Arne Saknussemm wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 02:40:46 -0800 (PST)
> "
jo...@tlc-direct.co.uk" wrote in microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion
> <
7fba0118-7564-429f...@googlegroups.com>:
>
>> Really long shot but here goes...
>>
>> Before I go reinventing the now very-old wheel; any chance you can
>> hit me up with a link to MMM or, if you're happy to, stick the source
>> on GIT and I'll (very likely) become a contributor?
>>
>> I'm STILL fighting the fight and am looking to move our mid-sized
>> application install (40+ apps and components) to side-by-side (where
>> possible). I've played with UMMM but it doesn't provide what I'm
>> after.
>>
>> *fingers crossed* you even see this,
>
> well, while the original MMM website is available on the "internet
> wayback machine"
>
>
http://web.archive.org/web/20140829021337/http://mmm4vb6.atom5.com/
>
> the download links don't seem to work due to the fact that the IWM
> respects the "robots.txt" hence it didn't archive the zip files :(
The top post ("Sunday, August 4, 2013") doesn't work because those links were
hosted on
app.box.com, which is the site with the robots.txt, but the
download link from the post dated "Sunday, April 7, 2013" works just fine.
> That said (and not sure if the files may be available elsewhere), I
> wonder why you say that UMMM doesn't do what you need; which feature is
> UMMM lacking ? And, did you try to contact the UMMM author/mantainer ?
I'm curious about this as well, but contacting the author might not be an
option, since UMMM hasn't been updated since 2012.
--
The mind grows by what it feeds upon.