Now you're posting spam?
Peter - what gives?
> Peter Foldes wrote:
>> Spam
He is responding to spam, and identifying it as such. I've taught my
newsreader to just discard it.
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum
> >> Spam
>
> > Now you're posting spam?
> >
> > Peter - what gives?
>
> He is responding to spam, and identifying it as such. I've
> taught my newsreader to just discard it.
What spam is he responding to?
The one that is "Free downloads etc etc etc) The person populated the MS servers .
At least in the 36 groups that I participate in. It is pure Spam and nothing else
--
Peter
Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
"98 Guy" <9...@Guy.com> wrote in message news:4B2EE783...@Guy.com...
I don't see it on google's "groups" server (usually the spam filtering
on google's server is very weak or non-existant) but in this case I
don't see it:
http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6.browser/topics
It's been my observation that a lot of spam that appears in the
microsoft.public groups are actually injected by Microsoft's own servers
- an indication they are poorly managed.
Ignore Peter. He doesn't get it.
> It's been my observation that a lot of spam that appears in the
> microsoft.public groups are actually injected by Microsoft's own servers
> - an indication they are poorly managed.
In my experience, most spam is injected by Google Groups. Do you consider
them "poorly managed"?
In any case, the spam in question was not injected by Microsoft's own
servers, but by NNTP servers run by Astraweb.