Hope this helps,
Ryan
This post was supposed to be a reply to Michael Schmitz's
question, not a new post.
>.
>
I wouldn't say it is a rason to use a different namespace. On the contrary,
the same namespace is becoming more popular lately. The original MS
documentationrecommended the different namespaces, but that is now defunct
and out of date.
As Kevin answered Michael's original post, all you have to do is create the
necessary A record www and give it the IP of the external web server.
Another way is you can delegate www to the IP of the external webserver IP
also. This method offers less adminsitration if the ISP changes the website
IP for whatever reason.
Proxy server on the other hand, is a different ballgame. The internal
nameserver will be root for the AD zone (no forwarding). Proxy will handle
name resolution for the web services for the clients.
--
Ace
Please direct all replies to the newsgroup so all can benefit.
Ace Fekay, MCSE 2000, MCSE+I, MCSA, MCT, MVP
Microsoft Windows MVP - Active Directory
--
I think you guys may be off base here. Michael stated
that he can ping the name just fine from the inside, he
just can't get to it through a browser. This would mean
DNS is functioning fine. That's why I'm leaning towards
the proxy issue.
Ryan
>.
>
Hi Ryan
Michael didn't specifically state that he can ping by name, but for this
purpose, we'll assume that. I still don't think that would cause
justification of using a different namespace. But that can be a whole other
discussion that we'll leave for another time.
So if it is Proxy, and he didn't specify that either, but being a good
assumption, Proxy would still use DNS to resolve it. If he can ping by name
from the internal machine, then I am tending to think that he doesn't have a
Proxy, since it won't pass ICMP (most Proxies, depending on the vendor
and/or version).
I posted a few questions to Michael. Maybe he isn';t reading the responses,
especially this thread. I mentioned that this thread exists that is trying
to help his issues.