If so, then which group will not move?
Also, please advise which versions of SQL and Windows you are using.
--
Geoff N. Hiten
Principal SQL Infrastructure Consultant
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
"Praful Varsani" <Praful...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:12A59E16-67A3-4182...@microsoft.com...
To test the failover this was carried out
Attempted to fail over from node 2 to node 1. Failover is unsuccessful.
Both Nodes were shutdown. Node 2 started first. The node 1 was started. SQL
Databases is now le on node 2.
SQL Server ENT V9.00 4035.00
Windows server 2003 R2 ENT
Well there was a issue with the switch that was conncected to the NIC cards
and should have failed over to another node.
"Geoff N. Hiten" wrote:
> .
>
If a network switch fails and the cluster is segmented, no failover occurs
since (a) the cluster cannont communicate the failover requests and (b)
there is no node that can accept support the IP address resource(s).
In short, it appears the cluster is behaving normally.
You definitely need to test your failover scenarios before putting the
system into production so you know what failures are capable of being
handled by clustering.
--
Geoff N. Hiten
Principal SQL Infrastructure Consultant
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
"Praful Varsani" <Praful...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:65D57187-CCB3-47BF...@microsoft.com...
"Geoff N. Hiten" wrote:
> .
>
Se what triggers a failover and what does not.
Clustering alone will not give you High Availability. You need People and
Process to complement the Technology.
--
Geoff N. Hiten
Principal SQL Infrastructure Consultant
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
"Praful Varsani" <Praful...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:745610AB-290F-4CC3...@microsoft.com...
"Geoff N. Hiten" wrote:
> .
>
--
Geoff N. Hiten
Principal SQL Infrastructure Consultant
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
"Praful Varsani" <Praful...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:78EB32AB-513D-4531...@microsoft.com...
"Geoff N. Hiten" wrote:
> .
>
--
Geoff N. Hiten
Principal SQL Infrastructure Consultant
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
"Praful Varsani" <Praful...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:0B59294F-6B7C-4BD8...@microsoft.com...
i thought local admin for that server and server operator....is this correct
if not please update me
"Geoff N. Hiten" wrote:
> .
>
I was on the impression they need to belong too local admin group and server
operator group
Is this correct..?
"Geoff N. Hiten" wrote:
> .
>
--
Geoff N. Hiten
Principal SQL Infrastructure Consultant
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
"Praful Varsani" <Praful...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:5FC1C7CB-8A01-4B3A...@microsoft.com...