Re: [mil-oss] Digest for mil-oss@googlegroups.com - 1 Message in 1 Topic

[Joel Odom]

Andy, keeping FalconView as a registered trademark gives Tech some control.  Others can still use FalconView OS under the terms of the LGPL, and they may even modify it, but they cannot call it FalconView.  I think that the reason in that is apparent.

On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 3:53 PM, <mil...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

  Today's Topic Summary

Group: http://groups.google.com/group/mil-oss/topics

• What do you use for package names for GOTS focused code? [1 Update]

 What do you use for package names for GOTS focused code?

Andy Ennamorato <virtu...@gmail.com> Feb 10 08:36PM -0700  

Curious what others do regarding naming and copyrighting open source/GOTS products.
 
For ex, say your org or company is developing GOTS code and you want to release it. When it comes to namespaces or package structure, what do you do?
 
NASA World Wind uses a gov.nasa.x package structure (and a government copyright, which I thought was problematic for some reason) and FalconView uses a GaTech copyright.
 
We want to eventually release a few things (using our co's copyright) but insure whether a gov.something namespace/package is a good idea or not.
 
Just curious what others have done or plan to do.
 
Thanks!
 
Andy
 
Sent from my iPhone


 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group mil-oss.
You can post via email.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an empty message.
For more options, visit this group.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Military Open Source Software" Google Group.
To post to this group, send email to mil...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mil-oss+u...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mil-oss?hl=en
 
www.mil-oss.org

--

http://www.falconview.org/