Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Best disk allocation unit size for SQL Server?
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  3 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
p_m_hegt  
View profile  
 More options Jun 23 2000, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.sqlserver.server
From: p_m_h...@hotmail.com
Date: 2000/06/23
Subject: Best disk allocation unit size for SQL Server?
Suppose you have a <big>big<big> Microsoft SQL Server 7 database and
suppose you put the data and the log on different drives (for
reliability and performance). What is the best allocation unit size to
format the drives with for the data drive and the log drive
respectively? I've read that SQL server uses blocks of 8K and does a
read-ahead of 64K, and the log is read and written in 32K blocks. So is
the best allocation unit size for the data drive 8K or 64K and for the
log drive 32K or is some other value better? (Note: assume that no
other stuff is stored on the drives).

Regards, Peter

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
David K. Brown  
View profile  
 More options Jun 23 2000, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.sqlserver.server
From: "David K. Brown" <nosp...@nothing.com>
Date: 2000/06/23
Subject: Re: Best disk allocation unit size for SQL Server?
I asked someone at Microsoft the very same question.  I was told that 64K
was the ideal size for allocation units for data drives.  Unfortunately,  he
didn't tell what the ideal size for the log drives.

David Brown


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Neil Pike  
View profile  
 More options Jun 25 2000, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.sqlserver.server
From: Neil Pike <100577....@compuserve.com>
Date: 2000/06/25
Subject: Re: Best disk allocation unit size for SQL Server?
 Peter - I've never seen any measurable difference and leave it at NTFS
defaults.

 > Suppose you have a <big>big<big> Microsoft SQL Server 7 database and

> suppose you put the data and the log on different drives (for
> reliability and performance). What is the best allocation unit size to
> format the drives with for the data drive and the log drive
> respectively? I've read that SQL server uses blocks of 8K and does a
> read-ahead of 64K, and the log is read and written in 32K blocks. So is
> the best allocation unit size for the data drive 8K or 64K and for the
> log drive 32K or is some other value better? (Note: assume that no
> other stuff is stored on the drives).

> Regards, Peter

> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.

 Neil Pike MVP/MCSE.  Protech Computing Ltd
 (Please reply only to newsgroups)
 SQL FAQ (484 entries) see
 forumsb.compuserve.com/gvforums/UK/default.asp?SRV=MSDevApps (faqrtf.zip - L7
- SQL Public)
 or www.ntfaq.com/sql.html
 or www.sql-server.co.uk
 or www.mssqlserver.com/faq

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »