Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion .DBX files in XP
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Bruce Hagen  
View profile  
 More options May 29 2009, 7:56 pm
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.outlookexpress.general, microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
From: "Bruce Hagen" <Nos...@mymail.invalid>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 16:56:04 -0700
Local: Fri, May 29 2009 7:56 pm
Subject: Re: .DBX files in XP
*You* are welcome.
--

              Bruce Hagen
            MS-MVP  [Mail]
          Imperial Beach, CA

"Doug W." <stand@attention> wrote in message

news:eghBcLL4JHA.4272@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Thanks Bruce.
> ==========
> "Bruce Hagen" <Nos...@mymail.invalid> wrote in message
> news:%23e3VIrH4JHA.1416@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> Viral Irony: The Most Common Cause of Corruption:
>> http://www.microsoft.com/windows/IE/community/columns/filecorruption....

>> Why you don't need your anti-virus to scan your email:
>> http://thundercloud.net/infoave/tutorials/email-scanning/index.htm
>> --

>>              Bruce Hagen
>>            MS-MVP  [Mail]
>>          Imperial Beach, CA

>> "Doug W." <stand@attention> wrote in message
>> news:eIOc7pH4JHA.1424@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>> How does "scanning" an incoming message corrupt anything? I have allowed
>>> incoming scanning for the last dozen years or so with NO corruption.
>>> There is more danger of corruption with .dbx files while adding and
>>> deletion of data or compacting while initiating or completing other
>>> computer procedures or functions IMHO.

>>> I was told that .dbx files are similar to the old RELATIVE files used
>>> twenty or thirty years ago which were definitely prone to corruption.

>>> Doug W.
>>> ======

>>> "Ron Sommer" <rsom...@nospam.ktis.net> wrote in message
>>> news:OQu3F4A4JHA.4412@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>>>I don't see where I mentioned losing an incoming message.
>>>> Due to the way data is stored in a dbx file, any corruption can cause
>>>> the whole file or just parts of the file to be lost. Why increase the
>>>> chance of corrupting a dbx file by scanning incoming email?
>>>> --
>>>> Ron Sommer

>>>> "Twayne" <nob...@devnull.spamcop.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:OvywsPA4JHA.1372@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>>> Ron Sommer wrote:
>>>>>> Were you planning on opening the viral attachments?
>>>>>> Even if tried to open them, AVG would have caught them.
>>>>>> It is just a matter of time before you lose a message and you may
>>>>>> never know it.

>>>>> Actually I have never heard of nor experienced loss of any incoming
>>>>> messages.  It's easy enough to tell when i go in to clean up my
>>>>> webmail whether there are any there that weren't delivered.
>>>>>   Are you aware of any actual loss of an incoming e-mail? Other than
>>>>> assumptions, I mean; I'm not saying it doesn't happen but rather that
>>>>> I'd like to see something supporting it that's all; thought you might
>>>>> have something based on your comment.

>>>>> I do know you can have outgoing e-mails go to your Sent Folder as
>>>>> though they were sent when they never actually left your machine
>>>>> though.  That mechanism, unlike the outgoing process, is easy to
>>>>> understand and is pretty well documented how it happens.  But I've
>>>>> never seen anything similar about incoming e-mails that explains the
>>>>> reality of the loss.

>>>>> It's just One of those "things" that sticks in my mind<g>.

>>>>> I don't allow outgoing to be checked, but I do allow incoming to be
>>>>> scanned.  I realize it's a "second layer of protection" as many like
>>>>> to call it, but so far I adhere to the "sooner the better" when it's
>>>>> grabbing malware.  No reason it should have to hit the disk to be
>>>>> discoved later when it can be stopped from even getting onto the disk
>>>>> and doing who knows what else before it triggers something. There are
>>>>> a lot of different schools of thought on the subjects, I know.

>>>>> Cheers,

>>>>> Twayne`

>>>>>> "Tim Meddick" <timmedd...@gawab.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:OaHPV283JHA.1512@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>> Robear,
>>>>>>>            did you happen to say:

>>>>>>>> Disable email scanning by your anti-virus application. It can cause
>>>>>>>> corruption (i.e., loss of messages) and provides no additional
>>>>>>>> protection:

>>>>>>> ???

