Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Uninstall Outlook Express

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Samantha

unread,
Feb 21, 2004, 12:17:18 PM2/21/04
to
Hi,

How do you uninstall outlook express from a PC? Thanks.

Colon Terminus

unread,
Feb 21, 2004, 4:03:43 PM2/21/04
to

You don't.

"Samantha" <anon...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:138be01c3f89e$8ef0e8e0$a101...@phx.gbl...

Samantha

unread,
Feb 21, 2004, 8:48:18 PM2/21/04
to
Why?
>.
>

Josef Stalin

unread,
Feb 22, 2004, 11:23:05 AM2/22/04
to

"Samantha" <anon...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:1493e01c3f8e5$f1d0d460$a601...@phx.gbl...

Samantha,

Please, if you don't know what you're talking about please don't guess or
give wrong information. Did you even *try* to use Google with these
keywords: uninstall OR remove "outlook express"?

OU *can* be removed.

http://www.tweakxp.com/tweak2101.aspx

http://www.xtra.co.nz/help/0,,5721-2446840,00.html

As to your "Why" question, because even when you're not using OE, it's
still actively listening and a security risk.

Uncle Joe


Geo

unread,
Feb 22, 2004, 12:04:55 PM2/22/04
to
On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 11:23:05 -0500, "Josef Stalin"
<UnionofSovietSo...@yahoo.com> wrote:


>http://www.xtra.co.nz/help/0,,5721-2446840,00.html
>
can't get that url to play ball...

Geo

Josef Stalin

unread,
Feb 22, 2004, 12:21:33 PM2/22/04
to
"Geo" <gm4xus@yahoo.c?.uk> wrote in message
news:28oh30504hs4p9t8m...@4ax.com...

Comrade,

Here it, sans images:

You are here : Xtra > Help > Home Mon 23 February 2004

Uninstalling/Reinstalling Outlook Express

Here is a guide to step you through how to uninstall and reinstall Outlook
Express.

Uninstalling Outlook Express

* Uninstalling Outlook Express 6.x
* Uninstalling Outlook Express 5.x
* Uninstalling Outlook Express 5.0x

Reinstalling Outlook Express

* Reinstalling Outlook Express 6.x
* Reinstalling Outlook Express 5.x
* Reinstalling Outlook Express 5.0x

Uninstalling Outlook Express 6.x

* Click Start, then Settings, and then Control Panel.
* Open the Add/Remove Programs control panel.
* Select the Windows Setup tab.
* Untick the Outlook Express check box and click Next.
* Click Finish.
* Restart your computer

Uninstalling Outlook Express 5.x

* Click Start, then Settings, and then Control Panel.
* Open the Add/Remove Programs control panel.
* Select the Windows Setup tab.
* Untick the Outlook Express check box and click OK.
* Restart your computer

Uninstalling Outlook Express 5.0x

* Click Start, then Settings, and then Control Panel.
* Open the Add/Remove Programs control panel.
* Select Outlook Express 5, and click Add/Remove.
* Click Yes to verify the removal of Outlook Express.
* Click Yes to restart your computer. If you are not prompted to restart
your computer then restart your computer manually.

Reinstalling Outlook Express 6.x

* Click Start, then Settings, and then Control Panel.
* Open the Add/Remove Programs control panel.
* Select the Windows Setup tab.
* Tick the Outlook Express check box and click OK.
* Click Finish.
* Restart your computer

Reinstalling Outlook Express 5.x

* Click Start, then Settings, and then Control Panel.
* Open the Add/Remove Programs control panel.
* Select the Windows Setup tab.
* Tick the Outlook Express check box and click OK.
* Restart your computer

Reinstalling Outlook Express 5.0x

* Click Start, then Settings, and then Control Panel.
* Open the Add/Remove Programs control panel.
* Select Internet Explorer 5 and Internet Tools, and click Add/Remove.
* Click Add a Component, and then click OK.
* Click Outlook Express, and then click Next.
* Click Finish to restart your computer. If you are not prompted to
restart your computer then restart your computer manually.

