!
> ... superior to everyone else's, you are AMAZING!!!!!!!!!!
> Your OMNISCIENCE! Your GREAT abilities! I am in AWE!!!!!!
> Want to TELL me some MORE about telecommunications??????????????
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then, you have this unique way of using the star key. On these words I
can envision you beet-red faced, gasping for breath and shaking
uncontrolably, while your blood-shot eyes are bugged out about 6 inches.
(Very funny stuff!)
PangK also wrote:
>
> to tell AOL that she *****HAD***** filed a lawsuit
> > No, *I* suffer NO such illusion,
> > **MIGHT*** have given you a clue.
> > You*ARE* the smartest man ...
> > SCHEESCH!!! The ************ONLY*********** interest she has, ...
--
Then there's the myriad of typos [in brackets]... (my DOG types with
less spelling errors)
..and let's not forget these gems that PangK wrote:
>
> [SOn], anyone who leaps into a discussion ...
> [SAuch] as calling someone a "FRAUD!"
> Look shithead! You [haver] absolutely NO,
> Did GOD send you to police the [newsgroup-s] and ...
> [WHen] I replied to AOL ...
> sending THOUSANDS and [THOIUSANDS] of emails back
> ... repeating the [thjreat] of ...
> What followed was a [barragge] of [telephonbe] calls to AOL ...
> ... that took it and the [sever] down for 2 days.
> ... after persistant attempts [surmopunt] the firewall in ...
> ... that you didn't [ned] these little factoid ...
> ... being here on the [PLlanet] of the Dolts!
> ... confined to the [lauhging] academy in the past,
> Dejanews has locked her out [onder] 143 DIFFERENT SCREEN NAMES!
> The one your fat ass is [ssitting] on is ...
> > Sorry, I engage the [bicth] [becaus] her agenda ...
> [Becvaus] SHE believe that the VAST VAST VAST majority ...
> [ALl] it takes os ONE such post ...
> [SHe] believes that you ALL want HER ...
> [ANd] she has SAID SO in email to AOL!
> Yes your SUPERIOR [INTLLECT] sure does show in your message [tro] me!
> ... diagnosis without ANY of the underlying [facks]!
> ... any of that [suff] because ...
> I [shoudll] have realized that you have an IQ over 5,000!
> [Yopu] know, here in the world of telecommunications,
> [SInce] I am in my 50's I doubt that kid!
> Gee [DIngleberry], You don't call folks names do you?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
And last, but not least, this wildly out-of-phase multidimensional,
time-warp statement, quoted below, just as they appeared in the last
"novel" you wrote to me. It includes stupid typos and mass
punctuational emphisis, interwoven amongst the psychotic babble of a
raving lunatic....
...and who knows what he was thinking when PangK wrote:
>
> Did GOD send you to police the newsgroup-s and
> offer your HEAVENLY opinions on people's education, mental state etc?????
> Himself?
> Geez! Just YOU huh???
Pretty good stuff, there sPangK-ster!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now it bewilders me as to how you managed to get the idea built up in
your micro-grey-matter, that I was, in some way "Supportive" and/or
"Approving of" Stacy Alexander. I hold NO judgement regarding Stacy or
her statements you so whole-heartedly disagree with.
It's interesting (and scarey) to watch how big ideas can be implanted
into such as small space as your (so-called for lack of a better term)
brain. (You probably had to shut down 50% or more of your bodily
functions just to accomodate the overload!)
PangK rants:
>
> THAT, mr. HIGH IQ, is your litle girl STACY ALEXANDER!
> Behavior YOU wholeheartedly APPROVE OF!
> AGain, behavior YOU, sir, APPROVE OF!
> And IDIOTS like you actually ENCOURAGE the bitch!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I remember telling you once:
> > [Man-O-Man, sPangKy, you ought to get that inferiority complex of
> > yours checked out! You're gonna hurt yourself one of these days!]
I just want to repeat the sentiment and say that, "No" I ain't no
doctor, but ..... It doesn't take a practicing psychologist to see that
you've got a major inferiority complex or something similar!
