Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Lathe Mill add-on

Received: by 10.66.76.38 with SMTP id h6mr2333854paw.15.1348887833422;
        Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:03:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: midsouth-makers@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.68.197.163 with SMTP id iv3ls16963279pbc.9.gmail; Fri, 28 Sep
 2012 20:03:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.222.225 with SMTP id qp1mr2876445pbc.8.1348887833113;
        Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:03:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.222.225 with SMTP id qp1mr2876444pbc.8.1348887833101;
        Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:03:53 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <so...@mounicou.com>
Received: from exprod7og103.obsmtp.com (exprod7og103.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.159])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id js4si142203pbb.2.2012.09.28.20.03.52;
        Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:03:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 64.18.2.159 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of so...@mounicou.com) client-ip=64.18.2.159;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 64.18.2.159 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of so...@mounicou.com) smtp.mail=so...@mounicou.com
Received: from mail-oa0-f47.google.com ([209.85.219.47]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob103.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP
	ID DSNKUGZlGP2u+DTj7zmKXoKYTxE3VM43z...@postini.com; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:03:52 PDT
Received: by oagh1 with SMTP id h1so3245418oag.6
        for <midsouth-makers@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
        d=google.com; s=20120113;
        h=from:content-type:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:references
         :to:in-reply-to:x-mailer:x-gm-message-state;
        bh=Mtl8aNWGO8DysCwt1jPrhqYWBKFY3Xaqcu6TjmTWCvM=;
        b=LvphgPz6w9bwJ3QNrJFcByRTFUA2IQCAz/vKL3/dSKPeMPI+HiJaUklaLlNrkIwCFL
         CtFqId3JrTs49COlz41aoe71NQp03agr9hF/mhHayBnsLBFZOnLDpBW5EdQEgST3LJ9u
         CsW8OghnFMvZNIP/73qNEaill95+2Zd0TeSAeUK0gobzcDumuK2SZlNOquM3ngpn3tO/
         CBQpT7dwdbi1SwIlqmb/rzkT+Er/ERflmOY14lz1steZWaPElArLkhJI8Ibcff+lTrqg
         TvWna0UKHWuKf580e1pl8CITt8c/47evKljskoed+0UzOgyPWWBWdkJMIqpxHM/rW4HQ
         nKag==
Received: by 10.60.31.165 with SMTP id b5mr7165477oei.58.1348887831406;
        Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <so...@mounicou.com>
Received: from vangogh.mounicou.com (75-120-199-9.dyn.centurytel.net. [75.120.199.9])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id rg10sm10045882obc.14.2012.09.28.20.03.50
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:03:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Sonny Mounicou <so...@mounicou.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_BCDFC0EC-5BFD-4F6E-B5D7-082D8A650A2D"
Message-Id: <4622E346-296B-4CBB-A9C2-CFE923FAD...@mounicou.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.1 \(1498\))
Subject: Re: [MidsouthMakers] Lathe Mill add-on
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 22:03:49 -0500
References: <CAPw6GYC7Gf8UquX6Rg8RiETte3E+xYKVAJwagPH4AZJBFD5...@mail.gmail.com>
To: midsouth-makers@googlegroups.com
In-Reply-To: <CAPw6GYC7Gf8UquX6Rg8RiETte3E+xYKVAJwagPH4AZJBFD5...@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1498)
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnj6T8B/uPuwBbU83ldgo8c4rJ67WIKYRY0eLuJ/ntHD1oG0kUWU3WumzguXxgiYVUacbAP


--Apple-Mail=_BCDFC0EC-5BFD-4F6E-B5D7-082D8A650A2D
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=windows-1252

Greg,

It is a Sherline 4400.  I'd recommend against getting a device like =
that.  The milling area is very limited and the rigidity is very poor.  =
In addition, you have to remove the spindle and remount it to use it.  =
That means realigning (tramming) each time you reconfigure it.  If you =
want to go that route, you could get the actual sherline base for the =
mill and move the motor when you want to use it.  It wouldn't be much =
more expensive, but you would have 4 times the work area plus rigidity =
to mill steel.   My .02 =85


On Sep 28, 2012, at 9:54 PM, Greg Zapf <x86da...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think the lathe is a Sherline 4400, right?  If it's a Sherline, has =
anyone seen this?  http://www.sherline.com/3050inst.htm  There's =
variants with CNC mount points, and an 8-direction one as well.
>=20
> Assuming we don't already have such a device, and that having one =
wouldn't conflict with the existing plans for the lathe, would anyone =
find this a worthwhile accessory to chip in on and purchase?  The most =
basic one with stepper mount is $235 on Sherline's site... About $175 =
shipped from an Amazon vendor here:
> =
http://www.amazon.com/Sherline-3050-CNC-Vertical-Milling-Column/dp/B007Z1V=
AII
>=20
> There's several different parts for this on Sherline's site, and I =
don't know enough to say what's best.  If someone with more knowledge on =
this can chime in on what's appropriate, I'd really appreciate it.  If =
we can identify an ideal accessory to add on for this purpose, I'll =
definitely chip in some cash towards it.
>=20
> Thanks,
> --Greg


--Apple-Mail=_BCDFC0EC-5BFD-4F6E-B5D7-082D8A650A2D
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset=windows-1252

<html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html =
charset=3Dwindows-1252"></head><body style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; =
-webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; =
">Greg,<div><br></div><div>It is a Sherline 4400. &nbsp;I'd recommend =
against getting a device like that. &nbsp;The milling area is very =
limited and the rigidity is very poor. &nbsp;In addition, you have to =
remove the spindle and remount it to use it. &nbsp;That means realigning =
(tramming) each time you reconfigure it. &nbsp;If you want to go that =
route, you could get the actual sherline base for the mill and move the =
motor when you want to use it. &nbsp;It wouldn't be much more expensive, =
but you would have 4 times the work area plus rigidity to mill steel. =
&nbsp; My .02 =85</div><div><br></div><div><br><div><div>On Sep 28, =
2012, at 9:54 PM, Greg Zapf &lt;<a =
href=3D"mailto:x86da...@gmail.com">x86da...@gmail.com</a>&gt; =
wrote:</div><br class=3D"Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote =
type=3D"cite">I think the lathe is a Sherline 4400, right?&nbsp; If it's =
a Sherline, has anyone seen this?&nbsp; <a =
href=3D"http://www.sherline.com/3050inst.htm" =
target=3D"_blank">http://www.sherline.com/3050inst.htm</a>&nbsp; There's =
variants with CNC mount points, and an 8-direction one as well.<br>



<br>Assuming we don't already have such a device, and that having one =
wouldn't conflict with the existing plans for the lathe, would anyone =
find this a worthwhile accessory to chip in on and purchase?&nbsp; The =
most basic one with stepper mount is $235 on Sherline's site... About =
$175 shipped from an Amazon vendor here:<br>


<a =
href=3D"http://www.amazon.com/Sherline-3050-CNC-Vertical-Milling-Column/dp=
/B007Z1VAII" =
target=3D"_blank">http://www.amazon.com/Sherline-3050-CNC-Vertical-Milling=
-Column/dp/B007Z1VAII</a><br><br>There's several different parts for =
this on Sherline's site, and I don't know enough to say what's =
best.&nbsp; If someone with more knowledge on this can chime in on =
what's appropriate, I'd really appreciate it.&nbsp; If we can identify =
an ideal accessory to add on for this purpose, I'll definitely chip in =
some cash towards it.<br>



<br>Thanks,<br>--Greg<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>=

--Apple-Mail=_BCDFC0EC-5BFD-4F6E-B5D7-082D8A650A2D--