Scheduled Outages

3 Upcoming Outages Scheduled:
View All Details
26 Feb 2004 1:00 AM 5 minutes

Access Product Outage
24 Feb 2004 4:00 AM 30 minutes

23 Feb 2004 5:55 AM 5 minutes

©2004 Xtra Limited. Terms for Xtra Help - These terms apply if you wish to
obtain help, support or related services
Site policies, Terms and Conditions, Advertise on XtraMSN. 15 / 01 / 04


George Hester

unread,
Feb 22, 2004, 7:49:50 PM2/22/04
to
you don't. Unless you want IE gone and other things.

--
George Hester
__________________________________
"Josef Stalin" <UnionofSovietSo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:103hlr4...@corp.supernews.com...

George Hester

unread,
Feb 22, 2004, 7:51:59 PM2/22/04
to
definitely NOT Windows 2000 information.

--
George Hester
__________________________________
"Josef Stalin" <UnionofSovietSo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:103hp96...@corp.supernews.com...

Josef Stalin

unread,
Feb 22, 2004, 8:34:20 PM2/22/04
to

"George Hester" <heste...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ODk4yba%23DH...@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...

you don't. Unless you want IE gone and other things.

That's strange. I've removed Outlook Express and I still have Internet
Explorer. Is it because I'm one of the most ruthless dictators in history
and the computer is terrified of being exiled to Siberia or that you don't
know what you're talking about?

Uncle Joe


George Hester

unread,
Feb 22, 2004, 10:02:43 PM2/22/04
to
Uncle Joe you're my hero. Good for you.

--
George Hester
__________________________________
"Josef Stalin" <FatherNiceGu...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:103im7l...@corp.supernews.com...

Josef Stalin

unread,
Feb 22, 2004, 10:57:15 PM2/22/04
to
Comrade Georgi! You're a true party patriot. You will be awarded an Order
of Lenin medal and a dacha in the Karelskiy Peninsula. Mother Russia
salutes you.

Uncle Joe

--
Take the "NiceGuy" out of name to respond.


"George Hester" <heste...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:emYXDmb%23DH...@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...

Enkidu

unread,
Feb 23, 2004, 12:42:56 AM2/23/04
to

Works for me, but then I'm in the same country as the company! What
error do you get when you try to access the page?

Cheers,

Cliff

Geo

unread,
Feb 23, 2004, 11:56:52 AM2/23/04
to
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 18:42:56 +1300, Enkidu <enk...@xyzcliffpxyz.com> wrote:


>Works for me, but then I'm in the same country as the company! What
>error do you get when you try to access the page?
>

If I copy and paste into IE address:-
http://www.xtra.co.nz/help/0,,5721-2446840,00.html
I get cannot find server
"The page cannot be displayed etc"

Double clicking on the link (using Agent), I get an address of
http://www.xtra.co.nz/help/0
which may be an Agent problem with the ,,
and the message
"Not Found
The requested object does not exist on this server. The link you followed is
either outdated, inaccurate, or the server has been instructed not to let you
have it. "
Geo

Enkidu

unread,
Feb 24, 2004, 3:34:28 AM2/24/04
to

Hi Geo, all I can say is it works for me with Agent! 8-(

Cheers,

Cliff

George Hester

unread,
Feb 28, 2004, 8:14:22 AM2/28/04
to
Outlook Express is necessary for various functionality in Microsoft Internet Explorer. I am not saying without Outlook Express you will not have a funtional Microsoft Internet Explorer. What I am saying is you will have a less then functional Microsoft Internet Explorer. Seems to me if you don't want Microsoft Outlook Express then don't use it. The savings in space by removing this application is what 3.3MB. If you ever have to repair IE you will get it back.

--
George Hester
__________________________________
"Enkidu" <enk...@xyzcliffpxyz.com> wrote in message news:s13m309pd3kmgrrd9...@4ax.com...

XS11E

unread,
Apr 1, 2004, 1:33:35 PM4/1/04
to
"George Hester" <heste...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:OflmJzf$DHA....@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl:

> Outlook Express is necessary for various functionality in
> Microsoft Internet Explorer. I am not saying without Outlook
> Express you will not have a funtional Microsoft Internet Explorer.
> What I am saying is you will have a less then functional
> Microsoft Internet Explorer.

