Also, the SP1 version of msvcr90d.dll has only public symbols, while
the original version has full private symbols.
> The first, the version of msvbvm60.dll shipped with Vista SP1.
Get an older version and put it with the .exe file.
Bruno
> The third, the Simplified Chinese version of winsrv.dll version
> 5.0.2195.7135.
SYMCHK output:
SYMSRV: c:\downloads\symbols\winsrv.dbg\45F6727244000\winsrv.dbg not
found
SYMSRV: http://msdl.microsoft.com/download/symbols/winsrv.dbg/45F6727244000/winsrv.dbg
not found
SYMSRV: c:\downloads\symbols\winsrv.dbg\45F6598944000\winsrv.dbg not
found
SYMSRV: http://msdl.microsoft.com/download/symbols/winsrv.dbg/45F6598944000/winsrv.dbg
not found
> Also, I have encountered a mispaired symbol.
> The DBG file for version 6.0.96.90 of msvbvm60.dll was published
> without publishing it's PDB. While in this case it isn't fatal because
> msvbvm60.dbg contains COFF symbols, it is still probably because of a
> mistake.
SYMCHK output:
DBGHELP: C:\WINNT\system32\MSVBVM60.DLL is stripped. Searching for
dbg file
SYMSRV: c:\downloads\symbols\MSVBVM60.pdb\3D753A4F\MSVBVM60.pdb not
found
SYMSRV: http://msdl.microsoft.com/download/symbols/MSVBVM60.pdb/3D753A4F/MSVBVM
60.pdb not found
DBGHELP: MSVBVM60 - coff symbols
c:\downloads\symbols\MSVBVM60.dbg\3EF31D60154000\MSVBVM60.dbg
Microsoft does not commit to put up symbols for everything on this site.
Product teams that build the bits make the decision to publish or not.
Furthermore, I am afraid that the people that own that site do not monitor
this newsgroup. You might be better served by finding the forums that
produce the bits you want to debug. Unfortunately, I don't personally have
that information.
.pat styles [microsoft]
"yuhong" <yuhong...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:e974cec6-2f6e-4bd7...@x16g2000prn.googlegroups.com...