- Removed the InProcServer entry from the CLSID and added an
RemoteServerName entry on the AppId node
- Watched the server with RegMon to see if the COM entries are being
accessed. They are, by svchost.
- Eliminated communication issues by using two identical computers
with the same user. I even tried calling into the same computer
(localhost), to no avail.
- Eliminated coding errors by using OleView 's "Create Instance On…"
option to try to create an instance of the class on a remote computer.
And still, "Class not registered".
I'm quite certain the error is misleading, as I've made sure the class
is indeed registered on the server, and RegMon shows no significant
errors. However, I might have gotten it all wrong: can I connect to an
automation dll using DCOM at all, by only changing some registry
settings?
"eran" <kal...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:82c3eb73-8a38-485a...@g23g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
> We have an app that uses a third party COM dll, which has an
> automation interface (SourceSafe's ssapi.dll, FWIW). This works fine
> when both our app and the COM dll are installed on the same box. I'd
> like our app to connect to a dll installed on a remote computer. I was
> hoping that since the interface is standard (automation), going DCOM
> would be easy. However, I keep getting "Class not registered" errors.
> So far, I've:
>
> - Removed the InProcServer entry from the CLSID and added an
> RemoteServerName entry on the AppId node
> - Watched the server with RegMon to see if the COM entries are being
> accessed. They are, by svchost.
> - Eliminated communication issues by using two identical computers
> with the same user. I even tried calling into the same computer
> (localhost), to no avail.
> - Eliminated coding errors by using OleView 's "Create Instance On�"