Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Encryption for Executables?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Henning  
View profile  
 More options Jun 2 2011, 3:52 pm
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion
From: "Henning" <computer_h...@coldmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:52:22 +0200
Local: Thurs, Jun 2 2011 3:52 pm
Subject: Re: Encryption for Executables?
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

"David Kaye" <sfdavidka...@yahoo.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:is8j50$m72$1@dont-email.me...

> "dpb" <n...@non.net> wrote

>> The question is is there any real money in it?  If not, nobody is really
>> going to care and even if they do other than simply pride you're not out
>> anything, anyway.

> I'm not sure if there's money in it or not.  I do know that when I
> mentioned it to several venue operators they wanted to buy it, though it's
> not ready yet.  That's a good sign, I think.

>> Best bet imo is to be first, be best and simply count on winning the
>> competition w/ the product.  Copyright and document so that if there ever
>> is an infringement that is worth the money to fight you've got the tools
>> to prove that if it were to actually be so.

> I also established prior art about 10 years ago when I first began
> developing the software, by distributing copies (actually, embarrassingly
> bad versions) to various folks, so I think I'm in decent shape for patent
> and trademark issues.  You're right about copyright.  I should do that as
> well.

That might screw the patent chances, it's already known in public.

/Henning


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google