Wrong. Sorry to come into this so late, I've been elsewhere.

OE is NOT necessary for ANY functionality in MSIE, it can be very
easily removed and, for those who haven't found it yet, the
instructions are on the MS website:

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;263837&Product=oex

FWIW, I've been running Windows 98, Windows ME, Windows NT 4.0, Windows
2000, Windows XP and now Windows XP 64bit version w/o Outlook Express.

Why? Because I hate it, OK?

George Hester

unread,
Apr 3, 2004, 1:07:32 AM4/3/04
to
"OE is NOT necessary for ANY functionality in MSIE" - wrong.

No mht without it.

--
George Hester
__________________________________
"XS11E" <xs1...@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message news:Xns94BE7597F15...@207.46.248.16...

XS11E

unread,
Apr 3, 2004, 6:18:51 PM4/3/04
to
"George Hester" <heste...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:eo020HUG...@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl:

> "OE is NOT necessary for ANY functionality in MSIE" - wrong.
>
> No mht without it.

OE is NOT necessary for ANY functionality in MSIE - Correct.

George Hester

unread,
Apr 3, 2004, 7:29:01 PM4/3/04
to
Have it your way XS11E.

--
George Hester
__________________________________
"XS11E" <xs1...@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message news:Xns94C0A5F50F8...@207.46.248.16...

XS11E

unread,
Apr 3, 2004, 11:09:03 PM4/3/04
to
"George Hester" <heste...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:u5EgUvdG...@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl:

> Have it your way XS11E.

It IS my way, George. Suppose you tell me one single function that is
lose in MSIE if OE is deleted? I've been running MSIE w/o OE for
several years and if I'm missing something, I've not noticed it?

Alias

unread,
Apr 4, 2004, 5:19:45 AM4/4/04
to

"XS11E" <xs1...@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote

> "George Hester" <heste...@hotmail.com> wrote


>
> > Have it your way XS11E.
>
> It IS my way, George. Suppose you tell me one single function that is
> lose in MSIE if OE is deleted? I've been running MSIE w/o OE for
> several years and if I'm missing something, I've not noticed it?

Just curious, what email program do you use and why do you think it's better
than OE?

Alias


George Hester

unread,
Apr 4, 2004, 12:25:30 PM4/4/04
to
I told you. I guess you didn't see it. Without OEX you will not be able to save a web page as a Web Archive; a mht. Furthermore repairing IE will reinstall it. There is a reason OEX has been included with all IE Browsers since IE 4.02 SP2. It is not because Microsoft wants to be anal. It is because IE will be less functional without it. Namely not as it was designed.

--
George Hester
__________________________________
"XS11E" <xs1...@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message news:Xns94C0D72882E...@207.46.248.16...

Rob Stow

unread,
Apr 4, 2004, 2:05:03 PM4/4/04
to
Alias wrote:

I use Firebird (browser) and Thunderbird (Mail/News).
Both developed by Mozilla.

The benefits are huge:

1.) Trust.

Mozilla hasn't done anything special to earn my trust in their
products, but MicroSoft has worked hard to destroy my trust in
IE and OE. MicroSoft has such a long history of nasty security
holes in IE and OE that I will never again trust a browser
or mail/news program developed by them.

2.) No more system crashes.

FBird and TBird aren't tied into the OS like IE and OE.
When IE or OE hangs or crashes it drags the whole system down with
it, but on those much rarer occasions where FBird or TBird crashes
only that app is affected.

3.) Security.

Again, it is largely because FBird and TBird aren't tied
into the OS the way IE and OE are.

As well, because IE and OE are used by such a huge horde of
mindless idiots who know nothing about security, IE and OE
are what the hackers target. Using IE and OE is like
renting a deer costume and wandering in the forest during
hunting season.

4.) Customizability.

For the typical user, FBird and TBird aren't much more customizable
than IE and OE, but for people willing to put in a little effort
you can achieve a *lot* by tweaking your prefs and installing
extensions. And for the fanatics there is always the source code
waiting to be tweaked.