>>>>>>> I just wondered because my email scanner (an in-built component of
>>>>>>> AVG Free) has removed 5 viral attachments from incoming emails over
>>>>>>> the past two months.  It has never had a negative effect on any
>>>>>>> other 'legitimate' emails.

>>>>>>> It may be that some email scanners do as you say, but I thought it
>>>>>>> was a bit of a sweeping statement to make is all...

>>>>>>> ==

>>>>>>> Cheers,    Tim Meddick,    Peckham, London.    :-)

>>>>>>> "PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABear...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:ejf7Ob63JHA.4960@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>>>> ...I first want to know why
>>>>>>>>> you think simply emptying the delete folder in o/e makes all
>>>>>>>>> things go away,,    only by shredding do things go away.

>>>>>>>> Emptying Deleted Items folder deletes its contents, at least as far
>>>>>>>> as your eyes are concerned.  Compacting the corresponding DBX file
>>>>>>>> (i.e., Deleted Items.dbx) is the equivalent of "shredding" the data
>>>>>>>> it previously contained.  (Until the DBX file is compacted, the
>>>>>>>> deleted data is still recoverable using one of many "extraction"
>>>>>>>> utilities.) Here's a link to Ron's reply of the 26th (the 27th on
>>>>>>>> your end):
>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general/msg...

>>>>>>>> jack wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the info pabear..
>>>>>>>>> I dont see any post from 'Ron', but if he had input too, then I
>>>>>>>>> thank you
>>>>>>>>> Ron,, (just cant see any post)

>>>>>>>>> Now,  even though I have the info for finding the 'hidden folder',
>>>>>>>>> ( I havent yet gone looking, am answering post first ) I first
>>>>>>>>> want to know why
>>>>>>>>> you think simply emptying the delete folder in o/e makes all
>>>>>>>>> things go away,,    only by shredding do things go away.
>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>> ...but I am greatful to you for pointing out where this nasty
>>>>>>>>> little file lives.

>>>>>>>>> PA Bear wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> As Ron (and the link
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.insideoe.com/files/store.htm#storemain) points out,
>>>>>>>>>> the location of your current identity's message store (your "mail
>>>>>>>>>> room") is revealed via pressing OE Tools | Options | Maintenance

>>>>>>>>>> Store folder <=this button.

>>>>>>>>>> In WinXP, the default location is...

>>>>>>>>>>     C:\Documents and Settings\<User>\Local Settings\Application
>>>>>>>>>> Data\Identities\{GUID}\Microsoft\Outlook Express <=this folder

>>>>>>>>>> In Win98, the default location is...

>>>>>>>>>>     C:\Windows\Application Data\Outlook Express\{GUID} <=this
>>>>>>>>>> folder ...where {GUID} = Global Unique IDentifier (technical
>>>>>>>>>> jargon for a
>>>>>>>>>> unique
>>>>>>>>>> long series of numbers & letters) used to specify an Identity.

>>>>>>>>>> NB: In Win98 (not Win98 SE) with IE4.x installed, OE's message
>>>>>>>>>> store will
>>>>>>>>>> contain MBX and IDX files, not DBX files.

>>>>>>>>>> Meanwhile, you should never need to go into your message store
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> delete
>>>>>>>>>> DELETED ITEMS.DBX (or any other DBX file).  Simply (a) empty
>>>>>>>>>> Deleted Items
>>>>>>>>>> folder (as well as Sent Items, ideally), then (b) compact all OE
>>>>>>>>>> folders
>>>>>>>>>> (ALT+F+F+F).  Doing so will remove all the "wasted space" in
>>>>>>>>>> DELETED ITEMS.DBX and reset it back to its default size (~59 KB).

>>>>>>>>>> jack wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> I tried that too,,  but either way, it doesnt show the dbx
>>>>>>>>>>> folder/file..
>>>>>>>>>>> dont know why.

