Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Removing duplicate files

1 view
Skip to first unread message

John

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 4:53:21 PM11/22/09
to
Hi

Is there a good utility to detect duplicate files based on content and then
to remove them?

Thanks

Regards


Pegasus [MVP]

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 5:04:35 PM11/22/09
to

"John" <in...@nospam.infovis.co.uk> wrote in message
news:e6tv247a...@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

Google is your friend. Type the following words into a Google search box,
then take your pick:

Windows duplicate file finder


John

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 5:14:01 PM11/22/09
to
did before coming here...there are a number of them..can't figure which one
has the features I need..even installed and tried some as well..thought
someone may have a recommendation

regards

"Pegasus [MVP]" <ne...@microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:ebFoI$7aKHA...@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

John John - MVP

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 5:40:45 PM11/22/09
to
I think that this is one of the best, it does it well and it's very fast!

http://www.softpedia.com/get/System/File-Management/Duplicate-File-Finder.shtml
Duplicate File Finder 1.1.0.3

Please do not remove duplicate Windows files! Duplicate system files
are normal and the duplicates are necessary for the good functioning of
your Windows installation!

John

sgopus

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 8:01:01 PM11/22/09
to
Duplicate files are not compared as to content, they are compared to with
file name. It would be way IBM too complicated to compare the content to find
duplicate files.

"John" wrote:

> .
>

John John - MVP

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 9:22:20 PM11/22/09
to
???

Real duplicate file finders will find duplicate files by contents, even
if the name and creation dates are different, it would be pretty useless
to search for duplicate by filename only! Real duplicate finders have
options to allow you to select if you want to have the filename or
creation date included in the duplicate file criteria.

John

ED

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 9:22:23 PM11/22/09
to
Not true.
Files are compared using the checksum value.
If CRC are equal, file contents must be equal/


"sgopus" <sgo...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:0F69381B-5E11-4F93...@microsoft.com...

sgopus

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 5:48:01 PM11/23/09
to
Thanks, I'm updated with that.

> .
>

HeyBub

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 4:25:52 PM11/24/09
to
ED wrote:
> Not true.
> Files are compared using the checksum value.
> If CRC are equal, file contents must be equal/
>

Almost certainly that's true, but not always.

If the check-sum is four bytes, there's a one-in-four-quadrillion chance the
files could differ but have the same check-sum.


Paul Randall

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 5:34:35 PM11/24/09
to

"HeyBub" <hey...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:uhiW1yUb...@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

Also, a malicious person could have modified the file in such a way that the
CRC is the same as it was before the modification. Other checksum
mechanism, such as MD5 were designed to be more difficult to spoof in this
way, but it turned out to be not that much more difficult. To be really
sure that the content of two files is identical, one might verify that the
CRC, MD5, and SHA checksums are all identical for the two files.

-Paul Randall


Bob I

unread,
Nov 30, 2009, 11:34:45 AM11/30/09
to

Paul Randall wrote:

See FC with the /b switch in Windows Help.
>
>

0 new messages