5.) Privacy.

I trust Mozilla products to not collect information about
anything I do and send it back to Mozilla.org. I don't
trust MicroSoft products to not do those kinds of things.


XS11E

unread,
Apr 4, 2004, 2:08:39 PM4/4/04
to
"George Hester" <heste...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:uezi0FmG...@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl:

> I told you. I guess you didn't see it. Without OEX you will not
> be able to save a web page as a Web Archive; a mht.

Correct, but I can save a webpage as an .html file.



> It is because IE will be less functional without it.

Since the .html and .mht files seem to work in the same way, how is
there less functionality?

XS11E

unread,
Apr 4, 2004, 2:16:14 PM4/4/04
to
"Alias" <maskedand...@aka.com> wrote in
news:c4ok16$2jqgef$1...@ID-208405.news.uni-berlin.de:

> Just curious, what email program do you use and why do you think
> it's better than OE?

I use Pegasus Mail, free at http://www.pmail.com, for email and Xnews,
also free at http://xnews.newsguy.com, for newsgroups.

Both are many times better, not only do they eliminate most of the
security flaws in OE they are easier to use, Xnews handles yEnc files
and is 100% GNKSA 2.0 (Good Net Keeping Seal of Approval) compliant
(which OE is NOT, it's so bad in that respect that in many newsgroups
some posters have set their newsreaders to killfile any posts made with
OE, pretty bad if you need help and you ask your question with OE!)

There are dozens of email clients and newsreaders out there, some of
which, IMHO, really suck but they are all better than OE.

George Hester

unread,
Apr 4, 2004, 3:33:32 PM4/4/04
to
When you save as a html then what you get is a extra folder called saved_files. This folder may in fact be empty. But you always get it. A web archive does not do that. Say I wanted to save 100 Knowledge Base articles. As a web archive I get 100 "things" saved. But as a html I get 200 "things" saved. That's 100 too many in my opinion.

But I have given you just one example. I'd be surprised if that was the ONLY one.

--
George Hester
__________________________________
"XS11E" <xs1...@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message news:Xns94C1715D825...@207.46.248.16...

XS11E

unread,
Apr 4, 2004, 6:48:02 PM4/4/04
to
"George Hester" <heste...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:#$A73unGE...@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl:

> When you save as a html then what you get is a extra folder called
> saved_files. This folder may in fact be empty. But you always
> get it. A web archive does not do that. Say I wanted to save 100
> Knowledge Base articles. As a web archive I get 100 "things"
> saved. But as a html I get 200 "things" saved. That's 100 too
> many in my opinion.

100 empty folders takes no space. Wanna bet either way takes the same
amount of space on the HD? You're splitting hairs, there's no change
in IE functionality by removing OE, merely an increase in security and,
by using another email client and another newsreader, a HUGE increase
in email and newsgroup functionality.

> But I have given you just one example. I'd be surprised if that
> was the ONLY one.

I'd be VERY surprised if it wasn't. OE isn't part of IE, it's entirely
an afterthought and not a very good one.


Gary Smith

unread,
Apr 4, 2004, 11:17:20 PM4/4/04
to
XS11E <xs1...@spamyahoo.com> wrote:
> "George Hester" <heste...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:#$A73unGE...@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl:

>> When you save as a html then what you get is a extra folder called
>> saved_files. This folder may in fact be empty. But you always
>> get it. A web archive does not do that. Say I wanted to save 100
>> Knowledge Base articles. As a web archive I get 100 "things"
>> saved. But as a html I get 200 "things" saved. That's 100 too
>> many in my opinion.

> 100 empty folders takes no space. Wanna bet either way takes the same
> amount of space on the HD? You're splitting hairs, there's no change
> in IE functionality by removing OE, merely an increase in security and,
> by using another email client and another newsreader, a HUGE increase
> in email and newsgroup functionality.