>>>>>>>>>>> Is the said folder for the mail room under the 'windows'
>>>>>>>>>>> hierachy? In 98
>>>>>>>>>>> it is and comes under the first heading of 'application data',
>>>>>>>>>>> then you
>>>>>>>>>>> have to drill down to the last folder in the hierachy to access
>>>>>>>>>>> where all
>>>>>>>>>>> dbx's are kept. (was bill trying to specifically hide something
>>>>>>>>>>> by doing
>>>>>>>>>>> this?)

>>>>>>>>>>> Pabear,  do you know the exact name of the folder where these
>>>>>>>>>>> files are
>>>>>>>>>>> kept in xp?

>>>>>>>>>>> Even after allowing all folders and files to be shown, not even
>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>> search
>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>> '*.dbx' brings up anything at all.....     so just where is this
>>>>>>>>>>> mysterious
>>>>>>>>>>> folder?     and why is it treasured so much that it needs to be
>>>>>>>>>>> hidden from
>>>>>>>>>>> the average user?    Personally, once i have deleted a swag of
>>>>>>>>>>> stuff from
>>>>>>>>>>> the mail room, (say, after about a month) i used to go into
>>>>>>>>>>> 'windows/appdata/' and blah blah, and simply shred the 'deleted
>>>>>>>>>>> items' dbx
>>>>>>>>>>> file as I knew it got rebuilt next time i went into o/e.
>>>>>>>>>>> Sure would like to know where this is stashed now, especially as
>>>>>>>>>>> a 'search
>>>>>>>>>>> files and folders' doesnt reveal a single dbx on xp even after
>>>>>>>>>>> all advice
>>>>>>>>>>> from links below were administered?

>>>>>>>>>>> "PA Bear [MS MVP]" wrote"
>>>>>>>>>>>> [Crosspost to OE General]

>>>>>>>>>>>> A1. See http://www.insideoe.com/files/store.htm#storemain

>>>>>>>>>>>> A2. When you delete a message from Deleted Items folder, the
>>>>>>>>>>>> message essentially vanishes.

>>>>>>>>>>>> A3. In WindowsXP, the OE user files (DBX and WAB) are marked as
>>>>>>>>>>>> hidden by
>>>>>>>>>>>> default. To view these files in Windows Explorer, you must
>>>>>>>>>>>> enable Show
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hidden Files and Folders via Start | Control Panel | Folder
>>>>>>>>>>>> Options | View
>>>>>>>>>>>> (cf.
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/tutorials/tutorial62.html).

>>>>>>>>>>>> General OE Caveats:

>>>>>>>>>>>> - Don't use Inbox or Sent Items to archive messages. Move them
>>>>>>>>>>>> to local
>>>>>>>>>>>> folders created for this purpose.

>>>>>>>>>>>> - Empty Deleted Items folder daily.

>>>>>>>>>>>> - Frequently perform a manual compact of all OE folders while
>>>>>>>>>>>> "working
>>>>>>>>>>>> offline".  More at http://www.insideoe.com/files/maintain.htm

>>>>>>>>>>>> - Do not cancel Automatic Compacting, should it occur, and do
>>>>>>>>>>>> not attempt
>>>>>>>>>>>> to close OE via Task Manager or shutdown your machine if
>>>>>>>>>>>> Automatic Compacting is taking place.

>>>>>>>>>>>> - Disable email scanning by your anti-virus application.  It
>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>> cause
>>>>>>>>>>>> corruption (i.e., loss of messages) and provides no additional
>>>>>>>>>>>> protection:

>>>>>>>>>>>>     Why you don't need your anti-virus to scan your email

>>>>>>>>>>>> http://thundercloud.net/infoave/tutorials/email-scanning/index.htm

>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> OE-specific newsgroup:
>>>>>>>>>>>> news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.outlookexpress.general

>>>>>>>>>>>> ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
>>>>>>>>>>>> MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Client - since 2002

>>>>>>>>>>>> dennis wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just wondering where dbx files are kept in xp???

>>>>>>>>>>>>> For instance, when I delete sometrhing from the mail room
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (o/e) then empty
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the deleted folder in mail room, where do the deleted files
>>>>>>>>>>>>> end up? I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> did
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> search for .DBX's, but it seems xp doesnt have them whereas
>>>>>>>>>>>>> win98 does.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.