Watching in task manager I see that explorer.exe CPU shoots up to the 40-60%
range as it works to open the file then drops back down to normal.
I am troubleshooting another machine (Vista) that is having the exact same
slow-to-open problem (when opening .jpg files stored on this server) which
is what brought me to notice that the server itself can't open the files
quickly.
Oddly, machines running XP have no performance issues opening these files.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Whether they open quickly in the viewer on the server really has
nothing to do with the way they behave over the network. I wouldn't
waste a lot of time on that - how often do you need to open JPEGs on
the server anyway? If the XP machines are working fine when accessing
the files from this server, then it clearly isn't the server. The
Vista PC is the issue - try using different software to open the
files. also check to see whether it's true for non JPEG files to rule
otu basic network connectivity problems between Vista and the server.
> Whether they open quickly in the viewer on the server really has
> nothing to do with the way they behave over the network.
Which is what I would suspect, but I find it odd that the problem presents
itself on the only two machines running OS that were released after XP.
> I wouldn't waste a lot of time on that - how often do you need to open
> JPEGs on
> the server anyway?
I don't. But it is an odd symptom nonetheless, and coincidences like this
are sometimes helpful - there might be a common cause.
> If the XP machines are working fine when accessing the files from this
> server, then it
> clearly isn't the server.
When I copy the .jpgs to a share on an XP machine and access them from the
Vista machine the process still isn't nearly as fast as accessing the photos
through XP but it does feel a bit faster.
> The Vista PC is the issue - try using different software to open the
> files.
I have tried every .jpg viewer that I can find.
> also check to see whether it's true for non JPEG files to rule otu basic
> network
> connectivity problems between Vista and the server.
It does not happen with .doc or .xls files (which are the only other types
that are used). Throughput tests show that the Vista writes to the server
at about 55Mb/s and reads at about 80Mb/s
Is it the start-up time of the image viewer that's different?
Have you tried IrfanView?
>> also check to see whether it's true for non JPEG files to rule otu
>> basic network
>> connectivity problems between Vista and the server.
>
> It does not happen with .doc or .xls files (which are the only other
> types that are used). Throughput tests show that the Vista writes to
> the server at about 55Mb/s and reads at about 80Mb/s
Different anti-virus software? Some filter on the Vista PCs - like the one
that used to come with Photoshop (psicon.dll) but was withdrawn because it
was slow and buggy?
Andrew
> Is it the start-up time of the image viewer that's different?
Yes.
> Have you tried IrfanView?
Yes - first non-MS viewer I tried.
>> It does not happen with .doc or .xls files (which are the only other
>> types that are used). Throughput tests show that the Vista writes to
>> the server at about 55Mb/s and reads at about 80Mb/s
>
> Different anti-virus software? Some filter on the Vista PCs - like the one
> that used to come with Photoshop (psicon.dll) but was withdrawn because it
> was slow and buggy?
Even with AV disabled, no change.
>
> Andrew
>
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/KB970987
No idea why so slow on the server but I can live with that.
"Wowbagger" <privacy, please> wrote in message
news:%23I0Nbgy...@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> I'm hoping that this will solve the problem on the Vista machine:
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/KB970987
It *WOULD* solve the problem but the hotfix applies to business and ultimate
versions only. MS' solution is to upgrade to business or ultimate and then
apply the hotfix.