The primary difference is that saving a page as HTML (complete) causes all
images and other supporting files to be saved in a folder that is
connected to the saved page. If the saved page is named SavedPage.html,
the folder will be named SavedPage_files. These folders are rarely empty
(one I just created contains 43 files occupying a total of 77K), and
managing them can be a nuisance.

Saving a file as a web archive creates a single file with extension .mht
that can be opened as if it were an ordinary HTML file, but with all of
the components in a single, easily-managed piece.

--
Gary L. Smith gls...@yahoo.com
Columbus, Ohio

Colon Terminus

unread,
Apr 5, 2004, 3:22:28 AM4/5/04
to

You know what? 93% of the internet world doesn't give a shit about GNKSA.
Nor do they care about yEnc. Outlook Express is a superb newsreader and is
in use by an overwhelming majority of usenet users. Who cares if an elite
group of pricks killfile my posts 'cause they're made with OE? I sure don't.

You just go ahead and yEnc, yEnc, yEnc till you go blind and can't see the
hair on your palms. Meanwhile, I'll use the best, most convenient, and most
compatible newsreader extant.


"XS11E" <xs1...@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message

news:Xns94C172A6EFC...@207.46.248.16...

Alias

unread,
Apr 5, 2004, 5:55:59 AM4/5/04
to

"Colon Terminus" wrote

>
> You know what? 93% of the internet world doesn't give a shit about GNKSA.
> Nor do they care about yEnc. Outlook Express is a superb newsreader and is
> in use by an overwhelming majority of usenet users. Who cares if an elite
> group of pricks killfile my posts 'cause they're made with OE? I sure
don't.
>
> You just go ahead and yEnc, yEnc, yEnc till you go blind and can't see the
> hair on your palms. Meanwhile, I'll use the best, most convenient, and
most
> compatible newsreader extant.

OE is the only free email program I know of that allows you to use multiple
signatures with all your accounts and doesn't separate your accounts into
different folders.

If I were into downloading and decoding binaries, I hear Xnews is good for
that but -- last I heard -- that's illegal.

Alias
>
>
> "XS11E" <xs1...@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote

> > "Alias" <maskedand...@aka.com> wrote

Rob Stow

unread,
Apr 5, 2004, 7:00:15 PM4/5/04
to
Alias wrote:

> "Colon Terminus" wrote
>
>>You know what? 93% of the internet world doesn't give a shit about GNKSA.
>>Nor do they care about yEnc. Outlook Express is a superb newsreader and is
>>in use by an overwhelming majority of usenet users. Who cares if an elite
>>group of pricks killfile my posts 'cause they're made with OE? I sure
>
> don't.
>
>>You just go ahead and yEnc, yEnc, yEnc till you go blind and can't see the
>>hair on your palms. Meanwhile, I'll use the best, most convenient, and
>
> most
>
>>compatible newsreader extant.
>
>
> OE is the only free email program I know of that allows you to use multiple
> signatures with all your accounts and doesn't separate your accounts into
> different folders.
>
> If I were into downloading and decoding binaries, I hear Xnews is good for
> that but -- last I heard -- that's illegal.

You heard wrong.

I have, for example, used newsgroups to distribute programs I
created to other users of those newsgroups. Nothing illegal
occurs: I own the copyright for said programs and by posting
it I am giving permission for world+dog to download a copy with
whatever their favourite newsreader happens to be.

A few musicians have done the same sort of thing with their
music - they own the copyright and they make it freely available
for downloading from a website or a newsgroup. A lot of small-time
bands do this with their demo material.

George Hester

unread,
Apr 5, 2004, 7:44:22 PM4/5/04
to
I run into this all the time Colon. And I feel exactly as you do. I do what I can to make sure their killfiles work.

--
George Hester
__________________________________
"Colon Terminus" <Colon_T...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:UO7cc.12362405$Id.20...@news.easynews.com...

George Hester

unread,
Apr 5, 2004, 7:47:14 PM4/5/04
to
I've done with XS11E. No matter what is said or what the truth of the matter is, "By Golly I'm right."

--
George Hester
__________________________________
"Gary Smith" <bitb...@example.com> wrote in message news:OLwmCyrG...@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...

0 new messages