Remember this saying:
'Tis wiser to remain silent and only appear foolish,
Than to open one's mouth and remove all doubt!
Take care of yourself sPangKy!
I'll always think of you as just a raving, weiner spankin' lunatic
moron, but God still loves even the retarded!!
Peace on you....
Discberry
p.s. Please, don't write back any more... my sides can't take the
pain from the laughter!!
--
PangK
>Alan, the following is a compilation all coming from ONE 15K message sent to
me by sPangKy.
Poor little Dingleberry, playing VICTIM... And her KEEPS on sending me email
even today.... Gee, he doesn't want to take part, huh????
alan carr
Yup...that makes 3 out of 5.
--
*****************************************
Alan Carr
Any opinions stated here are mine
and are not intended to reflect on
my ISPs, employers or anyone else.
To contact me personally use:
alan...@uwm.edu
alan...@execpc.com
ICQ: 11110724
*****************************************
Discberry wrote in message <353CA6...@globaldialog.com>...
>alan carr wrote:
>>
>> Discberry 2, PangK 0
>>
>> Best 3 out of 5, boys?
>>
>> --
>
>Alan, the following is a compilation all coming from ONE 15K message
>sent to me by sPangKy. It took a half hour to read due to the excessive
>amount of typos and twisted sentences. I thought others may enjoy the
>breakdown.
>
>Forgive my attempt at grabbing that last point in the 3 out of 5!
>
>Discberry
>---
>/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
>\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
>
>sPangky,
>
<<<SNIP!!>>>
end
Anonymous
Word has it, that one of Pang's victims has had enough and will be filing a
lawsuit against him. A little bird says that this will take place in Chicago.
Would any Milwaukee users be interested in making the trip to the windy city to
witness this? Just curious.
PangK
Word has it that David Moore is full of shit! David, you you REALLY, REALLY,
REALLY think I take this cveiled threat from YOU to be AT ALL credible? Hell
Stacy had a MUCH better chance then you do as she ranted for a year about her
MASSIVE, MASSIVE, lawsuits against me! From a whole GAGGLE of
"BIG TIME" Houston lawyers! Dozens of them. David there isn't a lawyer in
Illinois STUPIED enough to tgake your case! Of course IF you actually COULD
find one, the FIRST thing we'd do is slap him with a RULE 11 motion, if he
didn't dismiss, that means that HE would be on the hook for ALL COSTS! And the
fees for MY defense would run VERY HIGH! Yopu are a pathatic jokle Moore.
Your own posts would hang you.
Anonymous
PangK wrote:
We shall see, pang. First there's a matter of libel....namely your false claim
about my OTH discharge from the service. And I can prove that you knew that I was
honorably discharged, yet maliciously defamed me despite this knowledge. And just
think what your peers will think of all this.
PangK
>We shall see, pang. First there's a matter of libel....namely your false
claim about my OTH discharge from the service. And I can prove that you knew
that I was honorably discharged, yet maliciously defamed me despite this
knowledge. And just
think what your peers will think of all this.
David, do you think ANY of them are listening to YOU, or your pal Stacy
at this point? I so enjoy Stacy's constant threats of litigation, as well as
yours. Remember where I make my living.
Tell ya what. Here's a bet for ya. I'll bet that YOU and STACY both will be a
DEFENDANT well before *I* am! And a second, side bet, I'll also bet you'll
both lose. But the bet isn't fair, David, because *I* actually know how the
legal system works.
Still waiting, btw, to see YOUR proof that I "dodged the draft." And
your proof that I did NOT serve in the Air Force as YOU claimed.
Tom S
Sounds like a case for Nordlander
webg...@javanet.com
In article <353EBA03...@NOSPAMPLEASEnetstream.net>,
Tom S <tom...@NOSPAMPLEASEnetstream.net> wrote:
>
> Sounds like a case for Nordlander
>
>
Norlander? Do you have his number? :-)
Stacy Alexander
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/ Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading