Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

vpn - problems after connecting

12 views
Skip to first unread message

Mike

unread,
May 5, 2006, 11:52:02 AM5/5/06
to
we have notebooks connecting to our sbs 2003 premium sp1 (2 nic´s)

suddenly after a windows update some days ago after connecting to the server
via vpn the connections gets established but then the services like internet,
outlook, ecc. do not work.
after rerunning the internet connection wizard on the server everything
works for some hours than same problem.

we have this event errors:

failed to create a RAS context for the IP address 192.168.16.165. Please
insure that no other application or service is using the H.225 RAS ports
(1719 and 1718). Context status code: 00002741H Context status text: The
requested address is not valid in its context.

An error has been returned by the <WSAJoinLeaf> API. API error code:
00002741H. API error text: The requested address is not valid in its context.

An error has been returned by the <setsockopt> API. API error code:
00002741H. API error text: The requested address is not valid in its context.

Cannot load an application filter SOCKS V4 Filter
({25765C04-C80B-494C-914E-286297DB8C8E}). FilterInit failed with code
0x80072740. To attempt to activate this application filter again, stop and
restart the Firewall service

SOCKS filter: failed to bind IP address 192.168.16.2:1080 for listening.
Future SOCKS requests will be refused.

how to solve ? can we install sp2 for isa 2004 standard or do we have to
wait for sbs 2003 sp2 ?

cjobes

unread,
May 5, 2006, 4:14:53 PM5/5/06
to
What are you running there? Those ports are phone related ports for VoIP?

Claus

"Mike" <Mi...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:850EBA0C-0093-47DF...@microsoft.com...

Mike

unread,
May 7, 2006, 3:53:02 PM5/7/06
to
we do not use any services on this ports... no VoIP...

maybe spyware, adware ? or a client which uses VoIP ???

cjobes

unread,
May 7, 2006, 4:40:46 PM5/7/06
to
Give us the detailed info on the errors from the eventlogs (Event ID,
Source, Description)

Claus

"Mike" <Mi...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message

news:D6738CE7-F6DE-4D08...@microsoft.com...

Mike

unread,
May 7, 2006, 10:35:01 PM5/7/06
to
20002

SOCKS Filter

SOCKS filter: failed to bind IP address 192.168.0.2:1080 for listening.

Future SOCKS requests will be refused.

21075
Microsoft H.323 Gatekee

Failed to create a RAS context for the IP address 192.168.0.169. Please

insure that no other application or service is using the H.225 RAS ports
(1719 and 1718). Context status code: 00002741H Context status text: The
requested address is not valid in its context.

21056


21056
Microsoft H.323 Gatekee


An error has been returned by the <WSAJoinLeaf> API. API error code:
00002741H. API error text: The requested address is not valid in its context.


21056
Microsoft H.323 Gatekee


An error has been returned by the <setsockopt> API. API error code:
00002741H. API error text: The requested address is not valid in its context.

cjobes

unread,
May 7, 2006, 11:34:38 PM5/7/06
to
You still didn't give us the source but I think I know what is going on. It
looks like you have an IP address conflict. One way of testing this is to
change the Routing and Remote Access from DHCP to an unused static address
pool.

It could be that another service is using the specified IP address. In most
cases this address has been bound to the WinProxy service. Open the WinProxy
properties and remove the offending IP from its list.

I would first try solution one and see if it resolves the issue. Just make
sure that you are using a static pool that is not used anywhere else.

Claus

"Mike" <Mi...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message

news:4876B15A-78C7-4AAE...@microsoft.com...

Mike

unread,
May 8, 2006, 2:51:01 AM5/8/06
to
changed the routing and remote access from dhcp to static pool - reruned
internet connection wizard and remote access wizard - socks proxy error still
there in app-evt-log

where can i find the winproxy properties ?

cjobes

unread,
May 8, 2006, 8:53:36 AM5/8/06
to
Has the IP address changed in the new errors? Post the new errors as they
appear in the event logs and don't forget to give us the source as well.

"Mike" <Mi...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message

news:00410638-B59C-45DA...@microsoft.com...

>> >> >> > nic愀)

Mike

unread,
May 8, 2006, 10:47:02 AM5/8/06
to
Event Type: Error
Event Source: Microsoft H.323 Gatekeeper
Event Category: None
Event ID: 21075
Date: 08.05.2006
Time: 09:10:33
User: N/A
Computer: SBSERVER
Description:

Failed to create a RAS context for the IP address 192.168.0.169. Please
insure that no other application or service is using the H.225 RAS ports
(1719 and 1718). Context status code: 00002741H Context status text: The
requested address is not valid in its context.

Event Type: Error
Event Source: Microsoft H.323 Gatekeeper
Event Category: None
Event ID: 21056
Date: 08.05.2006
Time: 09:10:33
User: N/A
Computer: SBSERVER
Description:


An error has been returned by the <WSAJoinLeaf> API. API error code:
00002741H. API error text: The requested address is not valid in its context.

Event Type: Error
Event Source: Microsoft H.323 Gatekeeper
Event Category: None
Event ID: 21056
Date: 08.05.2006
Time: 09:10:33
User: N/A
Computer: SBSERVER
Description:


An error has been returned by the <setsockopt> API. API error code:
00002741H. API error text: The requested address is not valid in its context.


Event Type: Error
Event Source: SOCKS Filter
Event Category: None
Event ID: 20002
Date: 08.05.2006
Time: 08:29:51
User: N/A
Computer: SBSERVER
Description:


SOCKS filter: failed to bind IP address 192.168.0.2:1080 for listening.
Future SOCKS requests will be refused.


Event Type: Warning
Event Source: Microsoft Firewall
Event Category: None
Event ID: 14060
Date: 08.05.2006
Time: 08:29:51
User: N/A
Computer: SBSERVER
Description:


Cannot load an application filter SOCKS V4 Filter
({25765C04-C80B-494C-914E-286297DB8C8E}). FilterInit failed with code
0x80072740. To attempt to activate this application filter again, stop and

restart the Firewall service.

Event Type: Error
Event Source: Symantec Mail Security for Microsoft Exchange
Event Category: Error
Event ID: 283
Date: 08.05.2006
Time: 14:15:34
User: N/A
Computer: SBSERVER
Description:
An error has occurred trying to send an email notification.
The error occurred while sending LiveUpdate notifications to administrators.
Error code returned: 0x80004005

Event Type: Error
Event Source: Symantec Mail Security for Microsoft Exchange
Event Category: LiveUpdate/Rapid Release
Event ID: 35
Date: 08.05.2006
Time: 14:15:34
User: N/A
Computer: SBSERVER
Description:
LiveUpdate was unable to complete successfully. More information may be
available in C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Application
Data\Symantec\LiveUpdate\Log.LiveUpdate


"cjobes" wrote:

> >> >> >> > nic´s)

cjobes

unread,
May 8, 2006, 4:26:05 PM5/8/06
to
It's still the same IP address as in your first error. I thought you have
changed RRAS to a different static pool that is outside the scope of the
DHCP.


"Mike" <Mi...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message

news:254ACD2C-6BAB-4ACD...@microsoft.com...

Mike

unread,
May 8, 2006, 8:04:01 PM5/8/06
to
sorry - forgot to select it after configuring.

with ip adress assignment in routing and remote access:

Static address pool
192.168.0.111 to 192.168.0.120

there are the same errors and the ip adress changed in the following error:

Failed to create a RAS context for the IP address 192.168.0.111. Please

insure that no other application or service is using the H.225 RAS ports
(1719 and 1718). Context status code: 00002741H Context status text: The
requested address is not valid in its context.

cjobes

unread,
May 8, 2006, 8:36:27 PM5/8/06
to
I'm running out of ideas here....just in case there is an issue on the NIC
configuration, could you please post ipconfig results for WAN and LAN NIC on
the server?

Claus


"Mike" <Mi...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message

news:96788ED4-66D6-4B2C...@microsoft.com...

>> >> >> >> >> > nic愀)

Merv Porter [SBS-MVP]

unread,
May 8, 2006, 10:50:36 PM5/8/06
to
Am I correct that you're not using H.323 on your network? If so, try
disabling the H.323 filter in ISA 2004 (I assume you're using ISA 2004)...

To configure H.323 filter
+ In the console tree of ISA Server Management, click Add-ins:
+ For ISA Server 2004 Standard Edition, expand Microsoft Internet Security
and Acceleration Server 2004, expand Server_Name, expand Configuration, and
then click Add-ins.
+ In the details pane, on the Application Filters tab, select the H.323
Filter.
+ Right click on the h.323 filter and select Disable
+ Click the Apply button at the top of the menu
+ In the popup, click on "Save changes and Restart services"

--
Merv Porter [SBS MVP]
===================================


"Mike" <Mi...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message

news:96788ED4-66D6-4B2C...@microsoft.com...

>> >> >> >> >> > nic愀)

Mike

unread,
May 9, 2006, 4:05:01 AM5/9/06
to
the version of isa is 3.0.1200.365 SP2 - is this version 2004 ? isn´t the
version 2004 automatically installed with sbs premium sp1 ?

ipconfig /all

Windows IP Configuration

Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : SBSERVER

Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . : domain.com

Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Unknown

IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : Yes

WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : Yes

DNS Suffix Search List. . . . . . : domain.com

Ethernet adapter Network Connection Internet:

Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :

Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Intel(R) PRO/100 S Server Adapter

Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-0E-0C-59-AF-94

DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No

IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.100

Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0

Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1

DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.2

Primary WINS Server . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.2

NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Disabled

PPP adapter RAS Server (Dial In) Interface:

Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :

Description . . . . . . . . . . . : WAN (PPP/SLIP) Interface

Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-53-45-00-00-00

DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No

IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.168

Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.255

Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . :

NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Disabled

Ethernet adapter Server Local Area Connection:

Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :

Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Intel(R) PRO/1000 XT Network Connection

Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-0F-1F-68-DE-1F

DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No

IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.2

Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0

Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . :

DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.2

Primary WINS Server . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.2


"cjobes" wrote:

> >> >> >> >> >> > nic´s)

Mike

unread,
May 9, 2006, 4:09:01 AM5/9/06
to
i do not know anything about somebody or something using H.323 and the error
on the server is also there when all client computers are down.

i found the H.323 filter already disabled in the ISA Server Management.

the version of the isa server is 3.0.1200.365 SP2 - how can i update it ?

"Merv Porter [SBS-MVP]" wrote:

> >> >> >> >> >> > nic´s)

Mike

unread,
May 9, 2006, 6:59:02 AM5/9/06
to
now i found out that when the connection is not working and i disable or
enable the H.323 filter and so restarting the associated services so the
connection do work after this.
then after symantec mail security tries an update which it does every hour
than the connection do not work till disabling/enabling the H.323 filter.
if i do only restart the routing and remote access service i get the errors
regarding the H.323 filter and the connection does not work after this.
maybe it has to do with special filters i had to generate for the symantec
update getting work over ISA ?

cjobes

unread,
May 9, 2006, 8:46:24 AM5/9/06
to
I have not seen this one before but it sounds to me that there is a conflict
with the Symantec product. I would call Symantec and see if it is a known
issue.

Claus

"Mike" <Mi...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message

news:9D0A922E-1F9B-48AC...@microsoft.com...

>> > >> >> >> >> >> > nic愀)

0 new messages